Advertisement

Poverty dynamics and graduation from conditional cash transfers: a transition model for Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera program

  • Juan M. VillaEmail author
  • Miguel Niño-Zarazúa
Open Access
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The effects of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) on poverty and well-being have been widely studied. However, there is limited knowledge on how a CCT should respond to the dynamics of poverty. How should program administrators treat beneficiaries that exit poverty in period t-1, but exhibit a high probability of falling into poverty in period t? This is a relevant, yet unanswered question. This paper provides an analysis of the implications of poverty dynamics in the implementation of graduation strategies of CCTs, taking Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera (POP) program as reference case. We propose a Markovian transition model that allows to control for unobserved heterogeneity, state dependence, and attrition. The model provides a framework for a generic graduation condition that can be applied to cash transfer programs that follow well-defined eligibility income thresholds. Overall, we find that only one-third of program beneficiaries that were poor in 2002 exhibited low probabilities of becoming poor in 2009–12 and therefore could be regarded as true ‘graduates’ of the program. We also find that the ‘recertification’ process of POP—which takes place every three years—would be more efficient if it took place every 3.7 and 5.1 years in urban and rural areas, respectively.

Keywords

Poverty dynamics Conditional cash transfers Markovian models Mexico 
Download to read the full article text

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Armando Barrientos, Finn Tarp, Tony Addison, Jukka Pirttilä, Saurabh Singhal, and participants at the internal seminars of UNU-WIDER in Helsinki and the 22nd Annual Meeting of the LACEA/IADB/World Bank/UNDP Research Network on Inequality and Poverty, in Santiago, Chile, for their useful comments on earlier versions of this paper. We gratefully acknowledge funding from UNU-WIDER. All the errors are ours.

References

  1. Accion Social: El Camino Recorrido: Diez Años Familias en Acción. Agencvia Presidencial para la Accion Social y la Cooperacion Internacional. Departmento Nacional de Planeacion, Bogotá, Colombia. Document available at: http://www.bivica.org/upload/familias-accion.pdf (2010)
  2. Álvarez, C., Devoto, F., Winters, P.: Why do beneficiaries leave the safety net in Mexico? A study of the effects of conditionality on dropouts. World Dev. 36(4), 641–658 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alzúa, M.L., Cruces, G., Ripani, L.: Welfare programs and labor supply in developing countries: experimental evidence from Latin America. J. Popul. Econ. 26(4), 1255–1284 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrén, T.: The Persistence of Welfare Participation, IZA Discussion Paper No. 3100. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Angelucci, M., Attanasio, O., Di Maro, V.: The impact of oportunidades on consumption, savings and transfers*. Fisc. Stud. 33, 305–334 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antel, J.J.: The intergenerational transfer of welfare dependency: some statistical evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat. 74(3), 467–473 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azariadis, C., Stachurski, J.: Poverty traps. In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S.N (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, pp. 295–384. Elsevier (2005)Google Scholar
  8. Bane, M.J., Ellwood, D.T.: Welfare Realities: from Rhetoric to Reform. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  9. Barrett, A., McCarthy, Y.: Immigrants and welfare programs: exploring the interactions between immigrant characteristics, immigrant welfare dependence, and welfare policy. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 24(3), 542–559 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrientos, A.: Human Development Income Transfers in the Longer Term. IPC-IG Working Paper No. 116. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, Brasilia (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Barrientos, A., Villa, J.M.: Antipoverty transfers and labour market outcomes: regression discontinuity design findings. J. Dev. Stud. 51(9), 1224–1240 (2015a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrientos, A, Villa, JM: Evaluating antipoverty transfer programs in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Better Policies? Better Politics? J. Glob. Dev. (6) 147 (2015b)Google Scholar
  13. Barrientos, A., Niño-Zarazúa, M.: CPRC Report: Social Transfers and Chronic Poverty: Objectives, Design, Reach and Impact. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Manchester (2011)Google Scholar
  14. Barrientos, A., Debowicz, D., Woolard, I.: Heterogeneity in Bolsa Família outcomes. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 62, 33–40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bastagli, F.: From Social Safety Net to Social Policy? The Role of Conditional Cash Transfers in Welfare State Development in Latin America. IPC-IG Workng Paper No 60. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, Brasilia (2009)Google Scholar
  16. Battisti, D.S., Naylor, R.L.: Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science 323(5911), 240–244 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baulch, B.: Overview: poverty dynamics and persistence in Asia and Africa. In: Why Poverty Persists: Poverty Dynamics in Asia and Africa, pp. 1–28. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Behrman, J.R., Fernald, L., Gertler, P., Neufeld, L.M., Parker, S.: Longer-Run Effects After Almost a Decade on Child Development, Education and Nutrition of Exposure of Infants and Toddlers to Oportunidades in 1998–9. Evaluacion del Programa del Programa de Desarrollo Humano Oportunidades 2007–2008. Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico City (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Biewen, M.: Measuring state dependence in individual poverty histories when there is feedback to employment status and household composition. J. Appl. Econ. 24, 1095–1116 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Blank, R.M.: Analyzing the length of welfare spells. J. Public Econ. 39(3), 245–273 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blume, K., Verner, M.: Welfare dependency among Danish immigrants. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 23(2), 453–471 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Farrugia, N., Vella, S.: Economic vulnerability and resilience: concepts and measurements. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 37, 229–247 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bryan, G., Chowdhury, S., Mobarak, A.M.: Underinvestment in a profitable technology: the case of seasonal migration in Bangladesh. Econometrica 82, 1671–1748 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Calvo, C., Dercon, S.: Vulnerability to individual and aggregate poverty. Soc. Choice Welf. 41(4), 721–740 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Canavire Bacarreza, G.J., Vasquez-Ruiz, H.: Labour Supply Effects of Conditional Transfers: Analyzing the Dominican Republic’S Solidarity Program. Documentos de Trabajo Economia y Finanzas 13-08. Centro de Investigaciones Economicas y Financieras, Medellin (2013)Google Scholar
  26. Cappellari, L., Jenkins, S.P.: Who stays poor? Who becomes poor? Evidence from the british household panel survey. Econ. J. 112(478), C60–C67 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cappellari, L., Jenkins, S.P.: Modelling low income transitions. J. Appl. Economet. 19, 593–610 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carter, M.R., Little, P.D., Mogues, T., Negatu, W.: Poverty traps and natural disasters in Ethiopia and Honduras. World Dev. 35(5), 835–856 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cecchini, S., Madariaga, A.: Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: the Recent Experience in Latin America and the Caribbean. Cuadernos de la CEPAL No. 95. ECLAC, Santiago (2011)Google Scholar
  30. Chaudhuri, S., Jalan, J., Suryahadi, A.: Assessing Household Vulnerability to Poverty from Cross-Sectional Data: a Methodology and Estimates from Indonesia, Department of Economics Discussion Papers No. 0102-52. Columbia University, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  31. Chevalier, A., Harmon, C., O’Sullivan, V., Walker, I.: The impact of parental income and education on the schooling of their children. IZA J. Labor Econ. 2, 1–22 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coady, D.P., Parker, S.W.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of demand- and supply-side education interventions: the case of PROGRESA in Mexico. Rev. Dev. Econ. 8(3), 440–451 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Coady, D., Parker, S.: Targeting Social Transfers to the Poor in Mexico, IMF Working Paper No. 09/60. International Monetary Fund, D.C. (2009)Google Scholar
  34. CONEVAL: Evolución de la Pobreza en México. Consejo Nacional de Evaluacion de la Politica de Desarrollo Social, Mexico City (2009)Google Scholar
  35. Darity, W., Myers, S.L.: Changes in black family structure: implications for welfare dependency. Am. Econ. Rev. 73(2), 59–64 (1983)Google Scholar
  36. Das, J., Do, Q.-T., Ozler, B.: Reassessing conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Res. Obs. 20(1), 1–28 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Davis, P.: Poverty in time. Exploring poverty dynamics from life history interviews in Bangladesh. In: Addison, T., Hulme, D., Ravi Kanbur, S. M. (eds.) Poverty Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  38. Dercon, S., Krishnan, P.: In sickness and in health: risk sharing within households in rural Ethiopia. J. Polit. Econ. 108, 688–727 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fortin, B., Lacroix, G., Drolet, S.: Welfare benefits and the duration of welfare spells: evidence from a natural experiment in Canada. J. Public Econ. 88(7), 1495–1520 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Foster, J., Dutta, I., Mishra, A.: On Measuring Vulnerability to Poverty. Working Papers 2010–13. The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy (2010)Google Scholar
  41. Galasso, E.: With their effort and one opportunity: alleviating extreme poverty in Chile. Unpublished manuscript, World Bank, Washington DC (2006)Google Scholar
  42. Gaiha, R., Imai, K.: Vulnerability, shocks and persistence of poverty: estimates for semi-arid rural South India. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 32, 261–281 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gertler, P.: Do conditional cash transfers improve child health? Evidence from PROGRESA’s control randomized experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. (94), 336–341 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. González-Flores, M., Heracleous, M., Winters, P.: Leaving the safety net: an analysis of dropouts in an urban conditional cash transfer program. World Dev. 40 (12), 2505–2521 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gottschalk, P.: The intergenerational transmission of welfare participation: Facts and possible causes. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 11(2), 254–272 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A.: Simulation-Based Econometric Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York (1996)Google Scholar
  47. Hansen, L, Liu, Z: State dependence in social assistance receipt in Canada. In: Carcillo, I., Jenkins, SP, Tatsiramos, K. (eds.) Safety Nets and Benefit Dependence, Research in Labor Economics, vol. 39. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 81–105 (2014)Google Scholar
  48. Harris, K. M.: Work and welfare among single mothers in poverty. Am. J. Sociol. 99(2), 317–352 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harttgen, K., Günther, I.: Estimating vulnerability to covariate and idiosyncratic shocks, Ibero America Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Papers No. 154. Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research (2007)Google Scholar
  50. Heckman, J.J.: Heterogeneity and state dependence. In: Rosen, S. (ed.) Studies in Labor Markets, pp. 91–140. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1981)Google Scholar
  51. Heckman, J.J., Borjas, G.J.: Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica, New Series 47, 247–283 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hoddinott, J., Skoufias, E.: The impact of PROGRESA on food consumption. Econ. Dev. Cult. Chang. 53, 37–61 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hoddinott, J., Maluccio, J.A., Behrman, J.R., Flores, R., Martorell, R.: Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. Lancet 371, 411–416 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoynes, H., MaCurdy, T.: Has the decline in benefits shortened welfare spells? Am. Econ. Rev. 84(2), 43–48 (1994)Google Scholar
  55. Hu, W.-Y.: Child support, welfare dependency, and women’s labor supply. J. Hum. Resour. 34(1), 71–103 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hulme, D., Shepherd, A.: Conceptualizing chronic poverty. World Dev. 31, 403–424 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ibarrarán, P., Medellín, N., Regalia, F., Stampini, M., Parodi, S., Tejerina, L., Cueva, P., Vásquez, M.: How Conditional Cash Transfers Work? Inter-American Development Bank, Washington (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. INEGI: Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares 2012 ENIGH Nueva construcción de ingresos y gastos Diseño conceptual y definición de categorías y variables. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Aguascalientes (2013)Google Scholar
  59. Ivanic, M., Martin, W., Zaman, H.: Estimating the short-run poverty impacts of the 2010–11 surge in food prices. World Dev. 40(11), 2302–2317 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jaeger, D.A., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Bonin, H.: Direct evidence on risk attitudes and migration. Rev. Econ. Stat. 92, 684–689 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jalan, J., Ravallion, M.: Is transient poverty different? Evidence for rural China. J. Dev. Stud. 36, 82–99 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jenkins, S.P.: Changing Fortunes: Income Mobility and Poverty Dynamics in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kanbur, R., Keen, M., Tuomala, M.: Labor supply and targeting in poverty alleviation programs. World Bank Econ. Rev. 8, 191–211 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kugler, A.D., Rojas, I.: Do CCTs improve employment and earnings in the very long-term? Evidence from Mexico, NBER Working Paper No. 24248. National Bureau of Economic Research (2018)Google Scholar
