Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Homogeneity or heterogeneity? Profiles of opportunities to learn in primary teacher education and their relationship to cultural context and outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The curriculum of teacher education has been described as heterogeneous across countries and influenced by the context in which it is implemented. The present study investigates this potential heterogeneity by conducting latent class analysis of opportunities to learn mathematics, mathematics pedagogy and general pedagogy in primary teacher education as indicated by future teachers from 15 countries at the end of their training. The aim was to identify curricula profiles based on data from the “Teacher Education and Development Study: Learning to Teach Mathematics (TEDS-M)”. In each teacher education component, three groups of primary teachers were identified which differed quantitatively and qualitatively. Associations between these profiles and countries revealed broader cultural influences on OTL and thus shared (within a culture) and at the same time distinct (between cultures) visions of what primary teachers should know. Within countries, associations between curricula profiles and teacher education programs pointed to shared (within a program) and at the same time distinct (between programs) visions of what primary teachers should know at the end of their training. The OTL profiles were significantly related to outcomes of primary teacher education in terms of mathematics content knowledge, mathematics pedagogical content knowledge and general pedagogical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The international costs of TEDS-M were funded by the IEA, the National Science Foundation (REC 0514431), and the participating countries. In Germany, the German Research Foundation funded TEDS-M (DFG, BL 548/3-1). The instruments are copyrighted by the TEDS-M International Study Center at MSU (ISC). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IEA, the ISC, the participating countries or the funding agencies.

References

  • Bishop, A. J. (2004). Mathematics education in its cultural context. In T. P. Carpenter, J. A. Dossey, & J. L. Koehler (Eds.), Classics in mathematics education research (pp. 200–207). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (Eds.). (2010). TEDS-M 2008—Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Primarstufenlehrkräfte im internationalen Vergleich. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., & Paine, L. (2008). Getting the fish out of the water: Considering benefits and problems of doing research on teacher education at an international level. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 2027–2037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Houang, R. T., Hsieh, F.-J., Schmidt, W. H., Tatto, M. T., et al. (2008). Future teachers’ competence to plan a lesson. First results of a six-country study on the efficiency of teacher education. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., Kaiser, G., & Döhrmann, M. (2012). Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education. The report of the AERA Panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Criblez, L. (1999). Neue Schwerpunkte für die Lehrerbildungspolitik. Einige Konsequenzen aus dem Nationalfondsprojekt zur “Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildungssysteme” für die künftige Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 17(2), 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1976). Research on classrooms and schools: Formulation of questions, design, and analysis. Stanford: Stanford Evaluation Consortium, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics—the 15th ICMI Study. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielker, D. (1986). An analysis of geometry teaching in the United Kingdom. In R. Morris (Ed.), Studies in mathematics education, volume 5: Geometry in schools. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E., & Baumert, J. (2001). Identifying national cultures of mathematics education: Analysis of cognitive demands and differential item functioning in TIMSS. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(3), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KMK. (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für den Primarbereich. Beschluss vom 15.10.2004. München, Germany: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F.-J. (2011). General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. K. S., Graf, K.-D., & Lopez-Real, F. J. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics education in different cultural traditions—A comparative study of the East Asia and the West. The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 21–46). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim-Theo, S. K. (2009). Mathematics teacher education: Pre-service and in-service programmes. In K. Y. Wong, P. Y. Lee, B. Kaur, P. Y. Foong, & S. F. Ng (Hrsg.), Mathematics education. The Singapore journey (pp. 48–84). Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report. Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2008). Mplus (Version 5.21) [Computer software]. CA: Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCATE. (2001). NCATE’s ten-year progress report—Accrediting body changing the status quo in teacher preparation: Many states adopt profession’s standards. Washington, DC: NCATE.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. (1999). Aspects of the nature and state of research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT (Nasjonalt Organ for Kvalitet i Utdanningen). (2006). Evaluering av Allmennlæ-rerutdanningen i Norge 2006. Hovedrapport. http://www.nokut.no/Documents/NOKUT/Artikkelbibliotek/Norsk_utdanning/SK/alueva/ALUEVA_Hovedrapport.pdf. Download 2010, January 25.

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., De Sarbo, W., Reibskin, D., & Robinson, W. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Blömeke, S., & Tatto, M. T. (2011). Teacher education matters. A study of the mathematics teacher preparation from six countries. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R. T, Cogan, L., Blömeke, S., Tatto, M. T., Hsieh, F. J., Paine, L. (2008). Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: its structure and how it varies across six countries. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 735–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, J., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping the College Curriculum: Academic Plans in Action. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Rodriguez, M., Bankov, K., Reckase, M. et al. (2011). The Mathematics Teacher Education and Development Study (TEDS-M). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics: First findings. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IEA (in press).

  • Terhart, E. (Ed.). (2000). Perspektiven der Lehrerbildung in Deutschland. Abschlussbericht der von der Kultusministerkonferenz eingesetzten Kommission. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (1997). International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 1997. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Sigrid Blömeke

  2. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Gabriele Kaiser

Authors
  1. Sigrid Blömeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriele Kaiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigrid Blömeke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. Homogeneity or heterogeneity? Profiles of opportunities to learn in primary teacher education and their relationship to cultural context and outcomes. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 249–264 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0378-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0378-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation