Abstract
Food collection is a critical component of an individual’s life, and for eusocial insects, the colony that individual foragers support and maintain. Changes to the distribution and composition of food types in the environment are expected influence diet selection if the economics of foraging are altered. For seed-harvesting ants, the abundance and composition of seed types available on the ground typically shows a high degree of spatial and temporal variability, and not all types of seed are equally valued by foragers. We evaluated the response of Owyhee harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex salinus) to reductions in the availability of Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) seeds, a preferred food type, while leaving the availability of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) seeds, a less favored food type, unmanipulated. At control colonies (N = 8), cheatgrass seeds comprised 3.9 ± 1.6% of total seed intake, while Sandberg bluegrass seeds accounted for the remainder of the diet. At colonies where bluegrass was trimmed to prevent new seeds from dropping within 12 m of the nest (N = 8), cheatgrass seed intake increased significantly to 8.2 ± 1.4% of the diet. Despite the uptick in collection of cheatgrass seeds, bluegrass seed collection remained high and very similar between treatment and control colonies. Treatment colonies were significantly more likely than control colonies to have at least one trunk trail that extended beyond the 12 m foraging range of the colony, and ants returning along these trails carried bluegrass seeds but not cheatgrass seeds. These results suggest that when preferred seeds dropped in abundance near nests, the economics of foraging by harvester ants favored a small increase in acceptance of less preferred seeds as well as more distant forays to locate and collect preferred seeds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belchior C, Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2012) Seasonal patterns in the foraging ecology of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex naegelii (Formicidae, Myrmicinae) in a Neotropical savanna: daily rhythms, shifts in granivory and carnivory, and home range. Arthropod-Plant Inte 6:571–582
Bernstein RA (1975) Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density. Ecology 56:213–219
Briese DT, Macauley BJ (1981) Food collection within an ant community in semi-arid Australia, with special reference to seed harvesters. Aust J Ecol 6:1–19
Cochran WG (1954) Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests. Biometrics 10:417–451
Crist TO, Friese CF (1993) The impact of fungi on soil seeds: implications for plants and granivores in a semiarid shrub-steppe. Ecology 74:2231–2239
Crist TO, MacMahon JA (1992) Harvester ant foraging and shrub-steppe seeds: interactions of seed resources and seed use. Ecology 73:1768–1779
Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41
Detrain C, Pasteels JM (2000) Seed preferences of the harvester ant Messor barbarus in a Mediterranean mosaic grassland (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 35:35–48
Detrain C, Tasse O, Versaen M, Pasteels JM (2000) A field assessment of optimal forging in ants: trail patterns and seed retrieval by the European harvester ant Messor barbarus. Insect Soc 47:56–62
Fewell JH (1988) Variation in foraging patterns of the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis, in relation to variation in habitat structure. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Colorado, pp 257–282
Fewell JH, Harrison JF (1991) Flexible seed selection by individual harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:377–384
Flanagan TP, Letendre K, Burnside WR, Fricke GM, Moses ME (2012) Quantifying the effect of colony size and food distribution on harvester ant foraging. PLoS One 7(7):e39427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039427
Gordon DM (1991) Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants. Am Nat 138:379–411
Gordon DM (1995) The development of an ant colony’s foraging range. Anim Behav 49:649–659
Gross CL, Whalen MA, Andrew MH (1991) Seed selection and removal by ants in tropical savanna woodland in northern Australia. J Trop Ecol 7:99–112
Guarino R, Ferrario B, Mossa L (2005) A stochastic model of seed dispersal pattern to assess seed predation by ants in annual dry grasslands. Plant Ecol 178:225–235
Heredia A, Detrain C (2005) Influence of seed size and seed nature on recruitment in the polymorphic harvester ant Messor barbarus. Behav Process 70:289–300
Hickey A, Hollander J, Peacock M (2016) Assessing microhabitat cover and distance effects on harvester ant intraspecific seed preference. J Insect Behav 29:535–547
Holder Bailey K, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia 72:440–448
Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:1–44
Howell BD, Robertson IC (2015) Reclaiming lost territory: the response of Owyhee harvester ants to forager intrusions by neighboring colonies. J Insect Behav 28:722–731
Johnson RA (2000) Seed-harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of North America: an overview of ecology and biogeography. Sociobiology 36:89–122
Kay A (2004) The relative availabilities of complementary resources affect the feeding preferences of ant colonies. Behav Ecol 15:63–70
Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR, Sisson DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds, and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68:327–337
Kerley GIH, Landman M, de Beer S (2010) How do small browsers respond to resource changes? Dietary response of the cape grysbock to clearing alien Acacias. Funct Ecol 24:670–675
MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609
MacMahon JA, Mull JF, Crist TO (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:265–291
Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer I 22:719–748
Mehlhop P, Scott NJ Jr (1983) Temporal patterns of seed use availability in a guild of desert ants. Ecol Entomol 8:69–85
Morehead SA, Feener DH Jr (1998) Foraging behavior and morphology: seed selection in the harvester ant genus, Pogonomyrmex. Oecologia 114:548–555
Mull JF, MacMahon JA (1997) Spatial variation in rates of seed removal by harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) in a shrub-steppe ecosystem. Am Midl Nat 138:1–13
Ostoja SM, Schupp EW, Klinger R (2013) Seed harvesting by a generalist consumer is context dependent: interactive effects across multiple spatial scales. Oikos 122:563–574
Peters M, Oberrath R, Böhning-Gaese K (2003) Seed dispersal by ants: are seed preferences influenced by foraging strategies or historical constraints? Flora 198:413–420
Piemeisel RL (1951) Causes affecting change and rate of change in a vegetation of annuals in Idaho. Ecology 32:53–72
Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J (2010) Influence of seed size on feeding preferences and diet composition of three sympatric harvester ants in the Central Monte Desert, Argentina. Ecol Res 25:439–445
Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J (2011) Seed preferences of three harvester ants of the genus Pogonomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Monte desert: are they reflected in the diet? Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:212–220
Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J, Pol RG, Marone L, Milesi FA (2009) Influence of temporal fluctuations in seed abundance on the diet of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) in the Central Monte desert, Argentina. Austral Ecol 34:908–919
Pol RG, Lopez de Casenave J, Pirk GI (2011) Influence of temporal fluctuations in seed abundance on the foraging behavior of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) in the Central Monte desert, Argentina. Austral Ecol 36:320–328
Schmasow MS, Robertson IC (2016) Selective foraging by Pogonomyrmex salinus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in semiarid grassland: implications for a rare plant. Environ Entomol 45:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvw071
Sih A, Christensen B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Anim Behav 61:379–390
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Taber SW (1998) The world of the harvester ants. Texas A&M University Press, College Station
Weier JA, Feener DH Jr (1995) Foraging in the seed-harvesting ant genus Pogonomyrmex: are energy constraints important? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:291–300
Whitford WG (1978) Foraging in seed-harvester ants Pogonomyrmex spp. Ecology 59:185–189
Wilby A, Shachak M (2000) Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory. Oecologia 125:495–503
Willott SJ, Compton SG, Incoll LD (2000) Foraging, food selection and worker size in the seed harvesting ant Messor bouvieri. Oecologia 125:35–44
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted with funding from the Idaho Army National Guard, United States Fish & Wildlife Service, and Boise State University. We thank Samantha Gardner for assistance with fieldwork, and Julie Heath, Jennifer Forbey and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robertson, I.C., Schmasow, M.S. Modification of Diet and Foraging Range by Harvester Ants in Response to Altered Seed Availability. J Insect Behav 31, 361–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-018-9685-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-018-9685-x