Skip to main content
Log in

Technology exchange patterns in China: an analysis of regional data

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is much interest in technology exchange in the literature, but relatively little research directly provides understanding of technology exchange patterns at a regional level within a country. This study uses a unique dataset of Chinese patent licensing to study technology exchange patterns in thirty Chinese provinces since 2000. Our results indicate that five distinct technology exchange patterns have recently emerged in China: importers, exporters, self-sustainers, active generalists, and isolationists. To illustrate a refined map of these exchange patterns, we used a blockmodel analysis. We found two leading blocks in China that are active in technology exchange within and across blocks. Although many less-developed provinces have begun participating in regional technology exchange networks, the scale of technology exchange in these provinces is lower, and they are more active as net technology importers. Our results provide the basis for firms to form technology strategies and for governors to promote the growth of regional technology exchanges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this study, thirty administrative provincial-level regions were selected as the analysis unit. Here an administrative unit is a province, a municipality or an autonomous region in China. Since Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Tibet are different in their economic conditions from most of the other regions in the mainland and also information from these regions is not easily available, this paper excludes them from the analysis and thus only thirty regions were included. In the following, we will refer to the administrative units as regions and do not make distinctions between provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions.

  2. For example, Christopherson and Clark (2010) studied the EU and U.S. cases and pointed out that the learning region is directly related to both local institutional and governmental resources, Fritsch and Slavtchev (2010) investigated local knowledge spillovers in three German regions and confirmed interregional difference in terms of innovation efficiency, McAdam et al. (2012) specifically analyzed technology transfer from academia to industry by examining three local universities.

  3. The top ten innovative regions in terms of patent licensing are Beijing, Guangdong, Shanghai, Shandong, Jiangsu, Liaoning, Zhejiang, Hunan, Henan and Hebei in 2001, and are Jiangsu, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Shandong, Beijing, Shanghai, Anhui, Sichuan, Liaoning and Henan in 2011.

  4. According to the criteria used by the National Bureau of Statistics of the P.R.C., SMEs refer to those enterprises with less than 1,000 employees or 400 million Yuan in revenue. http://www.stats.gov.cn/. During the period of 2011–2012, Zhongxin group based in Guangdong applied 4,623 patents, Baoshan group based in Shanghai applied 654 patents, China National Petroleum Corporation based in Beijing applied 3,639 patents, Rixin group based in Jiangsu applied 148 patents.

References

  • Aloni, M. (1985). Patterns of information transfer among engineers and applied scientists in complex organizations. Scientometrics, 8(5), 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amesse, F., & Cohendet, P. (2001). Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy. Research Policy, 30(9), 1459–1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armando, A., & Plaza, L. M. (2004). The transfer of knowledge from the Spanish public R&D system to the productive sectors in the field of Biotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 775–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E., & Wright, M. (2012). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6102-9.

  • Baranson, J. (1970). Technology transfer through the international firm. American Economic Review, 60, 435–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, C. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 13–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology Boston. Mass: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Prencipe, A. (2008). Networks of innovation and modularity: A dynamic perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 42(4), 414–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2010). Limits to ‘The learning region’: What university-centered economic development can (and cannot) do to create knowledge-based regional economies. Local Economy, 25(2), 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

  • Cooke, P. (1994). Technology and economic development: The dynamics of local, regional and national change: E. Malecki, (Longman, London, 1991) pp. XV + 495, ISBN 0-582-01758-0. Research Policy, 23(1), 103–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criscuolo, P., Narula, R., & Verspagen, B. (2005). Role of Home and Host Country innovation systems in R&D internationalization: A patent citation analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2014). Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: How can firms benefit most? The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9329-4.

  • Dunning, J. H. (1983). Market power of the firm and international transfer of technology: A historical excursion. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1(4), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyker, D. A. (2001). Technology exchange and the foreign business sector in Russia. Research Policy, 30(5), 851–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, G. (2007). Research on innovation management and technology transfer in China. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1–2), 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferragina, A. M., & Mazzotta, F. (2013). FDI spillovers on firm survival in Italy: Absorptive capacity matters! The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9321-z.

  • Fritsch, M., & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33(2), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2010). How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., & Gong, Y. (2011). Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: evidence from China. World Development, 39(7), 1213–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella, A., & Giarratana, M. S. (2013). General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation, and markets for technology. Research Policy, 42(2), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Guan, J., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships. Scientometrics, 88(2), 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., Guo, X., Sylvan, K. J., & Guan, J. (2010). The Chinese innovation system during economic transition: A scale-independent view. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (1998). International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics, 55(2), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, C. (2013). The growth of China’s technology transfer industry over the next decade: Implications for global markets. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 716–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, J. C., Mok, C. K., Yam, R. C. M., Chin, K. S., & Pun, K. F. (2006). Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 666–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J.-S., & Lee, S.-Y. (2013). The impact of technology transfer contract on a firm’s market value in Korea. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(5), 651–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W. (2008). Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004. Research Policy, 37(4), 580–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. G., & Jefferson, G. H. (2009). A great wall of patents: What is behind China’s recent patent explosion? Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. G., Jefferson, G. H., & Jinchang, Q. (2005). R&D and technology transfer: Firm-level evidence from Chinese industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(4), 780–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Audretsch, D., & Hewitt, M. (2013). Chinese technology transfer policy: The case of the national independent innovation demonstration zone of East Lake. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 828–835.

  • Jason, Y.-L., Wang, Y., Salomo, S., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2013). Have Chinese firms learned from their prior technology in-licensing? An analysis based on patent citations. Scientometrics, 95(1), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. (2013). Licensing versus selling in transactions for exploiting patented technological knowledge assets in the markets for technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. H. A., & Liu, Q. (2011). Patenting and the role of technology markets in regional innovation in China: An empirical analysis. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2009). Choosing between international technology licensing partners: An empirical analysis of U.S. biotechnology firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(1–2), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, J. (2007). Determinants of localized technology spillovers: Role of regional and industrial attributes. Regional Studies, 41(7), 995–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J.-S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (2004). Indigeneous innovation and economic development: Lessons from China’s leap into the information age. Industrial and Innovation, 11, 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24(5), 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2009). China’s regional innovation capacity in transition: An empirical approach. Research Policy, 38(2), 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Fu, M., & Fu, X. (2011). Regional technology development path in an open developing economy: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 45(11), 1405–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Chen, L., Wu, Y., & Yuan, J. (2012). The role of Chinese universities in enterprise-university research collaboration. Scientometrics, 90(1), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, T.-J., & Yu, C.-M. (2013). The impact of local linkages, international linkages, and absorptive capacity on innovation for foreign firms operating in an emerging economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 809–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U., & Ernst, H. (2008). Innovation intermediaries: Why internet marketplaces for technology have not yet met the expectations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. (2010). China’s development model: an alternative strategy for technological catch-up. In X. Fu & L. Soete (Eds.), The Rise of Technololgical Power in the South. MacMillan, Palgrave.

  • Liu, F., & Sun, Y. (2009). A comparison of the spatial distribution of innovative activities in China and the U.S. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 797–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30(7), 1091–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, R. (2011). Building engines for growth and competitiveness in China: Experience with special economic zones and industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 45(9), 1292–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å., Intarakumnerd, P., & Vang-Lauridsen, J. (2006). Asia’s innovation systems in transition Cheltenham. UK, Northampton, MA: E. Elgar. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip062/2005031680.html.

  • Malik, T. H. (2013). National institutional differences and cross-border university-industry knowledge transfer. Research Policy, 42(3), 776–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., Romeo, A., Schwartz, M., Teece, D., Wagner, S., & Brach, P. (1982). Technology transfer, productivity, and economic policy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of University Technology Transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: Lessons for the future. Technovation, 32(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. (2010) China’s drive for ‘Indigenous Innovation’: A web of industrial policies. American Chamber of Commerce in China.

  • NBS, N.B.o.S. (2012). Statistical yearbook of China Beijing, China: Statistical Press.

  • Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, L. (2007). Economic liberalisation for high-tech industry development? Lessons from China’s response in developing the ICT manufacturing sector compared with the strategies of Korea and Taiwan. The Journal of Development Studies, 43(3), 562–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osabutey, E. L. C., Williams, K., & Debrah, Y. A. (2013). The potential for technology and knowledge transfers between foreign and local firms: A study of the construction industry in Ghana. Journal of World Business (forthcoming).

  • Prato, G., & Nepelski, D. (2012). Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9285-4.

  • Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sun, Y. (2000). Spatial distribution of patents in China. Regional Studies, 34(5), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Economic Journal, 87(346), 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Pan, X., Chen, Y., & Gu, X. (2013a). Do references in transferred patent documents signal learning opportunities for the receiving firms? Scientometrics, 75(2), 732–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2013b). Learning-by-licensing: How firms in China benefit from licensing-in technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2012). Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation: A theoretical analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 419–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2013). The dual role of local sites in assisting firms with developing technological capabilities: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 22(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Li-Ying, J. (2013c). The impact of licensed-knowledge attributes on the innovation performance of licensee firms: evidence from the Chinese electronic industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(5), 699–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, ENG and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. C. (2009). Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. Regional Studies, 43(3), 325–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. (2013). Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project. Research Policy, 42(3), 765–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, N., Ruether, F., Bader, M., & Gassmann, O. (2013). Creating value through external intellectual property commercialization: A desorptive capacity view. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(6), 930–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. This research is sponsored by projects grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no: 71302133), Youth Project of Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Funding (grant no. 13YJC790154), and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (grant no.20130181120057).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Pan, X., Ning, L. et al. Technology exchange patterns in China: an analysis of regional data. J Technol Transf 40, 252–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9338-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9338-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation