Skip to main content
Log in

Disambiguating Information and Memory Resources in Children’s Processing of Italian Relative Clauses

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the role of number agreement on verb and of animacy in the comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in 51 monolingual Italian-speaking children, mean age 9:33, tested through a self-paced listening experiment with a final comprehension question. A digit span test and a listening span test were also administered to examine the role of memory in comprehension. Subject relative clauses were easier to comprehend than object relative clauses; animacy of the relative clause head improved comprehension of object relative clauses; memory, as measured by the digit span test, modulates comprehension of object relative clauses, both with animate and inanimate heads, as shown in response accuracy. Although all children process number agreement morphology on the verb, only some perform a correct reanalysis, as shown by the accuracy measures. We argue that number agreement disambiguation is particularly taxing for children, as it provides a negative symptom in the sense of Fodor and Inoue (J Psycholinguist Res 29(1):25–36, 2000) and reanalysis requires them to hold two dependencies in memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adani, F. (2008). The role of features in relative clause comprehension: A study of typical and atypical development. PhD. Dissertation, University of Milano-Bicocca.

  • Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti M. T. (2009) Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian Relative Clauses by children. In A. Gavarrò, et al. (Eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation and acquisition. Oxford University Press

  • Baddeley A. D. (1986) Working memory. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A. D., Eysenck M. W., Anderson M. C. (2009) Memory. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. J. (1974) Working memory. In: Bower G. A. (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 8 Advances in research and theory. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader M., Bayer J. (2006) Case and linking in language comprehension: Evidence from German. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker M. (2006) There began to be a learnability puzzle. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 441–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard D. H. (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 433–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Booth J. R., Mac Whinney B., Harasaki Y. (2000) Developmental differences in visual and Auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development 71(4): 981–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornkessel I. D., Fiebach C. J., Friederici A. D. (2001) On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach. Cognitive Brain Research 21: 11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccarelli, L. (1998). Comprensione del linguaggio, dei processi di elaborazione e memoria di lavoro: uno studio in età prescolare. PhD dissertation, University of Padua, Italy.

  • Daneman M., Carpenter P. A. (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 450–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers J., Tager-Flusberg H., Hakuta K., Cohen M. (1979) Children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research 8: 499–518

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vincenzi M. (1991) Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs. Journal of Memory and Language. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.004.

  • Felser C., Marinis T., Clahsen H. (2003) Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition 11: 127–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Anes M. (1994) Why study spoken language?. In: Gernsbacher M. A. (eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F., Henderson J. M., Anes M. D., Weeks P. A. Jr., McFarlane D. K. (1996) Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving window technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 324–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor D. J., Inoue A. (2000) Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(1): 25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder U., Segui J., Mehler J. (1980) Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier L., Flores d’Arcais G. (1989) Filler-driven parsing: A study of gap-filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici A. D. (1997) Diagnosis and reanalysis: Two processing steps the brain may differentiate. In: Fodor J., Ferreira F. (eds) Reanalysis in sentence processing. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici A. D., Steinhauer K., Mecklinger A., Meyer M. (1998) Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology 47: 193–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann N., Novogrodsky R. (2004) The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31: 661–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin C., Campbell T. (1994) Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79: 55–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson E. (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68: 1–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P. C., Hendrick R., Johnson M. (2001) Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27: 1411–1423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guasti M. T., Cardinaletti A. (2003) Relative clause formation in romance child production. Probus 15: 47–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasti M. T., Stavrakaki S., Arosio F. (2007) Number and Case in the comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence from Italian and Greek. In: Gavarrò A., Freitas M. J. (eds) Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007. Cambridge Scholar Press, Newcastle

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris A. C. (1981) Georgian syntax. A study in relational grammar. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • King J., Just M. A. (1991) Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 580–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J. W., Kutas M. (1995) Who did what and when? Using word- and causal- level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7(3): 376–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little R. C., Milliken G. A., Stroup W. W., Wolfinger R. D. (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Publishing, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Love T. E. (2007) The processing of non-canonically ordered constituents in long distance dependencies by pre-school children: A real-time investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36: 191–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R. D. (1986) Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney B., Pléh C. (1988) The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition 29: 95–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mak W. M., Vonk W., Schriefers H. J. (2002) The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1): 50–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. J. (2008) Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Memory & Cognition (Vol. 36, pp. 170–181). Utrecht: Ms. University of Utrecht

  • McKee C., Nicol J., McDaniel D. (1993) Children’s application of binding during sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 8(3): 265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng M., Bader M. (2000) Mode of disambiguation and garden path strength: An investigation of subject–object ambiguities in German. Language and Speech 43: 43–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palladino P. (2005) Uno strumento per esaminare la memoria di lavoro verbale in bambini di scuola elementare: taratura e validità. Psicologia clinica dello sviluppo 1: 129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagno C., Cecchetto C., Reati F., Bello L. (2007) Processing of syntactically complex sentences relies on verbal short-term memory. Evidence from a STM patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology 24: 292–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli D. G. (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10: 437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi L. (1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Foris Publications, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts L., Marinis T., Felser C., Clahsen H. (2007) Antecedent priming at trace positions in children’s sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 36: 175–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers H., Friederici A. D., Kühn K. (1995) The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language 8: 499–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekerina I., Stromswold K., Hestvik A. (2004) How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns?. Journal of Child Language 31: 123–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler M. J., Morris R. K., Seely R. E. (2002) Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47: 69–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos S. H., Gunter T. C., Schriefers H., Friederici A. D. (2001) Syntactic parsing and working memory: The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load. Language and Cognitive Processes 16: 65–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters G. S., Caplan D. (1996) Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. Memory and Cognition 24: 342–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters G. S., Caplan D. (1996) The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49: 51–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittek A., Tomasello M. (2005) German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: Local cues help locally. First Language 25: 103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Arosio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arosio, F., Guasti, M.T. & Stucchi, N. Disambiguating Information and Memory Resources in Children’s Processing of Italian Relative Clauses. J Psycholinguist Res 40, 137–154 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9160-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9160-0

Keywords

Navigation