Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation and Characterization of Clay Nanocomposites of Plasticized Starch and Polypropylene Polymer Blends

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plasticized starch (PLS) is a renewable, degradable, and inexpensive polymer, but it suffers from poor mechanical properties. The mechanical properties can be improved by blending PLS with polyolefins, nonetheless, at high PLS content, the mechanical properties remain poor. Here we show that addition of clay can greatly improve the mechanical properties of PLS/polypropylene blends at high starch content. Unmodified and organically modified montmorillonite clays, MMT and Cloisite 30B respectively, were added to blends of glycerol-plasticized starch and polypropylene, compatibilized using maleated polypropylene. TEM indicates that MMT is well dispersed in the PLS phase of the blends, while Cloisite 30B is located both within the PLS phase as well as at the interface between PLS and PP. At high PLS content, the addition of clay increased the tensile strength and tensile modulus by an order of magnitude, while reducing the ultimate elongation only slightly. Such improvements are attributable to both the addition of clay as a reinforcing component, as well as to the change in the two phase morphology due to addition of clay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalambur S, Rizvi SSH (2006) J Plast Film Sheeting 22(1):39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Averous L, Boquillon N (2004) Carbohydr Polym 56(2):111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jane J (2009) In: BeMiller J, Whistler R (eds) Starch: chemistry and technology. Elsevier, New York

  4. Halley PJ (2005) In: Smith R (eds) Biodegradable polymers for industrial applications. CRC Publishing

  5. Fabunmi OO, Tabil LGJ, Panigrahi S, Chang PR (2007) ASABE/CSBE North central intersectional conference proceedings, Fargo, North Dakota, USA paper number RRV07130

  6. Averous L (2004) J Macromol Sci-Polym Rev C44(3):231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosa DS, Guedes CGF, Pedroso AG (2004) Polímeros 14:181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Huneault MA, Li HB (2007) Polymer 48(1):270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang S, Yu J, Yu J (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 87(3):395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bikiaris D, Panayiotou C (1998) J Appl Polym Sci Symp 70(8):1503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jun CL (2000) J Polym Environ 8(1):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park HM, Lee SR, Chowdhury SR, Kang TK, Kim HK, Park SH, Ha CS (2002) J Appl Polym Sci 86(11):2907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosa DS, Guedes CGF, Carvalho CL (2007) J Mater Sci 42(2):551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, Yu J, Yu J (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 93(2):686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen B, Evans JRG (2005) Carbohydr Polym 61(4):455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang MF, Yu JG, Ma XF (2004) Polymer 45(20):7017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilhelm HM, Sierakowski MR, Souza GP, Wypych F (2003) Carbohydr Polym 52(2):101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Park HM, Lee WK, Park CY, Cho WJ, Ha CS (2003) J Mater Sci 38(5):909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Akane Okada AU (2006) Macromol Mater Eng 291(12):1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer H (2003) Mater Sci Eng: C 23(6–8):763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng QH, Yu AB, Lu GQ, Paul DR (2005) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 5(10):1574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao RX, Torley P, Halley PJ (2008) J Mater Sci 43(9):3058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Correa CA, Razzino CA, Hage EJ (2007) J Thermo Compos Mater 20(3):323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. DeLeo C, Goetz J, Young B, Velankar S (2010) J Appl Polym Sci 116(3):1775

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hambir S, Bulakh N, Jog JP (2002) Polym Eng Sci 42(9):1800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Naoki H, Masaya K, Makoto K, Arimitsu U, Akane O (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 67(1):87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalambur S, Rizvi SHS (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 96(4):1072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM D638. American Society for Testing and Materials (2008)

  29. Thareja P, Velankar S (2008) Colloid Polym Sci 286(11):1257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fenouillot F, Cassagnau P, Majesté JC (2009) Polymer 50(6):1333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Magalhães NF, Andrade CT (2009) Carbohydr Polym 75(4):712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Avérous L, Halley P, Biofuels J (2009) Bioprod Biorefin 3(3):329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Potschke P, Paul DR (2003) Formation of co-continuous structures in melt-mixed immiscible polymer blends. Polym Rev 43(1):87–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Galgali G, Ramesh C, Lele A (2001) Macromolecules 34(4):852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeppa C, Gouanvé F, Espuche E (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 112(4):2044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nielsen LE, Landel RF (1994) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an IGERT grant DGE-0504345 from the National Science Foundation, USA, the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP (process n 04/15084-6), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq, Brazil. We thank Prof. Maria Isabel Felisberti in the Institute of Chemistry at UNICAMP for many fruitful discussions and Dr. Lei Hong and Dr. Steven Weber in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Pittsburgh for his assistance with DMA experiments. We also thank ExxonMobil Chemicals, Quattor and Copagra for providing the materials for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachin Velankar.

Appendix

Appendix

The XRD patterns (Fig. 5) showed the scattering peaks for dried MMT (left) and 30B (right) were 2θ = 8.2 and 4.8, respectively. These values correspond to d001 values of 1.07 nm and 1.83 nm, respectively and agree well with the literature [35]. The larger d001 value for 30B arises from the organic modification. Upon swelling in glycerol, the interlayer distance increased for the both MMT (d001 = 1.81 nm) and 30B (d001 = 2.32 nm). This suggests that glycerol intercalates into the galleries of both clays. Some level of exfoliation cannot be ruled out. Upon extrusion of the glycerol-swollen clays with starch to obtain PLS100-MMT and PLS100-30B the peak position remains essentially unchanged. In summary, from the XRD experiments we can conclude that glycerol intercalates both MMT and 30B clays, and melt extrusion with PLS does not exfoliate the clay any further than glycerol.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The XRD patterns showed the scattering peaks for dried MMT, MMT-glycerol and PLS100-MMT (left) and dried 30B, 30B-glycerol and PLS100-30B (right)

Figure 6 shows the dynamic mechanical properties of selected blends. Strongly polar polymers, especially with hydrogen bonding have slightly higher glassy moduli [36], and accordingly, the samples containing higher concentrations of PLS, which is more polar than PP, show the highest moduli in the glassy region (−100 °C). Moreover, the effect of clay was negligible in the glassy region. The Tg of all samples (as judged by the peak in tan δ), was near −25 °C and was not significantly affected by the addition of clay. The composition of the samples (i.e. the fraction of the PP phase) also had negligible effect on Tg which likely reflects the complete immiscibility of the phases. In all samples, the modulus increased with increasing PP content in the temperature range from the glass transition temperature to 100 °C. In the PLS70-MMT sample, the addition of clay resulted in a large increase in the storage modulus as temperature is increased, presumably due to the stiffening of the material due to the restriction of chain mobility by the nanoclays. The same was observed for the PLS80-MMT sample. In contrast, the addition of 30B does not increase in the plateau modulus at high temperature significantly.

Fig. 6
figure 6

DMA of (a) plasticized starch and polypropylene blends, (b) PLS/PP blends with MMT and (c) PLS/PP blends with 30B

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeLeo, C., Pinotti, C.A., do Carmo Gonçalves, M. et al. Preparation and Characterization of Clay Nanocomposites of Plasticized Starch and Polypropylene Polymer Blends. J Polym Environ 19, 689–697 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0311-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0311-7

Keywords

Navigation