Abstract
We consider the long time, large scale behavior of the Wigner transform W ϵ (t,x,k) of the wave function corresponding to a discrete wave equation on a 1-d integer lattice, with a weak multiplicative noise. This model has been introduced in Basile et al. in Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) to describe a system of interacting linear oscillators with a weak noise that conserves locally the kinetic energy and the momentum. The kinetic limit for the Wigner transform has been shown in Basile et al. in Arch. Rat. Mech. 195(1):171–203 (2009). In the present paper we prove that in the unpinned case there exists γ 0>0 such that for any γ∈(0,γ 0] the weak limit of W ϵ (t/ϵ 3/2γ,x/ϵ γ,k), as ϵ≪1, satisfies a one dimensional fractional heat equation \(\partial_{t} W(t,x)=-\hat{c}(-\partial_{x}^{2})^{3/4}W(t,x)\) with \(\hat{c}>0\). In the pinned case an analogous result can be claimed for W ϵ (t/ϵ 2γ,x/ϵ γ,k) but the limit satisfies then the usual heat equation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In the present paper we are concerned with the asymptotic behavior of the Wigner transform of the wave function corresponding to a discrete wave equation on a one dimensional integer lattice with a weak multiplicative noise, see (2.1) below. This kind of an equation arises naturally while considering a stochastically perturbed chain of oscillators with harmonic interactions, see [1] and also [15]. It has been argued in [1] that, due to the presence of the noise conserving both the energy and the momentum (in fact the latter property is crucial), in the low dimensions (d=1, or 2) conductivity of this explicitly solvable model diverges as N 1/2 in dimension d=1 and logN, when d=2, where N is the length of the chain. This complies with numerical results concerning some anharmonic chains with no noise, see e.g. [14] and [13]. We refer an interested reader to the review papers [5, 13] and the references therein for more background information on the subject of heat transport in anharmonic crystals.
It has been shown in [3] that in the weakly coupled case, i.e. when the coupling parameter ϵ is small, the asymptotics of the Wigner function W ϵ (t,x,k) (defined below by (2.8), with γ=0), that describes the resolution of the energy in spatial and momentum coordinates (x,k) at time t∼ϵ −1, is given by a linear Boltzmann equation, see (2.9) below. Furthermore, since in the dimension d=1 the scattering rate of a phonon is of order k 2 for small wavenumber k, in the unpinned case (then the dispersion relation satisfies \(\omega'(k)\approx \operatorname{sign} k\), for |k|≪1) the long time, large space asymptotics of the solution of the transport equation can be described by a fractional (in space) heat equation
for some \(\hat{c}>0\). The initial condition W(0,x) is the limit of the average of the initial Wigner transform over the wavenumbers, see [10] and also [2, 16]. Note that the above equation is invariant under time-space scalings t∼t′/ϵ 3γ/2, x∼x′/ϵ γ for an arbitrary γ>0. This suggests that the fractional heat equation is the limit of the Wigner transform in the above time space scaling. In our first main result, see part (1) of Theorem 2.1 below, we prove that it is indeed the case when γ∈(0,γ 0] for some γ 0>0.
On the other hand, in the pinned case, i.e. when the dispersion relation satisfies ω′(k)≈0, as |k|≪1, one can show that the solution of the Boltzmann equation approximates the regular heat equation
In part (2) of Theorem 2.1 below we assert that if the Wigner transform is considered under the scaling (t,x)∼(t′/ϵ 2γ,x′/ϵ γ), for γ∈(0,γ 0] and some γ 0>0, then it converges to W(t,x), as ϵ≪1. The coefficient \(\hat{c}\) in the heat equation (1.1) is related with the thermal conductivity coefficient κ. Recall that the latter is calculated explicitly in the pinned case with the help of the Green-Kubo formula in [1, see (16)] for the model without weak noise assumption. It corresponds to the system of harmonic oscillators described by (2.5) below with ϵ=1. The Green-Kubo formula reads then
where C(t) is the current-current correlation function. In fact, after detailed computation, see formulas (3.13) and (6.12)–(6.14) below, one obtains that the integral of the current correlation function in (1.2) equals \([e^{2}/(48\pi^{2})]\hat{c}\), cf. [1, see (12)]. Therefore, we can write
Finally, we mention also the results concerning the diffusive limits for the Wigner transform of a solution of the wave equation on a lattice with a random local velocity in the weak coupling regime (see [15]), for the geometric optics regime for the wave equation in continuum (see [12]) and in the case of Schrödinger equation in the radiative transport regime (see [9]).
The proof of Theorem 2.1 is made of two principal ingredients: the estimates of the convergence rate for the Wigner transform towards the solution of the kinetic equation, see Theorem 3.2 below in the unpinned case (resp. Theorem 3.5 for the pinned case), and the respective rate of convergence estimates for the solutions of the scaled kinetic equation, see Theorem 3.3 (resp. Theorem 3.6). To prove the latter we show two probabilistic results: Theorems 5.5 and 5.8 that are of interest on their own. They provide estimates of the rate of convergence of the characteristic functions corresponding to a scaled additive functional of a stationary Markov chain towards the characteristic function of an appropriate stable limit and the respective result in the continuous time case.
2 Description of the Model and Preliminaries
2.1 Discrete Wave Equation with a Noise
We consider a discrete wave equation with the multiplicative noise on a one dimensional integer lattice, see [1],
Here \(( \mathfrak{ p},\mathfrak{ q} )=\{( \mathfrak{ p}_{x},\mathfrak{ q}_{x}), x\in \mathbb{Z}\} \), where the component labelled by x corresponds to the one dimensional momentum \(\mathfrak{ p}_{x}\) and position \(\mathfrak{ q}_{x}\). The Hamiltonian corresponds to an infinite chain of harmonic oscillators and is given by
The interaction potential {α x ,x∈ℤ} will be further specified later on. The noises \(\{\dot{\xi}_{x}^{(\epsilon)}(t),x\in\mathbb{ Z}\}\) are defined by the following stochastic differentials
understood in the Stratonovich sense. Here ϵ>0 and
and {w x (t),t≥0}, x∈ℤ are i.i.d. standard, one dimensional Brownian motions over a certain probability space \((\varOmega ,{\mathcal{F}},{\mathbb{P}})\). Note that the vector field Y x is tangent to the surfaces
and
therefore the system (2.1) conserves the total energy and momentum.
System (2.1) can be rewritten formally in the Itô form:
Here \(\beta_{y}:=\Delta\beta^{(0)}_{y}\), with
The lattice Laplacian for a given g:ℤ→ℂ is defined as Δg y :=g y+1+g y−1−2g y .
2.2 Formulation of the Main Results
To describe the distribution of the energy of the chain over the position and momentum coordinates it is convenient to consider the Wigner transform of the wave function corresponding to the chain. Adjusting the time variable to the macroscopic scale it is defined as
Here \(\tilde{\omega}\) is the inverse Fourier transform, see (2.17), of the dispersion relation function given by \(\omega(k)=\sqrt{\hat{\alpha}(k)}\), with \(\hat{\alpha}(k)\) the direct Fourier transform of the potential, defined on \(\mathbb{ T}\)—the one dimensional torus, see (2.16). Suppose that the initial condition in (2.1) is random, independent of the realizations of the noise and such that for some γ>0
Here 〈⋅〉 ϵ denotes the average with respect to the probability measure μ ϵ corresponding to the randomness in the initial data. In fact, since the total energy of the system \(\sum_{y\in\mathbb{ Z}}|\psi^{(\epsilon)}_{y}(t)|^{2}\) is conserved in time, see Sect. 2 of [3], an analogue of condition (2.7) holds for any t>0.
The (averaged) Wigner transform of the wave function, see [3], is a distribution defined as follows
for any \(\tilde{J}\) belonging to \({\mathcal{S}}\)—the Schwartz class of functions on \(\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}\), see Sect. 2.4. Here \({\mathbb{E}}_{\epsilon}\) is the average with respect to the product measure μ ϵ ⊗ℙ. It has been shown in [3], see Theorem 5, that, under appropriate assumptions on the potential α(⋅), see conditions (a1) and (a2) below, the respective Wigner transforms W ϵ,0(t) converge in a distribution sense, as ϵ→0+, to the solution of the linear kinetic equation
where \({\mathcal{L}}\) is the scattering operator defined in (2.35). Our principal result concerning this model deals with the limit of the Wigner transform in the longer time scales, i.e. when γ>0. It is a direct consequence of Theorems 3.1 and 3.4 formulated below that contain also the information on the convergence rates. Before its statement let us recall the notion of a solution of a fractional heat equation. Assume that W 0 is a function from the Schwartz class on ℝ. The solution of the Cauchy problem for the fractional heat equation
with \(b,\hat{c}>0\) and W(0,x)=W 0(x) is given by
where
is the Fourier transform of W 0(x).
Theorem 2.1
Suppose that potential {α y ,y∈ℤ} satisfy assumptions (a1)–(a2) formulated in Sect. 2.3. Then, the following are true.
-
(1)
Assume that \(\hat{\alpha}(0)=0\) (no pinning case), γ∈(0,2a/3) for some a∈(0,1] and
$$ {\mathcal{K}}_{a,\gamma}:=\limsup_{\epsilon\to0+} \epsilon^{1+\gamma }\int_{\mathbb{ T} }\bigl\langle\bigl|\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon)}_0(k)\bigr|^2\bigr\rangle_{\epsilon} \frac {dk}{|k|^{2a}}<+\infty, $$(2.11)where \(\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon)}_{0}(k)\) is the Fourier transform of the initial condition \(\psi^{(\epsilon)}_{x}(0)\). Suppose also that for some W 0 with the norm (2.24) finite we have
$$ \lim_{\epsilon\to0+} \bigl\langle W_{\epsilon,\gamma}(0),\tilde{J} \bigr\rangle =\int_{\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}} W_0(x,k)\tilde{J}^*(x,k)\,dx\,dk, $$(2.12)for all \(\tilde{J}\in{\mathcal{S}}\). Then, for any fixed t>0 we have
$$ \lim_{\epsilon\to0+} \biggl\langle W_{\epsilon,\gamma} \biggl( \frac{t}{\epsilon^{3\gamma /2}} \biggr),\tilde{J} \biggr\rangle =\int_{\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}} W(t,x)\tilde{J}^*(x,k)\,dx\,dk, $$(2.13)where W(t,x) satisfies (2.10) with b=3/2 and the initial condition given by
$$ W(0,x):=\int_{\mathbb{ T}}W_0(x,k)\,dk. $$(2.14)The coefficient \(\hat{c}\) is given by (3.5).
-
(2)
Suppose that \(\hat{\alpha}(0)>0\) (pinned case), γ∈(0,1/2) and conditions (2.11) and (2.12) for W 0 with the norm (2.24) finite are satisfied. Then, for any \(\tilde{J}\in{\mathcal{S}}\) and fixed t>0 we have
$$ \lim_{\epsilon\to0+} \biggl\langle W_{\epsilon,\gamma} \biggl( \frac {t}{\epsilon^{2\gamma }} \biggr),\tilde{J} \biggr\rangle=\int_{\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}} W(t,x)\tilde{J}^*(x,k)\,dx\,dk, $$(2.15)where W(t,x) is the solution of the ordinary heat equation, i.e. (2.10) with b=2, with the initial condition given by (2.14) and coefficient \(\hat{c}\) as in (3.13).
2.3 Fourier Transform of the Wave Function
The one dimensional torus \(\mathbb{ T}\) is understood here as the interval [−1/2,1/2] with its endpoints identified. Let e r (k):=exp{−i2πrk}, r∈ℤ. It is a standard orthonormal base in \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\)—the space of complex valued, square integrable functions. The Fourier transform of a given square integrable sequence of complex numbers {g y ,y∈ℤ} is defined as
and the inverse transform is given by
for any f belonging to \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\).
A straightforward calculation shows that \(\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon )}(t,k)\)—the Fourier transform of the (complex valued) wave function given by (2.6)—satisfies the following Itô stochastic differential equation, cf. formula (7.0.7) of [4],
where \(\hat{\psi}_{0}\) is the Fourier transform of ψ (ϵ)(0). Here, a (nonlinear) mapping \(A:L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\to L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T} )\) is given by
where
For any \(g\in L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\) a linear mapping \(Q[g]:L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\to L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\) is given by
where
Finally, {w r (t),t≥0}, r∈ℤ are i.i.d. one dimensional, standard Brownian motions, on a probability space \((\varOmega,{\mathcal{F}},{\mathbb{P}} )\), that are non-anticipative w.r.t. the given filtration \(\{{\mathcal{F}}_{t},t\ge0\}\).
We assume, as in [3], that
-
(a1)
{α y ,y∈ℤ} is real valued and there exists C>0 such that |α y |≤Ce −|y|/C for all y∈ℤ,
-
(a2)
\(\hat{\alpha}(k)\) is also real valued, \(\hat{\alpha}(k)>0\) for \(k\not=0\) and in case \(\hat{\alpha}(0)=0\) we have \(\hat{\alpha}''(0)>0\).
The above assumptions imply that both y↦α y and \(k\mapsto \hat{\alpha}(k)\) are real valued, even functions. In addition \(\hat{\alpha}\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{ T})\) and if \(\hat{\alpha}(0)=0\) then \(\hat{\alpha}(k)=k^{2}\phi(k^{2})\) for some strictly positive \(\phi\in C^{\infty}( \mathbb{T})\). This in particular implies that, in the latter case, the dispersion relation \(\omega(k)=\sqrt{\hat{\alpha}(k)}\) belongs to \(C^{\infty}(\mathbb{ T}\setminus\{0\})\).
It can be easily checked that under the hypotheses made about the potential α y the mapping given by (2.19) is Lipschitz from \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\) to itself and \(\sum_{r\in\mathbb{ Z}}\|Q[g](e_{r})\|_{L^{2}}^{2}\le C\|g\|_{L^{2}}^{2}\) for some C>0 and all \(g\in L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\) so Q[g] is Hilbert-Schmidt. Using Theorem 7.4, p. 186, of [6] one can show that for any \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\)-valued, \({\mathcal{F}}_{0}\)-measurable, initial data \(\hat{\psi}_{0}^{(\epsilon)}\) there exists a unique solution to (2.18) understood as \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\)-valued, continuous trajectory, adapted process \(\{\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon)}(t), t\ge0\} \) a.s. satisfying (2.18). In addition, see Sect. 2 of [3], for every initial data \(\hat{\psi}_{0}^{(\epsilon)}\in L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\) we have
2.4 Wigner Transform
2.4.1 Some Function Spaces
Denote by \({\mathcal{S}}\) the set of functions \(J:\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}\to\mathbb{C}\) that are of C ∞ class and such that for any integers l,m,n we have \(\sup_{p,k}(1+p^{2})^{n/2}|\partial_{p}^{l}\partial_{k}^{m}J(p,k)|<+\infty\). For any a∈ℝ we introduce the norm
for a given \(J\in{\mathcal{S}}\). By \({\mathcal{A}}'_{a}\) we denote the completion of \({\mathcal{S}}\) in the norm \(\|\cdot\|_{{\mathcal{A}}_{a}'}\). Note that \({\mathcal{A}}_{a}'\) is dual to \({\mathcal{A}}_{a}\) defined as the completion of \({\mathcal{S}}\) in the norm
We use a shorthand notation \({\mathcal{A}}:={\mathcal{A}}_{0}\) and \({\mathcal{A}}':={\mathcal{A}}_{0}'\). With some abuse of notation by 〈⋅,⋅〉 we denote the scalar product in \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\) and the extension of
from \({\mathcal{S}}\times{\mathcal{S}}\) to \({\mathcal{A}}\times{\mathcal{A}}'\).
We shall also use the space \({\mathcal{B}}_{a,b}\) obtained by the completion of \({\mathcal{S}}\) in the norm
When b=0 we shall write \({\mathcal{B}}_{a}\) instead of \({\mathcal{B}}_{a,0}\).
2.4.2 Random and Average Wigner Transform
For a given ϵ>0 let \(\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon)}(t)\) be a solution of (2.18) with a random initial condition \(\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon)}(0)\) distributed according to a probability measure μ ϵ on \(L^{2}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{ T})\). Define
and
where, as we recall, 〈⋅〉 ϵ is the average with respect to the initial condition. Using (2.7) and (2.21) we conclude that both \(\widehat{W}_{\epsilon}(t)\) and \(\widehat{Y}_{\epsilon}(t)\) belong to \(L^{1}({{\mathbb{P}}} ;{\mathcal{A}})\)—the space of \({\mathcal{A}}\)-valued random elements possessing the absolute moment, for any t≥0. We also introduce the average objects \(\overline{W}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)\) and \(\overline{Y}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)\) using formulas analogous to (2.25) and (2.26) with 〈⋅〉 ϵ replaced by \({\mathbb{E}}_{\epsilon}\) corresponding to the average over both the initial data and realization of Brownian motion.
The (averaged) Wigner transform W ϵ,γ (t) is defined as
where \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}'\) and
The anti-transform Y ϵ,γ (t) is defined by an analogous formula, with \(\overline{W}_{\epsilon}\) replaced by \(\overline {Y}_{\epsilon}\).
2.5 Evolution of the Wigner Transform
Using Itô formula for the solution of (2.18), see Theorem 4.17 of [6], we conclude that
where the \(\{{\mathcal{M}}^{(\epsilon)}_{t},t\ge0\}\) is an \(\{ {\mathcal{F}}_{t},t\ge 0\}\)-adapted local martingale, given by
In order to guarantee that the stochastic integrals defined above are martingales, not merely local ones, we need to make an additional assumption that μ ϵ has the 4-th absolute moment. Taking the expectation of both sides of (2.28) with respect to the realizations of the Brownian motion we conclude that \(\overline{W}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)={\mathbb{E}}\widehat{W}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)\) satisfies
where
and
with \(\overline{Y}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)={\mathbb{E}}\widehat{Y}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)\).
Formula (2.30) remains valid also when only the second absolute moment exists. This can be easily argued by an approximation of the initial condition by random elements that are deterministically bounded.
Since the momentum, that is the inverse Fourier transform of \(\hat{\mathfrak{ p}}^{(\epsilon)}(t,k)\), is real valued, the expression under the expectation appearing on the right hand side of (2.30) is an even function of k′, thus the last term appearing on the right hand side of the equation can be replaced by
where
Note that
The following relation holds
We conclude therefore that \(\overline{W}_{\epsilon}(t,p,k)\) satisfies the following
where Bf(p,k):=pω′(k)f(p,k), for any \(f\in{\mathcal{S}}\). We let ω′(0):=0 in case ω is not differentiable at 0. In addition,
where for each ϵ∈[0,1] operator \({\mathcal{L}}^{(\epsilon )}\) acts on \({\mathcal{S}}\) according to the formula
and extends to a bounded operator on either \({\mathcal{A}}\), or \({\mathcal{A}}'\). Finally,
with
where
Similar calculations show that
where
and
2.6 Probabilistic Interpretation of the Kinetic Linear Equation
Denote by \(\overline{U}(t,p,k)\) the Fourier transform of the solution of (2.9) in the x variable. Let K t (k) be a \(\mathbb{ T}\)-valued, Markov jump process, defined over \((\varOmega ,{\mathcal{F}},{\mathbb{P}})\), starting at k, with the generator \({\mathcal{L}}\). Suppose also that \(\overline{U}_{0}\in{\mathcal{A}}\). Then
is understood as a continuous \({\mathcal{A}}\)-valued function \(\overline{U}(t)\) such that
for all \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}'\). It is well known that this solution admits the following probabilistic representation
Here \({\mathbb{E}}\) is the expectation over ℙ. For given \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}'\) we let
Therefore \(J(t)\in{\mathcal{A}}'\). Using the reversibility of the Lebesgue measure under the dynamics of K t , we conclude that the law of {K t−s ,s∈[0,t]} and that of {K s ,s∈[0,t]} coincide. Hence,
Likewise, using the definition of \({\mathcal{R}}_{\epsilon}(t)\) (see (2.37)), from (2.34) and the Duhamel formula we get
3 Convergence of the Wigner Transform
For a given a∈ℝ define the norm
Recall also that μ ϵ is the distribution of the initial data for Eq. (2.18). We assume that:
- (A a ):
-
for a given a>0
$$ {\mathcal{K}}_{a,\gamma}:=\limsup_{\epsilon\to0+} \epsilon^{1+\gamma }\int\|f\|_{H^{-a}}^2 \mu_{\epsilon}(df)<+\infty. $$(3.1)
Let \({\mathcal{K}}_{\gamma}:={\mathcal{K}}_{0,\gamma}\).
3.1 No Pinning
Since
part (1) of Theorem 2.1 is a consequence of the following result.
Theorem 3.1
Assume that t 0>0, \(\hat{\alpha}(0)=0\) and a∈(0,1] is such that (3.1) holds. Then, for any γ∈(0,2a/3),
and b>1 one can find C>0 such that
for all ϵ∈(0,1], μ ϵ , t≥t 0, \(J\in {\mathcal{A}}_{5}'\cap {\mathcal{B}}_{a,b}\) and \(W_{0}\in{\mathcal{B}}_{a}\). Here
and
Proof
Denote by \(\overline{U}_{\epsilon} (t,p,k )\) the solution of (2.41) with the initial condition \(\overline{U}_{\epsilon} (0,p,k )=W_{0} (p\epsilon^{-\gamma},k )\). The left hand side of (3.3) can be estimated by
Denote the terms appearing above by \({\mathcal{J}}_{1}\) and \({\mathcal{J}}_{2}\) respectively. The proof is made of two principal ingredients: the estimates of the convergence rates of the averaged Wigner transform of the wave function given by (2.18) to the solution of the linear equation (2.40) (that correspond to the estimates of \({\mathcal{J}}_{1}\)) and further estimates for the long time-large scale asymptotics of these solutions (these will allow us to estimate \({\mathcal{J}}_{2}\)). To deal with the first issue we formulate the following.
Theorem 3.2
Suppose that \(\{\hat{\psi}^{(\epsilon)}(t),\,t\ge0\}\) is the solution of (2.18) with coefficients satisfying (a1)–(a2) with \(\hat{\alpha}(0)=0\) and (A a ) for some a∈(0,1]. Assume also that \(\overline{U}(t)\) and J(t) are given by (2.42) and (2.43) respectively. Then, there exists a constant C>0 such that
for all \(J\in{\mathcal{S}}\), ϵ∈(0,1] and t≥0.
We postpone the proof of this theorem until Sect. 4.1, proceeding instead with estimates of \({\mathcal{J}}_{1}\). Using (3.7) we can write that
where J ϵ (p,k):=ϵ −γ J(pϵ −γ,k) and
Since \(\|J_{\epsilon}\|_{{\mathcal{A}}_{b}'}\le\|J\|_{{\mathcal{A}}_{b}'}\) for every ϵ∈(0,1] and b≥0, we obtain the last two terms on the right hand side of (3.8) account for the last two terms on the right hand side of (3.3).
Denote the first term on the right hand side of (3.8) by \({\mathcal{I}}\). We can write that \({\mathcal{I}}\le{\mathcal{I}}_{1}+{\mathcal{I}}_{2}\), where
Here for any function \(f:\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}\to\mathbb{C}\) we denote
Term \({\mathcal{I}}_{1}\) accounts for the first term on the right hand side of (3.3). Using the reversibility of the Lebesgue measure under the dynamics of K t (see (2.44)), we conclude that
To estimate \({\mathcal{I}}_{2}\) (and then further to estimate \({\mathcal{J}}_{2}\)) we need a bound on the convergence rate of the scaled functionals of the form (2.42). Let
Theorem 3.3
For any t 0>0, a∈(0,1], b>1 and γ′ as in (3.2) there exists a constant C>0 such that
for all ϵ∈(0,1], t≥t 0, \(W_{0}\in{\mathcal{B}}_{a}\) and \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}_{5}'\cap{\mathcal{B}}_{a,b}\).
The proof of this result shall be presented in Sect. 6.1. Using the above theorem we can estimate
Invoking again Proposition 3.3, this time to estimate \({\mathcal{J}}_{2}\), we obtain that
The above estimates account for the second term on the right hand side of (3.3), thus concluding the proof of the estimate in (3.3).
3.2 Pinned Case
Part (2) of Theorem 2.1 is a direct consequence of the following result.
Theorem 3.4
Assume that \(\hat{\alpha}(0)>0\) and t 0>0. Then, for any γ∈(0,1/2), a∈(0,1] and
one can find C>0 such that
for all ϵ∈(0,1], t≥t 0, \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}_{4}'\cap {\mathcal{B}}_{a,b}\) and \(W_{0}\in{\mathcal{B}}_{a}\). Here \(\overline{W}_{0}(p)\), \(\overline{J}(p)\) are given by (3.4) and
Proof
We proceed in the same fashion as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 so we only outline the main points of the argument. First, we estimate the left hand side of (3.12) by an expression corresponding to (3.6). The first term is estimated by an analogue of Theorem 3.2 that in this case can be formulated as follows.
Theorem 3.5
Assume that conditions (a1)–(a2) and (A0) hold. In addition, we let \(\hat{\alpha}(0)>0\). Then, the average Wigner transform \(\overline{W}_{\epsilon} (t)\) satisfies the following: there exists a constant C>0 such that
for all ϵ∈(0,1] and t≥0.
The proof of this result is presented in Sect. 4.2. In the next step we can estimate the rate of convergence of the functional appearing in the formula for the probabilistic solution of the linear Boltzmann equation towards the solution of the heat equation given in the following theorem. Let
Theorem 3.6
For any t 0>0, a∈(0,1], b>1 and γ′ as in (3.11) there exists a constant C>0 such that
for all ϵ∈(0,1], t≥t 0, \(W\in{\mathcal{B}}_{a}\) and \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}_{4}'\cap{\mathcal{B}}_{a,b}\).
The proof of the above theorem is contained in Sect. 6.2. The remaining part of the argument follows the argument of Sect. 3.1.
4 Proofs of Theorems 3.2 and 3.5
4.1 Proof of Theorem 3.2
From (2.45) and (2.44) we conclude that
with \({\mathcal{R}}_{\epsilon}(t)\) given by (2.37). Estimates of the last term on the right hand side above shall be done separately for each term appearing on the right hand side of (2.37).
4.1.1 Terms Corresponding to \({\mathcal{R}}_{\epsilon}^{(1)}\)
Denote
Lemma 4.1
For a given a∈(0,1] there exists C>0 such that
for all ϵ∈(0,1], t≥0.
Proof
Denote the expression on the left hand side of (4.1) by \({\mathcal{E}}_{a}(t)\). From (2.34) and (2.37) we conclude that
Since |k|−2a R(k,k′) is bounded when a∈(0,1] we can bound the right hand side of (4.2), with the help of (2.21), by \(C{\mathcal{K}}_{\gamma}\) and (4.1) follows. □
Let Δω ϵ (p,k):=pω′(k)−δ ϵ ω(p,k). For a given q∈ℝ define by mod(q,1/2) the unique r∈[−1/2,1/2) such that q=ℓ+r, where ℓ∈ℤ. Divide the cylinder \(\mathbb{ R} \times\mathbb{ T}\) into two domains: \({\mathcal{C}}\)—described below—and its complement \({\mathcal{C}}^{c}\). The first domain consists of those (p,k) for which either |mod(k±ϵp/2,1/2)|≥1/4, or both points mod(k±ϵp/2,1/2) belong to an interval [−1/2,0], or they belong to [0,1/2]. We can write then
where the terms on the right hand side correspond to the integration over the aforementioned domains. One can easily verify that there exists C>0 such that |Δω ϵ (p,k)|≤Cϵ|p| for \((p,k)\in{\mathcal{C}}\). We can estimate therefore
On the other hand, when \((p,k)\in{\mathcal{C}}^{c}\), with no loss of generality assume that 1/2>k+ϵp/2>0>k−ϵp/2>−1/2 (the other cases can be handled analogously) p is positive and k∈(−ϵp/2,ϵp/2). Since |Δω ϵ (p,k)|≤C|p|, for a given a∈(0,1] we can write
for some constant C>0. Using the above estimate we obtain
By virtue of (4.1) we get that
Taking the Taylor expansion of R ϵ (p,k,k′), up to terms of order ϵ, it is also straightforward to conclude that
Summarizing, (4.3), (4.5) and (4.6) together imply
4.1.2 Terms Corresponding to \({\mathcal{R}}_{\epsilon}^{(2)}\)
Straightforward computations, taking the Taylor expansions of \(\hat{\beta}(k-\epsilon p/2)\) and R ϵ (p,k,k′) up to ϵ, show that
From (2.39) we conclude the following estimate.
Lemma 4.2
Suppose that \(\phi_{\epsilon}:\mathbb{ R}\times\mathbb{ T}\to\mathbb{ R}\) is such that
Then, there exists C>0 such that
for all \(J\in{\mathcal{S}}\), ϵ∈(0,1], t>0.
