Abstract
The main goal of quantum logic is the bottom-up reconstruction of quantum mechanics in Hilbert space. Here we discuss the question whether quantum logic is an empirical structure or a priori valid. There are good reasons for both possibilities. First, with respect to the possibility of a rational reconstruction of quantum mechanics, quantum logic follows a priori from quantum ontology and can thus not be considered as a law of nature. Second, since quantum logic allows for a reconstruction of quantum mechanics, self-referential consistency requires that the empirical content of quantum mechanics must be compatible with the presupposed quantum ontology. Hence, quantum ontology contains empirical components that are also contained in quantum logic. Consequently, in this sense quantum logic is also a law of nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
von Neumann (1932).
Birkhoff and von Neumann (1936).
For a very detailed presentation of the history of quantum logic cf. Jammer (1974, 341–616).
Putnam (1969).
Kant (1998, B 600).
Newton (1729).
Leibniz(1686, 433–434).
Kant (1998, B 600).
Lorenzen (1955).
Curry (1952).
Mittelstaedt (2008).
A lattice of this kind is atomic and fulfils the covering law. Cf. Stachow (1984).
This remark confirms the more general point of view that quantum logic does not describe directly quantum reality but rather the way speak about this reality.
Mittelstaedt (2011, section 3.5).
Busch et al. (1995).
References
Armstrong, D. (1983). What is a law of nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Birkhoff, G., & von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37, 823–843.
Busch, P., Grabowski, M., & Lahti, P. (1995). Operational quantum physics. Berlin: Springer.
Curry, H. B. (1952). Lecons de Logique Algébrique. Paris: Gauthier–Villars.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1965). „Bemerkungen zur Verwendung nicht-klassischer Logiken in der Quantentheorie“. In Veröffentlichungen des internationalen Forschungszentrums für Grundlagen der Wissenschaften in Salzburg (pp. 351–359). Band 1, hrsg. Paul Weingartner, Wien.
Jammer, M. (1974). The philosophy of quantum mechanics. New York: Wiley.
Kant, I. (1998). The critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leibniz, G. W. (1686) „Discours de Métaphysique“, GP IV.
Lorenzen, P. (1955). Einführung in die operative Logik und Mathematik. Heidelberg: Springer.
Mittelstaedt, P. (1978). Quantum logic. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publ. Co.
Mittelstaedt, P. (2003). Does quantum physics require a new logic. In P. Weingartner (Ed.), Alternative logics. Berlin: Springer.
Mittelstaedt, P. (2008) Über eine rationale Rekonstruktion der Quantenmechanik. In Bernhard, P., & Peckhaus, V. (Hrsg.), Methodisches Denken im Kontext (pp. 303–314). Mentis, Paderborn.
Mittelstaedt, P. (2011). Rational reconstructions of modern physics. Heidelberg: Springer.
Mittelstaedt, P., & Weingartner, P. (2004). Laws of nature, Chap. 12. Heidelberg: Springer.
Newton, I. (1729). The mathematical principles of natural philosphy. Scholium.
Putnam, H. (1969). Is logic empirical? In M. Wartofsky & R. Cohen (Eds.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 5). New York: Humanities Press.
Stachow, E. W. (1976). Completeness of quantum logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 5, 237–280.
Stachow, E. W. (1980). Logical foundation of quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 19, 251–304.
Stachow, E. W. (1984). Structures of a quantum language for individual systems. In P. Mittelstadt & E.-W. Stachow (Eds.), Recent developments in quantum logic. Mannheim: BI-Wissenschaftsverlag.
Stachow, E.-W. (2003). Experimental approach to quantum-logical connectives. In P. Weingartner (Ed.), Alternative logics. Berlin: Springer.
Stegmüller, W. (1970). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Vol. 2, Theorie und Erfahrung. Berlin: Springer.
Van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and symmetries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mittelstaedt, P. Are the Laws of Quantum Logic Laws of Nature?. J Gen Philos Sci 43, 215–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-012-9195-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-012-9195-z