Skip to main content
Log in

Conjectured Metastable Super-explosives Formed Under High Pressure for Thermonuclear Ignition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If matter is suddenly put under a high pressure, for example, a pressure of 100 Mb = 1014 dyn/cm2, it can undergo a transformation into molecular excited states, bound by inner electron shells, with keV potential wells for the electrons. If this happens, the electrons can under the emission of X-rays go into the groundstate of the molecule formed under the high pressure. At a pressure of the order ∼1014 dyn/cm2, these molecules store in their excited states an energy with an energy density of the order ∼1014 erg/cm3, about 1,000 times larger than for combustible chemicals under normal pressures. Furthermore, with the much larger optical path length of keV photons compared to the path length of eV photons, these superexplosives can reach at their surface an energy flux density (c = 3 × 1010 cm/s) of the order (c/3) × 1014 = 1024 erg/cm2s = 1017W/cm2, large enough for the ignition of thermonuclear reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.E. Kidder, Physics of High Energy Density (Academic Press, 1971), p. 306

  2. F. Winterberg, Physics of High Energy Density (Academic Press, 1971), p. 397

  3. C. Maisonnier, Il Nuovo Cimento 426, 332 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Winterberg, J. Nucl. Energy Part C, 8, 541 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Guderley, Luftfahrtforschung, 19, 302 (1942)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Müller, J. Rafelski, W. Greiner, Phys. Lett. 47B(1), 5 (1973)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R.W. Pohl, Optik, vol. 208 (Springer, 1940)

  8. M. Schwarzschild, Structure and Evolution of the Stars (Princeton University Press, 1958), p. 44

  9. T.W.L. Sanford, T.J. Nash, R.C. Mock, R.B. Spielman, K.W. Struve, J.H. Hammer, J.S. De Groot, K.G. Whitney, J.P. Apruzese, Phys. Plasmas 69, 02188 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Deeney, M.R. Douglas, R.B. Spielman, T.J. Nash, D.L. Peterson, P. L’Eplattenier, G.A. Chandler, J.F. Seamen, K.W. Struve, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4883–4886 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y.K. Bae, Y.Y. Chu, L. Friedman, Phys. Rev. 54, R1742 (1995)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The idea presented in this paper, first considered in 1974, was stimulated by the paper of B. Müller, J. Rafelski, and W. Greiner, and I acknowledge the very useful conversation I had at that time with Dr. Rafelski in Frankfurt, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Winterberg.

Appendix: The Quantum Mechanical Eigenvalues of Two-atom Molecule Two-center Configurations

Appendix: The Quantum Mechanical Eigenvalues of Two-atom Molecule Two-center Configurations

This is the extension of the Heitler–London theory for the chemical bonding of two hydrogen atoms to heavier elements. It is fortunate that this problem has already been solved to predict the outcome of heavy atom collisions, and one can simply use the results obtained [6]. Because in the collision of the heaviest atoms, the effective two center electric charge can exceed the critical value Zcrit = 137, above which vacuum breakdown begins to set in, one has here to use the two center Dirac equation for an electron of mass M in the field of two electric charges located at –R and R:

$$ [c\varvec{\alpha}\cdot {\mathbf{p}}+ \varvec{\beta}\hbox{Mc}^{2}-\hbox{E}+\hbox{V}_{1}({\mathbf{r-R}})+\hbox{V}_{2}({\mathbf{r+R}})] \Uppsi=0.$$
(A.1)

Introducing prolate spheroidal coordinates ξ, η, φ, one has with the z-axis going from −R to R:

$$ \left. {\begin{array}{l} \hbox{x}=\hbox{R}\left[{\left({\xi^{2}-1}\right)\left({1-\eta ^{2}}\right)}\right]^{1/2}\cos \varphi \\ \hbox{y}=\hbox{R}\left[{\left({\xi^{2}-1}\right)\left({1-\eta ^{2}}\right)}\right]^{1/2}\sin \varphi \\ \hbox{z}=\hbox{R}\xi \eta \\ \end{array}}\right\} $$
(A.2)

With m + 1/2 the angular momentum around the z-axis, the φ dependence in (A.1) can be separated setting

$$ \Uppsi\left({\mathbf{r}}\right)=\left({{\begin{array}{llll} {e^{im\varphi }}& & & \\ & {e^{i(m+1)\varphi }}& & \\ & & {ie^{im\varphi }}& \\ & & & {ie^{i(m+1)\varphi }} \\ \end{array} }} \right){\psi }'(\xi,\eta) $$
(A.3)

resulting in

$$ \left[{\frac{\hbar c}{R\left({\xi ^{2}-\eta ^{2}}\right)}\left({{\begin{array}{llll} 0& 0& {\pi _z }& {\pi ^{-}} \\ 0& 0& {\pi ^{+}}& {-\pi _z } \\ {-\pi _z }& {-\pi ^{-}}& 0& 0 \\ {-\pi ^{+}}& {\pi _z }& 0& 0 \\ \end{array}}}\right)+\beta\hbox{M}c^{2}-\hbox{E}+V_1\left(\xi+\eta\right)+V_2 \left(\xi-\eta\right)}\right]\psi^{\prime} (\xi,\eta)=0 $$
(A.4)

where

$$ \left. {\begin{array}{l} \pi^{+}=\hbox{W}\left({\xi \frac{\partial }{\partial \xi} -\eta \frac{\partial }{\partial \eta }} \right)-\frac{m}{\hbox{W}}\left({\xi ^{2}-\eta ^{2}} \right) \\ \pi^{-}=\hbox{W}\left({\xi \frac{\partial }{\partial \xi }-\eta \frac{\partial }{\partial \eta }} \right)+\frac{m+1}{\hbox{W}}\left({\xi ^{2}-\eta ^{2}} \right) \\ \pi_z =\eta \left({\xi ^{2}-1} \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial \xi }+\xi \left({1-\eta ^{2}} \right)\frac{\partial }{\partial \eta } \\ \hbox{W}=\left[ {\left({\xi ^{2}-1} \right)\left({1-\eta ^{2}} \right)} \right]^{1/2} \\ \end{array}} \right\} $$
(A.5)

Equation A.4 is separable in a ξ and η dependence setting

$$ \Uppsi _{nls}^m \left({\xi,\eta } \right)=\left({\xi ^{2}-1} \right)^{{\left({m+\varepsilon _s } \right)}/2}\hbox{ }\times \hbox{ }\exp \left({-\frac{\xi -1}{a}} \right)\hbox{L}_n^{m+\varepsilon _s} \left({\frac{\xi -1}{a}} \right)P_l^{m+\varepsilon _s} \left(\eta \right)\chi _s $$
(A.6)

where L αi and P αi are the associated Laguerre and Legendre polynomials. In Eq. A.6, a is a scaling factor, not affecting the energy eigenvalue E. Furthermore, χ s are the unit spin vectors, ɛ s  = 0 for s odd and ɛ s  = 1 for s even. Inserting (A.6) into (A.4), one obtains the energy eigenvalues. As noticed by Muller et al. [6], the energy eigenvalues exhibit a “run way” toward distances of separation of the order 103 fm, which is an indication of the potential well in Fig. 3.

If the two atoms just touch each other without the application of an external pressure, one can approximately set for their distance of separation 1 Angström = 105 fm. Under the high pressure of 1014 dyn/cm2, their mutual distance of separation is reduced from 105 fm down to 5 × 104fm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winterberg, F. Conjectured Metastable Super-explosives Formed Under High Pressure for Thermonuclear Ignition. J Fusion Energ 27, 250–255 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-008-9143-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-008-9143-4

Key Words

Navigation