Abstract
Background or Purpose
To assess effectiveness of dofetilide in reducing the burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).
Background
Prior small sample studies show that dofetilide has benefit in reducing VA. However, large sample investigations with long-term follow-up are lacking.
Methods
Two hundred seventeen consecutive patients admitted between January 2015 and December 2021 for dofetilide initiation for control of VA were assessed. Dofetilide was successfully started in 176 patients (81%) and had to be discontinued in the remaining 41 patients (19%). Dofetilide was initiated for control of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 136 patients (77%), whereas 40 (23%) patients were initiated on dofetilide for reducing the burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs).
Results
The mean follow-up was 24 ± 7 months. In total, among the 136 VT patients, 33 (24%) died, 11 (8%) received a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and 3 (2%) received a heart transplant during follow-up. Dofetilide was discontinued in 117 (86%) patients due to lack of sustained effectiveness during follow-up. Dofetilide use was associated with similar odds of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality/LVAD/heart transplant (OR: 0.97, 0.55–4.23) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) compared to those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Dofetilide did not reduce PVC burden during follow-up in the 40 patients with PVCs (mean baseline PVC burden: 15%, at 1-year follow-up: 14%).
Conclusions
Dofetilide use was less effective in reducing VA burden in our cohort of patients. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Shantha G, Alyesh D, Ghanbari H, Oral H. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and all-cause mortality after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a propensity-matched analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1368–73.
Mounsey JP, DiMarco JP. Cardiovascular drugs. Dofetilide. Circulation. 2000;102:2665–70.
Boriani G, Lubinski A, Capucci A, et al. A multicentre, double-blind randomized crossover comparative study on the efficacy and safety of dofetilide vs sotalol in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia and ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2180–91.
Bashir Y, Thomsen PE, Kingma JH, et al. Electrophysiologic profile and efficacy of intravenous dofetilide (UK-68,798), a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia Dofetilide Arrhythmia Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1040–4.
Baquero GA, Banchs JE, Depalma S, et al. Dofetilide reduces the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23:296–301.
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/Postmarket DrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm489271.htm (Accessed on May 07, 2017).
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm489271.htm (Accessed on May 04, 2016).
Guanzon AV, Crouch MA. Phase IV trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of dofetilide. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1142–7.
Denetclaw TH, Oshima N, Dowling TC. Dofetilide dose calculation errors in elderly associated with use of the modification of diet in renal disease equation. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:e44.
Pokorney SD, Yen DC, Campbell KB. Dofetilide dose reductions and discontinuations in women compared with men. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:478–84.
Subedi R, Dean RK, Dhamoon AS. Dofetilide-induced severe hepatotoxicity. Am J Ther. 2018;25:e783–4.
Fukui S, Katoh H, Tsuzuki NS. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for QT prolongation following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2003;7:R7–12.
Makkar RR, Fromm BS, Steinman RT, Meissner MD, Lehmann MH. Female gender as a risk factor for torsades de pointes associated with cardiovascular drugs. JAMA. 1993;27:2590–7.
Kurokawa J, Tamagawa M, Harada S. Acute effects of oestrogen on the guinea pig and human Ikr channels and drug-induced prolongation of cardiac repolarization. J Physiol. 2008;586:2961–73.
Marill KA, Miller ES. Hypokalemia in women and methadone therapy are the strongest non-cardiologic factors associated with QT prolongation in an emergency department setting. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50:416–23.
Boriani G, Biffi M, Bacchi L, et al. A randomised cross-over study on the haemodynamic effects of oral dofetilide compared with oral sotalol in patients with ischaemic heart disease and sustained ventricular tachycardia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;58:165–9.
Boriani G, Biffi M, De Simone N, et al. Repolarization changes in a double-blind crossover study of dofetilide versus sotalol in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1935–8.
Rouet R, Picard S, Libersa C, et al. Electrophysiological effects of dofetilide in an in vitro model of “border zone” between normal and ischemic/reperfused myocardium. Circulation. 2000;101:86–93.
Ducroq J, Rouet R, Sallé L, et al. Class III effects of dofetilide and arrhythmias are modulated by [K+]o in an in vitro model of simulated-ischemia and reperfusion in guinea-pig ventricular myocardium. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;532:279–89.
Kassim NA, Althouse AD, Qin D, Leef G, Saba S. Gender differences in management and clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients. J Cardiol. 2017;69:195–200.
Pool PE, Singh SN, Friedrich T. Effects of intravenous dofetilide in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions: a clinical trial. Clin Cardiol. 2000;23:415–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Informed consent
Being a retrospective cohort analysis of de-identified data, informed consent was waived.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shantha, G., Singleton, M., Kozak, P. et al. Role of dofetilide in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 67, 91–97 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01578-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01578-w