Skip to main content
Log in

A universal predictor-based machine learning model for optimal process maps in laser powder bed fusion process

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary bottlenecks faced by the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is the identification of optimal process parameters to obtain high density (> 99.8%) and a good surface finish (< 10 µm) in the fabricated components. Prediction of optimal process maps with the help of machine learning (ML) models is still challenging due to extensive training data, which proves to be expensive in additive manufacturing. In view of this, the present study employs six different supervised ML algorithms on a comparatively small data set of 33 experiments to predict relative density and surface roughness. It has been observed that input data (predictor) curation can increase the accuracy of the ML models even with a small data set. In the ML prediction model, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was reduced by 30% (relative density) and 21.94% (surface roughness) with volumetric energy density as an input parameter instead of laser power, scanning speed, hatch space, and layer thickness. The choice of non-dimensional energy input as a universal predictor allows for an increase in training size and the translation capability of trained ML models from one machine/material combination to another. The ML model based on increased training data size (198 for relative density and 173 for surface roughness) procured from the material processed/fabricated on different LPBF machines showcased reasonable R2 values of 79.11% and 80.3% for relative density and surface roughness, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the infrastructure and support of Center for Agile and Adaptive and Additive Manufacturing (CAAAM) funded through State of Texas Appropriation: 190405-105-805008-220.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: SS; Methodology: SS, ZG; Formal analysis and investigation: ZG, SS; ML Modeling: ZG; Writing—original draft preparation: SS, ZG; Writing—review and editing: SF, ND; Funding acquisition: ND, SF; Resources: ND, SF; Supervision: SF, ND; Experimental data characterization: DAR, MVP, SJ.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narendra B. Dahotre.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, Z., Sharma, S., Riley, D.A. et al. A universal predictor-based machine learning model for optimal process maps in laser powder bed fusion process. J Intell Manuf 34, 3341–3363 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02004-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02004-0

Keywords

Navigation