Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and Validity of the Complex Postformal Thought Questionnaire: Assessing Adults’ Cognitive Development

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three studies investigated the psychometric properties of the complex postformal thought (PFT) questionnaire (Sinnott, unpublished scale, 1998; Sinnott and Johnson 1997), which is a measure of adult cognitive development. The scale was found to be moderately reliable (α = .63). To assess construct validity, a comparison of participants’ performance on the PFT scale to their performance on the Need for Cognition scale was conducted, which indicated the PFT scale is valid measure of complex thought. Factor analysis reduced the scale to three factors, which correspond to important components of PFT: Multiple Elements, Subjective Choice, and Underlying Complexities. Implications for understanding the nature of adult cognitive development and the usefulness of this new measure for research in this area are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, G., & Halford, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bidell, T. R., & Fisher, K. W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: Action, structure, and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in children’s gender stereotyping: Theoretical and educational implications of a cognitive-based intervention. Child Development, 63, 1351–1363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, J. A., & Papalia, D. E. (1992). The study of adult cognition from a Piagetian perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, K. B. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: The relation of multiple classification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (Chap. 6) (pp. 161–196). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1–2, Serial No. 246).

  • Harper Collins Webster’s dictionary (2002/2003). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1991). Innate constraints and developmental change. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 171–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2006). Do children and adults learn differently? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labouvie-Vief, G. (1990). Modes of knowledge and the organization of development. In M. L. Commons, C. Armon, L. Kohlberg, F. A. Richards, T. A. Grotzer, & J. D. Sinnott (Eds.), Adult development, Vol. 2: Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought (Chap. 3) (pp. 43–62). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labouvie-Vief, G. (1992). A neo-Piagetian perspective on adult cognitive development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75, 1357–1372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child (Helen Weaver, Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1966).

  • Sinnott, J. D. (1984). Postformal reasoning: The relativistic stage. In M. Commons, F. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations (pp. 298–325). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. D. (1998). The development of logic in adulthood: Postformal thought and its applications. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. D. (2008). Cognitive and representational development in adults. In K. B. Cartwright (Ed.), Literacy processes: Cognitive flexibility in learning and teaching. NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. D., & Johnson, L. (1997). Brief report: Complex postformal thought in skilled research administrators. Journal of Adult Development, 4(1), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. S., Panter, A. T., & Winborne, W. C. (1988). Dimensions of the need for cognition: Subscales and gender differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly B. Cartwright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cartwright, K.B., Galupo, M.P., Tyree, S.D. et al. Reliability and Validity of the Complex Postformal Thought Questionnaire: Assessing Adults’ Cognitive Development. J Adult Dev 16, 183–189 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9055-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9055-1

Keywords

Navigation