Abstract
Let N be an n-dimensional compact riemannian manifold, with \(n\ge 2\). In this paper, we prove that for any \(\alpha \in [0,n]\), the set consisting of homeomorphisms on N with lower and upper metric mean dimensions equal to \(\alpha \) is dense in \(\text {Hom}(N)\). More generally, given \(\alpha ,\beta \in [0,n]\), with \(\alpha \le \beta \), we show the set consisting of homeomorphisms on N with lower metric mean dimension equal to \(\alpha \) and upper metric mean dimension equal to \(\beta \) is dense in \(\text {Hom}(N)\). Furthermore, we also give a proof that the set of homeomorphisms with upper metric mean dimension equal to n is residual in \(\text {Hom}(N)\).
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
In the late 1990’s, M. Gromov introduced the notion of mean topological dimension for a continuous map \( \phi : X\rightarrow X\), which is denoted by \(\text {mdim}(X,\phi )\), where X is a compact topological space. The mean topological dimension is an invariant under conjugacy. Furthermore, this is a useful tool in order to characterize dynamical systems that can be embedded in \((([0,1]^m)^{{\mathbb {Z}}},\sigma )\), where \(\sigma \) is the left shift map on \(([0,1]^m)^{{\mathbb {Z}}} \) (see [12, 13]). In [8], Lindenstrauss and Weiss proved that any homeomorphism \(\phi : X\rightarrow X\) that can be embedded in \((([0,1]^m)^{{\mathbb {Z}}},\sigma )\) must satisfy that \(\text {mdim}(X,\phi )\le m\). In [6], Gutman and Tsukamoto showed that, if \((X, \phi )\) is a minimal system with \(\text {mdim}(X, \phi ) <m/ 2\), then we can embed it in \((([0, 1]^{m})^{{\mathbb {Z}}},\sigma )\). In [11], Lindenstrauss and Tsukamoto presented an example of a minimal system with mean topological dimension equal to m/2 that cannot be embedded into \((([0, 1]^{m})^{{\mathbb {Z}}},\sigma )\), which show the constant m/2 is optimal. Some applications in information theory can be found in [10] and [9].
The mean topological dimension is difficult to calculate. Therefore, Lindenstrauss and Weiss in [8] introduced the notion of metric mean dimension, which is an upper bound for the mean topological dimension. The metric mean dimension is a metric-dependent quantity (this dependence is not continuous, as we can see in [3]), therefore, it is not an invariant under topological conjugacy.
1.1 Metric mean dimension
Let X be a compact metric space endowed with a metric d. For any \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\), we define \(d_n:X\times X\rightarrow [0,\infty )\) by
Fix \(\varepsilon >0\). We say that \(A\subset X\) is an \((n,\phi ,\varepsilon )\)-separated set if \(d_n(x,y)>\varepsilon \), for any two distinct points \(x,y\in A\). We denote by \(\text {sep}(n,\phi ,\varepsilon )\) the maximal cardinality of any \((n,\phi ,\varepsilon )\)-separated subset of X. Set
We say that \(E\subset X\) is an \((n,\phi ,\varepsilon )\)-spanning set for X if for any \(x\in X\) there exists \(y\in E\) such that \(d_n(x,y)<\varepsilon \). Let \(\text {span}(n,\phi ,\varepsilon )\) be the minimum cardinality of any \((n,\phi ,\varepsilon )\)-spanning subset of X. Set
Definition 1.1
The topological entropy of \(\phi :X\rightarrow X\) is defined by
Definition 1.2
We define the lower metric mean dimension and the upper metric mean dimension of \((X,d,\phi )\) by
respectively.
Remark 1.3
Throughout the paper, we will omit the underline and the overline on the notations \(\underline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}\) and \(\overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}\) when the result be valid for both cases, that is, we will use \(\text {mdim}_{\text {M}}\) for the both cases.
In recent years, the metric mean dimension has been the subject of multiple investigations, which can be verified in the bibliography of the present work. The purpose of this manuscript is to complete the research started in [5, 14] and [2], concerning to the topological properties of the level sets of the metric mean dimension map.
In [5], Theorem C, the authors proved the set consisting of continuous maps \(\phi :[0,1]\rightarrow [0,1]\) such that \(\underline{\text {mdim}}_\text {M}([0,1], |\cdot |,\phi )=\overline{\text {mdim}}_\text {M}([0,1], |\cdot |,\phi )=\alpha \), for a fixed \(\alpha \in [0,1]\), is dense in \(C^{0}([0,1])\) (see also [2], Theorem 4.1). Furthermore, in Theorem A they showed if N is an n-dimensional compact riemannian manifold, with \(n\ge 2\), and riemannian metric d, the set of homeomorphisms \(\phi :N\rightarrow N\) such that \(\overline{\text {mdim}}_\text {M}(N, d,\phi )=n\) contains a residual set in \(\text {Hom}(N)\) (see a particular case of this fact in [14], Proposition 10). Next, for any \(n\ge 1\), the set consisting of continuous maps \(\phi :N\rightarrow N\) such that
is dense in \(C^{0}(N)\), for a fixed \(\alpha \in [0,n]\) (see [2], Theorem 4.5, and [1], Theorem 3.6).
We consider the next level sets of the metric mean dimension for homeomorphisms:
Definition 1.4
For \(\alpha ,\beta \in [0,n]\), with \(\alpha \le \beta \), we will set
If \(\alpha =\beta \), we denote \({H}_{\alpha }^{\alpha }(N)\) by \({H}_{\alpha }(N)\).
If \(n=1\), then \({H}_{\alpha }^{\beta }(N)=\emptyset \) for \(0<\alpha \le \beta \le 1\). This is due to the fact that any homeomorphism on a one-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold has zero topological entropy, leading to zero metric mean dimension. Our initial result is presented in the following theorem, proved in [1], Theorem 3.6, specifically for continuous maps on the interval.
Theorem 1.5
Let \(n\ge 2\). For any \(\alpha ,\beta \in [0,n]\), with \(\alpha \le \beta \), the set \({H}_{\alpha }^{\beta }(N)\) is dense in \(Hom (N)\).
Using the techniques employed to prove Theorem 1.5, we will provide a new proof of Theorem A in [5], that is:
Theorem 1.6
The set \({\overline{H}}(N)=\{\phi \in Hom (N):\overline{mdim }_{M }(N,d,\phi )=n\}\) contains a residual set in \(Hom (N)\).
Yano, in [15], defined a kind of horseshoe in order to prove the set consisting of homeomorphisms \(\phi :N\rightarrow N\) with infinite entropy is generic in \(\text {Hom}(N)\), where N is an n dimensional compact manifold, with \(n\ge 2\). If we want to construct a continuous map with infinite entropy we can consider an infinite sequence of horseshoes such that the number of legs is unbounded. For the metric mean dimension case, in [5] and [14] the authors used horseshoe in order to prove the set consisting of homeomorphisms \(\phi :N\rightarrow N\) with upper metric mean dimension equal to n (which is the maximal value of the metric mean dimension for any map defined on N) is generic in \(\text {Hom}(N)\). To get metric mean dimension equal to n we must construct a sequence of horseshoes such that the number of legs increases very quickly compared to the decrease in their diameters.
Estimating the precise value of the metric mean dimension for a homeomorphism, and hence to obtain a homeomorphism with metric mean dimension equal to a fixed \(\alpha \in (0,n)\), is harder and not trivial sake. We need to establish a precise relation between the sizes of the horseshoes together with the number of appropriated legs to control the metric mean dimension. This is our main tool (see Lemma 2.3).
The paper is organized as follows: In Sect. 2, we will construct homeomorphisms, defined on an n-cube, with metric mean dimension equal to \(\alpha \), for a fixed \(\alpha \in (0,n]\). Furthermore, given \(\alpha ,\beta \in [0,n]\), with \(\alpha \le \beta \), we will construct examples of homeomorphisms \(\phi :[0,1]^{n}\rightarrow [0,1]^{n}\) such that \( \underline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}([0,1]^{n},d,\phi )=\alpha \) and \( \overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}([0,1]^{n},d,\phi )=\beta .\) In Sect. 3, we will prove Theorem 1.5. Finally, in Sect. 4, we will show Theorem 1.6.
2 Homeomorphisms on the n-cube with positive metric mean dimension
Let \(n\ge 2\). Given \(\alpha , \beta \in [0,n]\), \(\alpha \le \beta \), in this section we will construct a homeomorphism \(\phi _{\alpha , \beta }\), defined on an n-cube, with lower metric mean dimension equal to \(\alpha \) and upper metric mean dimension equal to \(\beta \) (see Lemma 2.4). This construction will be the main tool to prove the Theorem 1.5, since if a homeomorphism present a periodic orbit, then we can glue, in the \(C^0\)-topology, along this orbit the dynamic of \(\phi _{\alpha ,\beta }\).
The construction of \(\phi _{\alpha , \beta }\) requires a special type of horseshoe. So, let us present the first definition.
Definition 2.1
(n-dimensional \((2k+1)^{n-1}\)-horseshoe) Fix \(n\ge 2\). Take \(E=[a,b]^{n}\) and set \(|E|=b-a\). For a fixed natural number \(k>1\), take the sequence \(a=t_0<t_{1}<\cdots<t_{4k}<t_{4k+1}=b \), with \(|t_{i}-t_{i-1}|=\frac{b-a}{4k+1}\), and consider
Take \(a=s_0<s_{1}<\cdots<s_{2(2k+1)^{n-1}-2}<s_{2(2k+1)^{n-1}-1}=b \), with \(|s_{i}-s_{i-1}|=\frac{b-a}{2(2k+1)^{n-1}-1}\), and consider
We say that \(E\subseteq A\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) is an n-dimensional \((2k+1)^{n-1}\)-horseshoe for a homeomorphism \(\phi :A\rightarrow A\) if:
-
\(\phi (a,a,\dots ,a,b)=(a,a,\dots ,a,b)\) and \(\phi (b,b,\dots ,b,a)=(b,b,\dots ,b,a)\);
-
For any \(H_{i_{1},i_{2},\dots ,i_{n-1}}\), with \(i_{j}\in \{1,3,\dots , 4k+1\}\), there exists some \(l\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(2k+1)^{n-1}-1\}\) with
$$\begin{aligned} \phi (V_{l})=H_{i_{1},i_{2},\dots ,i_{n-1}} \quad \text {and}\quad \phi |_{V_{l}}:V_{l}\rightarrow H_{i_{1},i_{2},\dots ,i_{n-1}} \quad \text {is linear}. \end{aligned}$$ -
For any \(l=2,4,\dots , 2(2k+1)^{n-1}-2\), \(\phi (V_{l})\subseteq A{\setminus } E\).
In that case, the sets \(H_{i_{1},i_{2},\dots ,i_{n-1}}\), with \(i_{j}\in \{1,3,\dots , 4k+1\}\) are called the legs of the horseshoe.
In Fig. 1 we present an example of a 2-dimensional 5-horseshoe. In that case, \(k=2\), we have \(2(2k+1)-1\) divisions \(V_{i}\) of \([a,b]^{2}\), and \(2k+1\) legs \(H_{i}\), for \(i=1,3,5,7,9\). In Fig. 2 we have a 3-dimensional 9-horseshoe (we only show \(\phi (E)\cap E\) in that figure). In that case, \(k=1\), we have \(2(2k+1)^{2}-1\) divisions \(V_{i}\) of \([a,b]^{3}\), and \((2k+1)^{2}\) legs \(H_{i,j}\), for \(i,j=1,3,5\).
Note if \(E=[a,b]^{n}\) is an n-dimensional \((2k+1)^{n-1}\)-horseshoe for \(\phi \), then
for any \(l_{1},l_{2}\in \{1,3\dots , 2(2k+1)^{n-1}\}\) and \(i_{1}^{(1)},\dots ,i_{n-1}^{(1)},i_{1}^{(2)},\dots ,i_{n-1}^{(2)}\in \{1,3,\dots , 4k+1\}\) (see Fig. 3).
The assumptions \(\phi (a,a,\dots ,a,b)=(a,a,\dots ,a,b)\) and \(\phi (b,b,\dots ,b,a)=(b,b,\dots ,b,a)\) is just to be able to extend \(\phi \) to a homeomorphism \(\tilde{\phi }:E^{\prime }\rightarrow E^{\prime }\), where \(E^{\prime }\) is an n-cube with \(E\subset E^{\prime }\), such that \(\tilde{\phi }|_{\partial E^{\prime }}\equiv Id\) and \(h_{\text {top}}(\phi ^{\prime })=h_{\text {top}}(\phi |_{E\cap \phi (E )})\) (see Lemma 2.2). Thus, our strategy to prove the Theorem 1.5 will be to use local charts to glue such horseshoes along of periodic orbits of a homeomorphism.
Lemma 2.2
Let \(E, E^{\prime }\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^n\) be closed n-cubes with \(E \subsetneqq (E^{\prime })^{\circ }\) and fix \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\). There exists a homeomorphism \(\phi : E^{\prime }\longrightarrow E^{\prime }\) such that \(\phi |_{E}: E \longrightarrow E\) is an n-dimensional \((2k+1)\)-horseshoe, \(\phi |_{\partial E^{\prime }}\equiv Id\) and \(h_{top }(\phi )=h_{top }(\phi |_{E\cap \phi (E )})\).
Inspired by the results shown in [5] and [14] to obtain a homeomorphism \(\phi :N\rightarrow N\) with upper metric mean dimension equal to \(\text {dim}(N)\), we present the next lemma, which proves for any \(\alpha \in (0,n]\), there exists a homeomorphism \(\phi :\mathcal {\mathcal {C}}:= [0,1]^n\rightarrow \mathcal {\mathcal {C}}\), with (upper and lower) metric mean dimension equal to \(\alpha \).
On any n-cube \(E\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), we will consider the metric inherited from \({\mathbb {R}}^{n}\), \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \), given by
Lemma 2.3
Let \(\phi : {\mathcal {C}}\rightarrow {\mathcal {C}}\) be a homeomorphism, \(E_{k}=[a_k, b_k]^{n}\) and \(E_{k}^{\prime }\) sequences of cubes such that:
- C1.:
-
\( E_{k}\subset (E_{k}^{\prime })^{\circ }\) and \((E_{k}^{\prime })^{\circ }\cap (E_{s}^{\prime })^{\circ }=\emptyset \) for \(k\ne s\).
- C2.:
-
\(S:=\cup _{k=1}^{\infty }E^{\prime }_{k}\subseteq {\mathcal {C}}\).
- C3.:
-
each \(E_{k}\) is an n-dimensional \(3^{k(n-1)}\)-horseshoe for \(\phi \);
- C4.:
-
For each k, \(\phi |_{E_{k}^{\prime }}: E_{k}^{\prime }\rightarrow E_{k}^{\prime }\) satisfies the properties in Lemma 2.2;
- C5.:
-
\(\phi |_{{\mathcal {C}}{\setminus } S}: {\mathcal {C}}{\setminus } S\rightarrow {\mathcal {C}}{\setminus } S\) is the identity.
We have:
-
(i)
For a fixed \(r\in (0,\infty )\), if \(|E_{k}|=\frac{B}{3^{kr}}\) for each \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), where \(B>0\) is a constant, then
$$\begin{aligned} mdim _{M }({\mathcal {C}},\Vert \cdot \Vert ,\phi ^{2}) =\frac{n}{r+1}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
If \(|E_{k}|=\frac{B}{k^{2}}\) for each \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), where \(B>0\) is a constant, then
$$\begin{aligned} mdim _{M }( {\mathcal {C}},\Vert \cdot \Vert ,\phi ^{2}) =n. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
We will prove (i), since (ii) can be proved analogously. Set \(\varphi =\phi ^{2}\). Note that
Take any \(\varepsilon \in (0,1)\). For any \(k\ge 1\), set \( \varepsilon _k= \frac{|E_{k}|}{2(3^{k})-1} =\frac{B}{(2(3^{k})-1)3^{kr}} \). There exists \(k\ge 1\) such that \(\varepsilon \in [\varepsilon _{k+1}, \varepsilon _{k}]\). We have
Since \(E_{k}\) is an n-dimensional \(3^{k(n-1)}\)-horseshoe for \(\phi \), for each \(k\ge 1\), consider
and
as in Definition 2.1. For each \(j=1,\dots , n-1\), let \(i_{j}\in \{1,3,5,\dots , 2(3^{k})-1\}\) and take
For \(t=1,\dots ,m\), let \(i_{1}^{(t)},\) \( \dots ,i_{n-1}^{(t)}\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(3^{k}) -1\}\), \(l_{j_{t}}\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(3^{k})^{n-1}-1\}\) and set
From the definition of \(\varphi \), these sets are non-empty. Furthermore, we can choose a sequence \(s_{1},\dots ,s_{3^{k}}\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(3^{k})^{n-1}-1\}\) such that, if x and y belong to different sets \( C^{k}_{s^{(m)},i_{1}^{(m)},\dots ,i_{n-1}^{(m)}, \dots ,s_{(m)}, i_{1}^{(1)},\dots , i_{n-1}^{(1)}} \), where \(s^{(j)}\in \{s_{1},\dots ,s_{3^{k}}\}\), then \(d_{m}(x,y)>\varepsilon _{k}\). Note that we have \(3^{km}3^{k(n-1) m}= 3^{knm}\) sets of this form. Hence,
Therefore,
On the other hand, note that \( \frac{\log 3^{kn}}{\log [4(2(3^{k})-1)3^{kr}B^{-1}]} \rightarrow \frac{n}{1+r}\) as \(k\rightarrow \infty \). Hence, for any \(\delta >0\), there exists \(k_{0}\ge 1\), such that, for any \(k> k_{0}\), we have \( \frac{\log 3^{kn}}{\log [4(2(3^{k})-1)3^{kr}B^{-1}]} <\frac{n}{1+r}+\delta \). Hence, suppose that \(\varepsilon >0\) is small enough such that \(\varepsilon <\epsilon _{k_{0}}\). Set \( \tilde{\Omega }_{k}=\underset{n\in {\mathbb {Z}}}{\bigcap }\varphi ^{n}(E_{k})\) and take \(\tilde{\Omega }=\underset{k\in {\mathbb {N}}}{\bigcup }\Omega _{k}\). We have
If \(x\in \tilde{\Omega }\), then x belongs to some \(C^{k}_{l_{j_{m}},i_{1}^{(m)},\dots ,i_{n-1}^{(m)}, \dots ,l_{j_{1}}, i_{1}^{(1)},\dots , i_{n-1}^{(1)}}\). Take \(s^{(j_{1})},\dots s^{(j_{m})} \in \{s_{1},\dots , s_{3^{k}}\}\) with
