Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ)

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite a vast amount of literature regarding emotion regulation throughout the years, the interpersonal emotion regulation has been underestimated to a large extent until the past few years. With the purpose of encouraging and filling the gap of research on interpersonal emotion regulation, Hofmann et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(3), 341–356, 2016) have developed Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ). The current study aims to conduct the adaptation study of Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) into Turkish culture and assess its psychometric properties. To the best of our knowledge, interpersonal emotion regulation as a culture-sensitive construct has not been tested in a non-western culture with distinct interpersonal relationship dynamics. Results revealed that the proposed four-factor model fits the data sufficiently and thus provided support for the original factor structure proposed by Hofmann et al. (Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(3), 341–356, 2016). Overall, results revealed that the Turkish version of IERQ is a valid and reliable self-report measure which can be used to assess the ways individuals utilize others to regulate their own emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aka, B. T. (2011). Perceived parenting styles, emotion recognition and emotion regulation in relation to psychological wellbeing: symptoms of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and social anxiety. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation.) Middle-East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Aka, B. T., & Gençöz, T. (2014). Perceived parenting styles, emotion recognition, and emotion regulation in relation to psychological well-being. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal, 159, 529–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amstadter, A. (2008). Emotion regulation and anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(2), 211–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, E. J., Saklofske, D. H., Huang, S. H. S., & McKenney, D. (2004). Measurement of trait EI: testing and cross-validating a modified version of Schutte et al.s (1998) measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berking, M., Ebert, D., Cuijpers, P., & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Emotion-regulation skills training enhances the efficacy of inpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 82(4), 234–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berking, M., Wirtz, C., Svaldi, J., & Hofmann, S. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts symptoms of depression over five years. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 57, 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 953–961.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, S. D., & Hill, A. (2007). Caregiver influences on emerging emotion regulation: Biological and environmental transactions in early development. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 229–248). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Sills, L., Barlow, D. H., Brown, T. A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2006). Effects of suppression and acceptance on emotional responses on individuals with anxiety and mood disorders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44(9), 1251–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cisler, J. M., Olatunji, B. O., Feldner, M. T., & Forsyth, J. P. (2010). Emotion regulation and the anxiety disorders: an integrative review. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32(1), 68–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Leersnyder, J., Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2013). Cultural regulation of emotion: individual, relational, and structural sources. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, A. (1989). The validity and reliability of UCLA loneliness scale. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 7, 14–18.

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: a comparative study of five specific samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1659–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2008). Emotion regulation. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 497–512). New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997). Hiding feelings: the acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotional regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. (2014). Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(5), 483–492.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S., Sawyer, A., Fang, A., & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 29(5), 409–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S., Carpenter, J., & Curtiss, J. (2016). Interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire (IERQ): scale development and psychometric characteristics. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(3), 341–356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamoğlu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1301–1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C. (1984). Socialization in traditional society: A challenge to psychology. International Journal of Psychology, 19(1/4), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Jr., Alper, S., et al. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9654g.

  • Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennin, D., Heimberg, R., Turk, C., & Fresco, D. (2005). Preliminary evidence for an emotion dysregulation model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(10), 1281–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B., & Albert, D. (2007). The cultural regulation of emotions. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), The handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 486–503). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öner, N. & Le Compte, A. (1998). Durumluk - sürekli kaygı envanteri el kitabı. 2.basım, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayını, İstanbul.

  • Özer, K., & Özer, S. (2006). Durumsal-sürekli depresyon ölçeğinin faktöriyel alt yapısı. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(2), 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özer, K., & Özer, S. (2009). Durumsal-sürekli depresyon ölçeği'nin birleşen, yapı ve zamandaş geçerliği. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 29, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. J., Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2018). Making the good even better: a review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rude, S. S., & McCarthy, C. T. (2003). Emotional functioning in depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 17(5), 799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugancı, R., & Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 442–455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290–294.

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminate validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N., Manes, R., & Malouff, J. (2009). Antecedent-focused emotion regulation, response modulation, and well-being. Current Psychology, 28(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk, E., Günaydın, G., Sümer, N., & Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar-II’nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yayınları, 8(16), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soykan, C., Özgüven, H. D., & Gençöz, T. (2003). Liebowitz social anxiety scale: the Turkish version. Psychological Reports, 93(8), 1059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. C., & Luschene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. California: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Ritterband, L. M., Reheiser, E. C., & Brunner, T. M. (2003). The nature and measurement of depression. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3(2), 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatar, A., Tok, S., & Saltukoglu, G. (2011). Adaptation of the revised Schutte emotional intelligence scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuna, M. E. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies as predictors of university adjustment of Turkish and U.S. students. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation.) Middle-East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Werner, K., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion regulation and psychopathology. In A. M. Kring & D. M. Sloan (Eds.), Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment (pp. 13–37). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, K., Goldin, P., Ball, T., Heimberg, R., & Gross, J. (2011). Assessing emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder: The emotion regulation interview. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 33(3), 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, C., Hofmann, S., Riper, H., & Berking, M. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts anxiety over a five-year interval: a cross-lagged panel analysis. Depression and Anxiety, 31(1), 87–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yurtsever, G. (2008). Negotiators’ profit predicted by cognitive reappraisal, suppression of emotions, misinterpretation of information, and tolerance of ambiguity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 590–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parts of this work comprised the first author’s M.A. thesis conducted under the third author’s ̇ supervision at Bahçeşehir University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burak Doğruyol.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for the data was granted by the Bahçeşehir University Scientific Research and Publications Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Melisa Sevi Koç, Başak Türküler Aka, Burak Doğruyol, Joshua Curtiss, Joseph Kevin Carpenter and Stefan G. Hofmann declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Experiment Participants

All participants provided written informed consent. Experimental protocols in this study were approved by the university's institutional review board and all procedures met the guidelines of the institutional and/or national research committees.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koç, M.S., Aka, B.T., Doğruyol, B. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ). J Psychopathol Behav Assess 41, 294–303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09732-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09732-3

Keywords

Navigation