Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence that a novel, industry-situated, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Learning Laboratory (STEM Lab) experience may have on students’ (ages 10–18) perceptions of manufacturing-related careers as well as to identify any challenges/strategies for the implementation of these informal learning spaces within manufacturing facilities. STEM labs, which are similar to makerspaces, can be defined as physical spaces where students can learn integrated skills and content through hands-on experiences (Roy and Love, 2017). While STEM labs can be found in a variety of settings (e.g., school libraries, museums, or even theme parks), the industry-situated STEM lab that is the focus of this study is a unique application of such a learning environment in an informal space within a manufacturing facility. However, the aim for this specific space is to offer local students an opportunity to see manufacturing, the people that work there, and the skills that might be necessary to pursue a future career in the various aspects of this industry. This type of career awareness and preparation initiative has become an area of interest for manufacturers as they continue to face increasing challenges with attracting employees and confronting negative, potentially outdated, perceptions of manufacturing-related careers. That being said, this research will not attempt to justify the STEM lab initiative, but will instead provide a critical view of this novel context and this type of informal learning environment. This research objective was pursued by interviewing key industry stakeholders and analyzing an existing dataset—consisting of both student surveys and drawing tests—collected by the host manufacturer over the first year of the lab’s operation. By triangulating the data gathered from stakeholder interviews and both student surveys and drawing tests, which were collected before and after their experience with the STEM lab at the manufacturing facilities, this research sheds light on the challenges that similar industry-situated learning environments might face, as well as provides opportunities to potentially enhance the experience from both the student and industry perspective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data and materials used in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Abbreviations
- STEM:
-
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Pearson.
Bosman, L., Strimel, G. J., & Krause, L. (2020). The role of higher education in establishing career perceptions related to manufacturing: An exploratory study. Industry & Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220976292
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Bureau of labor statistics data. https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000.
de Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point likert items: t test versus Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 15(11), 1–12.
Deloitte. (2017). US perception of the manufacturing industry: Manufacturing matters to the American public. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/manufacturing/articles/public-perception-of-the-manufacturing-industry.html.
Deloitte & The Manufacturing Institute. (2018). Skills gap in manufacturing study. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/manufacturing/articles/future-of-manufacturing-skills-gap-study.html.
Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376.
International Technology & Engineering Educators Association. (2020). Standards for technological and engineering literacy: The role of technology and engineering in STEM education. https://www.iteea.org/STEL.aspx.
IResearchNet. (2016). Social cognitive career theory. https://career.iresearchnet.com/career-development/social-cognitive-career-theory/
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
Krause, L. & Strimel, G. J. (2019). The next generation for manufacturing competitiveness?: Children’s perceptions as shown through drawings. Paper presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Tampa, FL.
Langin, K. (2018). What does a scientist look like? Children are drawing women more than ever before. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6337
Lee, K. (2017). A perception gap, not a skills gap, may be manufacturing's problem. https://dc.medill.northwestern.edu/blog/2017/08/23/a-perception-gap-not-a-skills-gap-may-be-manufacturings-biggest-problem-when-looking-for-new-hires/.
Lent, R., Brown, S., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
Marcus, P. (2017). The psychoanalysis of career choice, job performance, and satisfaction: How to flourish in the workplace.
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1189.
Pijls, M., van Eijck, T., Kragten, M., & Bredeweg, B. (2022). Activities and experiences of children and makerspace coaches during after-school and school programs in a public library makerspace. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00070-w
Roy, K. R. & Love, T. S. (2017). Safer makerspaces, fab labs and STEM labs: A collaborative guide!. Vernon, CT: National Safety Consultants LLC. ISBN-13: 978-0-692-92408-2.
Strimel, G. J., Krause, L., Bosman, L., Serban, S., & Harrel, S. (2020). The next generation for manufacturing competitiveness?: Investigating the influence of industry-driven outreach on children career perceptions. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(2), 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00028-w
The Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). (2019). What are the important gaps in informal STEM education research? Retrieved from https://www.informalscience.org/research/what-important-gaps-informal-stem-education-research.
Vossoughi, S., & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and tinkering: A review of the literature (pp. 1-55). National Research Council Committee on Out of School Time STEM Learning. https://www.informalscience.org/making-and-tinkering-review-literature.
Funding
This work was supported by funding received by the Wabash Heartland Innovation Network and the Indiana Next Generation Manufacturing Competitiveness Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WW conceived, designed, and assembled the manuscript for this study. GS and SB were major contributors to writing the interpretation of, and implications for, the results. SS and JO supported the data analysis process and were contributors to writing the manuscript sections related to the findings.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The de-identified participant data were received by the researchers following the university Institutional Review Board’s exempt protocol approved under IRB# 1907022516 and additional data were collected via protocol IRB# 2020-366.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Walls, W.H., Strimel, G.J., Bartholomew, S.R. et al. STEM learning labs in industry settings: a novel application in manufacturing and its influence on student career perceptions. Int J Technol Des Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09863-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09863-5