Skip to main content
Log in

Calling and Duetting Behavior in the Leafhopper Balclutha incisa (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae): Opportunity for Female Choice?

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male Balclutha incisa (Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) produces substrate-borne signals as well as sounds produced by wing fluttering. Males produce 6 signal types that are associated with different behavioral activities: (i) cleaning, (ii) calling, (iii) precopulatory, (iv) copulation, (v) postcopulatory behavior, and (vi) aggression. Within each category signals have a high degree of stereotypy in regard to their temporal structure. Females produce two kinds of signals: (i) a duetting signal in response to the male, and (ii) an introductory or preparatory signal before the main signal. The sexes duet, with the female placing its signal immediately after the first two components of the male’s call, with an interval of some 136 ms. We discuss the role of the male calls in attracting females and the importance of the duet in maintaining a temporary pair-bond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. D. (1967). Acoustic communication in Arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 12:449–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, W. J. (1991). Mate finding: selection on sensory cues. In Bailey, W. J., and Ridsdill-Smith, J. (eds.), Reproductive Behaviour of Insects, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 42–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, W. J. (2003). Insect duets: Underlying mechanisms and their evolution. Physiol. Entomol. 28:157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, W., and M. Nuhardiyati (in press). Copulation, the dynamics of sperm transfer and female refractoriness in the leafhopper Balclutha incisa (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae). Physiol. Entomol.

  • Bennet-Clark, H. C., and Young, D. (1992). A model of the mechanism of sound production in cicadas. J. Exp. Biol. 173:123–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, C. J. H. (1982). Biosystematics of the Muellerianella complex (Homoptera, Delphacidae) interspecific and geographic variation in acoustic behaviour. Z. Tierpsychol. 58:31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, M. F. (1983). Acoustic signals and species problems in the Auchenorrhyncha. In Knight, W. J., Pant, N. C., Robertson, T. S., and Wilson, M. R. (eds.), Proceedings of the first International Workshop on Biotaxonomy, Classification and Biology of Leafhoppers (Auchenorrhyncha) of Economic Importance, CIE, London, pp. 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, M. F. (1985a). Acoustic behavior of leafhoppers and planthoppers: Species problems and speciation. In Nault, L. R, and Rodriguez, J. G. (eds.), The Leafhoppers and Planthoppers, Wiley, London, pp. 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, M. F. (1985b). Acoustic signals in the Homoptera: behavior, taxonomy, and evolution. Ann. Rev. Entornol. 30:297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft, R. B., Tieu, T. D., Hoy, R. R., and Miles, R. N. (2000). Directionality in the mechanical response to substrate vibration in a treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Umbonia crassicornis). J. Comp. Physiol. A 186:695–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H. C. (1991). Female mate choice in treefrogs: Static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42:615–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, M. C. (1992). Variation in acoustic signals within and among leafhopper species of the genus Alebra (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, M. D. (2002) Signalers and Receivers: Mechanisms and Evolution of Arthropod Communication, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, S. E., and Denno, R. F. (1991). Reproductive isolation in Prokelisia planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae): Acoustic differentiation and hybridization failure. J. Insect Behav. 4:367–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, K.G., and von Helversen, D.(1993). Calling behaviour in bushcrickets of the genus Poecilimon with differing communication systems (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidea, Phaneropteridae). J. Insect Behav. 6:361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, T. (1976). Mutual communication by substrate vibrations in the mating behavior of planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 11:8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, T. (1979). Studies on the mating behavior of the four species of Auchenorrhynchous Homoptera which attack the rice plant. Mem. Fac. Agric. Kagawa Univ. 34:1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, T., and Ishii, S. (1974). Mating signal of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stal (Homoptera: Delphacidae): Vibration of the substrate. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 9:196–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, H. (1982). Species-specific calling sounds as a reproductive isolating mechanism in Nephotettix spp. (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 17:253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, W. J. (1987). Leaflioppers of the grass-feeding genus Baldutha (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in the Pacific region. J. Nat. Hist. 21:1173–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuhardiyati, M., and W. J. Bailey (in press). The biology and natural enemies of the leafhopper Baldutha incisa (Matsumura) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) in south western Australia. Austr. J. Entomol.

  • Nuhardiyati, M. (1998). The Mating System of the Leafhopper Baldutha incisa (Matsumura) (Cicadellidae: Auchenorrhyncha: Hemiptera), PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia.

  • Ott, J. R. (1994). An ecological framework for the study of planthopper mating systems. In Denno, R. F., and Perfect, T. J. (eds.), Planthoppers: Their Ecology and Management, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (1990). Acoustic communication between the sexes. In Bailey, W. J., and Rentz, D. C. F. (eds.), The Tettigoniidae: Biology, Systematics and Evolution, Crawford House Press, Bathurst, pp. 112–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K. N., and Kumar, H. (1984). Acoustic communication inthe sexual behaviour of the leafhopper, Amrasca devastans. Physiol. Entomol. 9:77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. W. (2002). Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in Insects, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijer, P. W. F. de. (1984). Variability in calling signals of the planthopper Javesella pellucida (F.) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) in relation to temperature, and consequences for species recognition during distant communication. Netherlands J. Zool. 34:388–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. S., and Stefano, J. D. (1991). Vibratory signals enhance mate-guarding in a water strider (Hemiptera: Gerridae). J. Inect. Behav. 4:43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, U., Rheinlacnder, J., and Robinson, D. (1989). Cues for male phonotaxis in the duetting bushcricket Leptophyes puctissima. J. Comp. Physiol. A 16:621–628.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winston Bailey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuhardiyati, M., Bailey, W. Calling and Duetting Behavior in the Leafhopper Balclutha incisa (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae): Opportunity for Female Choice?. J Insect Behav 18, 259–280 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-0479-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-0479-6

Keywords

Navigation