Abstract
This chapter investigates the variations in governability that occur in fisheries systems. It builds upon the notion that diversity, complexity, dynamics, and scale affect the performance of societal systems profoundly, and that these effects emerge at the level of their three components. Variations in the governability of systems-to-be-governed are examined through a chain approach. Theories of legal pluralism, institutional nestedness and adaptability are subsequently applied to assess the governability of governing systems. Finally, governing interactions are considered through the lens of three ideal-typical modes – self-governance, hierarchical governance and co-governance. The many variations of governability are illustrated with cases from the capture fisheries of South India. The central message is that connections between the components of a fisheries system matter and that a better match may result in higher levels of governability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Gibson et al. (1998) provide a useful overview of the use of scale in the social sciences. They define scale simply as “the dimension used in any effort to measure a phenomenon”, and distinguish three basic types: space, time and quantity (Gibson et al. 1998, 6). In this chapter we highlight the implications of spatial scale. Johnson (2006) discusses facets of scale with regard to fisheries.
- 2.
The fact that one setting is capable of delivering illustrations of almost the full set of governability options raises important questions regarding societal coherence. Is Tamil Nadu a particularly chaotic fisheries setting? Could other settings provide a similarly broad range of examples? We are inclined to believe that most fisheries settings, if investigated carefully, actually contain a large variety of governability arrangements, not dissimilar to Tamil Nadu. We must also point out, however, that the fisheries of Tamil Nadu may actually be more structured than this array of examples suggest.
- 3.
References
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Doubleday, N. (2007). Adaptive co-management – Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver: UB Press.
Bavinck, M. (1996). Fisher regulations along the Coromandel coast: A case of collective control of common pool resources. Marine Policy, 20(6), 475–482.
Bavinck, M. (1998). ‘A matter of maintaining the peace.’ State accommodation to subordinate legal systems: the case of fisheries along the Coromandel Coast of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 40, 151–170.
Bavinck, M. (2001). Marine resource management. Conflict and regulation in the fisheries of the Coromandel Coast. New Delhi: Sage.
Bavinck, M. (2003). The spatially splintered state: Myths and realities in the regulation of marine fisheries in Tamil Nadu, India. Development and Change, 34(4), 633–657.
Bavinck, M. (2005). Understanding fisheries conflicts in the South – A legal pluralist perspective. Society and Natural Resources, 18(9), 805–820.
Bavinck, M. (2011a). The megaengineering of ocean fisheries: A century of expansion and rapidly closing frontiers. In S.D. Brunn (Ed.), Engineering earth: The impacts of megaengineering projects (pp. 257–273). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bavinck, M. (2011b). Governance, poverty and social justice in the coastal fisheries of India. In N.R.M. Pouw, & I.S.A. Baud (Eds.), Local governance and poverty in developing nations (pp. 115–136). New York: Routledge.
Bavinck, M., & Karunaharan, K. (2006). Legal pluralism in the marine fisheries of Ramnad District, Tamil Nadu, India. IDPAD Working Paper Nr 2. New Delhi/The Hague: Indo-Dutch Program for Alternatives in Development.
Bavinck, M., & Vivekanandan, V. (2011). Conservation, conflict and the governance of fisher wellbeing – Analysis of the establishment of the Gulf of Mannar National Park and Biosphere Reserve. Environmental Management, 47, 593–602.
Bavinck, M., de Klerk, L., van Dijk, D., Rothuizen, J.V., Blok, A.N., Bokhorst, J.R., van Haastrecht, E.K., van de Loo, T.J.C., Quaedvlieg, J.G.J., Scholtens J. (2008). Time-zoning for the safe-guarding of capture fisheries: A closed season in Tamil Nadu, India. Marine Policy, 32, 369–378.
Beckley T.M. (1998). The nestedness of forest dependence. Society and Natural Resources, 11(2), 101–120.
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations, and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bundy, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., Mahon, R. (2008). If science is not the answer, what is? An alternative governance model for the world’s fisheries. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6. doi:10.1890/060112.
Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute. (2005). Marine fisheries census 2005. Cochin: CMFRI.
Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. European Journal of Development Research, 14(2), 11–30.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society (trans: Simpson, G.). New York: The Free Press.
Elias, N. (1970). Was ist Soziologie? Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–276.
Garcia, S.M., Zerbi, A., Aliaume, C., Do Chi, T., Lasserre, G. (2003). The ecosystem approach to fisheries: Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 443. Rome: FAO.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12, 78–104.
Gibson, C., Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.K. (1998) Scaling Issues in the social sciences. Working Paper No. 1. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP).
Gibson, C.C., Ostrom, E., Ahn, T.K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32, 217–239.
Hill, R.C., & Fujita, K. (2003). The nested city. Urban Studies, 40(2), 207–217.