Proof
The left hand side of (4.9) can be rewritten as
where \(\varGamma_{\epsilon}(p,k):= \phi_{\epsilon}(p,k)\bar{\omega}_{\epsilon}^{-1}(p,k)\). Using (2.39) we can estimate this expression by
Thanks to (2.21) and (4.8) the second term is bounded by \(\epsilon\varGamma_{*}\|J\|_{\mathcal{A}'}{\mathcal{K}}_{\gamma}t\). On the other hand, integration by parts allows us to estimate the first one by
by virtue of (2.21) and (4.8). □
Since
from the above lemma we conclude that
This ends the proof of (3.7). □
4.2 Proof of Theorem 3.5
We maintain the notation from the argument made in the previous section. Estimate (4.4) can be improved since in this case there exists C>0 such that |Δω ϵ (p,k)|≤Cϵ|p| for all (p,k), ϵ∈(0,1]. Thus, we can write
for all t≥0. With this improvement in mind we conclude that there is a constant C>0 such that
for all t≥0, ϵ∈(0,1]. Repeating the argument from the proof of Theorem 3.2 for the term corresponding to \({\mathcal{R}}_{\epsilon}^{(2)}\) we conclude (3.14). □
5 Convergence Rate for the Characteristic Function of an Additive Functional of a Markov Process
5.1 Markov Chains
Suppose that {ξ n ,n≥0} is a Markov chain taking values in a Polish metric space (E,d). Assume that π—the law of ξ 0—is an invariant and ergodic probability measure for the chain. The transition operator satisfies:
Condition 5.1
(Spectral gap condition)
Since P is also a contraction in L 1(π) and L ∞(π) we conclude, via Riesz-Thorin interpolation theorem, that for any β∈[1,+∞):
for all \(f\in L^{\beta}_{0}(\pi)\)—the subspace of \(L^{\beta}_{0}(\pi)\) consisting of functions satisfying ∫fdπ=0, with κ(β):=1−|2/β−1|>0. Thus, \(Q_{N}:=\sum_{n=0}^{N}P^{n}\) satisfies
Furthermore, we assume the following regularity property of transition of probabilities:
Condition 5.2
(Existence of bounded probability densities w.r.t. π)
Transition probability is of the form P(w,dv)=p(w,v)π(dv), where the kernel p(⋅,⋅) belongs to L ∞(π⊗π).
5.2 Convergence of Additive Functionals
Suppose that Ψ:E→ℝ satisfies the tail estimate
for some C>0, α>1 and all λ≥1 and
We wish to describe the behavior of tail probabilities \({\mathbb{P}} [\vert Z_{t}^{(N)}\vert \geq N^{\kappa}]\) when κ>0 for the scaled partial sum process
To that end we represent \(Z_{t}^{(N)}\) as a sum of an L β integrable martingale for β∈[1,α) and a boundary term vanishing with N. Let χ be the unique solution, belonging to \(L^{\beta}_{0}(\pi)\) for β∈[1,α), of the Poisson equation
In fact using Condition 5.2 we conclude that Pχ∈L ∞(π). Therefore the tails of χ and Ψ under π are identical. We introduce an L β integrable martingale letting: M 0:=0,
and the respective partial sum process \(M_{t}^{(N)}:= N^{-1/\alpha }M_{[Nt]}\), t≥0.
Using the dual version of Burkholder inequality for L β integrable martingales, when β∈(1,2), see Corollary 4.22, p. 101 of [17] (and also [11]) we conclude that there exists C>0 such that
Lemma 5.3
Under the assumptions (5.3) and (5.4) for any κ>0 and δ∈(0,ακ) there exists C>0 such that
Proof
Choose β∈[1,α). We can write
From (5.10) and Chebyshev’s inequality we can estimate the left hand side of (5.9) by
for some C>0. On the other hand
The last inequality follows from (5.8). Choosing β sufficiently close to α we conclude the assertion of the lemma. □
Suppose furthermore that an observable Ψ:E→ℝ is such that
Condition 5.4
∫Ψ dπ=0 and there exist α∈(1,2), α 1∈(0,2−α) and nonnegative constants \(c_{*}^{+},c_{*}^{-},C^{*}>0\) such that \(c_{*}^{+}+c_{*}^{-}>0\) and
for all λ≥1.
Let {Z t ,t≥0} be an α-stable process with the Levy exponent
where
In what follows we shall prove the following.
Theorem 5.5
Under the assumptions made above, for any δ∈(0,α/(α+1)) there exists C>0 such that
for all p∈ℝ, t≥0, N≥1.
Proof
In the first step we replace an additive functional of the chain by a martingale partial sum process. Using (5.10) we conclude that there exists C>0 such that
and (5.14) shall follow as soon as we can show that for any δ∈(0,α/(α+1)) there exist C>0 such that
for all p∈ℝ, t≥0, N≥1. The remaining part of the argument is therefore devoted to the proof of (5.15). Denote Z N,n :=N −1/α Z n with Z n defined in (5.7) and χ the solution of Poisson equation (5.6) with the right hand side equal to Ψ. Introduce also
and \(\psi^{(N)}(p):=-N \bar{h}_{p}^{(N)}\). Observe that \(\operatorname{Re} \bar{h}_{p}^{(N)}\le0\).
Lemma 5.6
There exists a constant C>0 such that
In addition, for any bounded set Δ⊂ℝ and β∈[1,α) there exists C>0 such that
Proof
Denote \(\tilde{\varPsi}(w,v):=\varPsi(v)+P\chi(v)-P\chi(w)\). With this notation the expression on the left hand side of (5.17) can be rewritten as
Here F N (λ):=π(Ψ≤N 1/α λ). The first term on the right hand side can be estimated by
where Δ is a bounded interval containing all possible values of Pχ(v)−Pχ(w). This expression can be further estimated by
As for the second term on the right hand side of (5.19), using integration by parts, we conclude that it can be bounded by
The first estimate follows from (5.11), while the last one follows upon the change of variables λ′:=λp and the fact that 1<α+α 1<2.
Concerning (5.18) expression appearing there can be estimated by
The first term is estimated by
for some C>0 and all p∈ℝ, N≥1. Since Δ is bounded the second term on the other hand is smaller than
Hence, (5.18) follows. □
In fact, in light of the above lemma to prove the theorem it suffices only to show that for any δ∈(0,α/(α+1)) one choose C>0 so that
for all p∈ℝ, t≥0, N≥1. To shorten the notation we let M j,N :=M j /N 1/α. Since {M n ,n≥0} is \(({\mathcal{F}}_{n})\) adapted and \({\mathbb{E}}[ Z_{N,n+1} \mid {\mathcal{F}}_{n}]=0\), we can write
To derive a recursive formula for
write
Since M 0=0, adding up from j=0 up to [Nt]−1 and then dividing both sides of the obtained equality by exp{ψ (N)(p)[Nt]/N} we get
where
We denote the terms appearing on the right hand side of (5.24) by I and II and examine each of them separately. As far as II is concerned we bound its absolute value by
and since \(\operatorname{Re}\bar{h}_{p}^{(N)}\le0\) we obtain the following
for some C>0.
Fix K≥1, to be adjusted later on, and divide the set Λ N ={0,…,[Nt]−1} into ℓ=[[Nt]/K]+1 contiguous subintervals, ℓ of size K and the last one of size K′≤K, i.e.
and
with K′≤K. Here [a] stands for the integer part of a∈ℝ. To simplify the notation we shall assume that K′=K. This assumption does not influence the asymptotics.
We need to estimate the absolute value of
where
The conditional expectation in the formula for I 1 equals
The supremum of its absolute value can be estimated by
for some constant C>0. Here Δ is a bounded set containing 0 and all possible values of Pχ(w)−Pχ(z) for z,w∈E. The last inequality follows from Lemma 5.6. On the other hand, since the real part of loge N,j is non-positive we have
According to (5.18) the first term in parentheses can be estimated by C|p|(1+|p|)K/N. Choose β∈(1,α). From (5.8) and Doob’s inequality we can estimate the second term by CK 1/β/N 1/α. Summarizing we have shown that
On the other hand,
where
Fix β∈(1,α). Since ∫g N dπ=0 and ℓ=[[Nt]/K]+1, from (5.2) we conclude that
Hence, we have shown that
Choose K=N δ with δ∈(0,1). It is easy to see that
thus the middle term on the right hand side is smaller than the first one. The optimal rate is obtained therefore when
or equivalently
From the above we get, that the optimal rate of convergence is obtained when β is as close to α as possible, and for each δ 1<α/(α+1) we can choose then C>0 so that
Taking into account the above and (5.26) we conclude (5.23). □
5.3 Convergence Rates in the Central Limit Theorem Regime
We maintain assumptions made about the chain in the previous section. This time however we assume instead of Condition 5.4 the following.
Condition 5.7
∫Ψ dπ=0 and Ψ∈L 2(π).
We define the martingale approximation, using (5.7) from the previous section. Decomposition (5.10) remains in force. Instead of (5.8) we have then an inequality
where C>0 is independent of N≥1. Let
Define the partial sum process \(Z^{(N)}_{t}\) by (5.5) with α replaced by 2. Our main result concerning the convergence of characteristic functions reads as follows.
Theorem 5.8
There exists C>0 such that
for all p∈ℝ, t≥0, N≥1.
Proof
Denote Z N,n :=N −1/2 Z n with Z n defined in (5.7) and M j,N :=M j /N 1/2. Using this notation as well as the notation from the previous section we can write that
It suffices therefore to prove
Let h p (x) be given by (5.16). We denote \(\bar{h}_{p}^{(N)}:=-(\sigma p)^{2}/(2N)\) and
Analogously to what has been done in the previous section we obtain
Adding up from j=0 up to [Nt]−1 and then dividing both sides of the obtained equality by exp{(σp)2[Nt]/(2N)} we conclude that
where
Denote the absolute value of the terms appearing on the right hand side by I and II respectively. We can easily estimate
for some constant C>0 and all t≥0, N≥1 and p∈ℝ.
To estimate I we invoke the block argument from the previous section. Fix K≥1 and divide the set Λ N ={0,…,N−1} in ℓ=[[Nt]/K]+1 contiguous subintervals, ℓ of size K and the last one of size K′≤K. In fact for simplicity sake we just assume that all intervals have the same size and maintain the notation introduced in the previous section. Estimate (5.27) remains in force with the obvious adjustments needed for α=2. Repeating the argument leading to (5.28) with (5.29) used in place of (5.8) we conclude that
On the other hand,
Choosing K=N 1/3 in the above estimates we conclude (5.31). □
5.4 Convergence Rates for Additive Functionals of Jump Processes
Assume that {τ n ,n≥0} are i.i.d. exponentially distributed random variables with \({\mathbb{E}}\tau_{0}=1\) that are independent of the Markov chain {ξ n ,n≥0} considered in the previous section. Suppose furthermore that V, θ are Borel measurable functions on E such that:
Condition 5.9
For some t ∗>0
there exist C ∗>0 and α 2>1 such that
We shall also assume that either Ψ(w):=V(w)θ(w) satisfies Condition 5.4, or it satisfies Condition 5.7.
Let \(t_{n}:=\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}\theta(\xi_{k})\tau_{k}\) and let {X t ,t≥0} be a jump process given by \(X_{t}:=\xi_{n_{t}}\) where n t :=n for t n ≤t<t n+1. The process conditioned on ξ 0=w shall be denoted by X t (w). The corresponding chain shall be called a skeleton, while θ −1(w) is the jump rate at w. Note that measure \(\tilde{\pi}(dw):=\bar{\theta}^{-1}\theta(w)\pi(dw)\) is invariant under the process. Here \(\bar{\theta}:={\mathbb{E}}\theta(\xi_{0})\).
We also define processes
with β=α when this condition holds and β=2, in case Condition 5.7 is in place.
Observe that the integral above can be written as a random length sum formed over a Markov chain. More precisely, when (5.11) holds
where
\(\{\tilde{\xi}_{n},n\ge0\}\) is an E×(0,+∞)-valued Markov chain given by \(\tilde{\xi}_{n}:=(\xi_{n},\tau_{n})\) and \(\tilde{\varPsi}(w,\tau ):=\varPsi(w)\tau\). Its invariant measure \(\tilde{\pi}\) is given by \(\tilde{\pi}(dw,d\tau):=e^{-\tau}\pi(dw)\,d\tau\) and the transition probability kernel equals \(\tilde{P}(w,\tau,dv,d\tau'):=p(w,v)e^{-\tau'}\pi(dv)\,d\tau'\). It is elementary to verify that this chain and the observable \(\tilde{\varPsi}\) satisfy Conditions 5.1–5.4 with the constants appearing in Condition 5.4 given by \(\tilde{c}_{*}^{\pm}:=\varGamma (\alpha +1) c_{*}^{\pm}\), where Γ(⋅) is the Euler gamma function. In case Condition 5.7 holds we can still write (5.37) and (5.38) with α=2.
Consider the stable process {Z t ,t≥0} whose Levy exponent is given by (5.12) with c ∗(λ) replaced by
Let {B t ,t≥0} be a zero mean Brownian motion whose variance equals
The aim of this section is to prove the following.
Theorem 5.10
In addition to the assumptions made in Sect. 5.1 suppose that Condition 5.9 holds. Then, for any
there exists C>0 such that
for all p∈ℝ, t≥0, N≥1.
If, on the other hand the assumptions made in Sect. 5.3 and Condition 5.9 hold then for any
there exists C>0 such that
for all p∈ℝ, t≥0, N≥1.
The proof of this result is carried out below. It relies on Theorem 5.5. The principal difficulty is that definition of \(Y^{(N)}_{t}\) involves a random sum instead of a deterministic one as in the previous section. This shall be resolved by replacing n Nt appearing in the upper limit of the sum in (5.37) by the deterministic limit \([\bar{N}t]\), where \(\bar{N}:=N/\bar{\theta}\), that can be done with a large probability, according to the lemma formulated below.
5.4.1 From a Random to Deterministic Sum
Lemma 5.11
Suppose that κ>0. Then, for any δ∈(0,α 2 κ) there exists C>0 such that
Proof
Denote
Let κ′∈(0,κ) be arbitrary and
We adopt the convention of summing up to the largest integer smaller than, or equal to the upper limit of summation. Note that on \(A_{N}^{+}\) we have
Furthermore
Hence,
To estimate the probability appearing on the utmost right hand side we apply Lemma 5.3 for the Markov chain \(\{\tilde{\xi}_{n},n\ge0\}\) and \(\varPsi(w,\tau):=\theta(w)\tau-\bar{\theta}\). We conclude therefore that for any δ∈(0,α 2 κ′) there exists C>0 such that
Since \({\mathbb{E}}\tau_{0}=1\) and κ′∈(0,κ) for any x∈(0,1) we can find C>0 such that
where I(x):=−(1−x−lnx). The last inequality follows from the large deviations estimate of Cramer, see e.g. Theorem 2.2.3 of [7]. Using this and (5.47) we get
Probability \({\mathbb{P}}[A_{N}^{-}]\) can be estimated in similar way. Instead of C N we consider the event
and carry out similar estimates to the ones done before. □
5.4.2 Proof of (5.42)
Choose any κ>0. We can write
with A N defined in (5.46). The last term on the right hand side can be estimated by the expression appearing on the right hand side of (5.42), by virtue of Theorem 5.5.
The first term on the right hand side can be estimated by C(t+1)N −δ for some δ∈(0,α 2 κ) and C>0. The second term is less than, or equal to
where
and
Lemma 5.12
Suppose that κ∈(0,1−1/α 2). Then, for any \(\delta\in (0,\alpha^{-1}(1- \kappa-\alpha^{-1}_{2}))\) there exists C>0 such that
and
Proof
First we prove (5.53). Since \(\tilde{\varPsi}(\tilde{\xi}_{0})\) is L β integrable we can write for any β∈(1,α)
Choosing β sufficiently close to α we conclude (5.53).
Now we prove (5.52). Again we can use martingale decomposition
where
and \(\tilde{\chi}(\cdot)\) is unique, zero mean, solution of \(\tilde{\chi}-\tilde{P}\chi=\tilde{\varPsi}\), with \(\tilde{P}\) the transition operator for the chain \(\{\tilde{\xi}_{n}, n\ge0\}\). Using stationarity we can bound
Denote the terms on the right hand side by \(I_{N}^{(i)}\), i=1,2,3 respectively. One can easily estimate \(I_{N}^{(2)}\le CN^{-1/\alpha}\). Also, to bound \(I_{N}^{(3)}\) we can repeat estimates made in (5.54), as \(\tilde{\chi}\) is also L β integrable and obtain
for some C>0. Finally, to deal with \(I_{N}^{(1)}\) observe that by Doob’s inequality for β∈(1,α)
We use again (5.8) and conclude that
Summarizing from the above estimates we get
where δ is as in the statement of the lemma. □
Gathering the above results we have shown that for any \(\kappa\in (0,1-\alpha^{-1}_{2})\) and δ 1∈(0,α 2 κ), \(\delta_{2}\in(0,\alpha^{-1}(1- \kappa-\alpha^{-1}_{2}))\) we have
Choosing κ sufficiently close to \((1-\alpha^{-1}_{2})/(\alpha \alpha_{2}+1)\) we obtain that for any δ∈(0,(α 2−1)(αα 2+1)−1) we can find a constant C>0 so that
Thus, we conclude the proof of (5.42).
5.4.3 Proof of (5.44)
In this case we can still write inequality (5.49). With the help of Lemma 5.11, for any κ>0 and δ∈(0,α 2 κ) we can find C>0 such that
where I N , J N are defined by (5.50) and (5.51) respectively, with α=2. Repeating the estimates made in the previous section we obtain that
for some C>0. Using the above estimates and (5.30) we conclude (5.44).
6 Proofs of Theorems 3.3 and 3.6
6.1 Proof of Theorem 3.3
Let N:=ϵ −3γ/2 and \(J\in{\mathcal{A}}\) be a real valued function. Define
where {K t (k),t≥0} is the Markov jump process starting at k, introduced in Sect. 2.6. It can be easily verified that the Lebesgue measure on the torus is invariant and reversible for the process and we denote the respective stationary process by {K t ,t≥0}. Its generator \({\mathcal{L}}\) is a symmetric operator on \(L^{2}(\mathbb{ T})\) given by
Here
We also let
Note that
and
The process K t (k) is a jump Markov process of the type considered in Sect. 2.6. The mean jump time and the transition probability operator of the skeleton Markov chain {ξ n ,n≥0} are given by θ(k)=R −1(k) and
respectively. Probability measure
is reversible under the dynamics of the chain. It is clear that Condition 5.2 holds. It has been shown in Sect. 3 of [10] that Condition 5.1 is satisfied.
Let {Q t ,t≥0} be the semigroup corresponding to the generator \({\mathcal{L}}\). It can easily be argued that Q t is a contraction on \(L^{p}(\mathbb{ T})\) for any p∈[1,+∞]. We shall need the following estimate.
Theorem 6.1
For a given a∈(0,1] there exists C>0
for all \(f\in{\mathcal{B}}_{a}\) such that \(\int_{\mathbb{ T}} f\,dk=0\).
The proof of this result shall be presented in Sect. 6.3. We proceed first with its application in the proof of Theorem 3.3. The additive functional appearing in (6.1) shall be denoted by
or by \(Y^{(N)}_{t}\) in case it corresponds to the stationary process K t . It is of the type considered in Sect. 5.4 with α=3/2 and
Since the dispersion relation satisfies
we have
and
with
and some C ∗>0. Condition 5.4 is therefore satisfied with α=3/2 and arbitrary α 1<1/2. Since Ψ(k) is odd we have \(c_{*}^{-}=c_{*}^{+}\). On the other hand, jump mean time θ(k) satisfies (5.35) with α 2=3/2.
We can apply to \(Y^{(N)}_{t}\) the conclusion of part (1) of Theorem 5.10. In this case \(\tilde{c}_{*}(\lambda)\equiv\hat{c}\), where
Since the integral on the right hand side equals \(4\sqrt{\pi}/3\) we obtain (3.5). Let Z t be the corresponding symmetric 3/2-stable process. From (3.9) we obtain \(\overline{W}(t,p)=\overline{W}(p){\mathbb{E}}e^{-ip Z_{t}}\). Therefore, for any \(J(\cdot)\in{\mathcal{S}}\)
Let 1>β>1/3. The left hand side of (6.5) is estimated by E 1+E 2+E 3, where
and \(\widetilde{W}_{p}(k):= W(p,k)-\overline{W}(p) \). The first term can be estimated as follows
To estimate the second term note that by the Markov property we can write
Term E 2 can be therefore estimated by
Invoking Theorem 6.1 we obtain
As a result we conclude immediately that
To deal with E 3 note that by reversibility of the process K t it equals
where \(\bar{J}(p):=\int_{\mathbb{ T}}J(p,k)\,dk\). We obtain that
From this point on we handle this term similarly to what has been done before and obtain that
and
provided b>1.
Term E 33 can be handled with the help of Theorem 5.10 with α=α 2=3/2 and an arbitrary α 1<1/2. Therefore, for any δ<2/13 we can find a constant C>0 such that
We have reached therefore the conclusion of Theorem 3.3 with the exponent γ′ as indicated in (3.2). □
6.2 Proof of Theorem 3.6
The respective additive functional in this case equals
where N:=ϵ −2γ. The observable Ψ is given by (6.3). From (6.4) we get
and the asymptotics of the tails of Ψ(k) is given by
for some C ∗>0 and all λ≥1. The observable belongs therefore to L 2(π) and, since it is odd, its mean is 0. Conditions 5.7 and 5.9 are therefore fulfilled (the latter with α 2=3). We also have
where
and χ is the unique zero mean solution of equation
Since k′↦R(k,k′) is an even function for any fixed k and Ψ is odd we conclude easily that PΨ=0, thus
The result is then a consequence of the argument made in Sect. 6.1 and Theorems 5.10 and 6.1. From (6.12), (6.13) and (6.15) we conclude (3.13).
