Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the Effects of Positive Reinforcement, Instructional Strategies, and Negative Reinforcement on Problem Behavior and Academic Performance: an Experimental Analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevalence of students with behavioral problems who also have learning problems has been reported to be as high as 50% (Glassberg et al. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 9–21, 1999). In the current study, we progressively evaluated the effects of positive reinforcement, instructional strategies, and, if needed, negative reinforcement on both academic performance (i.e., on-task academic behavior, task accuracy, reading fluency) and problem behavior with two boys who displayed a combination of behavioral and learning problems at school. A three-phase analysis was conducted within a combination multielement and reversal design. Phase 1 evaluated the effects of contingent positive reinforcement. Phase 2 evaluated the combined effects of positive reinforcement and instructional strategies. Phase 3, conducted for one participant, evaluated the inclusion of contingent negative reinforcement. Data were collected using interval and permanent product recording systems, with IOA averaging 97% across both participants. For one participant, contingent positive reinforcement with an instructional strategy improved task accuracy and fluency, and decreased problem behavior. For the second participant, contingent negative reinforcement with an instructional strategy decreased problem behavior and improved on-task academic behavior and task accuracy. Results showed that highly individualistic treatment packages can be developed if based on experimental analyses of both reinforcement and antecedent strategies to address multiple behavioral concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly M. Schieltz.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval and Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Parental informed consent was obtained for all individual participants included in this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This project was completed as partial fulfillment of the dissertation requirements by the first author at The University of Iowa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schieltz, K.M., Wacker, D.P., Suess, A.N. et al. Evaluating the Effects of Positive Reinforcement, Instructional Strategies, and Negative Reinforcement on Problem Behavior and Academic Performance: an Experimental Analysis. J Dev Phys Disabil 32, 339–363 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09696-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09696-y

Keywords

Navigation