Abstract
Recent developments and general penetration of society by relations between robots and human beings generate multiple feelings, opinions, and reactions. Such a situation develops a request to analyze this area; multiple references to facts indicate that the situation differs from public opinion. This paper provides a detailed analysis performed on the wide area of human–robot interaction (HRI). It delivers an original classification of HRI with respect to human emotion, technical means, human reaction prediction, and the general cooperation-collaboration field. Analysis was executed using reference outcome sorting and reasoning into separate groups, provided in separate tables. Finally, the analysis is finished by developing a big picture of the situation with strong points and general tendencies outlined. The paper concludes that HRI still lacks methodology and training techniques for the initial stage of human–robot cooperation. Also, in the paper, instrumentation for HRI is analyzed, and it is inferred that the main bottlenecks remain in the process of being understood, lacking an intuitive interface and HRI rules formulation, which are suggested for future work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akalin, N., Kristoffersson, A., & Loutfi, A. (2022). Do you feel safe with your robot? Factors influencing perceived safety in human-robot interaction based on subjective and objective measures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 158, 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102744
Alarcon, G. M., Gibson, A. M., Jessup, S. A., & Capiola, A. (2021). Exploring the differential effects of trust violations in human-human and human-robot interactions. Applied Ergonomics, 93, 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103350
Archer, M. S. (2021). Can humans and AI robots be friends? In Post-Human Futures: Human Enhancement, Artificial Intelligence and Social Theory (pp. 132–152). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351189958-7
Bajcsy, A., Herbert, S. L., Fridovich-Keil, D., Fisac, J. F., Deglurkar, S., Dragan, A. D., & Tomlin, C. J. (2018). A scalable framework for real-time multi-robot, multi-human collision avoidance. In Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2019-May, 936–943.
Ballen-Moreno, F., Bautista, M., Provot, T., Bourgain, M., Cifuentes, C. A., & Múnera, M. (2022). Development of a 3D relative motion method for human-robot interaction assessment. Sensors, 22(6), 2411. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062411
Bänziger, T., Kunz, A., & Wegener, K. (2020). Optimizing human–robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 1635–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1411-1
Bhattacharya, S. (2021). A note on robotics and artificial intelligence in pharmacy. Applied Drug Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs, 8(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.2174/2667337108666211206151551
Bi, L., & Feleke, A. (2019). A review on EMG-based motor intention prediction of continuous human upper limb motion for human-robot collaboration. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 51, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.01
Boschetti, G., Bottin, M., Faccio, M., & Minto, R. (2021). Multi-robot multi-operator collaborative assembly systems: A performance evaluation model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32, 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01714-7
Buerkle, A., Eaton, W., Lohse, N., Bamber, T., & Ferreira, P. (2021). EEG based arm movement intention recognition towards enhanced safety in symbiotic Human-Robot Collaboration. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 70, 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102137
Cacace, J., Caccavale, R., Finzi, A., & Grieco, R. (2023). Combining human guidance and structured task execution during physical human–robot collaboration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34, 3053–3067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01989-y
Caccavale, R., Saveriano, M., Finzi, A., & Lee, D. (2019). Kinesthetic teaching and attentional supervision of structured tasks in human–robot interaction. Autonomous Robots, 43(6), 1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9706-9
Canuto, C., Freire, E. O., Molina, L., Carvalho, E. A. N., & Givigi, S. N. (2022). Intuitiveness level: Frustration-based methodology for human-robot interaction gesture elicitation. IEEE Access, 10, 17145–17154. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3146838
Caporaso, T., Grazioso, S., & di Gironimo, G. (2022). Development of an integrated virtual reality system with wearable sensors for ergonomic evaluation of human-robot cooperative workplaces. Sensors, 22(6), 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062413
Choi, Y., Choi, M., Oh, M., & Kim, S. (2020). Service robots in hotels: Understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(6), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1703871
Chutima, P. (2022). A comprehensive review of robotic assembly line balancing problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01641-7
Davey, G. (1997). Phobias : A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Treatment. Wiley.
De Groote, F., & Falisse, A. (2021). Perspective on musculoskeletal modelling and predictive simulations of human movement to assess the neuromechanics of gait. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1946), 20202432. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2432
De Visser, E. J., Topoglu, Y., Joshi, S., Krueger, F., Phillips, E., Gratch, J., Tossell, C. C., & Ayaz, H. (2022). Designing man’s new best friend: Enhancing human-robot dog interaction through dog-like framing and appearance. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/S22031287
Desideri, L., Ottaviani, C., Malavasi, M., di Marzio, R., & Bonifacci, P. (2019). Emotional processes in human-robot interaction during brief cognitive testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.013
Duarte, N. F., Rakovic, M., Tasevski, J., Coco, M. I., Billard, A., & Santos-Victor, J. (2018). Action anticipation: Reading the intentions of humans and robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(4), 4132–4139. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2861569
Dzedzickis, A., Kaklauskas, A., & Bucinskas, V. (2020). Human emotion recognition: Review of sensors and methods. Sensors, 20(3), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030592
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021). Advanced applications of industrial robotics: New trends and possibilities. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010135
Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
Etemad-Sajadi, R., Soussan, A., & Schöpfer, T. (2022). How ethical issues raised by human-robot interaction can impact the intention to use the robot? International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(4), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-021-00857-8
Faccio, M., Granata, I., Menini, A., Milanese, M., Rossato, C., Bottin, M., Minto, R., Pluchino, P., Gamberini, L., Boschetti, G., & Rosati, G. (2023). Human factors in cobot era: A review of modern production systems features. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01953-w
Fisac, J. F., Bajcsy, A., Herbert, S. L., Fridovich-Keil, D., Wang, S., Tomlin, C. J., & Dragan, A. D. (2018). Probabilistically safe robot planning with confidence-based human predictions. Robotics: Science and Systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1806.00109
Fischer, K. (2022). Tracking anthropomorphizing behavior in human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 11(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442677
Fraune, M. R., Sherrin, S., Šabanović, S., & Smith, E. R. (2019). Is human-robot interaction more competitive between groups than between individuals?. In 2019 14th acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction (hri) (pp. 104–113). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673241
Fukumori, T., Cai, C., Zhang, Y., el Hafi, L., Hagiwara, Y., Nishiura, T., & Taniguchi, T. (2022). Optical laser microphone for human-robot interaction: Speech recognition in extremely noisy service environments. Advanced Robotics, 36(5–6), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2021.2023629
Gaggioli, A., Chirico, A., di Lernia, D., Maggioni, M. A., Malighetti, C., Manzi, F., Marchetti, A., Massaro, D., Rea, F., Rossignoli, D., Sandini, G., Villani, D., Wiederhold, B. K., Riva, G., & Sciutti, A. (2021). Machines like us and people like you: Toward human-robot shared experience. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(5), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.29216.aga
Gomez Chavez, A., Ranieri, A., Chiarella, D., Zereik, E., Babić, A., & Birk, A. (2019). CADDY underwater stereo-vision dataset for human-robot interaction (HRI) in the context of diver activities. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7010016
Gualtieri, L., Rauch, E., & Vidoni, R. (2022). Development and validation of guidelines for safety in human-robot collaborative assembly systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 163, 107801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107801
Gui, L.-Y., Zhang, K., Wang, Y.-X., Liang, X., Moura, J. M. F., & Veloso, M. (2018). teaching robots to predict human motion. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018, 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594452
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors: THe Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
Hatfield, E., Bensman, L., Thornton, P. D., & Rapson, R. L. (2014). New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona an International Journal on Personal Relationships, 8(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.162
Hayashi, Y., & Wakabayashi, K. (2018). Influence of robophobia on decision making in a court scenario. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176988
Hellström, T., & Bensch, S. (2018). Understandable Robots. Paladyn, 9(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/PJBR-2018-0009
Hentout, A., Aouache, M., Maoudj, A., & Akli, I. (2019). Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: A literature review of the decade 2008–2017. Advanced Robotics, 33(15–16), 764–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714
Higgins, P., Kebe, G. Y., Berlier, A. J., Darvish, K., Engel, D., & Ferraro, F. (2021). Towards Making Virtual Human-Robot Interaction a Reality. https://doi.org/10.13016/M2LHCH-CUZP
