Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rapid and reliable protein structure determination via chemical shift threading

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein structure determination using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy can be both time-consuming and labor intensive. Here we demonstrate how chemical shift threading can permit rapid, robust, and accurate protein structure determination using only chemical shift data. Threading is a relatively old bioinformatics technique that uses a combination of sequence information and predicted (or experimentally acquired) low-resolution structural data to generate high-resolution 3D protein structures. The key motivations behind using NMR chemical shifts for protein threading lie in the fact that they are easy to measure, they are available prior to 3D structure determination, and they contain vital structural information. The method we have developed uses not only sequence and chemical shift similarity but also chemical shift-derived secondary structure, shift-derived super-secondary structure, and shift-derived accessible surface area to generate a high quality protein structure regardless of the sequence similarity (or lack thereof) to a known structure already in the PDB. The method (called E-Thrifty) was found to be very fast (often < 10 min/structure) and to significantly outperform other shift-based or threading-based structure determination methods (in terms of top template model accuracy)—with an average TM-score performance of 0.68 (vs. 0.50–0.62 for other methods). Coupled with recent developments in chemical shift refinement, these results suggest that protein structure determination, using only NMR chemical shifts, is becoming increasingly practical and reliable. E-Thrifty is available as a web server at http://ethrifty.ca.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander PA, He Y, Chen Y, Orban J, Bryan PN (2009) A minimal sequence code for switching protein structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(50):21149–21154

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Altschul SF, Gish W (1996) Local alignment statistics. Meth Enzymol 266:460–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25(17):3389–3402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berjanskii MV, Wishart DS (2005) A simple method to predict protein flexibility using secondary chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 127(43):14970–14971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berjanskii MV, Wishart DS (2013) A simple method to measure protein side-chain mobility using NMR chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 135(39):14536–14539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berjanskii MV, Neal S, Wishart DS (2006) PREDITOR: a web server for predicting protein torsion angle restraints. Nucleic Acids Res 34(suppl 2):W63-W69

    Google Scholar 

  • Berjanskii M, Tang P, Liang J, Cruz JA, Zhou J, Zhou Y et al (2009) GeNMR: a web server for rapid NMR-based protein structure determination. Nucleic Acids Res 37(suppl 2):W670-W677

    Google Scholar 

  • Berjanskii M, Arndt D, Liang Y, Wishart DS (2015) A robust algorithm for optimizing protein structures with NMR chemical shifts. J Bio NMR 63(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt MR, Skolnick J (2001) Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures. Biopolymers 59(5):305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi M, Heller GT, Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M (2017) Principles of protein structural ensemble determination. Curr Opin Struct Biol 42:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boratyn GM, Schaffer AA, Agarwala R, Altschul SF, Lipman DJ, Madden TL (2012) Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biol Direct 7(1):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D (1991) A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253:164–170

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M (2014) Statistical mechanics of the denatured state of a protein using replica-averaged metadynamics. J Am Chem Soc 136(25):8982–8991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M (2007) Protein structure determination from NMR chemical shifts. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(23):9615–9620

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Choy WY, Forman-Kay JD (2001) Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain. J Mol Biol 308:1011–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy SR (1998) Profile hidden markov models. Bioinformatics 14:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzinger SW, Fischer J (2006) SimShift: identifying structural similarities from NMR chemical shifts. Bioinformatics 22(4):460–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene LH, Lewis TE, Addou S, Cuff A, Dallman T, Dibley M et al (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D291–D297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güntert P, Mumenthaler C, Wüthrich K (1997) Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J Mol Biol 273(1):283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmanas A, Adams PD, Bardiaux B, Berman HM, Case DA, Fogh RH et al (2015) NMR exchange format: a unified and open standard for representation of NMR restraint data. Nat Struct Mol Biol 22(6):433–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafsa NE, Wishart DS (2014) CSI 2.0: a significantly improved version of the Chemical Shift Index. J Biomol NMR 60(2–3):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafsa NE, Arndt D, Wishart DS (2015a) CSI 3.0: a web server for identifying secondary and super-secondary structure in proteins using NMR chemical shifts. Nucleic Acids Res 43(W1):W370–W377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafsa NE, Arndt D, Wishart DS (2015b) Accessible surface area from NMR chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR 62(3):387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han B, Liu Y, Ginzinger SW, Wishart DS (2011) SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction. J Biomol NMR 50(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henikoff S, Henikoff JG (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89(22):10915–10919

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm L, Rosenström P (2010) Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res 38(suppl 2):W545-W549

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358:86–89

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12):2577–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R (1998) Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14(10):846–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, Sjölander K, Haussler D (1994) Hidden markov models in computational biology—applications to protein modeling. J Mol Biol 235:1501–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuszewsk J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1995) The impact of direct refinement against proton chemical shifts on protein structure determination by NMR. J Magn Reson 107:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl E, Elofsson A (2000) Identification of related proteins on family, superfamily and fold level. J Mol Biol 295(3):613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhusudhan MS, Marti-Renom MA, Sanchez R, Sali A (2006) Variable gap penalty for protein sequence–structure alignment. Protein Eng Des Sel 19(3):129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti R, Van Domselaar GH, Zhang H, Wishart DS (2004) SuperPose: a simple server for sophisticated structural superposition. Nucleic Acids Res 32(2):W590–W594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medek A, Hajduk PJ, Mack J, Fesik SW (2000) The use of differential chemical shifts for determining the binding site location and orientation of protein-bound ligands. J Am Chem Soc 122(6):1241–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mielke SP, Krishnan VV (2009) Characterization of protein secondary structure from NMR chemical shifts. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 54(3):141–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247(4):536–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O (2002) MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 11(11):2606–2621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osapay K, Case DA (1991) A new analysis of proton chemical shifts in proteins. J Am Chem Soc 113(25):9436–9444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osapay K, Theriault Y, Wright PE, Case DA (1994) Solution structure of carbonmonoxy myoglobin determined from nuclear magnetic resonance distance and chemical shift constraints. J Mol Biol 244:183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman DA, Case DA, Caldwell JW, Ross WS, Cheatham TE, DeBolt S et al (1995) AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput Phys Commun 91(1):1–41

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Xu J (2010) Low-homology protein threading. Bioinformatics 26(12):i294-i300

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosato A, Vranken W, Fogh RH, Ragan TJ, Tejero R, Pederson K, Vuister GW (2015) The second round of critical assessment of automated structure determination of proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013. J Biomol NMR 62(4):413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost B (1995) TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 3:314–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost B, Schneider R, Sander C (1997) Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 270(3):471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234:779–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzinger S, Kroon GJ, Foss TR, Chung J, Wright PE, Dyson HJ (2001) Sequence-dependent correction of random coil NMR chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc 123(13):2970–2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N, Clore GM (2003) The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson 160(1):65–73

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma D, Rajarathnam K (2000) C-13 NMR chemical shifts can predict disulfide bond formation. J Biomol NMR 18:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Bax A (2013) Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks. J Biomol NMR 56(3):227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Bax A (2015) Homology modeling of larger proteins guided by chemical shifts. Nat Methods 12(8):747–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Lange O, Delaglio F, Rossi P, Aramini JM, Liu G et al (2008) Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(12):4685–4690

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Delaglio F, Cornilescu G, Bax A (2009) TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J Biomol NMR 44(4):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7(1):539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D (2000) MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 16(9):776–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TF, Waterman MS (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147(1):195–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söding J (2005) Protein homology detection by HMM–HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21(7):951–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, DiMaio F, Wang RYR, Kim D, Miles C, Brunette TJ et al (2013) High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21(10):1735–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF, Harano Y, Ioannidis YE, Lin J et al (2008) BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res 36(suppl 1):D402–D408

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranken WF, Rieping W (2009) Relationship between chemical shift value and accessible surface area for all amino acid atoms. BMC Struct Biol 9(1):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Dunbrack RL (2003) PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19(12):1589–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS (2011) Interpreting protein chemical shift data. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 58(1):62–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS, Case DA (2001) Use of chemical shifts in macromolecular structure determination. Methods Enzymol 338:3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS, Nip AM (1998) Protein chemical shift analysis: a practical guide. Biochem Cell Biol 76:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS, Sykes BD (1994a) Chemical shifts as a tool for structure determination. Methods Enzymol 239:363–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS, Sykes BD (1994b) The 13C chemical shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical shift data. J Biomol NMR 4(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS, Sykes BD, Richards FM (1992) The chemical shift index: a fast and simple method for the assignment of protein secondary structure through NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry 31(6):1647–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart DS, Arndt D, Berjanskii M, Tang P, Zhou J, Lin G (2008) CS23D: a web server for rapid protein structure generation using NMR chemical shifts and sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W496–W502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Zhang Y (2010) How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? Bioinformatics 26(7):889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 57:702–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Alberta Prion Research Institute (APRI) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E8, Canada

    Noor E. Hafsa & David S. Wishart

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada

    Mark V. Berjanskii, David Arndt & David S. Wishart

Authors
  1. Noor E. Hafsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark V. Berjanskii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Arndt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David S. Wishart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Wishart.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1553 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hafsa, N.E., Berjanskii, M.V., Arndt, D. et al. Rapid and reliable protein structure determination via chemical shift threading. J Biomol NMR 70, 33–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-017-0154-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-017-0154-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation