Abstract
This final chapter synthesizes the arguments that chapter authors make with regard to the governance and governability of small-scale fisheries. They point to a general conclusion that in order to enhance governability for the benefit of small-scale fisheries, given the related conditions and characteristics, governance designs and interactions must be sensitive to the needs of small-scale fishing people and responsive to their situations. We do not claim that one governing mode, be it hierarchical, co- or self-governance, is inherently better than others. Rather, the choice of governing modes must take into account the particularities of the system-to-be-governed as well as the governing system. Small-scale fisheries globally will benefit from more constructive interaction, collective action, empowerment, and innovation, but they are simply too diverse for preconceived and generalized governance blue prints. Governability assessments as carried out by chapter authors reveal that despite their structural commonalities, governing modes typically have unique features. Each governing mode must be seen as a governor’s response to the existing and emerging challenges and opportunities of a specific small-scale fishery. The transition of governing modes observed in many cases illustrates how governance actors try to cope with system dynamics. Often, the combination of different modes into one coherent but hybrid approach is warranted. This chapter summarizes how these processes occur in real world situations accounted for by the chapter authors in this book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
By the term small-scale fishing people we refer to all who are involved in the sector and not just those who fish.
References
Bavinck, M., & Jyotishi, A. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict, negotiations and natural resource management. New York: Routledge.
Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., & Kooiman, J. (Eds.). (2013). Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
Berkes, F. (2015). Coasts for people: Interdisciplinary approaches to coastal and marine resource management. New York: Routledge.
Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2007). Step zero for fisheries co-management: What precedes implementation. Marine Policy, 31(6), 657–668.
Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2013). Assessing governability: What’s next? In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications (pp. 335–350). Dordrecht: Springer.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2003). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.
Gray, T. S. (Ed.). (2005). Participation in fisheries governance. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jentoft, S. (2006). Beyond fisheries management: The phronetic dimension. Marine Policy, 30, 671–680.
Jentoft, S. (2007). Limits of governability? Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance. Marine Policy, 31, 360–370.
Jentoft, S. (2014). Walking the talk: Implementing the International voluntary guidelines for small-scale fisheries. Maritime Studies. Retrieved from http://www.maritimestudiesjournal.com/content/13/1/16
Jentoft, S., & Bavinck, M. (2014). Interactive governance for sustainable fisheries: Dealing with legal pluralism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 11, 71–77.
Jentoft, S., & Knol, M. (2014). Marine spatial planning: A view from the North Sea. Maritime Studies (MAST), 12, 13 http://www.maritimestudiesjournal.com/content/12/1/13
Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2015). The ‘new’ marine governance. Reality or aspiration. In M. Gileck & K. Kern (Eds.), Governing Europe’s marine environment: Europeanization of regional seas or regionalization of EU policies? London: Ashgate Publishing.
Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer.
Johnson, D. S. (2006). Category, narrative, and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 30, 747–756.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life. Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
McGoodwin, J. R. (1991). Crisis in the world’s fisheries: People, problems, and policies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond the qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, XLIV, 652–667.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R. (2015). Enhancing the Governability of Small-Scale Fisheries Through Interactive Governance. In: Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R. (eds) Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17033-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17034-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)