Abstract
Background
Patient satisfaction is an indicator of quality of care and a key factor for patients’ healthcare choices. Although atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is now common, there are no published data on patient satisfaction during this procedure.
Methods
Anonymous patient satisfaction questionnaires were distributed to consecutive AF ablation patients over 6 months at a single center.
Results
Of 101 questionnaires returned, 51 % related to a first procedure. Pre-operative clinic experiences were good. Prior to ablation, 53 % reported receiving information leaflets, while 55 % reported using the Internet to search for further information. Mean anxiety pre-procedurally on a ten-point scale was 3.1 ± 2.9 and 97 % of patients felt prepared. Afterwards, however, 31 % found the experience not as expected, mainly due to being in more pain or more awake. A large number of patients recalled the procedure in detail, despite use of conscious sedation. Overall cath lab experience was good or excellent for the majority (79 %). Patients felt less well than expected immediately post-procedure and perceived a higher complication rate immediately after ablation (24 %) and at home (32 %) than reported by physicians (4.5 %). Despite this, 89 % would recommend an AF ablation to a friend or relative, and 96 % would recommend our institution.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that most patients are satisfied with the AF ablation experience, but this is not solely dependent on procedural success. Dissatisfaction occurs due to unmet expectations, particularly excess pain, i.e. greater than expected, during and after ablation. An improved consent process may improve patient experience. Physicians should also address initiatives to reduce pain during AF ablation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fuster, V., et al. (2001). ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation, 104(17), 2118–2150.
Singer, D. E., et al. (2004). Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest, 126(3 Suppl), 429S–456S.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (interventional procedures overview). http://www.nice.org.uk/ip300overview, May 2005.
Jais, P., et al. (2008). Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: The A4 study. Circulation, 118(24), 2498–2505.
Pappone, C., et al. (2006). A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The APAF Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 48(11), 2340–2347.
Wazni, O. M., et al. (2005). Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: A randomized trial. JAMA, 293(21), 2634–2640.
Wilber, D. J., et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 303(4), 333–40.
Cleary, P. D., & McNeil, B. J. (1988). Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry, 25(1), 25–36.
Werner, R. M., & Chang, V. W. (2008). The relationship between measured performance and satisfaction with care among clinically complex patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(11), 1729–1735.
Trout, A., Magnusson, A. R., & Hedges, J. R. (2000). Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: What does the literature say? Academic Emergency Medicine, 7(6), 695–709.
NHS surveys http://www.nhssurveys.org.
Linder-Pelz, S. U. (1982). Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Social Science & Medicine, 16(5), 577–582.
Ware, J. E., Jr., Davies-Avery, A, Stewart A. L. (1978) The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health & Medical Care Services Review, 1(1):1, 3–15.
Gutknecht, S., Kaderli, R., & Businger, A. (2012). Perception of semiquantitative terms in surgery. Annals of Surgery, 255(3), 589–594.
Patel, M., et al. (2012). Patient perception of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia, the hard sell. Hernia, 16(4), 411–415.
Fulkerson, D. H., et al. (2010). The perception of complications in pediatric spine surgery: A comparative survey of surgeons, caregivers and patients. Pediatric Neurosurgery, 46(3), 213–220.
Krishel, S., & Baraff, L. J. (1993). Effect of emergency department information on patient satisfaction. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 22(3), 568–572.
Pita-Fernandez, S., et al. (2005). Satisfaction with treatment and prevalence of discomfort after external electrical cardioversion. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(1), 49–55.
Feveile, H., Olsen, O., & Hogh, A. (2007). A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: Response patterns in a survey. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 27.
Hall, M. F. (1995). Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(1), 54–61.
Walker, A. H., & Restuccia, J. D. (1984). Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with hospital care: Mail versus telephone. Health Services Research, 19(3), 291–306.
Cappato, R., et al. (2005). Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 111(9), 1100–1105.
National service framework for coronary heart disease, chapter 8: Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4105280.pdf.
Gardner, G., et al. (2005). Patient experiences following cardiothoracic surgery: An interview study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 4(3), 242–250.
Gilmartin, J., & Wright, K. (2008). Day surgery: Patients’ felt abandoned during the preoperative wait. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(18), 2418–2425.
Kottkamp, H., et al. (2011). Deep sedation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A prospective study in 650 consecutive patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 22(12), 1339–1343.
Salukhe, T. V., et al. (2012). Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists without assisted ventilation for long cardiac interventions: An assessment of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace, 14(3), 325–330.
Di Biase, L., et al. (2011). General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: Results from a randomized study. Hearth Rhythm, 8(3), 368–372.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Questionnaire for patients undergoing AF ablation procedures
Background:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ezzat, V.A., Chew, A., McCready, J.W. et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation—patient satisfaction from a single-center UK experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 37, 291–303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9763-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9763-5