Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of Codon Usage, Protein Abundance, and Protein Stability on Protein Evolution Vary by Evolutionary Distance and the Type of Protein

  • Published:
The Protein Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In general, the evolutionary rate of proteins is not primarily related to protein and amino acid functions, and factors such as protein abundance, codon usage, and the protein’s TM are more important. To better understand the factors that affect protein evolution, E. coli MG1655 orthologs were compared to those in closely related bacteria and to more distantly related prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and archaea. Also, the evolution of different types of proteins was studied. The analyses indicate that the amino acid conservation of enzymes that do not use macromolecules (e.g. DNA, RNA, and proteins) as substrates and that carry out metabolic processes involving small molecules (i.e. small molecule enzymes) is different than other enzymes. For example, the small molecule enzymes have a lower percent identity than other enzymes when sequences from closely related bacteria are compared. Analyses indicate the lower percent identity is not a result of the amino acid or codon usage of the small molecule enzymes. The small molecule enzymes also don’t have a significantly lower protein abundance indicating that is also not likely an important factor driving differences in amino acid conservation. Analyses indicate different methods to measure the TM of proteins have different relationships between amino acid conservation over different evolutionary distances. In totality, the results demonstrate that the relationship between the factors thought to affect protein evolution (protein abundance, codon usage, and proteins TMs) and protein evolution are complex and depend on the factor, the organisms, and the type of proteins being analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is taken from public sources.

Code Availability

Upon request.

References

  1. Dasmeh P, Girard É, Serohijos AWR (2017) Highly expressed genes evolve under strong epistasis from a proteome-wide scan in E. coli. Sci Rep 7:15844. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16030-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD (2001) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927–931

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rocha EPC, Danchin A (2004) An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. Mol Biol Evol 21:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boël G, Letso R, Neely H et al (2016) Codon influence on protein expression in E. coli correlates with mRNA levels. Nature 529:358–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishihama Y, Schmidt T, Rappsilber J et al (2008) Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytosol. BMC Genomics 9:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharp PM, Tuohy TM, Mosurski KR (1986) Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res 14:5125–5143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharp PM, Li WH (1987) The codon Adaptation Index–a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15:1281–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaney JL, Steele A, Carmichael R et al (2017) Widespread position-specific conservation of synonymous rare codons within coding sequences. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SJ, Yoon JS, Shishido H et al (2015) Protein folding. Translational tuning optimizes nascent protein folding in cells. Science 348:444–448. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa3974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palenchar PM (2008) Amino acid biases in the N- and C-termini of proteins are evolutionarily conserved and are conserved between functionally related proteins. Protein J 27:283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-008-9136-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saikia M, Wang X, Mao Y et al (2016) Codon optimality controls differential mRNA translation during amino acid starvation. RNA N Y N 22:1719–1727. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.058180.116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sato T, Terabe M, Watanabe H et al (2001) Codon and base biases after the initiation codon of the open reading frames in the Escherichia coli genome and their influence on the translation efficiency. J Biochem (Tokyo) 129:851–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C et al (2005) Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:14338–14343. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504070102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Drummond DA, Wilke CO (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Serohijos AWR, Rimas Z, Shakhnovich EI (2012) Protein biophysics explains why highly abundant proteins evolve slowly. Cell Rep 2:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.06.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Biesiadecka MK, Sliwa P, Tomala K, Korona R (2020) An overexpression experiment does not support the hypothesis that avoidance of toxicity determines the rate of protein evolution. Genome Biol Evol 12:589–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Plata G, Vitkup D (2018) Protein stability and avoidance of toxic misfolding do not explain the sequence constraints of highly expressed proteins. Mol Biol Evol 35:700–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Razban RM (2019) Protein melting temperature cannot fully assess whether protein folding free energy underlies the universal abundance-evolutionary rate correlation seen in proteins. Mol Biol Evol 36:1955–1963. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sikosek T, Chan HS (2014) Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics. J R Soc Interface 11:20140419. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO (2006) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 23:1751–1761. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aguilar-Rodríguez J, Wagner A (2018) Metabolic determinants of enzyme evolution in a genome-scale bacterial metabolic network. Genome Biol Evol 10:3076–3088. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Goh C-S, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M et al (2000) Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J Mol Biol 299:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.3732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hahn MW, Conant GC, Wagner A (2004) Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J Mol Evol 58:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-003-2544-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kann MG, Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR, Przytycka TM (2009) Correlated evolution of interacting proteins: looking behind the mirrortree. J Mol Biol 385:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palenchar PM, Palenchar JB (2012) The evolution of metabolic enzymes in plasmodium and trypanosomatids as compared to Saccharomyces and Schizosaccharomyces. Mol Biochem Parasitol 184:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.03.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schütte M, Klitgord N, Segré D, Ebenhöh O (2010) Co-evolution of metabolism and protein sequences. In: Genome informatics 2009. IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS, pp 156–166

