Abstract
Purpose
To compare visual acuity, refraction, topography, and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) performed in patients with keratoconus (KCN).
Methods
In this retrospective interventional non-randomized clinical study, patients with moderate to severe KCN that underwent either PKP or DALK for optical corrections were enrolled. The final outcome analysis was performed after complete suture removal for both groups of patients. Best corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, refractive cylinder, average keratometry, corneal astigmatism, and endothelial cell density as well as early and late complications such as cataract, glaucoma, corneal edema, elevated intraocular pressure without visual field defect or optic disk changes, rejection, loose suture, and re-suturing were compared.
Results
Two hundred and seven eyes were enrolled: 108 eyes underwent DALK, and 99 eyes underwent PKP for keratoconus. The mean follow-up time was 28.06 ± 12.62 months for DALK group and 29.29 ± 12.71 months for PKP. The study groups demonstrated comparable final outcome in terms of best corrected visual acuity: 0.25 ± 0.22 LogMAR and 0.28 ± 0.24 LogMAR (p = 0.415), spherical equivalent: −4.80 ± 4.55D and −3.58 ± 3.58D (p = 0.067), refractive cylinder: −3.37 ± 2.00D and −4.00 ± 2.15D (p = 0.061), average keratometry: 45.51 ± 2.30D and 44.85 ± 2.36D (p = 0.077), corneal astigmatism: 4.89 ± 3.07D and 4.63 ± 2.61D (p = 0.569) in DALK (n = 85) and PKP (n = 72), respectively. However, the postoperative endothelial cell density in DALK (n = 61) 2250 ± 450 cell/mm2 differs significantly from it in PKP (n = 55) 1795 ± 616 cell/mm2 p < 0.001. Eyes that had DALK (n = 99) had significantly more risk of loose suture (RR 5.2) and re-suturing (RR 3.6) than PKP (n = 108). However, the risk of cataract following DALKs was less than PKP (OR 0.4).
Conclusion
The vision, refractive error, and corneal astigmatism following DALK and PKP were comparable; however, DALK had lower incidence of long-term complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Mohaimeed MM (2013) Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual and graft survival outcomes. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 7(1):67–74
Dunn SP, Gal RL, Kollman C et al (2014) Corneal graft rejection 10 years after penetrating keratoplasty in the cornea donor study. Cornea 33(10):1003–1009
Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM (2005) Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 139:311–319
Shimmura S, Tsubota K (2006) Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17:349–355
Anwar M, Teichmann KD (2002) Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet’s membrane. Cornea 21(4):374–383
Anwar M, Teichmann KD (2002) Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 28(3):398–403
Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, Htoon HM, Tan DT (2009) Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 148(5):744–751
Kim MH, Chung TY, Chung ES (2013) A retrospective contralateral study comparing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 32(4):385–389
Zhang YM, Wu SQ, Yao YF (2013) Long-term comparison of full-bed deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in treating keratoconus. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 14(5):438–450
Tan DT, Anshu A, Parthasarathy A, Htoon HM (2010) Visual acuity outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a case-control study. Br J Ophthalmol 94(10):1295–1299
Claesson M, Armitage WJ, Fagerholm P, Stenevi U (2002) Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):174–180
Parthasarathy A, Por YM, Tan DT (2007) Use of a “small-bubble technique” to increase the success of Anwar’s “big-bubble technique” for deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete baring of Descemet’s membrane. Br J Ophthalmol 91(10):1369–1373
Feizi S, Faramarzi A, Javadi MA et al (2014) Modified big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using peripheral air injection. Br J Ophthalmol 98(11):1597–1600
Sarnicola V, Toro P (2011) Blunt cannula for descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 30(8):895–898
Fontana L, Parente G, Tassinari G (2007) Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 143(1):117–124
MacIntyre R, Chow SP, Chan E, Poon A (2014) Long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Australian keratoconus patients. Cornea 33(1):6–9
Ardjomand N, Hau S, McAlister JC, Bunce C, Galaretta D, Tuft SJ, Larkin DF (2007) Quality of vision and graft thickness in deep anterior lamellar and penetrating corneal allografts. Am J Ophthalmol 143(2):228–235
Feizi S, Javadi MA, Kanavi MR, Javadi F (2014) Effect of donor graft quality on clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 33(8):795–800
Price MO, Gorovoy M, Price FW Jr, Benetz BA, Menegay HJ, Lass JH (2012) Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 120(2):246–251
Harding SA, Nischal KK, Upponi-Patil A, Fowler DJ (2010) Indications and outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in children. Ophthalmology 117(11):2191–2195
Cheng YY, Visser N, Schouten JS et al (2011) Endothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. Ophthalmology 118(2):302–309
Barry Lee W, Mannis Mark J (2007) Corneal Suturing Techniques. In: Macsai Marian S (ed) ophthalmic microsurgical suturing techniques, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–59
Liu H, Chen Y, Wang P, Li B, Wang W, Su Y, Sheng M (2015) Efficacy and safety of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty vs. penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(1):e0113332
Maurino V, Aiello F (2015) Glaucoma risks in advanced corneal surgery. Prog Brain Res 221:271–295
Acar BT, Vural ET, Acar S (2011) Changes in endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Int J Ophthalmol 4(6):644–647
Kubaloglu A, Koytak A, Sari ES et al (2012) Corneal endothelium after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a four-year comparative study. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(1):35–40
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khattak, A., Nakhli, F.R., Al-Arfaj, K.M. et al. Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 38, 985–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0548-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0548-9