Hollingworth, J.R., & Boyer, R. (Eds.). (1998). Contemporary capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Types of multi-level governance. European Integration Online Papers, 5,11. doi:10.2139/ssrn.302786.
Hopewell, J. (2004). ‘When the shore seine is shot, the whole village eats!’ The change in shore seine organization in Valinokkam village and the decline of shore seining in southern Ramnad District, Tamil Nadu, India. Dissertation, Master thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Hornell, J. (1914). The sacred chank of India, a monograph of the Indian conch (Turbinella pyrum). Madras: Government Press.
Jentoft, S. (2004). Institutions in fisheries. Marine Policy, 28, 137–149.
Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits to governability? Institutional implications for ocean and coastal governance. Marine Policy, 4, 360–370.
Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Johnson, D.S., Thomson, K.T. (2009). Fisheries co-management and legal pluralism: How an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization, 68(1), 27–38.
Johnson, D. (2006). Category, narrative and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 30, 747–756.
Johnson, D. (2010). Institutional adaptation as a governability problem in fisheries: Patron–client relations in the Junagadh fishery, India. Fish and Fisheries, 11, 264–277.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J. (2008). Governability: Exploring a concept. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(2), 171–190.
Kooiman, J. (2010). Governance and governability. In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance (pp. 87–104). London: Routledge.
Kooiman, J., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2005). Governance and governability. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life – Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 325–349). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pullin, R. (Eds). (2005). Fish for life. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kraan, M. (2009). Creating space for fishermen’s livelihoods – Anlo-Ewe beach seine fishermen’s negotiations for livelihood space within multiple governance structures in Ghana. African Studies Collection, 19. Leiden: African Studies Centre.
Kurien, J. (1978). Entry of big business into fishing, its impact on fish economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 13(36), 1557–1565.
Mahon, R., Bavinck, M., Roy, R.N. (2005). Governance in action. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, R. Pullin (Eds), Fish for life (pp. 351–373). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Mahon, R., McConney, P., Roy, R.N. (2008). Governing fisheries as complex adaptive systems. Marine Policy, 32, 104–112.
Marshall, G.R. (2005). Economics for collaborative environmental management: Renegotiating the Commons. London: Earthscan.
Marshall, G.R. (2008). Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local level. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 75–97.
Merry, S.E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896.
North, D.C. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ostrom E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15181–15187.
Page, S.E. (2006). Path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 87–115.
Pramod, G. (2010). Illegal, unreported and unregulated marine fish catches in the Indian exclusive economic zone. Field report, policy and ecosystem restoration in fisheries. Vancouver: Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.
Swinnen, J.F.M., & Maertens, M. (2007). Globalization, privatization, and vertical coordination in food value chains in developing and transition countries. Agricultural Economics, 37(s1), 89–102.
Taylor, W.W., Schechter, M.G. et al. (Eds.). (2007). Globalization: Effects on fisheries resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Pijl, W. (2010). The implications of international food standards and regulations for stakeholders in the export oriented shrimp trade value-chain: A case study in Chennai, India. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
van Haastrecht, E., & Schaap, M. (2003). A critical look at fisheries management practices: The 45-day ban in Tuticorin District, Tamil Nadu, India. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Vanderlinden, J. (1971). Le pluralisme juridique, essai de synthese. In J. Gilissen (Ed.), Le pluralisme juridique (pp. 19–36). Brussels: l’Université de Bruxelles.
von Benda-Beckmann, F. (2002). Who’s afraid of legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 47, 37–82.
von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., Eckert, J. (2009). Rules of law and laws of ruling: Law and governance between past and future. In F. von Benda-Beckmann, K. von Benda-Beckmann, J. Eckert (Eds.), Rules of law and law of ruling – On the governance of law (pp. 1–30). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Wiber, M., & Kearney, J.F. (1996). Stinting the commons: Property, policy or power struggle? Comparing quota in the Canadian dairy and fisheries sectors. In J. Spiertz, & M.G. Wiber (Eds.), The role of law in natural resource management (pp. 145–165). The Hague: VUGA Uitgeverij B.V.
Wilden, A. (1987). The rules of the game. London: Routledge and Kagan.
Wylie, J. (1989). The law of the streets, the law of the courts, and the law of the sea in a Dominican fishing village. In J. Cordell (Ed.), A sea of small boats (pp. 152–176). Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival Inc.
Young, O.R. (2002). Institutional interplay: The environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, E.U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 263–291). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Acknowledgements
This chapter has benefitted greatly from the comments provided by Derek Johnson, to whom thanks are due.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bavinck, M., Kooiman, J. (2013). Applying the Governability Concept in Fisheries – Explorations from South Asia. In: Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., Kooiman, J. (eds) Governability of Fisheries and Aquaculture. MARE Publication Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6107-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6107-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6106-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6107-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)