In this article we argue that in order to understand why some governance systems deliver while others do not, we need to assess contributions and limitations of governability. Here, governability refers to a measure of how governable a particular fisheries and coastal system is. Such a system is always comprised of two parts: a system-to-be-governed and a governing system. Governability also depends on the interactions between these two systems. We provide key variables that must be assessed in order to determine governability related to these systems and their interactions. A governability assessment framework is proposed here to suggest that governance performance can only be judged from what is in the potential of the governing system, given the limitations of the governabiltiy of the system-to-be governed, the governing system itself, and their interactions. Such an assessment helps identify what exactly governing systems can and should do in order to enhance their performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anuchiracheeva, S., Demaine, H., Shivakoti, G. P., and Ruddle, K. (2003). Systematizing Local Knowledge Using GIS: Fisheries Management in Bang Saphan Bay, Thailand. Ocean and Coastal Management 46: 1049–1068.
Apostle, R., Barrett, G., Holm, P., Jentoft, S., Mazany, L., McCay, B., and Mikalsen, K. (1998). Community, State and Market on the North Atlantic Rim: Challenges to Modernity in Fisheries. Toronto University Press, Toronto.
Arnt, C., and Oman, C. (2006). Uses and Abuses of Government Indicators. Development Centre Studies. OECD, Paris.
Buanes, A., Jentoft, S., Karlsen, G. R., Maurstad, A., and Søreng, S. (2005). Stakeholder Participation in Norwegian Coastal Zone Management. Ocean and Coastal Management 48: 658–669.
Bundy, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., and Mahon, R. (2008). If Science is Not the Answer: What is? An Alternative Governance Model for Reversing the Dismal State of the World’s Fisheries Resources. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 152–155.
CHARM (2007). Successes and Lessons Learned for Future Coastal Resource Co-Management. Proceedings of the CHARM’s End-of-Project Workshop, Krabi, Thailand, August 22–24, 2007.
Chuenpagdee, R., and Bundy, A. (2006). What Was Hot at the Fourth World Fisheries Congress? Fish and Fisheries 7: 1–4.
Chuenpagdee, R., Kooiman, J., and Pullin, R. (2008). Assessing governability in capture fisheries, aquaculture and coastal zones. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 7: 14–33.
Cury, P. M., and Christensen, V. (2005). Quantitative Ecosystem Indicators for Fisheries Management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62: 307–310.
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Degnbol, P., and McCay, B. J. (2007). Unintended Consequences of Ignoring Linkages in Fisheries Systems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 793–797.
Degnbol, P., Gislasson, H., Hanna, S. S., Jentoft, S., Nielsen, J. R., Sverdrup-Jensen, S., and Wilson, D. C. (2006). Painting the Floor with a Hammer: Technical Fixes in Fisheries Management. Marine Policy 30: 534–543.
Dierberg, F. E., and Kiattisimkul, W. (1996). Issues, Impacts, and Implications of Shrimp Aquaculture in Thailand. Environmental Management 20: 649–666.
Dubbink, W., and van Vliet, M. (1996). Market Regulation Versus Co-management? Two Perspectives on Regulating Fisheries Compared. Marine Policy 20: 499–516.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The Division of Labor in Society. Free, New York.
Hardi, P., and Zdan, T. (1997). Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practices. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg.
ICES. (2006). Report of the Study Group on Fisheries Management Strategies. ICES Document CM 2006/ACFM: 19.
Jentoft, S. (2004). Institutions in Fisheries: What They Are, What They Do, and How They Change. Marine Policy 28: 137–149.
Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits of Governability: Institutional Implications for Fisheries and Coastal Governance. Marine Policy 31: 360–370.
Jentoft, S., and Buanes, A. (2005). Challenges and Myths in Norwegian Coastal Zone Management. Coastal Management 33: 151–65.
Jentoft, S., van Son, T., and Bjørkan, M. (2007). Marine Protected Areas: A Governance System Analysis. Human Ecology 35: 611–622.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Governance matters VI: Governance indicators for 1996–2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper # 4280. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Keohane, R. O., and Ostrom, E. eds. (1995). Local Commons and Global Interdependence. Sage Publications, London.
Kjær, A. M. (2004). Governance. Polity, Cambridge.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. Sage, London.
Kooiman, J. (2008). Exploring the concept of governability. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10: 171–190.
Kooiman, J., and Chuenpagdee, R. (2005). Governance and governability. In Kooiman at al (ed.), Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. University of Amsterdam Press, Amsterdam, pp. 325–349.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., and Pullin, R. (2005). Fish for Life: Interactive Governance for Fisheries. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
McCay, B. J., and Jentoft, S. (1998). Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human Organization 57: 121–29.
Mannan, M. A. (1997). Foreword: Asian Development Bank. In Silvestre, G., and Pauly, D. (eds.), Status and Management of Tropical Coastal Fisheries in Asia. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 53.
March, J. G. (1988). Decisions and Organizations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Mikalsen, K. H., and Jentoft, S. (2003). Limits to participation? On the history, structure and reform of Norwegian fisheries management. Marine Policy 27: 397–407.
O’Riordan, T., and Curch, C. (2001). Synthesis and content. In Riordan, T. (ed.), Globalism, Localism, and Identity: Fresh Perspectives on the Transition to Sustainability, Earthscan, London, pp. 3–24.
Ostrom, E. (2007). A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the USA 104: 15181–15187.
Pauly, D., and Chuenpagdee, R. (2003). Development of fisheries in the Gulf of Thailand Large Marine Ecosystem: analysis of an unplanned experiment. In Hempel G, and Sherman K (eds.), Large Marine Ecosystems of the World: Trends in Exploitation, Protection, and Research Elsevier, New York, pp. 337–354.
Rittel, H. W. J., and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
Rochet, M. -J., and Rice, J. C. (2005). Do Explicit Criteria Help in Selecting Indicators for Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management? ICES Journal of Marine Science 62: 528–539.
SEAFDEC. (2003). Regional Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries in Southeast Asia: Responsible Fisheries Management. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center. MFRDMD/SP/3. April 2003.
Sea Around Us (2007). A Global Database on Marine Fisheries and Ecosystems. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. http://www.seaaroundus.org
Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. Free, New York.
Thadaniti, S. (2000). Towards Sustainable Eco-cultural Tourism for Water-based Settlements on the Banks of the Chao-Phraya River, A Case of Koh Kret, Nonthaburi Province. Proceedings of the International Conference: The Chao Phraya Delta: Historical Development, Dynamics and Challenges of Thailand’s Rice Bowl, 13–15, December 2000, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
UNESCO. (2006). A Handbook for Measuring the Progress and Outcomes of Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management. IOC manuals and guides, 46; ICAM Dossier, Paris.
Yeemin, T. (2004). Status of coral reefs in the Gulf of Thailand and the Andaman Sea, Poster presentation at the 10th ICRS, Okinawa, Japan, 28 June–2 July 2004.
This article was originally presented at The Ocean Management Research Network (OMRN) 2007 National Conference, Ottawa, 24–27 October 2007. We acknowledge the contributions from the students of the Coastal Connections project at the International Coastal Network, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s: Dean Dumeresque, Jenny Glikman, Kathryn Goetting, Ahmed Khan, Jessica Kukac, Anu Rao, and Andrew Song. We thank Jan Kooiman and Josè Pascual Fernandez of the Fisheries Governance Network (FISHGOVNET) for their comments on the earlier versions. We truly appreciate the critical comments on the manuscript provided by the two anonymous reviewers. Support for this research is provided by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), Canada Research Chairs program, OMRN and EU-funded INCOFISH project (Project no. INCO 003739).
About this article
Cite this article
Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S. Governability Assessment for Fisheries and Coastal Systems: A Reality Check. Hum Ecol 37, 109–120 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9212-3
- Governance system
- Assessment framework
- Fisheries and coasts