Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamics of health insurance coverage: identifying trigger events for insurance loss and gain

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By linking consecutive years of the 1996–2004 Current Population Survey (CPS), we create new estimates of annual transitions into and out of health insurance coverage. Using the matched CPS panel data, we explore the dynamic factors—including job loss, changes in hours or weeks worked, and movement between firm sizes—associated with health insurance loss and gain. Job loss is strongly associated with losing insurance, whereas becoming reemployed is only weakly associated with gaining insurance. Movement down (up) in employment size is associated with insurance loss (gain), but movement to employers with fewer than 10 employees is associated with especially high rates of loss. Changes in hours or weeks worked and employment type are also strongly associated with insurance transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An extensive literature also examines the “job lock” phenomenon—that employees will stay longer in jobs that provide them with health insurance than jobs that do not. The magnitude of this effect has been estimated to vary substantially depending on the data, econometric specification, or subgroups examined (Madrian 1994; Kapur 1998; Gruber and Madrian 2001; Gilleskie and Lutz 2002).

  2. We estimate separate regressions for health insurance transitions allowing the effects to differ for insurance gain and loss, which is more flexible than a fixed effects regression for health insurance coverage. For comparison, however, we also estimate cross-sectional and fixed effects regressions for the probability of health insurance coverage and note the results below.

  3. Prior to matching years we remove the supplemental samples to the 2001–2004 ADFs, which are generally not re-interviewed in the following March.

  4. One drawback to the matched CPS data is that when households dissolve due to marital breakup, the CPS does not re-interview both marital partners. Thus, we cannot examine the relationship between insurance transitions and changes in marital status. We can, however, examine the relationship between spousal job changes and health insurance transitions for adults whose marriages remain intact.

  5. Age in the second survey year is allowed to be in the range from −1 to +3 from the first survey year.

  6. On the other hand, measurement error in reporting health insurance coverage across surveys is likely to overstate transition rates.

  7. The steady-state health insurance coverage rate is simply equal to G/(G+L), where G is the rate of gaining health insurance and L is the rate of losing health insurance.

  8. The CPS also provides information on types of health insurance coverage. We find that 93.1% of individuals with health insurance have private health insurance. Examining transitions between types of coverage, we also find that most movement from uninsurance to insurance appears to be largely to and from private insurance coverage.

  9. Similar to Czajka and Olsen (2000) we view these dynamic factors as “trigger events” instead of as truly exogenous determinants of health insurance transitions.

  10. The included measure of employer change is imputed from changes in employer type, employer size (at least 2 size categories) and major industry category, and from having multiple jobs in the second survey year because the CPS does not include a direct measure of employer changes. We find that 38.9% of the sample has an employer change using our imputed measure, which likely to overstate employer changes (see Fairlie and London 2005 for more discussion).

  11. We also estimate cross-sectional and fixed effects regressions for the probability of health insurance coverage (see Appendix 3). The estimates provide similar findings as those expected based on the results from the health insurance transition regressions. In particular, the signs of the coefficients generally align with the health insurance gain coefficients and are opposite in sign from the health insurance loss coefficients.

References

  • Baker, D.W., Sudano, J.J., Albert, J.M., Borawski, E.A., Dor, A.: Lack of health insurance and decline in overall health in late middle age. N. Engl. J. Med. 345(15), 1106–1112 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennefield, R.L.: A comparative analysis of health insurance coverage estimates: data from CPS and SIPP. Paper presented at the joint statistical meetings, American Statistical Association, 1996

  • Bhandari, S.: People with health insurance: a comparison of estimates from two surveys. The Survey of Income and Program Participation, U.S. Census Bureau Working Paper No. 243, 2004

  • Bhandari, S., Mills, R.: Dynamics of Economic Well-being: Health Insurance 1996–1999. U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports P70–92. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2003)

  • Buchmueller, T.C., Valletta, R.G.: The effect of health insurance on married female labor supply. J. Hum. Resour. 34(1), 42–70 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office: How Many People Lack Health Insurance and For How Long? Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Czajka, J.L., Olsen, C.: The Effects of Trigger Events on Changes in Children’s Health Insurance Coverage. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., Princeton, NJ (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B.D., Lee, C.H.: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2005. U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports P60–231. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2006)

  • Fairlie, R.W., London, R.A.: The Dynamics of Health Insurance Coverage: Factors Correlated with Insurance Gain and Loss among Adults, Final Report, U.S. Department of Labor (2005)

  • Farber, H.S., Levy, H.: Recent trends in employer-sponsored health insurance coverage: are bad jobs getting worse? J. Health Econ. 19(1), 93–119 (2000)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleskie, D., Lutz, B.: The impact of employer-provided health insurance on dynamic employment transitions. J. Hum. Resour. 37(1), 129–155 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., Madrian, B.: Employment separation and health insurance coverage. J. Public Econ. 66, 349–382 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., Madrian, B.: Health Insurance, Labor Supply, and Job Mobility: A Critical Review of the Literature. Economic Research Initiative on the Uninsured (ERIU) Working Paper 4 (2001)

  • Haas, J., Swartz, K.: The relative importance of worker, firm, and market characteristics for racial/ethnic disparities in employer-sponsored health insurance. Inquiry 44(3), 280–302 (2007)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, J.: Changes in Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Coverage. Snapshots of America’s Families #9. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC (2003)

  • Kapur, K.: The impact of health on job mobility: a measure of job lock. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 51(2), 282–298 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, B.C.: Employment-based health insurance and job mobility: is there evidence of job-lock? Q. J. Econ. 109(1), 27–54 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, B.C.: Health insurance portability: consequences of COBRA. Regul.: Cato Rev. Bus. Gov. 21(1), 27–31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrian, B.C., Lefgren, L.J.: An approach to longitudinally matching current population survey (CPS) respondents. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 26, 31–62 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, T.D.: Uninsured spells of the poor: prevalence and duration. Health Care Finance. Rev. 19(1), 145–161 (1997)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monheit, A.C., Vistnes, J.P., Zuvekas, S.H.: Stability and change in health insurance: new estimates from the 1996 MEPS. MEPS Research Findings No.18. AHRQ Pub. No. 02-0006. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD (2001)

  • Neumark, D., Kawaguchi, D.: Attrition bias in labor economics research using matched CPS files. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 29, 445–472 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C.W., Rosen, H.S.: Insurance and the Utilization of Medical Services Among the Self-Employed. CESifo Working Paper No. 580 (2001)

  • Reschovsky, J.D., Hadley, J., Nichols, L.: Why do hispanics have so little employer-sponsored health insurance? Inquiry 44(3), 257–79 (2007)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, C., DesRoches, C.: Uninsured and unstably insured: the importance of continuous insurance coverage. Health Serv. Res. 35(1), 187–206 (2000)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Short, P.F., Gaefe, D.R.: Battery-powered health insurance? Stability in coverage of the uninsured. Health Aff. 22(6), 244–255 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, K., Schroeder, M.: The Effect of Involuntary Job Displacement on Health Insurance. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University (2006)

  • Steward, J.: Using March CPS data to analyze labor market transitions. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 32, 177–197 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudano, J.J., Baker, D.W.: Intermittent lack of health insurance coverage and use of preventive services. Am. J. Public Health 93(1), 130–138 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, K.: Interpreting the estimates from four national surveys of the number of people without health insurance. J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 14, 233–242 (1986)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, K., McBride, T.D.: Spells without health insurance: distributions of durations and their link to point-in-time estimates of the uninsured. Inquiry 27(Fall), 281–288 (1990)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, K., Marcotte, J., McBride, T.D.: Personal characteristics and spells without health insurance. Inquiry 30(Spring), 64–76 (1993)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, S., Haley, J.: Variation and Trends in the Duration of Uninsurance, Urban Institute Discussion Paper 04–10. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The U.S. Department of Labor provided funds for this research. The views expressed here are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the funder. We would like to thank Carlos Dobkin, John Holahan, Matt Ruttledge, Donald Wittman and participants at the 2005 Annual Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management and the ERIU Conference at the University of Michigan for useful comments and suggestions. Oded Gurantz provided excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Fairlie.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1 Match rates and false match rates (Current Population Survey, Matched Annual Demographic Surveys (1996–2004))
Appendix 2 Comparison of analysis variables for original and matched samples (Current Population Survey, Annual Demographic Surveys (1996–2004))
Appendix 3 Probit and linear regressions for probability of health insurance coverage—marginal effects (Current Population Survey, Matched Annual Demographic Surveys (1996–2004))

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fairlie, R.W., London, R.A. The dynamics of health insurance coverage: identifying trigger events for insurance loss and gain. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 8, 159–185 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-008-0033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-008-0033-z

Keywords

Navigation