Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Roost Site-Selection Criteria and Locations East of the Appalachian Mountains, U.S.A.

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The monarch butterfly is a flagship species and pollinator whose populations have declined by 85% in the recent two decades. Their largest population overwinters in Mexico, then disperses across eastern North America during March to August. During September-December, they return south using two flyways, one that spans the central United States and another that follows the Atlantic coast. Migrating monarchs fly diurnally and roost in groups nocturnally. We sought to determine the criteria this species uses to select roost sites, and the landscape context where those sites are found. We developed species distribution models of the landscape context of Atlantic flyway roost sites via citizen scientist observations and environmental variables that affect monarchs in the adult stage prior to migration, using two algorithms (Maximum Entropy and Genetic Algorithm for Ruleset Prediction). We developed two model validation methods: a citizen scientist smartphone application and peer-informed comparisons with aerial imagery. Proximity to surface water, elevation, and vegetative cover were the most important criteria for monarch roost site selection. Our model predicted 2.6 million ha (2.9% of the study area) of suitable roosting habitat in the Atlantic flyway, with the greatest availability along the Atlantic coastal plain and Appalachian Mountain ridges. Conservation of this species is difficult, as monarchs range over both large areas and various habitat types, and most current monarch research and conservation efforts are focused on the breeding and overwintering periods. These models can serve to help prioritize surveys of roosting sites and conservation efforts during the monarchs’ fall migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data used in this study are available in datasets listed in Table 1, and model rasters are available in Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7sqv9s4vz). Contact B. Boxler for questions about the data. Contact sources indicated in Table 1 for more information about the individual data sets for monarch observations.

References

  • Abrahams BE, Hazen L, Aikens EO, Savoca MS, Goldbogen JA, Bograd SJ, Jacox MG, Irvine LM, Palacios DM, Mate BR (2019) Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:5582–5587

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ainslie B, Alexander N, Johnston N, Bradley J, Pomeroy AC, Jackson PL, Otter KA (2014) Predicting spatial patterns of eagle migration using a mesoscale atmospheric model: a case study associated with a mountain-ridge wind development. Int J Biometeorol 58:17–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alerstam T, Pettersson S (1977) Why do migrating birds fly along coastlines? J Theor Biol 65:699–712

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aschwanden J, Schmidt M, Wichmann G, Stark H, Peter D, Steuri T, Liechti F (2020) Barrier effects of mountain ranges for broad-front bird migration. J Ornithol 161:59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf U, Peterson AT, Chaudhry MN, Ashraf I, Saqib Z, Ahmad SR, Ali H (2017) Ecological niche model comparison under different climate scenarios: a case study of Olea spp. In Asia. Ecosphere 8:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batalden RV, Oberhauser K, Peterson AT (2007) Ecological niches in sequential generations of eastern North American monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Danaidae): the ecology of migration and likely climate change implications. Environ Entomol 36:1365–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrer G, Brandes D, Mandel JT, Bildstein KL, Miller TA, Lanzone M, Katzner T, Maisonneuve C, Tremblay JA (2012) Estimating updraft velocity components over large spatial scales: contrasting migration strategies of golden eagles and turkey vultures. Ecol Lett 15:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Biosci 59:977–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GE (1976) Science and statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 71:791–799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brower LP, Fink LS, Walford P (2006) Fueling the fall migration of the monarch butterfly. Integr Comp Biol 46:1123–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos Trans Biol Sci 336:2351–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury S, Zalucki MP, Amano T, Woodworth BK, Venega-Li R, Fuller RA (2021a) Seasonal spatial dynamics of butterfly migration. Ecol Lett 24:1814–1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury S, Fuller RA, Dingle H, Chapman JW, Zalucki MP (2021b) Migration in butterflies: a global overview. Biol Rev 96:1462–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury S, Jennions MD, Zalucki MP, Maron M, Watson JEM, Fuller RA (2022) Protected areas and the future of insect conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2022.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WE, Marshall RD, Yacker AC, Zinman LA (2019) SEC sues asset managers for using untested, error-filled quantitative investment models. J Invest Compliance 20:44–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AK, Nibbelink NP, Howard E (2012) Identifying large- and small-scale habitat characteristics of monarch butterfly migratory roost sites with citizen science observations. Int J Zool. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/149026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer JE, Loomis JB, Ries L, Oberhauser K, Lopez-Hoffman L, Semmens D, Semmens B, Butterfield B, Bagstad K, Goldstein J, Wiederholt W, Mattsson B, Thogmartin WE (2013) National valuation of monarch butterflies indicates an untapped potential for incentive-based conservation. Conserv Lett 7:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H, Zalucki MR, Rochester W, Armijo Prewitt T (2005) Distribution of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), in western North America. Biol J Linn Soc 85:491–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H, Drake VA (2007) What is migration? Biosci 57:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eButterfly (2018) An online database of butterfly distribution and abundance [web application]. http://www.e-butterfly.org. Accessed 10 May 2018

  • Eddy DM, Hollingworth W, Caro JJ, Tsevat J, McDonald KM, Wong JB (2012) Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force–7. Med Decis Mak 32:733–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fensham RJ, Fairfax RJ (2007) Effect of photoscale, interpreter bias and land type in woody crown-cover estimated from aerial photography. Aust J Bot 55:457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-Sanchez Y, Rodriguez-Estrella R (2016) How rare species conservation management can be strengthened with the use of ecological niche modelling: the case for endangered endemic Gundlach’s hawk and Cuban black-hawk. Glob Ecol Conserv 5:88–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer FK, Kistler M, Brandhuber R, Maier H, Treisch M, Auerswald K (2017) Validation of official erosion modelling based on high-resolution radar rain data by aerial photo erosion classification. Earth Surf Process Landf 43:187–194

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher KE, Adelman JS, Bradbury SP (2020) Employing very high frequency (VHF) radio telemetry to recreate monarch butterfly flight paths. Environ Entomol 49:312–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher KE, Bradbury SP (2022) Influence of habitat quality and resource density on breeding-season female monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) movement and space use in north-central USA agroecosystem landscapes. J Appl Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher KE, Bradbury SP (2021) Estimating perceptual range of female monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) to potted vegetative common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) and blooming nectar resources. Environ Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvab058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller L, Shewring M, Caryl FM (2018) A novel method for targeting survey effort to identify new bat roosts using habitat suitability modelling. Eur J Wildl Res 64:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GBIF.org (2018) GBIF Occurrence Download. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.30ezd6. Accessed 10 May 2018

  • Geldmann J, Heilmann-Clausen J, Holm TE, Levinsky I, Markussen B, Olsen K, Rahbek C, Tottrup AP (2016) What determines spatial bias in citizen science? Exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements. Divers Distrib 22:1139–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Roy A, Chatterjee A, Sikdar SR (2019) Effect of regional wind circulation and meteorological factors on long-range migration of mustard aphids over indo-gangetic plain. Sci Rep 9:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibo DL, Pallett MJ (1978) Soaring flight of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danaidae), during the late summer migration in southern Ontario. Can J of Zool 57:1393–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibo DL (1986) Flight strategies of migrating monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) in Southern Ontario. Insect flight, proceedings in life sciences insect flight: dispersal and migration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pps 172–184

  • Global Solar Atlas (2012) 2.0, a free, web-based application is developed and operated by the company Solargis s.r.o. on behalf of the World Bank Group, utilizing Solargis data, with funding provided by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP). https://globalsolaratlas.info. Accessed 12 Sept 2012

  • Gurarie E, Cagnacci F, Peters W, Fleming CH, Calabrese JM, Mueller T, Fagan WF (2017) A framework for modelling range shifts and migrations: asking when, whither, whether and will it return. J Anim Ecol 86:943–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herman WS (1981) Studies on the adult reproductive diapause of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus. Biol Bull 160:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard E, Davis AK (2008) The fall migration flyways of monarch butterflies in eastern North America revealed by citizen scientists. J Insect Conserv 13:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard E, Davis AK (2015) Investigating long-term changes in the spring migration of monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) using 18 years of data from Journey North, a citizen science program. Ann Entomol Soc Am 108:664–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium 22: 415-427

  • iNaturalist (2018) Available from https://www.inaturalist.org. Accessed 10 May 2018

  • James DG, James TA (2019) Migration and overwintering in Australian monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: 1578 Nymphalidae): a review with new observations and research needs. J Lepid Soc 73:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journey North (2019) Riding Ridges, Traveling Coastlines. https://journeynorth.org/monarchs/news/fall-2019/10032019-riding-ridges-traveling-coastlines?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Monarch%20Butterfly%20Migration%20News%20October%2003%202019&utm_content=Monarch%20Butterfly%20Migration%20News%20October%2003%202019+CID_97d876195b5ef83a9a14b05ecd3bb758&utm_source=Journey%20North%20emails&utm_term=Read%20more. Accessed 4 Oct 2019

  • Kaartvedt S, Klevjer TA, Torgersen T, Sornes TA, Rostad A (2007) Diel vertical migration of individual jellyfish (Periphylla periphylla). Limnol Oceanogr 52:975–983

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Knight A, Brower LP (2009) The influence of eastern North American autumnal migrant monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) on continuously breeding resident monarch populations in southern Florida. J Chem Ecol 35:816–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight SM, Flockart DTT, Derbyshire R, Bosco MG, Norris DR (2021) Experimental field evidence shows milkweed contaminated with a common neonicotinoid decreased larval survival of monarch butterflies. J Anim Ecol 90:1742–1752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan N, Jurenka RA, Bradbury SP (2021) Neonicotinoids can cause arrested pupal ecdysis in Lepidoptera. Sci Rep 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95284-0. Open Source

  • Krueger A, Hanford JK, Weissling TJ, Velez AM, Anderson TD (2021) Pyrethroid exposure reduces growth and development of monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) caterpillars. J Insect Sci 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa149. Open Source

  • Kull CA, Ibrahim CK, Meredith TC (2007) Tropical forest transitions and globalization: neo-liberalism, migration, tourism, and international conservation agendas. Soc Nat Resour 20:723–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg C, Kasperowski D (2016) What is citizen science?—A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152

  • Lewis AD, Bouman MJ, Winter AM, Hasle EA, Stotz DF, Johnston MK, Klinger KR, Rosenthal A, Czarnecki CA (2019) Does nature need cities? Pollinators reveal a role for cities in wildlife conservation. Front Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00220

  • Lotts K, Naberhaus T (2017) Butterflies and Moths of North America. http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/. Accessed 10 May 2018

  • Malthus TJ, Ohmsen R, Van der Woerd HJ (2020) An evaluation of citizen science smartphone apps for inland water quality assessment. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCord JW, Davis AK (2010) Biological observations of Monarch Butterfly Behavior at a migratory stopover site: results from a long-term tagging study in coastal South Carolina. J Insect Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-010-9224-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRoberts RE, Stehman SV, Liknes GC, Naesset E, Sannier C, Walters BF (2018) The effects of imperfect reference data on remote sensing-assisted estimators of land cover class proportions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 142:292–300

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NG, Wassenaar LI, Hobson KA, Norris DR (2011) Monarch butterflies cross the Appalachians from the west to recolonize the east coast of North America. Biol Lett 7:43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mission Monarch (2018) Available from http://missionmonarchs.com/. Accessed 10 May 2018

  • MonarchWatch (2022) Tagging Monarchs. https://monarchwatch.org/tagging/. Accessed 12 Aug 2022

  • Mouton AM, Baets BD, Goethals PLM (2010) Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models. Ecol Modell 16:1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir J (1901) Our national parks. Houghton, Mifflin, and Company, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musiega DE, Sanga-Ngoie K, Fukuyama K (2006) A framework for predicting and visualizing the East African wildebeest migration-route patterns in variable climatic conditions using geographic information system and remote sensing. Ecol Res 21:530–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy C, Bardwell K, Rockwell RF, Christie R, Weckel M (2012) Validation of a citizen science-based model of site occupancy for Eastern Screech Owls with systematic data in suburban New York and Connecticut. Northeast Nat 19:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Atmospheric Research (2012) Climate Data. Available at https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data. Accessed 12 Sept 2012

  • Nishihiro J, Nishihiro MA, Washitani I (2005) Assessing the potential for recovery of lakeshore vegetation: species richness of sediment propagule banks. Ecol Res 21:436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NLCD (2016) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2016, U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P937PN4Z

  • Norton M, Uryasev S (2018) Maximization of AUC and buffered AUC in binary classification. Math Program 174:575–612

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Obama BH, Nieto EP, Harper SJ (2014) Joint statement by North American Leaders. North American Leaders Summit 18 February 2014. Toluca, Mexico

  • Oberhauser KS, Peterson AT (2003) Modeling current and future potential wintering distributions of eastern North American monarch butterflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:14063–14068

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BB, Gaston KJ, Bullock JM, Osborne JL (2019) Road verges support pollinators in agricultural landscapes, but are diminished by heavy traffic and summer cutting. J Appl Ecol 56:2316–2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickens BA, King SL, Vasseur PL, Zimorski SE, Selman W (2017) Seasonal movements and multiscale habitat selection of whooping crane (Grus americana) in natural and agricultural wetlands. Waterbirds 4:322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston SD, Liao JD, Toombs TP, Romero-Canyas R, Speiser J, Seifert CM (2021) A case study of a conservation flagship species: the monarch butterfly. Biodivers Conserv 30:2057–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team: R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org

  • Read MA, Grigg GC, Irwin SR, Shanahan D, Franklin CE (2007) Satellite tracking reveals long distance coastal travel and homing by translocated Estuarine Crocodiles, Crocodylus porosus. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000949

  • Reppert SM, Gegear RJ, Merlin C (2010) Navigational Mechanisms of migrating monarch butterflies. Trends Neurosci 33:399–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Taron DJ, Rendon-Salinas E (2015) The disconnect between summer and winter monarch trends for the eastern migratory population: possible links to differing drivers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 108:691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Neupane N, Baum KA, Zipkin EF (2018) Flying through hurricane central: impacts of hurricanes on migrants with a focus on monarch butterflies. Anim Migr 5:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson C (1928) Flowers and insects: lists of visitors of four hundred and fifty-three flowers. The Science Press Printing Company, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders SP, Ries L, Oberhauser KS, Thogmartin WE, Zipkin EF (2017) Local and cross-seasonal associations of climate and land use with abundance of monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus. Ecography 41:278–290

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub M, Jenni L, Bairlein F (2008) Fuel stores, fuel accumulation, and the decision to depart from a migration stopover site. Behav Ecol 19:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senapathi D, Biesmeijer JC, Breeze TD, Kleijn F, Potts SG, Carvalheiro LG (2015) Pollinator conservation — the difference between managing for pollination services and preserving pollinator diversity. Curr Opin Insect Sci 12:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani F, Kumar L, Ahmadi M (2016) A comparison of absolute performance of different correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area. Ecol Evol 6:5973–5986

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smessaert J, Honnay O, Keulemans W (2019) Monitoring pollinator activity in an Apple and pear orchard, linked with the analysis of the nectar composition. Acta Hortic 1231:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellman KV, Mulder CPH (2016) Validating herbarium-based phenology models using citizen-science data. Biosci 66:897–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell D, Peters D (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolar J, Nielsen SE (2014) Accounting for spatially biased sampling effort in presence-only species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 21:595–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam KC, Bonebrake TC (2016) Butterfly diversity, habitat and vegetation usage in Hong Kong urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 19:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarkesh M, Jetschke G (2012) Comparison of six correlative models in predictive vegetation mapping on a local scale. Environ Ecol Stat 19:437–457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor OR, Pleasants JM, Grundel R, Pecoraro SD, Lovett JP, Ryan A (2020) Evaluating the migration mortality hypothesis using monarch tagging data. Front Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald D (2016) Human modification for North America. Databasin https://databasin.org/datasets/110a8b7e238444e2ad95b7c17e889b66. Accessed 15 Feb 2018

  • Thogmartin WE, Wiederholt W, Oberhauser K, Drum RG, Diffendorfer JE, Altizer S, Taylor OR, Pleasants J, Semmens D, Semmens B, Erickson R, Libby K, Lopez- Hoffman L (2017) Monarch butterfly population decline in North America: identifying the threatening processes. R Soc Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170760

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tooker JF, Reagel PF, Hanks LM (2002) Nectar sources of day-flying Lepidoptera of central Illinois. Ann Entomol Soc Am 95:84–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy J, Kantola T, Baum KA, Coulson RN (2019) Modeling fall migration pathways and spatially identifying potential migratory hazards for the eastern monarch butterfly. Landsc Ecol 34:443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart FA (1960) The Monarch butterfly. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart FA, Stegner RW (1966) Laboratory techniques for maintaining cultures of the monarch butterfly. J Res Lepid 5:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart FA, Urquhart NR (1978) Autumnal migration routes of the eastern Population of the monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus L.; Lepidoptera) in North America to the overwintering site in the neo-volcanic plateau of Mexico. C J Zool 56:1759–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory website (2020) U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  • USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropland Data Layer (2020) Published crop-specific data layer [Online]. Available at https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  • US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (2020) GIS in Transportation. Available online https://www.gis.fhwa.dot.gov/. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2015) Species occurrence data for the Nation—USGS Biodiversity Information Serving Our Nation (BISON): U.S. Geological Survey General Information Product 160, 1 p.. https://doi.org/10.3133/gip160. Accessed 10 May 2018

  • U.S. Geological Survey, the National Map (2020) Available at https://www.usgs.gov/science-explorer-results?es=The+National+Map. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Project (GAP) (2018), Protected areas database of the United States (PAD-US): U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  • Walton RK, Brower LP, Davis AK (2005) Long-term monitoring and fall migration patterns of the monarch butterfly in Cape May, New Jersey. Ecol Popul Biol 98:682–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong SC, Oksanen A, Mattila ALK, Lehtonen R, Niitepold K, Hanski I (2016) Effects of ambient and preceding temperatures and metabolic genes on flight metabolism in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. J Insect Physiol 85:23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Si Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Prins HHT, Cao L, Boer WFD (2019) Loss of functional connectivity in migration networks induces population decline in migratory birds. Ecol Appl 29:e01960

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Phillip deMaynadier, Frank Drummond, and Joseph Zydlewski for review of the manuscript. Data used in this study are available in datasets listed in Table 1, and model rasters are available in Dryad (https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7sqv9s4vz). Contact B. Boxler for questions about the data. Contact sources indicated in Table 1 for more information about the individual data sets for monarch observations.

Funding

This project was funded by the University of Maine and Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife through the Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. Geological Survey Maine Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (student tuitions and health insurance). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BB gathered data, conducted analysis, wrote initial draft and consolidated input from all authors into final paper, CL co-conceived project, assisted with analysis troubleshooting and decision making, expanded on paper details for increased clarity, WS co-conceived project, assisted with analysis troubleshooting and decision making, expanded on paper details for increased clarity.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon M. Boxler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 33149 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boxler, B.M., Loftin, C.S. & Sutton, W.B. Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Roost Site-Selection Criteria and Locations East of the Appalachian Mountains, U.S.A.. J Insect Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-023-09844-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-023-09844-5

Keywords

Navigation