Skip to main content
Log in

Parental Symptoms of Anhedonia, Parenting, and Youth Outcomes: A Multi-Method, Multi-Informant Investigation

  • Published:
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Parental depression is a well-established risk factor for youth psychopathology; however, depression is highly heterogeneous, and different parental symptom profiles may be differentially associated with risk mechanisms and youth psychopathology outcomes. Thus, this study examined associations between parental anhedonic symptoms of depression, specifically, and (1) parenting and (2) youth outcomes using a multi-method, multi-informant approach. Participants included 595 parents (89% mothers) and youth (ages 8–16; M[SD] = 12.07[2.39]). Regression analyses indicated that parental self-reported anhedonic symptoms at baseline demonstrated relatively specific prospective associations with chronic parent–child stress assessed using contextual stress interview methods, as well as youth self-reported depressive symptoms at 18-month follow-up. Findings also indicated concurrent associations between parental anhedonic symptoms and observed parental criticism, conflict, and responsiveness in the context of a 5-min discussion task, as well as parent self-reported monitoring/supervision, although results were no longer significant after controlling for parental co-occurring non-anhedonic depressive symptoms. Findings suggest that parental anhedonic symptoms may contribute to relatively unique reductions in the quality of the parent–child relationship and may be a particularly salient risk factor for youth depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analysed during the current study may be available from the senior author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Specifically, parental report of IQ was obtained during an initial phone screening assessment during which parents were asked to report on whether their child had any history of diagnoses of autism or intellectual disability (i.e., IQ < 70). No formal tests of IQ were administered in the context of the present work.

  2. Data concerning the participating caregiver’s relationship to the participating youth was not available in 3.4% of cases.

  3. Study procedures specifically received the following Institutional Review Board approvals: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Denver, and Rutgers University.

  4. For more details regarding this previous work and evidence for the validity of the specific disaggregation of the BDI-II implemented in the present study, please see Supplemental Materials.

  5. To preserve the independence of chronic stress ratings, the individual who conducted any given interview was excluded from the coding team for that respective interview. A sufficient number of staff were trained such that three independent raters were available to code each interview.

  6. Please see Supplemental Table S1 for additional details regarding the skew and kurtosis describing primary variables of interest.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE – 1746047.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julianne M. Griffith.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The research reported in this article was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health to Benjamin L. Hankin, R01MH077195, and to Jami F. Young, R01MH077178.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Dr. Young has developed Interpersonal Psychotherapy—Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) and has received royalties from sales of the book she co-authored that describes the program.

Ethical Approval

The study has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association. The research was approved by the University of Denver and the Rutgers University Institutional Review Boards.

Informed Consent

All participants provided written consent as well as assent to participation.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffith, J.M., Young, J.F. & Hankin, B.L. Parental Symptoms of Anhedonia, Parenting, and Youth Outcomes: A Multi-Method, Multi-Informant Investigation. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol 52, 413–427 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-023-01130-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-023-01130-4

Keywords

Navigation