6.3 Proof of Theorem 6.1
Denoting f t :=Q t f we can write, using Duhamel’s formula
where
Let \(\mathbb{H}:=[\lambda\in\mathbb{C}: \operatorname{Re}\lambda>0]\),
and \(\hat{\mathfrak{ f}}_{\iota}(\lambda):=\langle\hat{f}(\lambda),\mathfrak {e}_{\iota}\rangle\), ι=±1. Formula (6.17) extends to the resolvent set of the generator \({\mathcal{L}}\) in \(L^{2}(\mathbb{ T})\), that contains in particular ℂ∖[−M,0], with M:=(4/3)∥R∥∞+1.
From (6.16) we obtain that
Vector \(\hat{ \mathfrak{f}}^{T}(\lambda):=[\hat{ \mathfrak{f}}_{-1}(\lambda ),\hat{ \mathfrak{f}}_{1}(\lambda)]\) satisfies therefore
where
\(\hat{ \mathfrak{ g}}^{T}(\lambda):=[\hat{ \mathfrak{ g}}_{-1}(\lambda ),\hat{ \mathfrak{ g}}_{1}(\lambda)]\) and
Let \(\Delta(\lambda):=\det \mathfrak{ A}(\lambda) \) and
Observe that
and
From (6.20) we get that Δ(0)=0. In addition, from (6.21) we can see that D(λ):=Δ(λ)λ −1 is analytic in ℂ∖[−M,0]. In addition,
Hence, there exist ϱ>0 and c ∗>0 such that
It can be straightforwardly argued that ϱ can be further adjusted in such a way that (6.22) holds on the boundary \({\mathcal{C}}\) of the rectangle (−M,0)×(−ϱ,ϱ).
From (6.19) we obtain that
where
and
Using the fact that \(\int_{\mathbb{ T}}f dk=0\), after a straightforward calculation, we obtain that
where
We use the well known formula, see e.g. Chap. VII.3.6 of [8],
where \({\mathcal{K}}\) is a contour enclosing the L 2 spectrum of \({\mathcal{L}}\), that as we recall is contained in [−M,0]. It is easy to see that
for an appropriate ϱ>0. This is clear for ι=0. Form this and (6.22), (6.24) we conclude that (6.25) holds also for ι=±1. Therefore, we can use as \({\mathcal{K}}\) the boundary \({\mathcal{C}}\) of the rectangle, mentioned after (6.22), oriented counter-clockwise. From (6.18) we get
Note that
where C:=sup x≥0 x a e −x. Consider the term I(t) corresponding to the integral on the right hand side of (6.26). We can write \(I(t)=\sum_{i=1}^{4}I_{i}(t)\), where I i (t) correspond to the sides of the rectangle {−M}×(−ϱ,ϱ), [−M,0]×{−ϱ}, [−M,0]×{ϱ}, {0}×(−ϱ,ϱ) appropriately oriented. The estimations of I i (t), i=1,2,3 are quite straightforward and lead to the bounds
To deal with I 4(t) observe that, thanks to (6.24), it equals to I 41(t)+I 42(t), where
and
The asymptotics of I 4,1 for t≫1 is, up to a term of order \(\| f\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{ T})}/t\), the same as
for some C ∞ function F(iν) supported in (−ρ,ρ) and equal to D −1(iν) in (−ρ/2,ρ/2). Denoting
we can write
for sufficiently large t (the support of F is contained in (−ϱ,ϱ)). The first term on the utmost right hand side can be estimated by
As for the second term, it can be estimated by
The first term is less than
for some b∈(0,1/2). Since for any a,b>0 there exists C>0 such that
expression in (6.29) can be estimated by \(C\|f\|_{{\mathcal{B}}_{a}}/t^{a+b}\). Finally the second term in (6.28) can be estimated by
by virtue of (6.30). Summarizing, we have shown that
for some C>0 and all t>0. The estimates for \(\|\tilde{I}_{4,2}(t)\|_{L^{1}(\mathbb{ T})}\) are quite analogous.
References
Basile, G., Bernardin, C., Olla, S.: Momentum conserving model with anomalous thermal conductivity in low dimension. Physical Review Letters 96, 204303 (2006)
Basile, G., Bovier, A.: Convergence of a kinetic equation to a fractional diffusion equation. Markov Process. Relat. Fields 16, 15–44 (2010)
Basile, G., Olla, S., Spohn, H.: Wigner functions and stochastically perturbed lattice dynamics. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 195(1), 171–203 (2009)
Bernardin, C., Olla, S.: Non-equilibrium macroscopic dynamics of chains of anharmonic oscillators (2010). Manuscript available at http://www.ceremade.dauphine.fr/~olla/
Bonetto, F., Lebowitz, J.L., Rey-Bellet, L.: Fourier law: a challenge to theorists. In: Mathematical Physics 2000, pp. 128–150. Imp. Coll. Press, London (2000)
Da Prato, G., Zabczyk, J.: Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Dembo, A., Zeitouni, O.: Large Deviation Techniques and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1998)
Dunford, N., Schwartz, J.T.: Linear Operators. Part I. Wiley, New York (1988)
Erdös, L., Salmhofer, M., Yau, H.-T.: Quantum diffusion of the random Schrödinger evolution in the scaling limit. Acta Math. 200(2), 211–277 (2008)
Jara, M., Komorowski, T., Olla, S.: Limit theorems for additive functionals of a Markov chain. Ann. Appl. Probab. 19(6), 2270–2300 (2009)
Junge, M., Xu, Q.: Noncommutative Burkholder-Rosenthal inequality. Ann. Probab. 31, 948–995 (2003)
Komorowski, T., Ryzhik, L.: Diffusion in a weakly random Hamiltonian flow. Commun. Math. Phys. 263(2), 277–323 (2006)
Lepri, S., Livi, R., Politi, A.: Thermal conduction in classical low-dimensional lattices. Phys. Rep. 377, 067102 (2003)
Lepri, S., Livi, R., Politi, A.: Universality of anomalous one-dimensional heat conductivity. Phys. Rev. E 68, 067102 (2003)
Lukkarinen, J., Spohn, H.: Kinetic limit for wave propagation in a random medium. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 183(1), 93–162 (2007)
Mellet, A., Mischler, S., Mouhot, C.: Fractional diffusion limit for collisional kinetic equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 199(2), 493–525 (2011)
Pisier, G.: Martingales in Banach spaces (in connection with type and cotype). Manuscript available at http://people.math.jussieu.fr/~pisier/ihp-pisier.pdf
Acknowledgements
Both authors wish to thank the anonymous referee of the paper for many valuable remarks that contributed to the improvement of the manuscript. In particular we are thankful for pointing out the relationship (6.15) which leads to (1.3). The support of the grant of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, NN 201 419 139 is gratefully acknowledged by both authors. L.S. would also like to acknowledge the support of the European Social Fund.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Komorowski, T., Stȩpień, Ł. Long Time, Large Scale Limit of the Wigner Transform for a System of Linear Oscillators in One Dimension. J Stat Phys 148, 1–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0528-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0528-4