and furthermore \(d_{m}(x,y)\le 4 \varepsilon _{k}\) for any \(y\in C^{k}_{s^{(j_{m})},i_{1}^{(m)},\dots ,i_{n-1}^{(m)}, \dots ,s^{(j_{1})}, i_{1}^{(1)},\dots , i_{n-1}^{(1)}}\). Hence, if \(Y_{k}=\cup _{j=1}^{k}E_{j}\), for every \( m\ge 1\), we have
Therefore,
This fact implies that for any \(\delta >0\) we have
The above facts prove that \({ {\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}}(\mathcal {C},\Vert \cdot \Vert ,\varphi )=\frac{n}{r+1}. \) \(\square \)
Given \(\alpha ,\beta \in [0,n]\), with \(\alpha \le \beta \), in the next lemma we construct an homeomorphism \(\phi :[0,1]^{n}\rightarrow [0,1]^{n}\) such that
Lemma 2.4
For every \(\alpha ,\beta \in [0,n]\), with \(\alpha <\beta \), there exists a homeomorphism \(\phi _{\alpha ,\beta }:[0,1]^{n}\rightarrow [0,1]^{n}\) such that
Proof
We will prove the case \(\beta <n\). First, we will show there exists a homeomorphism \(\phi _{0,\beta }:[0,1]^{n}\rightarrow [0,1]^{n}\) such that
Fix \(r>0\) and set \( b=\frac{n}{r+1}\). Set \(a_{0}=0\) and \(a_{n}= \sum _{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{C}{3^{ir}}\) for \(n\ge 1\), where \(C=\frac{1}{\sum _{i=0}^{\infty }\frac{1}{3^{ir}}}= \frac{3^{r}-1}{3^{r}}\). Let \(E_{k}=[a_{k},b_{k}]^{n}\) and \(E_{k}^{\prime }\) satisfying the conditions C1 and C2, C4 and C5 in Lemma 2.3, with \(|E_{k}|=\frac{B}{3^{kr}}\), and such that each \(E_{k^{k}}\) is an n-dimensional \(3^{nk^{k}}\)-horseshoe for \(\phi _{0,\beta }\) and otherwise \(\phi _{0,\beta }|_{E_{k}}\) is the identity on \(E_{k}\). We can prove \( \underline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}([0,1]^{n},\Vert \cdot \Vert ,\phi _{0,\beta })=0\) and \( \overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}([0,1]^{n},\Vert \cdot \Vert ,\phi _{0,\beta })=\beta .\)
Now consider \(\alpha <\beta \). From Lemma 2.3(i), we have there exists \(\phi _{\alpha }\in \text {Hom}([0,1]^{n})\) such that
Set \( {\phi }_{\alpha ,\beta }\in \text {Hom}([0,1]^{n})\) be defined by
where \(T_{1}:[0,\frac{1}{2}]^{n}\rightarrow [0,1]^{n}\) and \(T_{2}:[\frac{1}{2},1]^{n}\rightarrow [0,1]^{n}\) are bi-lipchitsz maps. We have
Analogously, we prove \( {\overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}}([0,1]^{n},\Vert \cdot \Vert ,\phi _{\alpha ,\beta })={\overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}}([0,1]^{n},\Vert \cdot \Vert , \phi _{0,\beta })=\beta .\) \(\square \)
3 Homeomorphisms on manifolds with positive metric mean dimension
Throughout this section, N will denote an n dimensional compact riemannian manifold with \(n\ge 2\) and d a riemannian metric on N. On \(\text {Hom}(N)\) we will consider the metric
It is well-known \((\text {Hom}(N),{\hat{d}})\) is a complete metric space. The main goal of this section is to prove Theorem 1.5.
Good Charts For each \(p\in N\), consider the exponential map
where \(0_{p}\) is the origin in the tangent space \(T_{p}N\), \(\delta ^{\prime }\) is the injectivity radius of N and \(B_{\epsilon }(x)\) denote the open ball of radius \(\epsilon >0\) with center x. We will take \( {\delta }_{N}=\frac{\delta ^{\prime }}{2}\). The exponential map has the following properties:
-
Since N is compact, \(\delta ^{\prime }\) does not depends on p.
-
\( \text {exp}_{p}(0_{p}) = p\) and \( \text {exp}_{p}[ B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})] = B_{\delta _{N}}({p})\);
-
\(\text {exp}_{p}: B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})\rightarrow B_{\delta _{N}}({p})\) is a diffeomorphism;
-
If \(v\in B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})\), taking \(q=\text {exp}_{p}(v)\) we have \(d(p,q)=\Vert v\Vert \).
-
The derivative of \(\text {exp}_{p}\) at the origin is the identity map:
$$\begin{aligned} D (\text {exp}_{p})(0) = \text {id}: T_{p}N \rightarrow T_{p}N. \end{aligned}$$
Since \(\text {exp}_{p}: B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})\rightarrow B_{\delta _{N}}({p})\) is a diffeomorphism and \(D (\text {exp}_{p})(0) = \text {id}: T_{p}N \rightarrow T_{p}N,\) we have \(\text {exp}_{p}: B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})\rightarrow B_{\delta _{N}}({p})\) is a bi-Lipschitz map with Lipschitz constant close to 1. Therefore, we can assume that if \(v_{1},v_{2}\in B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})\), taking \(q_{1}=\text {exp}_{p}(v_{1})\) and \(q_{2}=\text {exp}_{p}(v_{2})\), we have \(d(q_{1},q_{2})=\Vert v_{1} -v_{2}\Vert \). Furthermore, we will identify \(B_{\delta _{N}}(0_{p})\subset T_{p}N\) with \(B_{\delta _{N}}(0)=\{x\in {\mathbb {R}}^{n}:\Vert x\Vert <\delta _{N}\}\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\).
Recall that if \(\alpha =\beta \in [0,n]\), then
Theorem 3.1
For any \(\alpha \in [0,n]\), the set \(H_{\alpha }(N) \) is dense in \(Hom (N)\).
Proof
Let \(P^{r}(N)\) be the set of \(C^{r}\)-diffeomorphisms on N with a periodic point. This set is \(C^{0}\)-dense in \(\text {Hom}(N)\) (see [4, 7]). Hence, in order to prove the theorem, it is sufficient to show that \(H_{\alpha }(N)\) is dense in \(P^r(N)\). Fix \(\psi \in P^{r}(N)\) and take any \(\varepsilon \in (0,\delta _{N})\). Suppose that \(p\in N\) is a periodic point of \(\psi \), with period k. Let \(\beta >0\), small enough, such that \([-\beta , \beta ]^n\subset B_{\frac{\varepsilon }{4}}(0)\). For each \(i=0,\dots , k-1\), \(N{\setminus } \psi (\exp _{\psi ^{i}(p)}\partial [-\beta ,\beta ]^n)\) has two connected components. We denote by \(C_{i}\) the connected component that contains \(\psi ^{i}(p)\). Consider the positive number
Let \(\lambda \in (0, \min \{\gamma /2, \beta \}),\) such that
The regions \([-\beta ,\beta ]^n{\setminus } (-\lambda , \lambda )^n \) and \( C_{i+1}{\setminus } \exp _{\psi ^{i}(p)}(-\lambda , \lambda )^n \) are homeomorphic. For each \(i=0,\dots , k-1, \) take
Then, there exists a homeomorphism
such that
If \(q\in R_i=\exp _{\psi ^{i}(p)} \left( [-\beta ,\beta ]^n{\setminus } (-\lambda ,\lambda )^n \right) \), we can write
Set \(\varphi _{\alpha }: N\rightarrow N\), given by
where \(\phi _{\alpha }:[ -\lambda ,\lambda ]^n \rightarrow [ -\lambda ,\lambda ]^n\) is a homeomorphism which satisfies \(\phi _{\alpha }|_{\partial [ -\lambda ,\lambda ]^n }=Id\) and
(see Lemma 2.3). Set \(K:=\cup _{i=0}^{k-1}D_{i}\). Note that \(N\setminus K\) is \(\varphi _{\alpha }\) invariant and
Hence,
Note if \(q\in D_{i}\), we have
Hence, \(D\subseteq D_{i}\) is an \((s,\phi _{\alpha },\epsilon )\)-separated set if and only if \(\text {exp}_{\psi ^{i}(p)}(D)\subseteq N\) is an \((s,\varphi _{\alpha },\epsilon )\)-separated set for any \(\epsilon >0\). Therefore, \(\text {sep}(s,\varphi _{\alpha }|_{K},\epsilon )=k\,\text {sep}(s,\phi _{\alpha },\epsilon ).\) Therefore,
which proves the theorem. \(\square \)
The last theorem proved Theorem 1.5 in the case \(\alpha =\beta =n\). The proof of the general case will be a consequence of the above arguments, in fact:
Proof of the Theorem 1.5
The proof follows similarly to the proof of Theorem 3.1, changing \(\phi _{\alpha }\) by a continuous map \(\phi _{\alpha ,\beta }:[-\lambda , \lambda ]^n \rightarrow [-\lambda , \lambda ]^n\) such that
as in the Lemma 2.4. \(\square \)
4 Tipical homeomorphism has maximal metric mean dimension
To complete this work, in this section we show Theorem 1.6, which was proved in Theorem A in [5], however, we will present an alternative proof of this fact using the techniques of Sects. 2 and 3.
Definition 4.1
(n-dimensional strong horseshoe) Let \(E=[a,b]^{n}\) and set \(|E|=b-a\). For a fixed natural number \(k>1\), set \(\delta _{k}= \frac{b-a}{4k+1}\) and \(\epsilon _{k}=\frac{b-a}{2(2k+1)^{n-1}-1}\). For \(i=0,1, 2, \dots , 4k+1\), set \(t_i= a+i\delta _{k} \) and consider
for \(i_{j}\in \{1,\dots , 4k+1\}.\) For \(l=0,1, 2, \dots , 2(2k+1)^{n-1}-2\), set \(s_l= a+l\epsilon _{k} \) and consider
We say that \(E\subseteq A\subseteq {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) is an n-dimensional strong \((\epsilon ,(2k+1)^{n-1})\)-horseshoe for a homeomorphism \(\phi :A\rightarrow A\) if \(|E|>\epsilon \) and furthermore:
-
For any \(H_{i_{1},i_{2},\dots ,i_{n-1}}\), with \(i_{j}\in \{1,3,\dots , 4k+1\}\), there exists \(l\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(2k+1)^{n-1}-1\}\) with
$$\begin{aligned} H_{i_{1},i_{2},\dots ,i_{n-1}}\subseteq \phi (V_{l})^{\circ }. \end{aligned}$$ -
For any \(l=2,4,\dots , 2(2k+1)^{n-1}-2\), \(\phi (V_{l})\subseteq A{\setminus } E\).
Remark 4.2
Note if \(\epsilon ^{\prime }>\epsilon \), then any n-dimensional strong \((\epsilon ^{\prime },(2k+1)^{n-1})\)-horseshoe for \( \phi \) is an n-dimensional strong \((\epsilon ,(2k+1)^{n-1})\)-horseshoe for \( \phi \).
Using local charts, the last definition can be done on the manifold N.
Definition 4.3
Let N be an n-dimensional riemannian manifold and fix \(k\ge 1\). We say that \(\phi \in \text {Hom}(N)\) has an n-dimensional strong \(( \epsilon , (2k+1)^{n-1})\)-horseshoe \(E=[a,b]^{n}\), if there is s and an exponential charts \(\text {exp}_{i}: B_{\delta _{N}}(0)\rightarrow N\), for \(i=1,\dots ,s\), such that:
-
\(\phi _{i}=\text {exp}_{(i+1)\text {mod}\, s}\circ \phi \circ \text {exp}^{-1}_{i}: B_{\delta }(0 )\rightarrow B_{\delta _{N}}(0)\) is well defined for some \(\delta \le \delta _{N}\);
-
E is an n-dimensional strong \((\epsilon , (2k+1)^{n-1})\)-horseshoe for \(\phi _{i} \).
To simplify the notation, we will set \(\phi _{i}=\phi \) for each \(i=1,\dots , s\).
For \(\epsilon >0\) and \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), we consider the sets
Lemma 4.4
The set \(\mathcal {H}\) is residual.
Proof
Clearly, for any \(\epsilon \in (0,\delta _{N})\) and \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), the set \( H(\epsilon , k)\) is open and nonempty.
We claim that the set H(k) is dense in \(\text {Hom}(N)\). In fact: fix \(\psi \in P^{r}(N)\) with a s-periodic point. In the same way as the proof of the Theorem 3.1, every small neighborhood of the orbit of this point can be perturbed in order to obtain a strong \(\left( \frac{1}{i^{2}},3^{n k i}\right) \) horseshoe for a \(\phi \) such that \(\phi ^{2}\) be close to \(\psi \) for a large enough i. Thus H(k) is a dense set, and a fortiori \(\mathcal {H}=\overset{\infty }{\underset{k=1}{\bigcap }} H(k) \) is residual in \(\text {Hom}(N)\). \(\square \)
Finally, we prove Theorem 1.6.
