Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Orientation, and Temperature on Thermal Conductivity in Nettle Fiber/Polyester Composites

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the thermal conductivity (k-values) of pure and composite samples obtained from raw materials which these samples came from different parts (stalk, fiber) and different regions (bottom, middle and top) of nettle plants and collected from low and high altitudes (350 and 2100) in the Black Sea regions were investigated depending on orientation and temperature. According to the ASTM C518 standard, the k-value is only given for the temperature value of 10 °C. However, it is also important to determine the thermal conductivity depend on climatic conditions, ambient temperature, and humidity. It is known that the thermal conductivity coefficient changes depend on the density, pore structure and size, humidity, and temperature. However, for materials with a fibrous structure (rock wool, glass wool, VIP), the orientation of the fiber structure depends on the heat transfer direction also significantly affects the thermal conductivity. In the first stage of the study, the pure thermal conductivity of cellulosic materials was determined. The fiber parts of the nettle plant, which have low thermal conductivity (k < 0.040 W/mK), were used in the formation of the composites. In this context, the thermal conductivity of composites formed with fibers obtained from two different altitudes was characterized depend on temperature (0 ºC, 10 ºC, 20 ºC, 30 ºC, 40 ºC) and orientation (0º, 45º, 90º). Ratios such as 2.5 %, 5 %, 7.5 %, and 10 % by volume were used to form the composite, and the effect of orientation and temperature was measured in composites with a 10 % reinforcement ratio. The manual laying method was used in the production of test samples. The physical and chemical properties of the reinforcement material affecting the thermal conductivity of the composites were determined and its effect on the thermal conductivity coefficient was discussed. In the conducted study, it was determined that the altitude difference affects the characteristic features of the plant (such as fiber diameter, crystal structure, and density), and accordingly, the thermal conductivity behaviors show differences. On the other hand, it was determined that orientation significantly affects the thermal conductivity coefficients, but the effect of temperature increase on the thermal conductivity coefficient change in the same composites is low. As a result, it has been concluded that the fibers obtained from the bottom parts of the plants obtained from high altitudes may be a more suitable insulation material than the fibers obtained from the other part.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Availability of data and material is clearly stated in the text.

Code Availability

Suitable.

References

  1. Y.K. Sahu, Thesıs Master of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha (India), June, 2014.

  2. K. Uetani, K. Hatori, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 877 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N.V.S. Raju, M.I. Reddy, M.A. Kumar, K. Ramji, (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.191

  4. M. Barbuta, A.A. Serbanoiu, R. Teodorescu, B. Rosca, R. Mitroi, G. Bejan, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 246, 12033 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E.S. Zaini, M.D. Azaman, M.S. Jamali, K.A. Ismail, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636218758589

  6. B.M. Suleiman, J. Larfeldt, B. Leckner, M. Gustavsson, (1999)https://doi.org/10.1007/s002260050130

  7. I. Frydrych, G. Dziworska, J. Bilska, Fibres Textıles Eastern Eur. 10, 40 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. B.P. Jelle, (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100546-0.00008-X

  9. L. Ducoulombier, Z. Lafhaj, (2017)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2017.11.005

  10. D. Jones, C. Brischke, Perform. Bio-based Build. Mater. 2017, 249 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. F.R. Cichocki, J.L. Thomason, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00011-8

  12. F. Danes, B. Garnier, T. Dupuis, (2002).https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024096401779

  13. .T. Behzad, M. Sain, (2007).https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20632

  14. X. Li, L.G. Tabil, I.N. Oguocha, S. Panigrahi, (2008).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.016

  15. H-R. Kymalainen, A. M. Sjoberg, (2008).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.006

  16. M. Mounika, M. K. Ramaniah, K. Prasad, A.V.R. Rao, K.M. Reddy, M.H.C., 3, 1109 (2012)

  17. F.M. Al-Oqla, S.M. Sapuan, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.050

  18. A. Dupleix, A. Kusiak, M. Hughes, F. Rossi, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2012-0125

  19. R. El‑Sawalhi, J. Lux, P. Salagnac, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1674-4

  20. S.T. Nguyen, A.D. Tran-Le, M.N. Vu, Q.D. To, O. Douzane, T. Langlet, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.07.026

  21. J. Thomason, L. Liu Yang, F. Gentles, (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/fib5040036

  22. www.Poliya.com. Accessed 07 June 2022

  23. L. Segal, J. J. Creely, A. E. Martin, C. M. Conrad, (1959).https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003

  24. M. Joonobi, J. Harun, P.M. Tahir, L.H. Zaini, S. SaifulAzry, BioResources 5, 2556 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Tutuş, M. Çıçekler, H.G. Özkan, (2017) https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.285252

  26. C 518 – 98 Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.06.

  27. L. Qiu, X. Zhang, Z. Guo, and Q. Li, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.02.105

  28. L. Qiu, Y. Ouyang, Y. Feng, X. Zhang, X. Wang, and J. Wu, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106781

  29. L. Qiu, Y. Ouyang, Y. Feng, X. Zhang, (2018).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5052692

  30. L. Bacci, S. Baronti, S. Predieri, N. di Virgilio, (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.09.005

  31. E. Tshwafo, E. Mfiso, E. Mngomezulu and J. Mpitloane (2018).https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705716679478

  32. A. Palanivel, A. Veerabathiran, R. Duruvasalu, S. Iyyanar, R. Velumayil, (2017).https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.00516

  33. L.H. Zaini, M. Jonoobi, M. Tahir, Karimi P., (2013) https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2013.41006

  34. B. Focher, M.T. Palma, M. Canetti, G. Torri, C. Cosentino, G. Gastaldi, (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00077-7

  35. R. Čiukas, J. Abramavičiūtė, P. Kerpauskas, Fibres Textiles Eastern Eur. 18, 89 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Korjenic, J. Zach, J. Hroudova, (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.037

  37. K. Uetani, T. Okada, T. Oyama, (2015).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00617

  38. M. Venkataraman, R. Mishra, J. Militky, (2017). https://doi.org/10.15406/jteft.2017.02.00062

Download references

Funding

No support was received from any organization/person.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK, KB, and MK contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Kan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Suitable.

Consent to Participate

Suitable.

Consent for Publication

Suitable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koru, M., Büyükkaya, K. & Kan, M. The Effect of Orientation, and Temperature on Thermal Conductivity in Nettle Fiber/Polyester Composites. Int J Thermophys 43, 155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03079-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03079-w

Keywords

Navigation