Skip to main content
Log in

Implicit Attitudes and Explicit Ratings of Romantic Attraction of College Students Toward Opposite-Sex Peers with Physical Disabilities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is a replication and extension of a study by Man et al. in Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 18:35–44, 2006, who found that college students rated the romantic attractiveness of opposite-sex peers as equal, regardless of the presence or absence of a physical disability. Based on photographs with brief biographical vignettes 41 college students rated attractiveness of young adults with the Romantic Attraction Scale (RAS; Campbell in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:1254–1270, 1999) and then completed the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Nosek et al. in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31:166–180, 2005) to assess their implicit attitudes toward disabilities. Self-reported romantic attractiveness was unaffected by the presence of a physical disability. However, the IAT revealed a clear preference for physical health over physical disabilities. The discrepancy between the explicit attractiveness ratings and the implicit attitudes toward physical disabilities suggests that the former were biased by social desirability. Alternative explanations of the inconsistencies between the explicit and implicit data are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Terms used by the IAT.

References

  • Campbell, W. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2007). What do implicit measures tell us? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gething, L., & Wheeler, B. (1992). The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale: A new instrument to measure attitudes towards people with disabilities. Australian Journal of Psychology, 9, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., McGhee, D., & Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hergenrather, K., & Rhodes, S. (2007). Exploring undergraduate student attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Application of the disability social relationship scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louvet, E. (2007). Social judgment toward job applicants with disabilities: Perception of personal qualities and competences. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Man, M., Rojahn, J., Chrosniak, L., & Sanford, J. (2006). College students’ romantic attraction toward peers with physical disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 18, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two component models of social desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Facio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (Eds.). (2008). Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Susman, J. (1994). Disability, stigma, and deviance. Social Science Medical, 38, 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yazbeck, M., McVilly, K., & Parmenter, T. (2004). Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities: an Australian perspective. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Rojahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojahn, J., Komelasky, K.G. & Man, M. Implicit Attitudes and Explicit Ratings of Romantic Attraction of College Students Toward Opposite-Sex Peers with Physical Disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 20, 389–397 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-008-9108-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-008-9108-6

Keywords

Navigation