Proof of the Theorem 1.6
It is sufficient to prove that \(\overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}(N,d,\phi )=n\) for any \(\phi \in \mathcal {H}\). For this sake, take \(\varphi =\phi ^{2}\in \mathcal {H}\). We have \(\varphi \in H(k)\) for any \(k\ge 1\). Therefore, for any \(k\in {\mathbb {N}}\), there exists \(i_{k}\), with \(i_{k}<i_{k+1}\), such that \(\phi \) has a strong \(\left( \frac{1}{i_{k}^{2}},3^{n\,k\, i_{k}} \right) \)-horseshoe \(E_{{k}}=[a_{k},b_{k}]^{n}\), such that \(|E_{{k}}|>\frac{1}{i_{k}^{2}}\), consisting of rectangles
and
with
For \(i_{j}\in \{1,\dots , 2(3^{ki_{k}})-1\}\) and \(l=1,\dots , 2(3^{ki_{k}})^{n-1}-1,\) take
For \(t=1,\dots ,m\), let \(i_{1}^{(t)},\) \( \dots ,i_{n-1}^{(t)}\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(3^{ki_{k}})-1\}\) and for \(l_{t}\in \{1,\dots , 2(3^{ki_{k}})^{n-1}-1\},\) set
Furthermore, set
For any \(k\ge 1\), take \(\varepsilon _{k}=\frac{1}{4i_{k}^{2}(2(3^{k \,i_{k} })-1)}\). We can choose at least \(3^{ki_{k}}\) sub-indices \(p_{1},\dots ,p_{3^{ki_{k}}}\) in \(\{1,\dots , 2(3^{ki_{k}})^{n-1}-1\}\) such that if \(x\in {\tilde{C}}_{p_{s}, i_{1},\dots , i_{n-1}}\) and \(y\in {\tilde{C}}_{p_{t}, i_{1},\dots , i_{n-1}}\), with \(s\ne t\), then \(d_{1}(x,y)>\varepsilon _{k}\). Hence, if x and y belong to different sets \( {\tilde{C}}^{k}_{p^{(m)},i_{1}^{(m)},\dots ,i_{n-1}^{(m)}, \dots ,p^{(1)}, i_{1}^{(1)},\dots , i_{n-1}^{(1)}},\) with \(p^{(t)}\in \{p_{1},\dots ,p_{3^{ki_{k}}}\}\) and \(i_{1}^{(t)},\) \( \dots ,i_{n-1}^{(t)}\in \{1,3,\dots , 2(3^{ki_{k}})-1\}\), we have that \(d_{m}(x,y)>\varepsilon _{k}\). Hence,
Therefore,
This fact proves the theorem, since for any \(\psi \in \text {Hom}(N)\), the inequality \( \overline{\text {mdim}}_{\text {M}}(N,d,\phi )\le n\) always holds (see [14], Remark 4). \(\square \)
Data Availability
This declaration is not applicable.
References
Acevedo, J.M., Romaña, S., Arias, R.: Hölder continuous maps on the interval with positive metric mean dimension. Rev. Colomb. de Math. 57, 57–76 (2024)
Acevedo, J.M.: Genericity of continuous maps with positive metric mean dimension. RM 77(1), 2 (2022)
Acevedo, J.M., Baraviera, A., Becker, A.J., Scopel É.: Metric mean dimension and mean Hausdorff dimension varying the metric. (2024)
Artin M., Mazur B.: On periodic points. Ann. Math. pp. 82-99 (1965)
Carvalho, M., Rodrigues, F.B., Varandas, P.: Generic homeomorphisms have full metric mean dimension. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Syst. 42(1), 40–64 (2022)
Gutman, Y., Tsukamoto, M.: Embedding minimal dynamical systems into Hilbert cubes. Invent. Math. 221(1), 113–166 (2020)
Hurley, M.: On proofs of the \(C^{0}\) general density theorem. Proceed. Amer. Math. Soci. 124(4), 1305–1309 (1996)
Lindenstrauss, E., Weiss, B.: Mean topological dimension. Israel J. Math. 115(1), 1–24 (2000)
Lindenstrauss, E., Tsukamoto, M.: Double variational principle for mean dimension. Geom. Funct. Anal. 29(4), 1048–1109 (2019)
Lindenstrauss, E., Tsukamoto, M.: From rate distortion theory to metric mean dimension: variational principle. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 64(5), 3590–3609 (2018)
Lindenstrauss, E., Tsukamoto, M.: Mean dimension and an embedding problem: an example. Israel J. Math. 199(2), 573–584 (2014)
Shinoda, M., Tsukamoto, M.: Symbolic dynamics in mean dimension theory. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Syst. 41(8), 2542–2560 (2021)
Tsukamoto, M.: Mean dimension of full shifts. Israel J. Math. 230, 183–193 (2019)
Velozo A., Velozo R.: Rate distortion theory, metric mean dimension and measure theoretic entropy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05762 (2017)
Yano, K.: A remark on the topological entropy of homeomorphisms. Invent. Math. 59(3), 215–220 (1980)
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Colombia Consortium. We were not financed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to writing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This declaration is not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The second author thanks to CNPq and Bolsa Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado No. E-26/201.432/2022.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Acevedo, J.M., Romaña, S. & Arias, R. Density of the Level Sets of the Metric Mean Dimension for Homeomorphisms. J Dyn Diff Equat (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-023-10344-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-023-10344-5