Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterior Versus Anterior Walkers for Children with Cerebral Palsy-Biomechanical Analysis and Energy Consumption: a Systematic Review

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systematically review the comparison of anterior and posterior framed walker in terms of biomechanical analysis and energy expenditure and to discuss the implications for clinical practice. A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies that evaluated the gait pattern, upper extremity (UE) kinetics and kinematics and energy consumption. Outcome measures and treatment results for them were identified. 6 studies met the criteria and were included in this systematic review. Gait analysis, UE kinetics and kinematics and energy consumption were all assessed in 4 different papers. Gait parameters were comparable between walkers but declined torso tilt was found in the posterior walker group. In UE joints, two groups showed no significant difference but adaptive therapeutic posterior walker helped decrease UE burden. Most of papers prefer posterior walkers because of low oxygen cost. For better gait pattern, less UE burden and energy consumption, the adaptive therapeutic posterior walker is relatively the proper choice among all. For future studies, crossover studies or randomized controlled trails (RCTs) with larger sample size and more accurate measurement equipment may provide more persuasive evidence. Long term effects of walker users can also be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Report (2016). Australian cerebral palsy register report 2016. Sydney: Cerebral Palsy Alliance.

  • Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schünemann, H. J., et al. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 4(64), 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brożek, J., Akl, E., Jaeschke, R., Lang, D., Bossuyt, P., & Glasziou, P. et al. (2009). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Allergy, 64(8), 1109-1116.

  • Chen, H. (2017). Cerebral palsy. Atlas of Genetic Diagnosis and Counseling (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colver, A., Fairhurst, C., & Pharoah, P. (2014). Cerebral palsy. The Lancet, 383(9924), 1240–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health: Children and youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H., Rosenbaum, P., Paneth, N., et al. (2016). Cerebral palsy. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, 2, 15082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanyi, B., Schoenmakers, M., van Veen, N., Maathuis, K., Nollet, F., & Nederhand, M. (2015). The effects of orthoses, footwear, and walking aids on the walking ability of children and adolescents with spinal bifida: A systematic review using international classification of functioning, disability and health for children and youth (ICF-CY) as a reference framework. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 39(6), 437–443.

  • Fast, A., Wang, F., Adrezin, R., Cordaro, M. A., Ramis, J., & Sosner, J. (1995). The instrumented walker: Usage patterns and forces. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76(5), 484–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opila, K., Nicol, A., & Paul, J. (1987). Forces and impulses during aided gait. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68(10), 715–722.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateni, H., & Maki, B. (2005). Assistive devices for balance and mobility: Benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(1), 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., Palisano, R., Walter, S., Avery, L., & Russell, D. (2009). Stability and decline in gross motor function among children and youth with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 21 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 51(4), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M., Simkiss, D., Rose, A., & Li, F. (2017). Anterior or posterior walkers for children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology., 13(4), 422–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A., Brien, M., Plourde, J., Wood, E., Rosenbaum, P., & McLean, L. (2007). Stability of the gross motor function classification system in adults with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcquade, K., Finley, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Upper extremity joint stresses during walkerassisted ambulation in post-surgical patients. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 15(4), 332–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., et al. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konop, K., Strifling, K., Krzak, J., et al. (2011). Upper extremity joint dynamics during Walker assisted gait: A quantitative approach towards rehabilitative intervention. J Exp Clinic Med., 3(5), 213–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, E., & Andersson, C. (1997). Oxygen cost, walking speed, and perceived exertion in children with cerebral palsy when walking with anterior and posterior walkers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39(10), 671–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, E., Park, C., & Kim, J. (2001). Comparison of anterior and posterior walkers with respect to gait parameters and energy expenditure of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Yonsei Medical Journal, 42(2), 180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strifling, K., Lu, N., Wang, M., Cao, K., Ackman, J. D., Klein, J. P., Schwab, J. P., & Harris, G. F. (2008). Comparison of upper extremity kinematics in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy using anterior and posterior walkers. Gait & Posture, 28(3), 412–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konop, K., Strifling, K., Wang, M., Cao, K., Schwab, J., Eastwood, D., Jackson, S., Ackman, J. D., & Harris, G. F. (2009a). A biomechanical analysis of upper extremity kinetics in children with cerebral palsy using anterior and posterior walkers. Gait & Posture, 30(3), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konop, K., Strifling, K., Wang, M., Cao, K., Eastwood, D., et al. (2009b). Upper extremity kinetics and energy expenditure during walker-assisted gait in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 43(2), 156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KOOP, S. (2009). Scoliosis in cerebral palsy. Devl Med Child Neurol, 51, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, A., Mokhtar, N., & Byrne, N. (2014) Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Frontiers in Nutrition, 1(5), 1-16.

  • Lam, Y., & Ravussin, E. (2016). Analysis of energy metabolism in humans: A review of methodologies. Molecular Metabolism, 5(11), 1057–1071.

  • Rose, J., Gamble, J., Burgos, A., Medeiros, J., & Haskell, W. (2010). Energy expenditure index of walking for Normal children and for children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 32(4), 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susan, K. (2002). Oxygen cost, walking speed, and perceived exertion in children with cerebral palsy when walking with anterior and posterior walkers. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 14(3), 159–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bei-hua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, R., Feng, L., Xiao, Z. et al. Posterior Versus Anterior Walkers for Children with Cerebral Palsy-Biomechanical Analysis and Energy Consumption: a Systematic Review. J Dev Phys Disabil 32, 877–892 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09731-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09731-3

Keywords

Navigation