Hjorth, S., & Chrysostomou, D. (2022). Human–robot collaboration in industrial environments: A literature review on non-destructive disassembly. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 73, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102208
Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2022). The fundamental attribution error in human-robot interaction: An experimental investigation on attributing responsibility to a social robot for its pre-programmed behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(5), 1137–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-021-00856-9
Hu, H., & Fisac, J. F. (2022). Active Uncertainty Reduction for Human-Robot Interaction: An Implicit Dual Control Approach. http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07720
Hu, Y., Abe, N., Benallegue, M., Yamanobe, N., Venture, G., & Yoshida, E. (2022). Toward active physical human-robot interaction: Quantifying the human state during interactions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(3), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3138684
Huang, R., Cheng, H., Qiu, J., & Zhang, J. (2019). Learning physical human-robot interaction with coupled cooperative primitives for a lower exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 16(4), 1566–1574. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2018.2886376
Innes, J. M., & Morrison, W. B. (2021). Experimental studies of human-robot interaction: Threats to valid interpretation from methodological constraints associated with experimental manipulations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00671-8
Hofstede Insights, (2023) Retrieved December 4, 2023, from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool?countries=denmark,greece
Jørgensen, J., Bojesen, K. B., & Jochum, E. (2022). Is a soft robot more “Natural”? Exploring the perception of soft robotics in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00761-1
Kaonain, T. E., Rahman, M. A. A., Ariff, M. H. M., Yahya, W. J., & Mondal, K. (2021). Collaborative robot safety for human-robot interaction in domestic simulated environments. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1096(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1096/1/012029
Katsanis, I. A., & Moulianitis, V. C. (2021). An architecture for safe child-robot interactions in autism interventions. Robotics, 10(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010020
Kempt, H. (2020). Social Reverberations. In Social Reverberations (pp. 137–173).
Kempt, H. (2022). Social Integration. In Synthetic Friends (pp. 163–1834). Berlin: Springer.
Khairuddin, I. M., Sidek, S. N., Majeed, A. P. P. A., Razman, M. A. M., Puzi, A. A., & Yusof, H. M. (2021). The classification of movement intention through machine learning models: The identification of significant time-domain EMG features. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.379/SUPP-2
Kitagawa, R., Liu, Y., & Kanda, T. (2021). Human-inspired motion planning for omni-directional social robots. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444679
Kousi, N., Stoubos, C., Gkournelos, C., Michalos, G., & Makris, S. (2019). Enabling Human robot interaction in flexible robotic assembly lines: An augmented reality based software suite. Procedia CIRP, 81, 1429–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.328
Krueger, F., Mitchell, K. C., Deshpande, G., & Katz, J. S. (2021). Human–dog relationships as a working framework for exploring human–robot attachment: A multidisciplinary review. Animal Cognition, 24(2), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10071-021-01472-W
Kuhail, M. A., Berengueres, J., Taher, F., Alkuwaiti, M., & Khan, S. Z. (2023). Haptic systems: Trends and lessons learned for haptics in spacesuits. Electronics, 12, 1888. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081888
Kulke, L., Feyerabend, D., & Schacht, A. (2020). A comparison of the affectiva iMotions facial expression analysis software with emg for identifying facial expressions of Emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 329. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.00329
Lai, Y., Paul, G., Cui, Y., & Matsubara, T. (2022). User intent estimation during robot learning using physical human robot interaction primitives. Autonomous Robots, 46(2), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10514-021-10030-9
Lavit Nicora, M., Ambrosetti, R., Wiens, G. J., & Fassi, I. (2021). Human-robot collaboration in smart manufacturing: Robot reactive behavior intelligence. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME,. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048950/1089694
Lee, J.-E. R., & Nass, C. I. (2010). Trust in Computers. In Trust and Technology in a Ubiquitous Modern Environment (pp. 1–15). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-901-9.ch001
Lee, S. A., & Liang, Y. J. (2019). Robotic foot-in-the-door: Using sequential-request persuasive strategies in human-robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.026
Leichtmann, B., Nitsch, V., & Mara, M. (2022). Crisis ahead? Why human-robot Interaction user studies may have replicability problems and directions for improvement. Frontiers in Robotics and A, I, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.838116
Lestingi, L., Askarpour, M., Bersani, M. M., & Rossi, M. (2021). A deployment framework for formally verified human-robot interactions. IEEE Access, 9, 136616–136635. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3117852
Lewandowska, A., Rejer, I., Bortko, K., & Jankowski, J. (2022). Eye-tracker study of influence of affective disruptive content on user’s visual attention and emotional state. Sensors, 22(2), 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020547
Li, G., Li, Z., & Kan, Z. (2022). Assimilation control of a robotic exoskeleton for physical human-robot interaction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(2), 2977–2984. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3144537
Li, J., Lu, L., Zhao, L., Wang, C., & Li, J. (2021). An integrated approach for robotic Sit-To-Stand assistance: Control framework design and human intention recognition. Control Engineering Practice, 107, 104680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104680
Li, W., Hu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Pham, D. T. (2023). Safe human–robot collaboration for industrial settings: A survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02159-4
Lim, J. Z., Mountstephens, J., & Teo, J. (2020). Emotion recognition using eye-tracking: Taxonomy. Review and Current Challenges. Sensors, 20(8), 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082384
Lim, Y., Pongsakornsathien, N., Gardi, A., Sabatini, R., Kistan, T., Ezer, N., & Bursch, D. J. (2021). Adaptive human-robot interactions for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. Robotics, 10(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010012
Liu, Z., Lyu, K., Wu, S., Chen, H., Hao, Y., & Ji, S. (2021). Aggregated multi-GANs for controlled 3D human motion prediction. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(3), 2225–2232.
Londoño, L., Röfer, A., Welschehold, T., & Valada, A. (2022). Doing Right by Not Doing Wrong in Human-Robot Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2202.02654
Maccarini, A. M. (2021). The social meanings of perfection: Human self-understanding in a post-human society. In What is Essential to Being Human?: Can AI Robots Not Share It? (pp. 197–213). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351563-10
Maggioni, M. A., & Rossignoli, D. (2023). If it looks like a human and speaks like a human. Communication and cooperation in strategic Human-Robot interactions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 104, 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102011
Malik, A. A., & Bilberg, A. (2019). Developing a reference model for human–robot interaction. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13(4), 1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00591-6
Maroger, I., Ramuzat, N., Stasse, O., & Watier, B. (2021). Human trajectory prediction model and its coupling with a walking pattern generator of a humanoid robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(4), 6361–6369. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3092750
Matheson, E., Minto, R., Zampieri, E. G. G., Faccio, M., & Rosati, G. (2019). Human-robot collaboration in manufacturing applications: A review. Robotics, 8(4), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ROBOTICS8040100
Mazhar, O., Navarro, B., Ramdani, S., Passama, R., & Cherubini, A. (2019). A real-time human-robot interaction framework with robust background invariant hand gesture detection. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 60, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.008
Melchiorre, M., Scimmi, L. S., Mauro, S., & Pastorelli, S. P. (2021). Vision-based control architecture for human–robot hand-over applications. Asian Journal of Control, 23(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2480
Moro, C., Lin, S., Nejat, G., & Mihailidis, A. (2019). Social robots and seniors: A comparative study on the influence of dynamic social features on human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0488-1
Mugisha, S., Guda, V. K., Chevallereau, C., Zoppi, M., Molfino, R., & Chablat, D. (2022). Improving haptic response for contextual human robot interaction. Sensors, 22(5), 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22052040
Müller, M., Ruppert, T., Jazdi, N., & Weyrich, M. (2023). Self-improving situation awareness for human–robot-collaboration using intelligent Digital Twin. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02138-9
Murata, S., Yamashita, Y., Arie, H., Ogata, T., Sugano, S., & Tani, J. (2017). Learning to perceive the world as probabilistic or deterministic via interaction with others: A neuro-robotics experiment. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(4), 830–848. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2492140
Neto, P., Simão, M., Mendes, N., & Safeea, M. (2019). Gesture-based human-robot interaction for human assistance in manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101(1–4), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2788-x
Noroozi, F., Corneanu, C. A., Kaminska, D., Sapinski, T., Escalera, S., & Anbarjafari, G. (2021). Survey on emotional body gesture recognition. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 12(2), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2018.2874986
Obo, T., & Takizawa, K. (2022). Analysis of timing and effect of visual cue on turn-taking in human-robot interaction. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 34(2), 55–63.
Oliveira, R., Arriaga, P., & Paiva, A. (2021). Human-robot interaction in groups: Methodological and research practices. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(10), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5100059
Páez, J., & González, E. (2022). Human-robot scaffolding: An architecture to foster problem-solving skills. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 11(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526109
Park, S., & Whang, M. (2022). Empathy in human-robot interaction: Designing for social robots. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19031889
Pathi, S. K., Kiselev, A., & Loutfi, A. (2022). Detecting groups and estimating F-formations for social human-robot interactions. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6030018
Porpora, D. (2021). On robophilia and robophobia. What Is Essential to Being Human?: Can AI Robots Not Share It?, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351563-2
Qian, K., Xu, X., Liu, H., Bai, J., & Luo, S. (2022). Environment-adaptive learning from demonstration for proactive assistance in human–robot collaborative tasks. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 151, 104046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104046
Qu, W., Li, J., Zhang, R., Liu, S., & Bao, J. (2023). Adaptive planning of human–robot collaborative disassembly for end-of-life lithium-ion batteries based on digital twin. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02081-9
Rabb, N., Law, T., Chita-Tegmark, M., & Scheutz, M. (2022). An attachment framework for human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00802-9
Rahman, S. M. M. (2021). Machine learning-based cognitive position and force controls for power-assisted human-robot collaborative manipulation. Machines, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines9020028
Richards, L. E., & Matuszek, C. (2021). Learning to Understand Non-Categorical Physical Language for Human Robot Interactions. https://doi.org/10.13016/m2lbuq-ulee
Richardson, S. (2020). Affective computing in the modern workplace. Business Information Review, 37(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382120930866
Roesler, E., Naendrup-Poell, L., Manzey, D., & Onnasch, L. (2022). Why context matters: The influence of application domain on preferred degree of anthropomorphism and gender attribution in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(5), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-021-00860-Z
Ruhland, K., Peters, C. E., Andrist, S., Badler, J. B., Badler, N. I., Gleicher, M., Mutlu, B., & McDonnell, R. (2015). A review of eye gaze in virtual agents, social robotics and HCI: Behaviour generation, user interaction and perception. Computer Graphics Forum, 34(6), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12603
Sanders, T., Kaplan, A., Koch, R., Schwartz, M., & Hancock, P. A. (2019). The relationship between trust and use choice in human-robot interaction. Human Factors: THe Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 61(4), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818816838
Saunderson, S., & Nejat, G. (2019). How robots influence humans: A survey of nonverbal communication in social human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4), 575–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00523-0
Schydlo, P., Rakovic, M., Jamone, L., & Santos-Victor, J. (2018). Anticipation in human-robot cooperation: A recurrent neural network approach for multiple action sequences prediction. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460924
Shi, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., Ju, L., & Ding, X. (2021). Human-centred adaptive control of lower limb rehabilitation robot based on human–robot interaction dynamic model. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 162, 104340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104340
Song, C. S., & Kim, Y. K. (2022). The role of the human-robot interaction in consumers’ acceptance of humanoid retail service robots. Journal of Business Research, 146, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.087
Song, S., Kidziński, Ł, Peng, X. B., Ong, C., Hicks, J., Levine, S., Atkeson, C. G., & Delp, S. L. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning for modeling human locomotion control in neuromechanical simulation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00919-y4
Spatola, N., & Wudarczyk, O. A. (2021). Implicit attitudes towards robots predict explicit attitudes, semantic distance between robots and humans, anthropomorphism, and prosocial behavior: From attitudes to human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(5), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-020-00701-5
Story, M., Webb, P., Fletcher, S. R., Tang, G., Jaksic, C., & Carberry, J. (2022). Do speed and proximity affect human-robot collaboration with an industrial robot arm? International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(4), 1087–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12369-021-00853-Y