  27. Jack BR, Meyer AG, Echave J, Wilke CO (2016) Functional sites induce long-range evolutionary constraints in enzymes. PLoS Biol 14:e1002452. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharir-Ivry A, Xia Y (2019) Non-catalytic binding sites induce weaker long-range evolutionary rate gradients than catalytic sites in enzymes. J Mol Biol 431:3860–3870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2019.07.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction 11Edited by A. R Fersht J Mol Biol 271:511–523. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dasmeh P, Serohijos AWR (2018) Estimating the contribution of folding stability to nonspecific epistasis in protein evolution. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinforma 86:1242–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang D, Liu F, Wang L et al (2011) Nonsynonymous substitution rate (Ka) is a relatively consistent parameter for defining fast-evolving and slow-evolving protein-coding genes. Biol Direct 6:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Z, Li J, Zhao X-Q et al (2006) KaKs_Calculator: calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 4:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60007-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M et al (2016) KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D457–D462. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. The UniProt Consortium (2019) UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mateus A, Bobonis J, Kurzawa N et al (2018) Thermal proteome profiling in bacteria: probing protein state in vivo. Mol Syst Biol 14:e8242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Leuenberger P, Ganscha S, Kahraman A et al (2017) Cell-wide analysis of protein thermal unfolding reveals determinants of thermostability. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai7825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  40. Dilucca M, Cimini G, Giansanti A (2018) Essentiality, conservation, evolutionary pressure and codon bias in bacterial genomes. Gene 663:178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.04.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang J, Yang J-R (2015) Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution. Nat Rev Genet 16:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Faure G, Ogurtsov AY, Shabalina SA, Koonin EV (2017) Adaptation of mRNA structure to control protein folding. RNA Biol 14:1649–1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2017.1349047

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang J-R (2017) Does mRNA structure contain genetic information for regulating co-translational protein folding? Zool Res 38:36–43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Komar AA (2016) The Yin and Yang of codon usage. Hum Mol Genet 25:R77–R85. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddw207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim I-W et al (2007) A “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315:525–528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Benkovic SJ, Hammes-Schiffer S (2003) A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 301:1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bunzel HA, Anderson JLR, Mulholland AJ (2021) Designing better enzymes: insights from directed evolution. Curr Opin Struct Biol 67:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2020.12.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Liang Z-X, Klinman JP (2004) Structural bases of hydrogen tunneling in enzymes: progress and puzzles. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:648–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2004.10.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pompliano DL, Peyman A, Knowles JR (1990) Stabilization of a reaction intermediate as a catalytic device: definition of the functional role of the flexible loop in triosephosphate isomerase. Biochemistry 29:3186–3194. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00465a005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Villanova University, 800 E. Lancaster Ave, Villanova, PA, 19805, USA

    Peter M. Palenchar

Authors
  1. Peter M. Palenchar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All work and ideas are the work of Peter M. Palenchar.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter M. Palenchar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 158 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palenchar, P.M. The Influence of Codon Usage, Protein Abundance, and Protein Stability on Protein Evolution Vary by Evolutionary Distance and the Type of Protein. Protein J 41, 216–229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-022-10045-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-022-10045-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation