Abstract
The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS) is one of the most widely used measures to assess career adaptabilities. Despite intensive worldwide use across heterogeneous populations, no study has assessed its factorial validity in the not in education, employment, or training (NEET) population. This study aims to extend evidence of CAAS factorial validity by assessing the Italian version for NEET. Participants (N = 318) completed the Italian CAAS. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the hierarchical factor structure of this version. Evidence of measurement invariance across age and sex groups were observed. The results supported the CAAS as a reliable and good psychometrically-based assessment of career adaptabilities in the Italian NEET population.
Résumé
Propriétés psychométriques de l'échelle des capacités d'adaptation à la carrière chez les jeunes italiens NEET
L'échelle Career Adapt-Abilities Scale est l'une des mesures les plus largement utilisées pour évaluer les capacités d'adaptation professionnelle. Malgré son utilisation intensive dans le monde entier auprès de populations hétérogènes, aucune étude n'a évalué sa validité factorielle dans la population NEET. Cette étude vise à étendre les preuves de la validité factorielle de la CAAS en évaluant la version italienne pour les NEET. Les participants (N = 318) ont rempli le CAAS italien. Des analyses factorielles confirmatoires ont confirmé la structure factorielle hiérarchique de cette version. Des preuves d'invariance de la mesure ont été observées entre les groupes d'âge et de genre. Les résultats confirment que le CAAS est une évaluation fiable et de bonne qualité psychométrique des capacités d'adaptation à la carrière dans la population italienne des NEET.
Zusammenfassung
Psychometrische Eigenschaften der Career Adapt-Abilities Scale bei italienischen Jugendlichen NEET
Die Career Adapt-Abilities Scale ist eine der am häufigsten verwendeten Messungen zur Beurteilung von Karriereanpassungsfähigkeiten. Obwohl sie weltweit intensiv bei heterogenen Populationen eingesetzt wird, hat bisher keine Studie ihre faktorielle Validität in der NEET-Bevölkerung beurteilt. Diese Studie zielt darauf ab, die Evidenz der faktoriellen Validität der italienischen Version des CAAS für NEET zu erweitern. Dazu haben 318 Teilnehmende den italienischen CAAS ausgefüllt. Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen bestätigten die hierarchische Faktorenstruktur dieser Version. Zudem konnten Hinweise auf Messinvarianz bei Alters- und Geschlechtsgruppen beobachtet werden. Die Ergebnisse unterstützen den CAAS als zuverlässige und gut psychometrisch basierte Bewertung von Karriereanpassungsfähigkeiten in der italienischen NEET-Bevölkerung.
Resumen
Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Adaptabilidad de la Carrera en jóvenes italianos NINI
La Escala de Adaptabilidad de la Carrera es una de las medidas más utilizadas para evaluar las habilidades de adaptación de la carrera. A pesar de su uso intensivo a nivel mundial en poblaciones heterogéneas, ningún estudio ha evaluado su validez factorial en la población de NINIs. Este estudio tiene como objetivo ampliar la evidencia de la validez factorial de la CAAS mediante la evaluación de la versión italiana para NINIs. Las personas participantes (N= 318) completaron la CAAS italiana. Los análisis factoriales confirmatorios corroboraron la estructura factorial jerárquica de esta versión. Se observaron evidencias de invarianza de la medida entre los grupos de edad y sexo. Los resultados apoyaron la CAAS como una prueba fiable y con una buena base psicométrica de la adaptabilidad de la carrera en la población italiana de NINIs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The labor market in times of economic uncertainty makes it increasingly difficult for young people to find a job. In this situation, the number of career transitions, both intentional or unintentional, and career choices that an individual must make have increased [International Labor Organization (ILO), 2020]. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has compounded these difficulties, raising a serious risk for young people that are the most at-risk category (ILO, 2020; Masenya, 2021).
Young people who remain excluded from the labor market, for the short or long term, are defined as not in education, employment or training (NEET). The NEET group is conceived as dynamic because young people are moving in and out of employment or education/training conditions in a short time and often involuntarily. Being excluded from the labor market represents a risk condition at various levels with serious consequences for the individual and society (Eurostat, 2021). On the social level, the failure to move successfully from school to work can harm society in terms of costs and problems related to unemployment (Caliendo and Schmidl, 2016; Morrison, 2005). On the individual level, the literature showed a strong relationship between the NEET condition and mental health (for a review, Bartelink et al., 2019), such as increased stress (Bjarnason and Sigurdardottir, 2003), risk of depression (Crowe and Butterworth, 2016), anxiety (Parola et al., 2022; Virtanen et al., 2016), and decreased mental health later in life (Strandh et al., 2014).
Young people during the pursuit of first employment need to be able to prevent such mismatches and wretched career starts (Koen et al., 2012). Although proper career preparation is useful to successfully find employment (van Hooft et al., 2021), the evidence of stagnating economy can interfere with the school-to-work transition (Fusco et al., 2021). In light of this, it would be helpful to enhance the needed resources to cope with the school-to-work transition to prevent prolonged unemployment (Koen et al., 2012).
Despite the increase in studies that bring attention to the NEET condition, too few have focused on the personal resources that would enable this group to cope with this uncertain era. According to Rossier (2015), regulation skills and adaptability resources, i.e., career adaptability, are needed for young people in this unstable and challenging environment for mastering unpredictable and changing tasks and demands. Career adaptabilities are crucial competencies because they allow the self-extension of the individual in the social environment (Savickas, 2013). The implications are twofold: measuring and monitoring adaptability resources are useful for planning career interventions both for prevention of NEET condition, supporting young people for mastering career transitions, and on the other hand to increase these competences in young NEET to enhance opportunities for entering the world of work. Career adaptabilities, as adaptability resources, can be key competencies for mastering career transitions throughout the lifespan (Rossier, 2015) handling the changing context. Indeed, several studies have found that career adaptability might help remedy the experience of job mismatch and underemployment (Koen et al., 2012).
Career adaptability, as a pivotal construct in career construction theory (CCT; Savickas, 1997, 2005, 2019, 2020), refers to a psychosocial construct that denotes an individual’s resources for coping with current and anticipated tasks, transitions, and traumas in their occupational roles (Savickas & Porfeli, 2012, p. 662). In the last years, career adaptability has been conceived as a needed resource for successful career development (Johnston et al., 2016; Zacher, 2015). This psychosocial construct allows to adaptively respond to challenges in the current era characterized by job uncertainty (Blossfeld et al., 2005). Career adaptability as a multidimensional and hierarchical structure includes four main resources (4 Cs): concern, control, curiosity, and confidence. Concern reflects a planful attitude toward the future. Control indicates belief about personal responsibility in career construction and the perceived control over their future. Curiosity is related to the personal ability to explore career opportunities. Confidence regards the perception of influencing the environment and overcoming obstacles in career paths through personal actions.
Literature showed that career adaptabilities were related to several dimensions of the work, i.e., job search self-efficacy (Guan et al., 2013), employability skills (de Guzman and Choi, 2013), work engagement (Yang et al., 2019), career calling (Douglass and Duffy, 2015; Guo et al., 2014). Furthermore, in the face of unemployment, career adaptability can increase the odds of finding employment (Zikic and Klehe, 2006). Indeed, career adaptability may represent a key resource to cope with stressful situations, such as unemployment, because it seems to mediate the relationship between personal dispositions, environment, and work outcomes (Johnston et al., 2013).
Career scholars agreed on the operationalization of career adaptability and to measure the construct the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS, Savickas and Porfeli, 2012) was developed. The CAAS measure was developed and validated in several countries (Chen et al., 2020a; Rudolph et al., 2017). The CAAS, composed of 24 selected items, demonstrated the validity across countries and these led to a rapid increase of research on career adaptability in the last years. Validation of the Italian version of the CAAS was conducted by Soresi et al. (2012) and used among adolescents and young adults in several studies.
However, no studies so far have validated any versions of the CAAS, in NEET youth who are not in education, employment, or training. Only one study, in the Chinese version, has tested the CAAS measure in the NEET population (Su et al., 2021). The study showed that the original version of CAAS does not apply to NEET. The study proposed a two-factor structure drawn from 17 items of 24-CAAS to operationalize the career adaptability of NEETs. These two factors were reconceptualized as career exploration (eight items) and career self-efficacy (nine items). Career exploration refers to self-exploration and environment exploration for the sake of exploring possible opportunities for one’s future career. Career self-efficacy refers to a self-belief about one’s ability to make decisions, to be responsible for one’s own choices, and to perform tasks efficiently. According to the CCT, both dimensions are conceptualized as important dimensions of career adaptability (Chen et al., 2020b; Creed et al., 2009; Solberg et al., 1995).
Consistent with Su et al. (2021), it remains unknown whether the four-factor structure of CAAS applies to the target group of NEETs, given their higher level of vulnerability. For this reason, the present study aims to examine the factor structure of the Italian version of the CAAS in the NEET population. Specifically, the study proposes to test the original four-factor structure of the Italian version of the CAAS with the NEET population.
Method
Participants and procedure
Sample size calculation was based on the recommendations of quality criteria for measurement properties of questionnaires (Terwee et al., 2007), using at least ten subjects per item. Participants were recruited through the network with the Italian youth associations, respecting some inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were: young people aged 18–34, and young adults who were not studying nor working for at least 4 weeks from the survey, following the recommendation of the NEET categorization of Eurofound (2012). Exclusion criteria were: not being a native Italian speaker, young people engaged in education, employment, or training programs. The sample is composed of 318 young NEET, 169 males (53.15%) and 149 females (46.85%), 155 aged 18–24 (48.7%) and 163 aged 25–34 (51.3%) [mean (M)age 24.45, standard deviation (SD)age 3.23].
Participation was voluntary, and respondents did not receive remuneration. The questionnaire was completed entirely online. Participants were informed about the aim of the study and were reassured of the confidentiality of their answers. The initial page contained a detailed description of the study, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were then asked to acknowledge that they had read the terms and conditions by signing an informed consent form. This research was approved by the Ethical Committee of Psychological Research of the University of Naples Federico II.
Measure
The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS)—Italian Form
The study used the 24-item Career Adapt-Abilities Scale—Italian form (Soresi et al., 2012). The participants were asked to answer on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (not strong) to 5 (strongest). The scale assesses the four dimensions of career adaptability: concern (six items), control (six items), curiosity (six items), and confidence (six items). The 24 items combine into a total score indicating adaptability. The original version of CAAS reported reliability of 0.83 for concern, 0.74 for control, 0.79 for curiosity, and 0.85 for confidence. The total score has reported reliability of 0.92. The CAAS—Italian form for the general population reported reliability of 0.80 for concern, 0.74 for control, 0.77 for curiosity, and 0.85 for confidence. The total score has reported reliability of 0.91.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with R software (v.4.0.5) and using the “lavaan” (v. 0.6-8) package (Rosseel, 2012). To test the factorial structural model of CAAS, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed. Considering the nature of the response scale and distribution of the items, the robust maximum likelihood (MLM) estimator was used as an estimator for the CFA (Brown, 2015; Kline, 2016; Pietrabissa et al., 2020; Simpson et al., 2018). The MLM is a robust variant of maximum likelihood (Bentler, 1989) that provides robust standard errors and is also referred to as the Satorra–Bentler chi-squared test (S–Bχ2) to assess the model fit. Moreover, the comparative fit indexII (CFI), the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and the ratio of S–Bχ2 to the degrees of freedom (df) were also used to assess model fit.
The following cut-off criteria were used to evaluate the goodness of fit: CFI and TLI with values between 0.90 and 0.95 (Brown, 2015; Kline, 2016), RMSEA and SRMR with values between 0.05 and 0.08 (Byrne, 2016; Browne and Cudeck, 1992; Pietrabissa et al., 2020), and a χ2/df ratio value of 3 or less.
The two-factor structure with 17 items proposed by Su et al. (2021) was tested and was not shown as an adequate fit: χ2(118) = 525.888, p < .001, TLI 0.834, CFI 0.856, RMSEA 0.087 (0.079–0.095), and SRMR 0.061.
Following the original 24-item validation study (Savickas & Porfeli, 2012), the model comparison was performed following this order: (A) a first-order four-factor model, (B) a first-order one-factor model, and (C) a second-order model (hierarchical). According to the CAAS literature (Soresi et al., 2012), the second-order model was specified by positing an overarching general latent dimension loaded by the four first-order latent dimensions (concern, control, curiosity, and confidence). Model comparison was assessed by using the test differences in fit indices, with the following criteria as cutoffs for model equivalence: ΔS–Bχ2 (p value > 0.050), ΔCFI (< 0.010), and ΔRMSEA (< 0.015) (Brown, 2015; Bryant and Satorra, 2012; Cheung and Rensvold, 2002; Millsap, 2011). Excess of the cutoff in two out of these three indices is evidence of model worsening (Bryant and Satorra, 2012; Cheung and Rensvold, 2002).
Lastly, measurement invariance was computed to evaluate whether the best structure was invariant across sex (males versus females) and age (18–24 years old versus 25–34 years old) (Manzoni et al., 2020; Vandenberg and Lance, 2000). Four nested models were sequentially performed constraining to equality models parameters across groups. First, factorial structure was constrained to equality (model 1: configural invariance). Second, factor loadings were constrained to equality (model 2: metric invariance). Third, factor loadings and intercepts of measured variables were constrained to equality (model 3: scalar invariance). Lastly, factor loadings, intercepts, and latent means were constrained to equality (model 4: latent means invariance) (Meredith, 1993; Millsap, 2011; Vandenberg and Lance, 2000). For both multigroup CFAs, models were sequentially compared by using test differences in three fit indices, with the following criteria as cutoffs for model equivalence: DIFFTEST (equal to Δχ2; p value > 0.050), ΔCFI (≤ 0.010), and ΔRMSEA (≤ 0.015) (Brown, 2015; Cheung and Rensvold, 2002; Millsap, 2011; Muthén and Muthén, 1998–2017).
Finally, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to measure internal consistency for each CAAS subscale.
Results
Factorial validity and model comparison
The CFA suggests a good first-order four-factor solution, with χ2(246) = 463.515, p < 0.001; TLI 0.917; CFI 0.926; RMSEA 0.060 (0.052–0.069); and SRMR 0.049. The concern factor loadings ranged from 0.633 to 0.779. The control factor loadings ranged from 0.589 to 0.698. The curiosity factor loadings ranged from 0.633 to 0.753. The confidence factor loadings ranged from 0.731 to 0.819.
The second order model (hierarchical) shows an adequate data fit, with χ2(248) = 475.038, p < .001; TLI 0.914; CFI 0.923; RMSEA 0.061 (0.053–0.070); and SRMR 0.051. The fit indices were all adequate in accordance with the cutoff criteria. Factor loadings are reported in Table 1. As reported in Table 2, the factors showed positive and moderate correlations.
The first order one-factor model shows a non-satisfactory solution, χ2(252) = 728.061, p < 0.001; TLI 0.822; CFI 0.837; RMSEA 0.088 (0.081–0.096); SRMR 0.063. Factor loadings ranged from 0.524 to 0.764. The fit indices were not adequate in accordance with the cutoff criteria.
The four-factor, first-order solution was compared with different models that could better explain the CAAS factor structure (Table 3). The four-factor and the hierarchical models produced a strong fit to the data. The information criteria slightly favored the hierarchical model due to its parsimonious nature (Brown, 2015; Hoyle,2012).
Due to the model comparison revealing the superiority of the second-order (hierarchical) model, it was chosen to perform successive analyses.
Internal consistency
Reliability indices revealed an acceptable consistency of each scale, 0.862 for concern, 0.799 for control, 0.843 for curiosity, and 0.897 for confidence, as well as 0.944 for the overall dimension.
Measurement invariance
Sex
The second-order model shows an adequate fit to the data in the sample of males: χ2 (248) = 357.273, p < 0.001; TLI 0.922; CFI 0.930; RMSEA 0.060 (0.046–0.074); SRMR 0.055. Also, this model shows an adequate fit to data in the sample of females: χ2 (248) = 398.628, p < 0.001; TLI 0.889; CFI 0.900; RMSEA 0.069 (0.056–0.081); SRMR 0.070. A configural invariance model was specified across groups. Good model fit indices were found: χ2 (496) = 752.169, p < 0.001; TLI 0.907; CFI 0.917; RMSEA 0.064 (0.055–0.074); and SRMR 0.060. Also, metric invariance model still fitted the data well: χ2 (519) = 787.134, p < 0.001; TLI 0.908; CFI 0.914; RMSEA 0.064 (0.055–0.073); and SRMR 0.079. In this case, a non-significant decrease in fit indices was found, with DIFFTEST 34.986, p = 0.052, ns; |ΔRMSEA| 0.000; and |ΔCFI| 0.003, indicating that the items were equivalently related to the latent factor in these groups. Also the scalar invariance model revealed adequate fit indices: χ2 (538) = 841.462, p < 0.001; TLI 0.902; CFI 0.904; RMSEA 0.066 (0.058–0.075); SRMR 0.080. An incomplete significant decrease in fit indices compared with the metric invariance model was found: DIFFTEST 83.449, p < 0.001; |ΔRMSEA| 0.002; |ΔCFI| 0.010. This suggested that groups did not have the same expected item response at the same absolute level of the trait. Lastly, means invariance model also revealed adequate fit indices: χ2 (543) = 853.412, p < 0.001; TLI 0.901; CFI 0.902; RMSEA 0.067 (0.058–0.075); SRMR 0.082. In this case, a non-significant decrease in fit indices compared with the scalar invariance model was found, with DIFFTEST 17.812, p = 0.003; |ΔRMSEA| 0.000; and |ΔCFI| 0.002, suggesting that groups had the same latent means.
Age
The second-order model shows an adequate fit to data in the sample of young individuals: χ2 (248) = 375.220, p < 0.001; TLI 0.910; CFI 0.919; RMSEA 0.065 (0.051–0.078); SRMR 0.060. Also, this model shows an adequate fit to data in the sample of adult participants: χ2 (248) = 375.955, p < .001; TLI 0.899; CFI 0.909; RMSEA 0.065 (0.051–0.078); SRMR 0.065. Then, a configural invariance model was specified across groups. Good model fit indices were found: χ2 (496) = 751.191, p < 0.001; TLI 0.905; CFI 0.914; RMSEA 0.065 (0.055–0.074); SRMR 0.060. Also, metric invariance model still fitted data well: χ2 (519) 773.614, p < 0.001; TLI 0.910; CFI 0.915; RMSEA 0.063 (0.053–0.072); SRMR 0.071. A non-significant decrease in fit indices was found: DIFFTEST 20.571, p 0.607, ns; |ΔRMSEA| 0.002; |ΔCFI| 0.001. This indicated that the items were equivalently related to the latent factor in these groups. The scalar invariance model revealed adequate fit indices: χ2 (538) 808.726, p < 0.001; TLI 0.909; CFI 0.911; RMSEA 0.063 (0.054–0.072); SRMR 0.072. Moreover, an incomplete significant decrease in fit indices compared with the metric invariance model was found, with DIFFTEST 40.008, p = 0.003; |ΔRMSEA| 0.000; and |ΔCFI| 0.004, suggesting that groups had the same expected item response at the same absolute level of the trait. Finally, means invariance model also revealed adequate fit indices: χ2 (543) = 815.819, p < 0.001; TLI 0.909; CFI 0.911; RMSEA 0.063 (0.054–0.072); SRMR 0.075. Moreover, a non-significant decrease in fit indices compared with the scalar invariance model was found, with DIFFTEST 6.716, p = 0.243 ns; |ΔRMSEA| 0.000; |ΔCFI| 0.000, suggesting that groups had the same latent means (Table 4).
Discussion
Career adaptability is a key concept in CCT (Savickas, 1997, 2005, 2013, 2019, 2020). Career adaptability was conceived as a crucial meta-competency in coping with vocational development tasks, such as school-to-work transitions. Moreover, career adaptability facilitates individual adjustment to career-related changes (Savickas, 2005). In the NEET population, which refers to young people not engaged in education, employment or training programs, career adaptability could improve the successful transition to the world of work. Indeed, career adaptability was positively correlated with career success (Pan et al., 2018). Despite an intensive use in the literature of CAAS measure, no previous studies have assessed its structural validity with the NEET population. Thus, the study aimed to cover this lack by testing the psychometric properties of the Italian version of CAAS with young adults NEET.
The results of the study provided psychometric support for the factorial structure suggested by Soresi et al. (2012). The CFAs performed successfully confirmed the four-factor first-order solution and the second-order (hierarchical) model with the superiority of the second-order (hierarchical) model. Unlike the alternative, uni-dimensional structure was not supported. The information criteria favored the use of hierarchical model due to its parsimonious nature (Brown, 2015; Hoyle, 2012). Thus, the Italian version of CAAS with young adults NEET reported a second-order factor structure with four well-separated (but strongly correlated) first-order factors clearly reflecting the four dimensions of career adaptability, concern, control, curiosity, and confidence. This CFA model revealed a good fit to the data and good reliability for each scale, and its overall dimension provides satisfying results. Research suggests that hierarchical models provide a powerful mechanism for parsing shared and unique components of variance (Markon, 2019). Moreover, it leads to greater conceptual clarity rather than other CFAs model structures (Rossi et al., 2022a, 2022b). The hierarchical model helps researchers to understand the domain subscores (i.e., career concern, control, curiosity, and confidence) and the overarching general factor (i.e., career adaptability). The latter has theoretical and practical implications. Related to the theoretical implication, this evidence confirms that the CAAS dimensions, concern, control, curiosity, and confidence are correlated, but are still conceptually different. As recommended by Savickas and Porfeli (2012), career adaptability resources are multidimensional and hierarchical. The dimensions of the first-order level, namely concern, control, curiosity, and confidence, combine to become an aggregate construct. From a methodological point of view, each dimension has a unique effect and together models the global indicator. Related to practical implications, researchers may also want to consider measuring the effect of each dimension on psychological outcomes. Moreover, career practitioners might plan their career interventions with young NEET improving the lacking resources by focusing interventions even more effectively.
This study confirmed the use of the 24-CAAS measure for young NEET. Overall, based on the definition of career adaptability, the CAAS measure could be useful for assessing these skills, also with youth in critical conditions, as well as in young people not engaged in education, employment, or training paths. Indeed, these results suggest possibilities for future use of CAAS for both researchers and career practitioners for working with NEET in community settings and/or career centers. In addition, invariance tests proposed by the current study, i.e., configural, metric, and scalar invariances, showed acceptable fit to the data collected from different age as well as groups of the sexes.
This study, aside from testing the CAAS for the specific group of NEETs, also covered a lack of career adaptability, argued by a recent systematic review (Johnston, 2018). According to Johnston (2018), researchers should consider measuring career adaptability resources as a latent variable (Hirschi & Valero, 2015), rather than as a total score. The findings support the adequacy of using career adaptability as a latent variable rather than as a total score. From a psychometrical point of view, research recommends latent variables because they allow researchers to adjust for measurement errors in the measured variables (Kline, 2016). The use of the latent variable approach is suggested because in the mediation model, for example, this approach provides better estimates on average across all levels of effect size and reliability. According to Ledgerwood and Shrout (2011), direct and indirect effects were more likely to be better estimated when latent, rather than observed, variables were used. Thus, the use of career adaptability as a latent variable might be the best way to shed light on the true value of the relations between career constructs.
However, there are some limitations with the current study opening a potentially important avenue for future investigation. Firstly, the results need to be replicated in other Italian geographical areas and in areas with different neighborhood characteristics to determine their generalizability. Secondly, further psychometric properties of the measure remain to be examined, such as the test–retest reliability of the measure, providing evidence of its stability over time. Thirdly, its predictive validity on specific measures should be investigated, such as career self-efficacy, career decision-making, and career calling. Finally, it has been considered that the data may have been influenced by a reporting bias due to the selection process (response from people with a certain proactivity and interest in returning their situation).
Despite these limitations, this study extends the previous research of the use of CAAS among different population groups and provides additional support for its application. Previous studies have already underlined that the CAAS measure maintains its psychometric properties, also with vulnerable populations, e.g., intellectual disability (Ginevra et al., 2018), mental disorder (Xu et al., 2020), and substance use disorder (Di Maggio et al., 2021). This study justifies the use of CAAS also for the NEET population.
The good psychometric proprieties of the CAAS measure provide important implications for career counseling as well, because this instrument might help young NEET to regulate goal-pursuing processes (Savickas, 1997) in work transitions. Career counselors could orient their interventions starting from the items scales. In this view, CAAS could be used as an effective tool for self-reflection and improvement (Yu et al., 2019) and to increase the possibility of lifelong employment of at-risk groups (Van der Heijden and De Vos, 2015).
References
Bartelink, V. H., Zay Ya, K., Guldbrandsson, K., & Bremberg, S. (2019). Unemployment among young people and mental health: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494819852847
Bentler P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles, CA
Bjarnason, T., and Sigurdardottir, T. J. (2003). Psychological distress during unemployment and beyond: Social support and material deprivation among youth in six northern European countries. Social Science and Medicine, 56(5), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00109-0
Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurtz, K. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. Routledge.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Bryant, F. B., and Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 372–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687671
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (Multivariate Applications) (3 ed.). Routledge, New York.
Caliendo, M., and Schmidl, R. (2016). Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 5(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-016-0057-x
Chen, H., Fang, T., Liu, F., Pang, L., Wen, Y., Chen, S., and Gu, X. (2020a). Career adaptability research: A literature review with scientific knowledge mapping in web of science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5986. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165986
Chen, H., Ling, L., Ma, Y., Wen, Y., Gao, X., and Gu, X. (2020b). Suggestions for Chinese university freshmen based on adaptability analysis and sustainable development education. Sustainability, 12, 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041371
Cheung, G. W., and Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Creed, P. A., Fallon, T., and Hood, M. (2009). The relationship between career adaptability, person and situation variables, and career concerns in young adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.12.004
Crowe, L., and Butterworth, P. (2016). The role of financial hardship, mastery and social support in the association between employment status and depression: Results from an Australian longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open, 6(5), e009834. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009834
de Guzman, A. B., and Choi, K. O. (2013). The relations of employability skills to career adaptability among technical school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.009
Di Maggio, I., Montenegro, E., Little, T. D., Nota, L., and Ginevra, M. C. (2021). Career adaptability, hope, and life satisfaction: An analysis of adults with and without substance use disorder. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00405-1
Douglass, R. P., & Duffy, R. D. (2015). Calling and career adaptability among undergraduate students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.003
Eurofound. (2012). NEETs—Young people not in employment, education or training: Characteristics, costs and policy responses in Europe. Publications of the European Union.
Eurostat. (2021). Statistics on young people neither in employment nor in education or training. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Statistics_on_young_people_neither_in_employment_nor_in_education_or_training
Fusco, L., Parola, A., and Sica, L. S. (2021). Life design for youth as a creativity-based intervention for transforming a challenging world. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662072
Ginevra, M. C., Magnano, P., Lodi, E., Annovazzi, C., Camussi, E., Patrizi, P., and Nota, L. (2018). The role of career adaptability and courage on life satisfaction in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.11.002
Guan, Y., Deng, H., Sun, J., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., Ye, L., Fu, R., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., and Li, Y. (2013). Career adaptability, job search self-efficacy and outcomes: A three-wave investigation among Chinese university graduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.09.003
Guo, Y., Guan, Y., Yang, X., Xu, J., Zhou, X., She, Z., Jiang, P., Wang, Y., Pan, J., Deng, Y., Pan, Z., and Fu, M. (2014). Career adaptability, calling and the professional competence of social work students in China: A career construction perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.09.003
Hirschi, A., and Valero, D. (2015). Career adaptability profiles and their relationship to adaptivity and adapting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.010
Hoyle R. H. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford press, New York
International Labor Organization. (2020). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2020. https://www.ilo.org/global/contact-us/lang--en/index.htm
Johnston, C. S. (2018). A systematic review of the career adaptability literature and future outlook. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679921
Johnston, C. S., Broonen, J. P., Stauffer, S., Hamtiaux, A., Pouyaud, J., Zecca, G., Houssemand, C., & Rossier, J. (2013). Validation of an adapted French form of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in four French-speaking countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.002
Johnston, C. S., Maggiori, C., and Rossier, J. (2016). Professional trajectories, individual characteristics, and staying satisfied and healthy. Journal of Career Development, 43(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315584161
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Koen, J., Klehe, U. C., & Van Vianen, A. E. (2012). Training career adaptability to facilitate a successful school-to-work transition. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.10.003
Ledgerwood, A., and Shrout, P. E. (2011). The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 174–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024776
Manzoni, G. M., Rossi, A., Pietrabissa, G., Mannarini, S., Fabbricatore, M., Imperatori, C., Innamorati, M., Gearhardt, A. N., and Castelnuovo, G. (2020). Structural validity, measurement invariance, reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the Italian version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 in patients with severe obesity and the general population. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-00858-y
Markon, K. E. (2019). Bifactor and hierarchical models: Specification, inference, and interpretation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522
Masenya, T. M. (2021). Promotion of digital entrepreneurship for youth employability in the post Covid-19 Era. In Handbook of research on sustaining SMEs and entrepreneurial innovation in the post-COVID-19 era (pp. 122–142). IGI Global.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.
Morrison, P. S. (2005) Unemployment and urban labour markets, Urban Studies, 42, 2261–2288. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098050033203
Muthén, L. K., and Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
Pan, J., Guan, Y., Wu, J., Han, L., Zhu, F., Fu, X., and Yu, J. (2018). The interplay of proactive personality and internship quality in Chinese university graduates’ job search success: The role of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.09.003
Parola, A., Marcionetti, J., Sica, L. S., and Donsì, L. (2022). The effects of a non-adaptive school-to-work transition on transition to adulthood, time perspective and internalizing and externalizing problems. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03605-x
Pietrabissa, G., Rossi, A., Simpson, S., Tagliagambe, A., Bertuzzi, V., Volpi, C., Fava, G., Manzoni, G. M., Gravina, G., and Castelnuovo, G. (2020). Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the schema mode inventory for eating disorders: Short form for adults with dysfunctional eating behaviors. Eating and Weight Disorders, 25(3), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00644-5
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
Rossi, A. A., Panzeri, A., and Mannarini, S. (2022a). The Italian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (IT-DERS-SF): A two-step validation study. Journal of Psychopathological and Behavioral Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-10006-8
Rossi, A. A., Panzeri, A., Taccini, F., Parola, A., and Mannarini, S. (2022b). The Rising of the Shield hero. Development of the Post-Traumatic Symptom Questionnaire (PTSQ) and assessment of the protective effect of self-esteem from trauma-related anxiety and depression. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-022-00512-y
Rossier, J. (2015). Adaptability and life designing. In L. Nota and J. Rossier (Eds.), Handbook of life design: From practice to theory and from theory to practice (pp. 153–168). Hogrefe.
Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., and Zacher, H. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.002
Savickas, M. (2019). Career construction theory: Life portraits of attachment, adaptability, and identity. Vocopher.
Savickas, M. L. (1997). Career adaptability: An integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 45(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb00469.x
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70). Wiley.
Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S. Brown and R. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 147–183). Wiley.
Savickas, M. L. (2020). Career construction theory and counseling model. In R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research into work (3rd ed., pp. 165–200). Wiley.
Savickas, M. L., and Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011
Simpson, S., Pietrabissa, G., Rossi, A., Seychell, T., Manzoni, G. M., Munro, C., Nesci, J. B., and Castelnuovo, G. (2018). Factorial structure and preliminary validation of the Schema Mode Inventory for Eating Disorders (SMI-ED). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00600
Solberg, V. S., Good, G. E., Fischer, A. R., Brown, S. D., and Nord, D. (1995). Career decision-making and career search activities: Relative effects of career search self-efficacy and human agency. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(4), 448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.4.448
Soresi, S., Nota, L., and Ferrari, L. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Italian Form: Psychometric properties and relationships to breadth of interests, quality of life, and perceived barriers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.020
Strandh, M., Winefield, A., Nilsson, K., and Hammarström, A. (2014). Unemployment and mental health scarring during the life course. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku005
Su, X., Wong, V., & To, S. M. (2021). Factor structure of the Chinese Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in youth with a longer spell of status of not in education, employment, or training. Child and Youth Services, 42(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2020.1768843
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Van der Heijden, B. I., and De Vos, A. (2015). Sustainable careers: Introductory chapter. Edward Elgar Publishing.
van Hooft, E. A., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Kanfer, R., & Basbug, G. (2021). Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(5), 674. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000675
Vandenberg, R. J., and Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
Virtanen, P., Hammarström, A., and Janlert, U. (2016). Children of boom and recession and the scars to the mental health—A comparative study on the long term effects of youth unemployment. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0305-0
Xu, C., Gong, X., Fu, W., Xu, Y., Xu, H., Chen, W., and Li, M. (2020). The role of career adaptability and resilience in mental health problems in Chinese adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 112, 104893.
Yang, X., Feng, Y., Meng, Y., and Qiu, Y. (2019). Career adaptability, work engagement, and employee well-being among Chinese employees: The role of Guanxi. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104893
Yu, K., Liu, C., & Li, Y. (2019). Beyond social exchange: career adaptability linking work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01079
Zacher, H. (2015). Daily manifestations of career adaptability: Relationships with job and career outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.003
Zikic, J., and Klehe, U. C. (2006). Job loss as a blessing in disguise: The role of career exploration and career planning in predicting reemployment quality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.05.007
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the University of Naples Federico II.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individuals.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Parola, A., Marcionetti, J. & Savickas, M. Psychometric properties of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in Italian young people not in education, employment, or training (NEET). Int J Educ Vocat Guidance (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-023-09604-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-023-09604-z