  65. Levy, S.: Progress Against Poverty: Sustaining Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades Program. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  66. Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S.: Raising children to work hard: altruism, work norms, and social insurance*. Q. J. Econ. 121(4), 1473–1503 (2006)Google Scholar
  67. Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., Weibull, J.W.: Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state*. Q. J. Econ. 114(1), 1–35 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lopez, R., Schiff, M: Migration and the skill composition of the labour force: the impact of trade liberalization in LDCs. Can. J. Econ./Revue Canadienne d’Economique 31(2), 318–336 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lundborg, P., Nilsson, A., Rooth, D.: Parental education and offspring outcomes: evidence from the Swedish compulsory school reform. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 6, 253–278 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Maloney, T., Maani, S., Pacheco, G.: Intergenerational welfare participation in New Zealand. Aust. Econ. Pap. 42(3), 346–362 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mayda, A.M.: International migration: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. J. Popul. Econ. 23, 1249–1274 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McKenzie, D.: Beyond remittances: the effects of migration on mexican households. In: International Migration, Remittances and the Brain Drain, McMillan and Palgrave, pp. 123–147 (2005)Google Scholar
  73. McKenzie, D., Stillman, S., Gibson, J.: How important is selection? Experimental vs. non-experimental measures of the income gains from migration. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 8(4), 913–945 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00544.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. MIDEPLAN: Trayectorias Familiares al Egreso del Programa Puente. Santiago de Chile (2009)Google Scholar
  75. Moav, O.: Cheap children and the persistence of poverty. Econ. J. 115, 88–110 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Moffitt, R.: Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: a review. J. Econ. Lit. 30(1), 1–61 (1992)Google Scholar
  77. Munro, L.: Risks, needs and rights: compatible or contradictory bases for social protection. In: Barrientos, A., Hulme, D. (eds.) Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics, pp. 27–46. Palgrave, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  78. Naude, W., Santos-Paulino, A., McGillivray, M.: Measuring vulnerability: an overview and introduction. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 37, 183–191 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Narayan-Parker, D., Pritchett, L., Kapoor, S.: Moving Out of Poverty, vol. 2. Palgrave; World Bank, New York; Basingstoke (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Neidhöfer, G., Niño-Zarazúa, M.: The long(er)-term effects of a conditional cash transfer on children’s human capital. The case of Chile Solidario. WIDER Working Papers 201, Helsinki (2017)Google Scholar
  81. Nino-Zarazua, M.: Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades and the emergence of Social Assistance in Latin America. BWPI Working Paper Series No. 14211. Brooks World Poverty Institute, The University of Manchester (2011)Google Scholar
  82. Parker, S.W., Todd, P.E.: Conditional cash transfers: the case of progresa/oportunidades. J. Econ. Lit. 55(3), 866–915 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Penman, R.: Psychosocial factors and intergenerational transmission of welfare dependency: a review of the literature. Australian Social Policy 85–107 (2006)Google Scholar
  84. Robins, P.K.: Child support, welfare dependency, and poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 76(4), 768–788 (1986)Google Scholar
  85. Rubalcava, L., Teruel, G.: The Mexican family life survey project (MxFLS): study design and baseline results. Documento de trabajo. Centro de Investigacion y Desarrollo Economico and Universidad Ibero-Americana (2004)Google Scholar
  86. Schmidt, L., Weisner, C., Wiley, J.: Substance abuse and the course of welfare dependency. Am. J. Public Health 88(11), 1616–1622 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. SEDESOL: Reglas de Operación del Programa de Desarrollo Humano, Oportunidades para el Ejercicio Fiscal 2014, Diario Oficial. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (2013)Google Scholar
  88. Sen, A.: The political economy of targeting. In: Public Spending and the Poor. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1995)Google Scholar
  89. Skoufias, E.: The Poverty and Welfare Impacts of Climate Change: Quantifying the Effects, Identifying the Adaptation Strategies. World Bank Publications, Washington DC (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Skoufias, E., Di Maro, V.: Conditional cash transfers, adult work incentives, and poverty. J. Dev. Stud. 44(7), 935–960 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Skoufias, E., Davis, B., Behrman, J. R.: An Evaluation of the Selection of the Beneficiary Households in the Education, Health, and Nutrition Program (PROGRESA) of Mexico. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division. International Food Policy Research Institute (1999)Google Scholar
  92. Skoufias, E., Davis, B., de la Vega, S.: Targeting the poor in Mexico: an evaluation of the selection of households into PROGRESA. World Dev. 29(10), 1769–1784 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thomas, D., Witoelar, F., Frankenberg, E., Sikoki, B., Strauss, J., Sumantri, C., Suriastini, W.: Cutting the costs of attrition: results from the Indonesia Family Life Survey. J. Dev. Econ. Symposium on Measurement and Survey Design 98, 108–123 (2012)Google Scholar
  94. Weissberg, N.C.: Intergenerational welfare dependency: a critical review. Social Problems 18(2), 257–274 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhang, Y., Wan, G.: How precisely can we estimate vulnerability to poverty? Oxf. Dev. Stud. 37, 277–287 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© UNU-WIDER 2018
corrected publication 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Development Institute, University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER)HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations