Abstract
Evidence-based maternal and early childhood home visiting (EBHV) may support health and well-being among families headed by a caregiver with an intellectual disability or other learning difference. Little is known about tools EBHV staff can use to identify caregivers with learning differences and inform service delivery strategies. Investigators used a two-step stakeholder-engaged approach to identify screening tools that are feasible, acceptable, and useful in the EBHV context. In the first step, authors conducted a scoping review to identify validated screening tools. Data describing the studies and tools were extracted and synthesized. In the second step, an established Stakeholder Advisory Group gave two rounds of feedback on the feasibility, acceptability, and usefulness of each tool for the EBHV context. Most identified tools were verbal or written questionnaires developed outside the United States. Only one tool was developed for parents or other caregivers. Overall, tools had limited psychometric evidence. Stakeholders expressed concerns about potentially stigmatizing language of some items within tools, suggesting that adaptations may be needed for tools to be acceptable in the EBHV context. Investigators concluded that there are few valid and reliable screening tools to identify learning differences that are brief and can be used by paraprofessionals with no prior expertise. Additional research is needed to further validate, adapt, or develop a tool that is feasible, acceptable, and useful for the EBHV context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availablity of Data and Material
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Adirim, T., & Supplee, L. (2013). Overview of the federal home visiting program. Pediatrics, 132(Supplement), S59–S64. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021C
Akobirshoev, I., Parish, S. L., Mitra, M., & Rosenthal, E. (2017). Birth outcomes among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 10(3), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.010
*Ali, S., & Galloway, S. (2016). Developing a screening tool for offenders with intellectual disabilities – the RAPID. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 7(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-01-2015-0001
Ammons, R. B., & Ammons, C. H. (1962). The Quick Test (QT): Provisional manual. Psychological Reports, 11(1), 111–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/003329416201100106
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Booth, T. (2005). Temporal discrimination and parents with learning difficulties in the child protection system. British Journal of Social Work, 36(6), 997–1015. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch401
*Braatveit, K. J., Torsheim, T., & Hove, O. (2018). Screening for intellectual disabilities: A validation of the Hayes Ability Screening Index for in-patients with substance use disorder. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 72(5), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1468923
*Cashin, A., Butler, T., Levy, M., & Potter, E. (2006). Intellectual disability in the New South Wales inmate population. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 2(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449200600935752
Collings, S., & Llewellyn, G. (2012). Children of parents with intellectual disability: Facing poor outcomes or faring ok? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 37(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2011.648610
Duggan, A., Portilla, X. A., Filene, J. H., Crowne, S. S., Hill, C. J., Lee, H., & Knox, V. (2018). Implementation of Evidence-Based Early Childhood Home Visiting: Results from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation. (OPRE Report 2018–76A). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/mihope_implementation_report_2018_10_26_508b.pdf
Emerson, E. (2011). Health status and health risks of the “hidden majority” of adults with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities., 49(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-49.3.155
*Fichten, C. S., Nguyen, M. N., King, L., Havel, A., Mimouni, Z., Barile, M., Budd, J., Jorgensen, S., Chauvin, A., & Gutberg, J. (2014). How well do they read? Brief English and French screening tools for college students. International Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 33–46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1034081.pdf
*Geijsen, K., Kop, N., & deRuiter, C. (2018). Screening for intellectual disability in Dutch police suspects. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1502
*Giménez, A., Luque, J. L., López-Zamora, M., & Fernández-Navas, M. (2015). Autoinforme de Trastornos Lectores para AdultoS(ATLAS) [A self-report of reading disabilities for adults: ATLAS]. Anales De Psicología, 31(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.l.166671
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and Associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
*Hayes, S., & C. (2002). Early intervention or early incarceration? Using a screening test for intellectual disability in the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2002.00113.x
Hirota, T., So, R., Kim, Y. S., Leventhal, B., & Epstein, R. A. (2018). A systematic review of screening tools in non-young children and adults for autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 80, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.017
Homeyard, C., Montgomery, E., Chinn, D., & Patelarou, E. (2016). Current evidence on antenatal care provision for women with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Midwifery, 32, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.002
International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, Special Interest Group on Parents and Parenting with Intellectual Disabilities. (2008). Parents labelled with Intellectual Disability: Position of the IASSID SIRG on Parents and Parenting with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00435.x
*Kane, S. T., Walker, J. H., & Schmidt, G. R. (2011). Assessing college-level learning difficulties and “at riskness” for learning disabilities and ADHD: Development and validation of the Learning Difficulties Assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410392045
King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 199–201.
Kulkarni, M. (2012). Contextual factors and help seeking behaviors of people with disabilities. Human Resource Development Review, 11(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311416488
Kulkarni, M. (2013). Help-seeking behaviors of people with disabilities in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 25(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-012-9202-x
LaLiberte, T., Piescher, K., Mickelson, N., & Lee, M. H. (2017). Child protection services and parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12323
*Lancaster, S., & Mellard, D. (2005). Adult learning disabilities screening using an internet-administered instrument. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 62–73. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/3968
*Lefly, D., & L. & Pennington, B., F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300306
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1–9.
Levy, S. E., Wolfe, A., Coury, D., Duby, J., Farmer, J., Schor, E., Van Cleave, J., & Warren, Z. (2020). Screening tools for autism spectrum disorder in primary care: A systematic evidence review. Pediatrics, 145(Supplement 1), S47–S59. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1895H
Lightfoot, E., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T. (2011). Prevalence of children with disabilities in the child welfare system and out of home placement: An examination of administrative records. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2069–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.02.019
MacIntyre, G., Stewart, A., & McGregor, S. (2019). The double-edged sword of vulnerability: Explaining the persistent challenges for practitioners in supporting parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(6), 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12647
*Mason, J., & Murphy, G. (2002a). Intellectual disability amongst people on probation: Prevalence and outcome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(3), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00399.x
*Mason, J., & Murphy, G. (2002b). People with an intellectual disability in the criminal justice system: Developing an assessment tool for measuring prevalence. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466502760379163
McConnell, D., & Llewellyn, G. (2000). Disability and discrimination in statutory child protection proceedings. Disability & Society, 15(6), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/713662015
McConnell, D., & Llewellyn, G. (2002). Stereotypes, parents with intellectual disability and child protection. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 24(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060210161294
McConnell, D., Matthews, J., Llewellyn, G., Mildon, R., & Hindmarsh, G. (2008). “Healthy Start.” A national strategy for parents with intellectual disabilities and their children. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 5(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00173.x
*McConnell, D., Aunos, M., Pacheco, L., Savage, A., Hahn, L., & Feldman, M. (2021). Screening for parental intellectual disability: A first step in planning and delivering equitable support services? Journal of Family Social Work, 24(4), 282–298.
*McKenzie, K., Paxton, D., Michie, A., Murray, G., Murray, A. L., & Curtis, J. (2012a). Screening with young offenders with an intellectual disability. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23(5–6), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.733723
*McKenzie, K., Paxton, D., Michie, A., Murray, G., Milanesi, P., & Murray, A. L. (2012b). The evaluation of a screening tool for children with an intellectual disability: The Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1068–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.015
*McKenzie, K., Michie, A., Murray, A., & Hales, C. (2012c). Screening for offenders with an intellectual disability: The validity of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 791–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.006
*McKenzie, K., Sharples, P., & Murray, A. L. (2015). Validating the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire against the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale. Fourth Edition. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(4), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.4.301
*McKenzie, K., Murray, G., Murray, A., & Martin, R. (2020). The impact of an adult intellectual disability screening questionnaire on service providers and users. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12687
*McKinnon, I., Thorp, J., & Grubin, D. (2015). Improving the detection of detainees with suspected ID in police custody. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-04-2015-0015
*Mellard, D., & Lancaster, S. (2000). Adult Learning Disabilities Screening: Report of the Development Activities. Unpublished report from author.
*Mellard, D., Woods, K., & Md Desa, Z. (2012). An oral reading fluency assessment for young adult career and technical education students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00358.x
Minkovitz, C., O’Neill, K., & Duggan, A. (2016). Home Visiting: A Service Strategy to Reduce Poverty and Mitigate Its Consequences. Academic Pediatrics, 16(3S), S105-111.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
*Murray, A. L., & McKenzie, K. (2013). Estimating the severity of intellectual disability in adults: A Mokken scaling analysis of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 1002–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032369
*Murray, A. L., & McKenzie, K. (2014). The accuracy of the Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q) in classifying severity of impairment: a brief report. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58(part 12), 1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12115
*Nijman, H., Kaal, H., van Scheppingen, L., & Moonen, X. (2018). Development and testing of a Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL). Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31, e59–e67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12310
Powell, R. M., Parish, S. L., & Akobirshoev, I. (2017). The health and economic well-being of us mothers with intellectual impairments. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12308
Redshaw, M., Malouf, R., Gao, H., & Gray, R. (2013). Women with disability: The experience of maternity care during pregnancy, labour and birth and the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-174
*Robertson, J. M., Benton, S. L., Newton, F. B., Downey, R. G., Marsh, P. A., Benton, S. A., Tseng, W.-C., & Shin, K. H. (2006). K-State Problem Identification Rating Scales for college students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 39, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2006.11909795
Sama-Miller, E., Akers, L. Mraz-Esposito, A., Zukiewicz, M., Avellar, S., Paulsell, D., & Del Grosso, P. (2019). Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC.
Sheerin, F. (1998). Parents with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 126–133.
Slayter, E. M., & Jensen, J. (2019). Parents with intellectual disabilities in the child protection system. Children and Youth Services Review, 98, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.013
*Snowling, M., Dawes, P., Nash, H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Validity of a protocol for adult self-report of dyslexia and related difficulties. Dyslexia, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1432
*Sondenaa, E., Bjorgen, T. G., & Nottestad, J. A. (2007). Validation of the Norwegian version of Hayes Ability Screening Index for mental retardation. Psychological Reports, 101I, 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.101.4.1023-1030
*Sondenaa, E., Nygard, O., Nottestad, J. A., & Linaker, O. M. (2011). Validation and adaptation of the Norwegian version of Hayes Ability Screening Index for intellectual difficulties in a psychiatric sample. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 65(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2010.486444
*Strick, S., Field, B., & Black, J. (2018). An independent investigation of the utility of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) within a community learning disability team. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31, e223–e228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12316
Taylor, A., Deb, S., & Unwin, G. (2011). Scales for the identification of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 924–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.036
*To, W. T., Vanheule, S., Vanderplasschen, W., Audenaert, K., & Vandevelde, S. (2015). Screening for intellectual disability in persons with a substance abuse problem: Exploring the validity of the Hayes Ability Screening Index in a Dutch-speaking sample. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.046
Weiber, I., Eklund, M., & Tengland, P. A. (2016). The characteristics of local support systems, and the roles of professionals, in supporting families where a mother has an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 29(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12169
West, A. & Dibble, K. (2022). Evidence-based early home visiting for parents with intellectual disability: home visitor perceptions and practices. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (In press).
*Young, J. T., van Dooren, K., Lennox, N. G., Butler, T. G., & Kinner, S. A. (2015). Inter-rater reliability of the Hayes Ability Screening Index in a sample of Australian prisoners. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(Part 11), 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12198
Funding
This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant number X10MC3114601, Maternal and Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program and with funding from the Maryland State Department of Human Services Social Services Administration (SSSA/SHVTP-19–001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr. West was primarily responsible for study conceptualization and design with contributions from Beth Barnet, Margo DeVoe, and Stacy Lu. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Stacy Lu, Veni Kandasamy, and Jane Daniels. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Allison West and Stacy Lu. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board designated the study as not human subjects research.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
West, A., Lu, S., Kandasamy, V. et al. Caregivers with Learning Differences: A Scoping Review and Stakeholder-Engaged Process to Identify Screening Tools for Maternal and Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs. J Dev Phys Disabil 34, 1031–1051 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09833-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09833-0