Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible seed selection by individual harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Individual seed harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex) have been shown to specialize on specific seed types. We examined possible mechanisms for seed specialization and tested whether fidelity to food type limits the foraging decisions of individual western harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. The seed selection regimes of individually marked ants foraging at piles of two seed types were described and related to differences in seed quality and colonial dietary history. Individual foraging choices were affected by multiple factors, including seed caloric rewards, the previous seed selected, and the dietary history of the colony. Individual seed choices generally converged on the most energetically profitable species, suggesting that foragers exhibit labile preference. However, for a portion of the foragers, seed specialization was also partially due to constancy, defined as a tendency to select seed species that were previously collected. When colonies were presented with one seed type for 1 h and then were offered a mix of that seed and a novel seed type, individuals showed a strong preference for the novel seeds. Such rapid changes in seed preference argue strongly that individual P. occidentalis ants are highly flexible in seed choice and that resource assessment by these ants is more complex than simple maximization of net energetic return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateman A (1951) The taxonomic discrimination of bees. Heredity 5:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD, Fewell JF, Moore AJ, Williams K (1987) Graded recruitment in a ponerine ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:407–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherrett JM (1972) Chemical aspects of plant attack by leaf-cutting ants. In: Harbourne J (ed) Phytochemical ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1876) On the effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH (1988a) Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH (1988b) Variation in the foraging patterns of the ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis in relation to variation in habitat structure. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH (1990) Directional fidelity as a foraging constraint in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Oecologia 82:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976) The foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecol Monogr 46:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) ‘Majoring’ and ‘minoring’ by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Rissing SW (1990) Comparative learning and memory of two sympatric seed-harvester ants. In: Veeresh GK, Mallik B, Viraktamath CA (eds) Social insects and the environment. Proc 11th Int Congr IUSSI. Oxford and IBH, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR, Sisson DV (1986) Native seed preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the relationships of seed attributes and seed use. Oecologia 68:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverty TM (1980) The flower-visiting behaviour of bumblebees: floral complexity and learning. Can J Zool 58:1324–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis AC (1986) Memory constraints and flower choice in Pieris rapae. Science 232:863–865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis AC (1989) Flower visit consistency in Pieris rapae, the cabbage butterfly. J Anim Ecol 58:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littledyke M, Cherrett JM (1975) Variability in the selection of substrate by the leaf-cutting ants Atta cephalotes (L.) and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) (Formicidae, Attini). Bull Entomol Res 65:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel DA, Neal TM (1972) Observations of foraging behavior of southern harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex badius. Fla Entomol 55:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Monogr Popul Biol 12. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1971) The measurement and application of the calorie to ecological problems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW (1981) Foraging specializations of individual seed-harvester ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Pollock GB (1984) Worker size variability and foraging efficiency in Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Wheeler J (1976) Foraging responses of Veromessor pergandei to changes in seed production (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pan-Pacif Entomol 52:63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherz H, Kloos G (1981) Food composition and nutrition tables 1981/82 (Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Lebensmittelchemie). Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1984) Individually different foraging methods in the desert ant Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor F (1977) Foraging behavior in ants: experiments with two species of myrmecine ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traneillo JFA (1987) Individual and social modification of behavior in response to environmental factors in ants. In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA (1988) Variation in foraging behavior among workers of the ant Formica schaufussi: ecological correlates of search behavior and the modification of search pattern. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Traneillo JFA (1989) Foraging strategies of ants. Annu Rev Entomol 34:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA, Fujita MS, Bowen RV (1984) Ant foraging behavior: ambient temperature influences prey selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1986) Flower constancy: definition, cause, and measurement. Am Nat 127:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells H, Wells PH (1983) Honeybee foraging: optimal diet, minimal uncertainty, or individual constancy behaviour? J Anim Ecol 52:829–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Offprint requests to: J.H. Fewell at the current address

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fewell, J.H., Harrison, J.F. Flexible seed selection by individual harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28, 377–384 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164118

Keywords

Navigation