Skip to main content
Log in

FMS for Unmanned Aerial Systems: HMI Issues and New Interface Solutions

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To integrate UASs in the NAS, an improvement in navigation, planning, communication and 4D trajectory control capabilities is mandatory. A way to obtain this enhance is to adopt a Flight Management System. A FMS for an UAS has some differences with respect to one for a manned aircraft, in terms of architecture and performed functions. In particular, from HMI point of view, the specific UAS human factor issues shall be added to the current manned FMS interface lacks. Starting from these considerations, a new FMS HMI for the Alenia Aeronautica TCS has been developed, using as data entry devices two touch screens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Croft, J.: Unmanned flight tests to advance airline reduced-crew concepts. www.flightglobal.com (2009)

  2. Shively, J.: Pilot aircraft interface objectives/rationale. In: Meeting of Experts on NASA’s Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Integration in the National Airspace System (NAS) Project (2010)

  3. Johnson, C.: UAS Integration in the NAS Project. NASA, Washington, DC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. STANAG 4586 (Edition 2) Standard Interfaces of UAV Control System (UCS) for NATO UAV Interoperability (2007)

  5. Israel, K., Nesbit, R.: Defense Science Board Study on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Arlington (2004)

  6. Cambone, S., Krieg, K., Pace, P., Wells, L. II: Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005–2030. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Arlington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, K.: A Summary of Unmanned Aircraft Accident/Incident Data: Human Factors Implications. FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nisser, T.: Human Factors Challenges in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV): A Literature review. School of Aviation of the Lund University, Ljungbyhed (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopcroft, R., Burchat, E., Vine, J.: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Maritime Patrol: Human Factor Issues. Defense Science and Technology Organization, Australian Government Department of Defense, Sydney (2006)

  10. Wickens, C.: Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum. Factors 50(3), 449–455 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, K.: Human Factors Implications of Unmanned Aircraft Accidents: Flight-Control Problems. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gean, J.: Teaching Non-Pilots to Fly Predators Require More Cockpit Hours in Manned Aircraft. National Defense Magazine (2010)

  13. Cummings, M., Kirschbaum, A., Platts, J.: STANAG 4586 Human Supervisory Control Implications. MIT, DP Associates, Muretex Ltd, Air and Weapon System Department, Dstl Farnborough and Office of Naval Research (2008)

  14. Cummings, M., Platts, J., Sulmistras, A.: Human Performance Considerations in the Development of Interoperability Standards for UAV Interfaces. Moving Autonomy Forward Conference (2006)

  15. Cummings, M., Bruni, S., Mercier, S., Mitchell, P.: Automation Architecture for Single Operator Multiple UAV Command and Control. Int. C2 J. 1(2), 1–24 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galster, S., Barnes, M., Cosenzo, K., Hollnagen, E., Miller, C., Parasuraman, R., Reising, J., Taylor, R., van Breda, L.: Chapter 7-Human Automation Integration—Uninhabited Military Vehicles (UMVs): Human Factors Issues in Augmenting the Force (RTO-TR-HFM-078–07) (2007)

  17. Mejdal, S., McCauley, M., Beringer, D.: Human Factors Design Guidelines for Multifunction Displays. DOT/FAA/AM-01/17 (2001)

  18. Rosenkrans, W.: Autoflight Audit—Flight Safety Foundation. AeroSafety World Magazine (2008)

  19. Lyall, B.: Autoflight Modes Awareness Issues: An Overview. FAA Mode Awareness Workshop (1997)

  20. Lee, K., Sandford, B., Slattery, R.: The Human Factors of FMS usage in the terminal area. AIAA, New Orleans (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sherry, L., Polson, P., Feary, M.: Designin User-Interface for the Cockpit: Five Common Design Errors and How to Avoid Them. Society of Automotive Engineers (2001)

  22. Sherry, L., Polson, P., Feary M., Palmer, E.: When does the MCDU Interface Work Well? Lesson Learned for the Design on New Flightdeck User-Interfaces. Honeywell, Institute of Cognitive Science University of Colorado, NASA Ames Research Center (2003)

  23. MIL-STD-1472F Human Engineering—Department of Defense Design Criteria Standard (1999)

  24. STANAG 4671 (Edition 1)—Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Systems Airworthiness Requirements (USAR) (2009)

  25. EASA Policy Statement Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)—E.Y013–01 (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulvia Quagliotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Damilano, L., Guglieri, G., Quagliotti, F. et al. FMS for Unmanned Aerial Systems: HMI Issues and New Interface Solutions. J Intell Robot Syst 65, 27–42 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9567-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9567-3

Keywords

Navigation