Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving cell adhesion: development of a biosensor for cell behaviour monitoring by surface grafting of sulfonic groups onto a thermoplastic polyurethane

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface properties of a material in combination with the mechanical properties are responsible for the material performance in a biological environment as well as the behaviour of the cells which contact with the material. Surface properties such as chemical, physical, biological play an important role in the biomaterials filed. In this work, the surface of a thermoplastic polyurethane film (Elastollan®1180A50) was tailored with sulfonic groups by grafting [2-(methacryloxyl)ethyl]-dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium hydroxide (SB) after a previous surface activation either by Argon plasma or by ultra-violet irradiation. This surface modification had the purpose of improving cell adhesion in order to develop a biosensor able to monitor cell behaviour. The surfaces were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, by atomic force microscopy and by contact angle measurements in order to evaluate the efficiency of the modification. Additionally, blood compatibility studies and cell adhesion tests with human bone marrow cells were performed. These methods allowed the grafting of SB and the results indicate that a higher density of grafting was achieved with previous surface plasma treatment than with UV irradiation. However, for both techniques, the presence of SB functional groups led to a decrease of hydrophobicity and roughness of the surface, together with an improvement of the materials biological performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horbett TJ, Brash JL. Proteins at interfaces: an overview. In: Horbett TJ, Brash JL, editors. Proteins at interfaces II: fundamentals and applications. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1995. p. 1–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alves P, Coelho JFJ, Haack J, Rota A, Bruinink A, Gil MH. Surface modification and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane. Eur Polym J. 2009;45:1412–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hylton DM, Shalaby SW, Latour RA. Direct correlation between adsorption induced changes in protein structure and platelet adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res. 2005;73A:349–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He D, Susanto H, Ulbricht M. Photo-irradiation for preparation, modification and stimulation of polymeric membranes. Prog Polym Sci. 2009;34:62–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Siow KS, Britcher L, Kumar S, Griesser HJ. Plasma methods for the generation of chemically reactive surfaces for biomolecule immobilization and cell colonization—a review. Plasma Process Polym. 2006;3:392–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alves P, Sousa HC, Gil MH. Surface grafting polymerization of thermoplastic polyurethane by low pressure plasma treatment to improve hydrophilicity. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;122:2302–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Inagaki N. Plasma surface modification and plasma polymerization. Basel: Techomic publishing co Inc.; 1996. p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu S, Ren X, Li MBCSG, Allbritton N. Surface-directed, graft polymerization within microfluidic channels. Anal Chem. 2004;76:1865–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng Y, Gurgel PV, Carbonell RG. Effects of UV exposure and initiator concentration on the spatial variation of poly(glycidyl methacrylate) grafts on nonwoven fabrics. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2011;50:6115–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng J, Wang L, Liu L, Yang W. Developments and new applications of UV-induced surface graft polymerizations. Prog Polym Sci. 2009;34:156–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebara M, Hoffman J, Stayton P, Hoffman A. Surface modification of microfluidic channels by UV-mediated graft polymerization of non-fouling and ‘smart’ polymers. Radiat Phys Chem. 2007;76:1409–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong I, Ho C-M. Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2009;7:291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar S, Maxwell IZ, Heisterkamp A, Polte TR, Lele TP, Salanga M, Mazur E, Ingber DE. Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys J. 2006;90:3762–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaiser J-P, Bruinink A. Investigating cell—material interactions by monitoring and analysing cell migration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15:429–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tymchenko N, Wallentin J, Petronis S, Bjursten LM, Kasemo B, Gold J. A novel cell force sensor for quantification of traction during cell spreading and contact guidance. Biophys J. 2007;93:335–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan J, Huang X, Li P, Li L, Shen J. Surface-initiated RAFT polymerization of sulfobetaine from cellulose membranes to improve hemocompatibility and antibiofouling property. Polym Chem. 2013;4:5074–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Correia NT, Ramos JJM, Saramago BJV, Calado JCG. Estimation of the surface tension of a solid: application to a liquid crystalline polymer. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1997;189:361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chibowski E. Surface free energy of a solid from contact angle hysteresis. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2003;103:149–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Owens D, Wendt R. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymer. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969;13:1711–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Raymund Kwok WM. XPSPEAK, XPS Peak Fitting Program for WIN95/98, Version 4.1. Hong Kong: Department of Chemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2000.

  22. ISO. 10993–4: Biological evaluation of medical devices, part 4: selection of tests for interaction with blood. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2002.

  23. ASTM F 756-00. Standard practice for assessment of hemolytic properties of materials. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 2000.

  24. Imai Y, Nose Y. A new method for evalution of antithrombogenicity of materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1972;6:165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferreira P, Pereira R, Coelho JFJ, Silva AFM, Gil MH. Modification of the biopolymer castor oil with free isocyanate groups to be applied as bioadhesive. Int J Biol Macromol. 2007;40:144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Besteiro MC, Guiomar AJ, Gonçalves CA, Bairos VA, Pinho MN, Gil MH. Characterization and in vitro hemocompatibility of bi-soft segment, polycaprolactone-based poly(ester urethane urea) membranes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93A:954–64.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaiser J-P, Wick P, Manser P, Spohn P, Bruinink A. Single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) affect cell physiology and cell architecture. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1523–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwok SCH, Wang J, Chu PK. Surface energy, wettability, and blood compatibility phosphorus doped diamond-like carbon films. Diam Relat Mater. 2005;14:78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Interfacial chemistry, operating manual dataphysics OCA. DataPhysics Instruments GmbH, Germany; 2002. p. 1–4

  30. Alves P, Pinto S, Kaiser J-P, Bruinink A, Sousa HC, Gil MH. Surface grafting of a thermoplastic polyurethane with methacrylic acid by previous plasma surface activation and by ultraviolet irradiation to reduce cell adhesion. Colloids Surfaces B. 2011;82:371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pinto S, Alves P, Matos CM, Santos AC, Rodrigues LR, Teixeira JA, Gil MH. Poly(dimethyl siloxane) surface modification by low pressure plasma to improve its characteristics towards biomedical applications. Colloids Surfaces B. 2010;81:20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang P, Tan K, Ho C, Khew M, Kang E. Surface modification of natural rubber latex films by graft copolymerization. Eur Polym J. 2000;36:1323–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Qiu Y, Klee D, Plüster W, Severich B, Höcker H. Surface modification of polyurethane by plasma-induced graft polymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate. J Appl Polym Sci. 1996;62:2373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lappan U, Buchhammer H-M, Lunkwitz K. Surface modification of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) by plasma pretreatment and adsorption of polyelectrolytes. Polymer. 1999;40:4087–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen W, Li Z, Liu Y. Surface chemical functional groups modification of porous carbon. Recent Patents Chem Eng. 2008;1:27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Masters KS. The haemocompatibility of polyurethane-hyaluronic acid copolymers. Biomaterials. 2007;29:150–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen H, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Brook MA, Sheardown H. Protein repellent silicone surfaces by covalent immobilization of poly(ethylene oxide). Biomaterials. 2005;26:2391–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao C, Liu X, Nomizu M, Nishi N. Blood compatibility aspects of DNA-modified polysulfone membrane-protein adsorption and platelet adhesion. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3747–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alves P, Kaiser J-P, Haack J, Salk N, Bruinink A, Sousa HC, Gil MH. Surface modification of thermoplastic polyurethane in order to enhance reactivity and avoid cell adhesion. Colloid Polym Sci. 2009;287:1469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kowalczyńska HM, Nowak-Wyrzykowska M, Inkielman M, Stołowska L, Marciniak E. The shape of cells adhering to sulfonated copolymer surfaces. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2005;10:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the European Commission through the specific targeted research project CellForce of the 6th FP (Contract No.: NMP4-CT-2005-016626).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIEPQPF, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Universidade de Coimbra, Polo II, Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-790, Coimbra, Portugal

    P. Alves, S. Pinto, P. Ferreira, Hermínio C. de Sousa & M. H. Gil

  2. EMPA St. Gallen, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, 9014, St. Gallen, CH, Switzerland

    Jean-Pierre Kaiser & Arie Bruinink

Authors
  1. P. Alves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Pierre Kaiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arie Bruinink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hermínio C. de Sousa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. H. Gil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Alves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alves, P., Pinto, S., Ferreira, P. et al. Improving cell adhesion: development of a biosensor for cell behaviour monitoring by surface grafting of sulfonic groups onto a thermoplastic polyurethane. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 25, 2017–2026 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5233-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5233-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation