• Feng-Jui HsiehEmail author
  • Khoon Yoong Wong
  • Ting-Ying Wang


This study investigates the similarities and differences of mathematics-related teaching competencies between the future secondary school teachers of Taiwan and Singapore by using data from the international Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M), organized by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Taiwan and Singapore are identified as the only two Asian countries integrating the Chinese/Confucian tradition in their education regarding TEDS-M. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two countries, as compared to other TEDS-M higher-achieving Western countries, such as Germany, Poland, Russia, Switzerland, and the USA, are examined after reselecting and reclassifying the achievement items based on Niss’ (2003) mathematics competence and Hsieh’s (Secondary Education, 63(3), 2012) mathematics teaching competence structures. This study shows that Singaporean future teachers are weaker in the competence of devising formal mathematical arguments and transforming heuristic ideas into valid proofs than Taiwanese future teachers. Taiwan and Singapore demonstrate relative strengths at primary, lower-, and upper-secondary levels in mathematics competencies but show relative weaknesses at the tertiary level than do other higher-achieving Western countries. Comparing these two countries, Taiwan shows relative strengths at upper-secondary and tertiary levels, and Singaporean strengths are at primary and lower-secondary levels. This distinction is primarily because of the thought-oriented category of mathematics competencies. This study also finds that Taiwan and Singapore belong to different clusters compared with the higher-achieving Western countries regarding their future teachers’ relative strengths and weaknesses in either mathematics or mathematics teaching competence.


international comparison study mathematics teacher competence mathematics teacher education mathematics teaching competence pedagogical content knowledge TEDS-M 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, C. & Xin, T. (2005). Large‐scale diagnostic assessment: Comparison of eighth graders’ mathematics performance in the United States, Singapore and Israel. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blömeke, S. & Kaiser, G. (2012). Homogeneity or heterogeneity? Profiles of opportunities to learn in primary teacher education and their relationship to cultural context and outcomes. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 249–264. doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0378-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blömeke, S., Suhl, U. & Döhrmann, M. (2013). Assessing strengths and weaknesses of teacher knowledge in Asia, Eastern Europe, and Western Countries: differential item functioning in TEDS-M. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, this issue.Google Scholar
  4. Blömeke, S., Suhl, U. & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154–171. doi: 10.1177/0022487110386798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, C. J., Reys, B. J. & Reys, R. E. (2009). Analysis of the learning expectations related to grade 1–8 measurement in some countries. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 1013–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delaney, S., Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G. & Zopf, D. (2008). “Mathematical knowledge for teaching”: Adapting U.S. measures for use in Ireland. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(3), 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gopinathan, S. (1999). Preparing for the next rung: Economic restructuring and educational reform in Singapore. Journal of Education and Work, 12(3), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsieh, F.-J. (2012). 國高中數學教學專業知能指標 [Indicators of professional mathematics teaching competence at the secondary school level]. Secondary Education, 63(3).Google Scholar
  10. Hsieh, F.-J., Chu, C.-T., Hsieh, C.-J., Lin, P.-J. (in press). In-depth analyses of different countries' responses to MCK items: a view on the differences within and between East and West. In S. Blömeke, F.-J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser & W. H. Schmidt (Eds.), Teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs and opportunities to learn in 16 countries. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Hsieh, F.-J., Law, C.-K., Shy, H.-Y., Wang, T.-Y., Hsieh, C.-J. & Tang, S.-J. (2011). Mathematics teacher education quality in TEDS-M—globalizing the views of future teachers and teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 172–187. doi: 10.1177/0022487110390819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsieh, F.-J., Lin, P.-J., Chao, G. & Wang, T.-Y. (2009). Policy and practice of mathematics teacher education in Taiwan. Retrieved from
  13. Hsieh, F.-J., Lin, P.-J. & Shy, H.-Y. (2012). Mathematics teacher education in Taiwan. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Taiwan, 1, 187–206.Google Scholar
  14. Hsieh, F.-J., Lin, P.-J. & Wang, T.-Y. (2012). Mathematics related teaching competence of Taiwanese primary future teachers: Evidence from the TEDS-M. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 277–292. doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0377-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J. Teller, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1968).Google Scholar
  16. Leung, F. K. S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions—a comparative study of the East Asia and the West (pp. 21–46). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, Y. & Ginsburg, M. B. (2006). Classification and framing of mathematical knowledge in Hong Kong, Mainland China, Singapore, and the United States. In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions—a comparative study of the East Asia and the West (pp. 195–211). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education, 61(5), 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P. & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international reports in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  22. National Research Council (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nisell, M., Brodin, U., Christensson, K. & Rydelius, P.-A. (2009). The Imperforate Anus Psychosocial Questionnaire (IAPSQ): Its construction and psychometric properties. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 3(15). Retrieved from
  24. Niss, M. A. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education—Athens, Hellas 3–4–5 January 2003 (pp. 116–124). Athens, Greece: Hellenic Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  25. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do—student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol 1). Retrieved from
  26. Ramakrishnan, M. (2000). Should the United States emulate Singapore’s education system to achieve Singapore’s success in the TIMSS? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(6), 345–348.Google Scholar
  27. Schmidt, W. H. & Houang, R. T. (2012). Preparing primary teachers in the United States: Balancing selection and preparation. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 265–276. doi: 10.1007/s11858-011-0372-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwille, J., Ingvarson, L. & Holdgreve-Resendez, R. (Eds.). (2013). TEDS-M encyclopedia: A guide to teacher education context, structure and quality assurance in the seventeen TEDS-M countries. East Lansing, MI: TEDS-M International Study Center.Google Scholar
  29. Shen, C. (2005). How American middle schools differ from schools of five Asian countries: Based on cross-national data from TIMSS 1999. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 11(2), 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  31. Sim, W.-K. (1991). The influence of Western theories on teacher education and research practices in Singapore. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 17(3), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematical and scientific literacy around the world. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  33. Stigler, J. W., Gallimore, R. & Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational psychologist, 35(2), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tan, J. B. & Yates, S. (2011). Academic expectations as sources of stress in Asian students. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 14(3), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., et al (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Multicopy.Google Scholar
  36. Wu, M. (2006). A comparison of mathematics performance between East and West: What PISA and TIMSS can tell us. In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions—a comparative study of the East Asia and the West (pp. 239–259). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu, M. (2011). Relative strengths of Western and Asian students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(1), 67– 89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feng-Jui Hsieh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Khoon Yoong Wong
    • 2
  • Ting-Ying Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.The Department of MathematicsNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China
  2. 2.Mathematics and Mathematics EducationNational Institute of Education1 Nanyang WalkSingapore

Personalised recommendations