Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Pinyin Invented Spelling and Oddity Test in Measuring Phonological Awareness in L2 Learners of Chinese

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of phonological awareness (PA) for the acquisition of literacy skills has been widely recognized. Across languages, PA is commonly examined using the Oddity test, however, for Chinese-speaking children, Pinyin invented spelling is recommended as being a more powerful tool to assess PA. However, it is still unclear whether this holds true for learners of Chinese as a second language (CSL). To address this issue, we administered an oddity test and a Pinyin invented spelling task to explore Chinese PA in 43 Arabic and 40 English CSL learners at pre-intermediate and intermediate levels. The results generated two major findings. First, Pinyin invented spelling revealed more significant cross-group differences in Chinese PA between the Arabic and English CSL learners than the oddity test. Second, the participants’ performance in Pinyin invented spelling was a stronger predictor of character-reading and character-writing skills than their performance in the oddity test. The overall findings suggest that Pinyin invented spelling may be a more powerful measurement of Chinese PA for CSL learners in comparison to the conventional test, in line with the findings reported for Chinese-speaking children. The theoretical implications for understanding the role of phonological skills in the growth of Chinese literacy skills and practical suggestions for measuring Chinese PA are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.chinesetest.cn/userfiles/file/dagang/HSK1.pdf.

  2. The present study adopts the criteria for effect size proposed by Cohen (1988) and Cohen’s benchmarks are .40 = small, .70 = medium and 1.00 = big.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by China Scholarship Council [[2013]3009] and Minzu University of China [2020QNPY70].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiwei Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Roberts, L. A Comparison of Pinyin Invented Spelling and Oddity Test in Measuring Phonological Awareness in L2 Learners of Chinese. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 375–396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09700-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09700-z

Keywords

Navigation