Strazdas, D., Hintz, J., Khalifa, A., Abdelrahman, A. A., Hempel, T., & Al-Hamadi, A. (2022). Robot system assistant (RoSA): Towards intuitive multi-modal and multi-device human-robot interaction. Sensors, 22(3), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22030923
Toichoa Eyam, A., Mohammed, W. M., & Martinez Lastra, J. L. (2021). Emotion-driven analysis and control of human-robot interactions in collaborative applications. Sensors, 21(14), 4626. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144626
Umbrico, A., Orlandini, A., Cesta, A., Faroni, M., Beschi, M., Pedrocchi, N., & Makris, S. (2022). Design of advanced human–robot collaborative cells for personalized human–robot collaborations. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 6839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146839
Van Maris, A., Zook, N., Dogramadzi, S., Studley, M., Winfield, A., & Caleb-Solly, P. (2021). A new perspective on robot ethics through investigating human-robot interactions with older adults. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10136. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110136
Vasconez, J. P., Kantor, G. A., & Auat Cheein, F. A. (2019). Human–robot interaction in agriculture: A survey and current challenges. Biosystems Engineering, 179, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.12.005
Vianello, L., Ivaldi, S., Aubry, A., & Peternel, L. (2023). The effects of role transitions and adaptation in human–cobot collaboration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02104-5
Vianello, L., Mouret, J.-B., Dalin, E., Aubry, A., & Ivaldi, S. (2021). Human posture prediction during physical human-robot interaction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(3), 6046–6053. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3086666
Wan, S., Gu, Z., & Ni, Q. (2020). Cognitive computing and wireless communications on the edge for healthcare service robots. Computer Communications, 149, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.012
Wang, W., Chen, Y., Li, R., & Jia, Y. (2019). Learning and comfort in human-robot interaction: A review. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 5152. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235152
Weis, P. P., & Herbert, C. (2022). Do I still like myself? Human-robot collaboration entails emotional consequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107060
Willemse, C. J. A. M., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2019). Social touch in human-robot interaction: Robot-initiated touches can induce positive responses without extensive prior bonding. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0500-9
Xiao, C., Fan, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhou, R. (2022). People do not automatically take the level-1 visual perspective of humanoid robot avatars. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(1), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00773-x
Xiong, J., Chen, J., & Lee, P. S. (2021). Functional fibers and fabrics for soft robotics, wearables, and human-robot interface. Advanced Materials, 33(19), 2002640. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002640
Yao, X., Ma, N., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Yang, E., & Faccio, M. (2022). Enhancing wisdom manufacturing as industrial metaverse for industry and society 5.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 35(1), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02027-7
Yu, J., Gao, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, D., Liu, J., & Ju, Z. (2022). Deep object detector with attentional spatiotemporal LSTM for space human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(4), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2022.3144951
Zacharaki, N., Dimitropoulos, N., & Makris, S. (2022). Challenges in human-robot collaborative assembly in shipbuilding and ship maintenance, repair and conversion (SMRC) industry. Procedia CIRP, 106, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.165
Funding
This project has received financial support from the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT), Nr. P-LLT-21–6, State Education Development Agency of Latvia, Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST)) of Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, AD. and VB; methodology, VB and DV; validation, AD, GV and VB; formal analysis, DV and VB; investigation, GV and KL; resources, VB; data curation, GV and KL; writing—original draft preparation, DV; AD; KL.; writing—review and editing, DV, VB. and AD; visualization, AD; supervision, VB; funding acquisition, VB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dzedzickis, A., Vaičiūnas, G., Lapkauskaitė, K. et al. Recent advances in human–robot interaction: robophobia or synergy. J Intell Manuf (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02362-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02362-x