Skip to main content
Log in

Modification of Diet and Foraging Range by Harvester Ants in Response to Altered Seed Availability

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food collection is a critical component of an individual’s life, and for eusocial insects, the colony that individual foragers support and maintain. Changes to the distribution and composition of food types in the environment are expected influence diet selection if the economics of foraging are altered. For seed-harvesting ants, the abundance and composition of seed types available on the ground typically shows a high degree of spatial and temporal variability, and not all types of seed are equally valued by foragers. We evaluated the response of Owyhee harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex salinus) to reductions in the availability of Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) seeds, a preferred food type, while leaving the availability of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) seeds, a less favored food type, unmanipulated. At control colonies (N = 8), cheatgrass seeds comprised 3.9 ± 1.6% of total seed intake, while Sandberg bluegrass seeds accounted for the remainder of the diet. At colonies where bluegrass was trimmed to prevent new seeds from dropping within 12 m of the nest (N = 8), cheatgrass seed intake increased significantly to 8.2 ± 1.4% of the diet. Despite the uptick in collection of cheatgrass seeds, bluegrass seed collection remained high and very similar between treatment and control colonies. Treatment colonies were significantly more likely than control colonies to have at least one trunk trail that extended beyond the 12 m foraging range of the colony, and ants returning along these trails carried bluegrass seeds but not cheatgrass seeds. These results suggest that when preferred seeds dropped in abundance near nests, the economics of foraging by harvester ants favored a small increase in acceptance of less preferred seeds as well as more distant forays to locate and collect preferred seeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belchior C, Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2012) Seasonal patterns in the foraging ecology of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex naegelii (Formicidae, Myrmicinae) in a Neotropical savanna: daily rhythms, shifts in granivory and carnivory, and home range. Arthropod-Plant Inte 6:571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein RA (1975) Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density. Ecology 56:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briese DT, Macauley BJ (1981) Food collection within an ant community in semi-arid Australia, with special reference to seed harvesters. Aust J Ecol 6:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (1954) Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests. Biometrics 10:417–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, Friese CF (1993) The impact of fungi on soil seeds: implications for plants and granivores in a semiarid shrub-steppe. Ecology 74:2231–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, MacMahon JA (1992) Harvester ant foraging and shrub-steppe seeds: interactions of seed resources and seed use. Ecology 73:1768–1779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C, Pasteels JM (2000) Seed preferences of the harvester ant Messor barbarus in a Mediterranean mosaic grassland (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 35:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C, Tasse O, Versaen M, Pasteels JM (2000) A field assessment of optimal forging in ants: trail patterns and seed retrieval by the European harvester ant Messor barbarus. Insect Soc 47:56–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH (1988) Variation in foraging patterns of the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis, in relation to variation in habitat structure. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Colorado, pp 257–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH, Harrison JF (1991) Flexible seed selection by individual harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan TP, Letendre K, Burnside WR, Fricke GM, Moses ME (2012) Quantifying the effect of colony size and food distribution on harvester ant foraging. PLoS One 7(7):e39427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039427

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1991) Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants. Am Nat 138:379–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1995) The development of an ant colony’s foraging range. Anim Behav 49:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross CL, Whalen MA, Andrew MH (1991) Seed selection and removal by ants in tropical savanna woodland in northern Australia. J Trop Ecol 7:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino R, Ferrario B, Mossa L (2005) A stochastic model of seed dispersal pattern to assess seed predation by ants in annual dry grasslands. Plant Ecol 178:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heredia A, Detrain C (2005) Influence of seed size and seed nature on recruitment in the polymorphic harvester ant Messor barbarus. Behav Process 70:289–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey A, Hollander J, Peacock M (2016) Assessing microhabitat cover and distance effects on harvester ant intraspecific seed preference. J Insect Behav 29:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holder Bailey K, Polis GA (1987) Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia 72:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behavior, home range orientation and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell BD, Robertson IC (2015) Reclaiming lost territory: the response of Owyhee harvester ants to forager intrusions by neighboring colonies. J Insect Behav 28:722–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA (2000) Seed-harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of North America: an overview of ecology and biogeography. Sociobiology 36:89–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay A (2004) The relative availabilities of complementary resources affect the feeding preferences of ant colonies. Behav Ecol 15:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR, Sisson DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds, and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68:327–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerley GIH, Landman M, de Beer S (2010) How do small browsers respond to resource changes? Dietary response of the cape grysbock to clearing alien Acacias. Funct Ecol 24:670–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon JA, Mull JF, Crist TO (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): their community and ecosystem influences. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer I 22:719–748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlhop P, Scott NJ Jr (1983) Temporal patterns of seed use availability in a guild of desert ants. Ecol Entomol 8:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morehead SA, Feener DH Jr (1998) Foraging behavior and morphology: seed selection in the harvester ant genus, Pogonomyrmex. Oecologia 114:548–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mull JF, MacMahon JA (1997) Spatial variation in rates of seed removal by harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex occidentalis) in a shrub-steppe ecosystem. Am Midl Nat 138:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostoja SM, Schupp EW, Klinger R (2013) Seed harvesting by a generalist consumer is context dependent: interactive effects across multiple spatial scales. Oikos 122:563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters M, Oberrath R, Böhning-Gaese K (2003) Seed dispersal by ants: are seed preferences influenced by foraging strategies or historical constraints? Flora 198:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piemeisel RL (1951) Causes affecting change and rate of change in a vegetation of annuals in Idaho. Ecology 32:53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J (2010) Influence of seed size on feeding preferences and diet composition of three sympatric harvester ants in the Central Monte Desert, Argentina. Ecol Res 25:439–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J (2011) Seed preferences of three harvester ants of the genus Pogonomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Monte desert: are they reflected in the diet? Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirk GI, Lopez de Casenave J, Pol RG, Marone L, Milesi FA (2009) Influence of temporal fluctuations in seed abundance on the diet of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) in the Central Monte desert, Argentina. Austral Ecol 34:908–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pol RG, Lopez de Casenave J, Pirk GI (2011) Influence of temporal fluctuations in seed abundance on the foraging behavior of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) in the Central Monte desert, Argentina. Austral Ecol 36:320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmasow MS, Robertson IC (2016) Selective foraging by Pogonomyrmex salinus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in semiarid grassland: implications for a rare plant. Environ Entomol 45:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvw071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Christensen B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail? Anim Behav 61:379–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging: behavior and ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber SW (1998) The world of the harvester ants. Texas A&M University Press, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Weier JA, Feener DH Jr (1995) Foraging in the seed-harvesting ant genus Pogonomyrmex: are energy constraints important? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG (1978) Foraging in seed-harvester ants Pogonomyrmex spp. Ecology 59:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby A, Shachak M (2000) Harvester ant response to spatial and temporal heterogeneity in seed availability: pattern in the process of granivory. Oecologia 125:495–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willott SJ, Compton SG, Incoll LD (2000) Foraging, food selection and worker size in the seed harvesting ant Messor bouvieri. Oecologia 125:35–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with funding from the Idaho Army National Guard, United States Fish & Wildlife Service, and Boise State University. We thank Samantha Gardner for assistance with fieldwork, and Julie Heath, Jennifer Forbey and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C. Robertson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robertson, I.C., Schmasow, M.S. Modification of Diet and Foraging Range by Harvester Ants in Response to Altered Seed Availability. J Insect Behav 31, 361–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-018-9685-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-018-9685-x

Keywords

Navigation