Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“I’d be expecting caviar in lectures”: the impact of the new fee regime on undergraduate students’ expectations of Higher Education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of the new tuition fee regime in the UK has resulted in growing concerns about the impact on students’ expectations of their university experiences (e.g. Jones in Perspectives 14(2):44–48, 2010). This is coupled with reports from those such as the OIA (Office of the Independent Adjudicator (2012) Annual Report. Accessed on July 22, 2013. Retrieved from, http://oiahe.org.uk/media/88650/oia-annual-report-2012.pdf) which detailed the rise in the number of student complaints year on year. The current study explored undergraduate psychology students’ (N = 62) expectations and derived experiences of Higher Education through a series of focus groups. In particular, a focus on students’ perceptions of level of support, contact time, and resources were explored. These were undertaken both before (n = 21) and after (n = 41) the introduction of the fee rise, to provide a cross-sectional comparison of the potential changes. Thematic analysis of the narratives indicated minimal support for the idea that increased tuition fees had heightened expectations in Higher Education. Additionally, although there were some discrepancies between students’ expectations and experiences, particularly in relation to level of support and contact time, this did not have a detrimental impact on satisfaction of their University experiences. This was related to the fact that these experiences exceeded their original expectations. One noteworthy finding however, suggested that higher tuition fees were related to greater expectations of graduate employability. The implications of this are discussed, as well as the implications of student satisfaction (using models such as the Student Satisfaction Index Model; Zhang et al. in Int J Bus Manag 3(9):46–51, 2008), for institutional policies of recruitment and retention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The cap was lifted and 64 of the Universities in England stated they would charge the maximum £9000 with some opting to charge slightly lower fees. This legislation was not UK wide with Scotland and Wales having different policies on the use of tuition fees.

  2. Post-92 era Universities refer to any former poly-technic, central institution or Higher Education college given University status by the UK Government in 1992 through the Further and Higher Education Act (1992). HEIs of this era were chosen as they do not represent the traditional Russell Group (e.g. Oxford University) which generally are leading research Universities and receive more funding through research and scholarly activity.

References

  • Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in Higher Education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 18(5), 571–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awang, H., & Ismail, N. A. (2010). Undergraduate education: A gap analysis of students’ expectations and satisfaction. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 21, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for Higher Education: An independent review of Higher Education funding and student finance. Accessed on July 22, 2013. Retrieved from, http://www.bis.gov.uk//assets/biscore/corporate/docs/s/10-1208-securing-sustainable-higher-education-browne-report.pdf.

  • Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2005). A study of accounting students’ motives, expectations and preparedness for Higher Education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, G., Palmer, E., Turnbull, D., Nettelbeck, T., Ward, L., LeCouter, A., et al. (2009). First year student expectations: Results from a university wide student survey. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Further and Higher Education Act. (1992). London: The Stationary Office Limited.

  • Gedye, S., Fender, E., & Chalkley, B. (2004). Students’ undergraduate expectations and post-graduation experiences of the value of a degree. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(3), 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (2012). Highest ever satisfaction rates in 2012 student survey. Accessed July 22, 2013. Retrieved from, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/name,75522,en.html.

  • Houston, D., Meyer, L., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D., & Dunmont, K. (1993). Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21(6), 775–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. M., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., & Hunsberger, B. E. (2000). Great expectations: The relation between expectancies and adjustment during the transition to university. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(10), 2100–2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2006). “I wish to register a complaint”: The growing complaints culture in Higher Education. Perspectives, 10(3), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2010). Managing student expectations: The impact of top-up tuition fees. Perspectives, 14(2), 44–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longden, B. (2006). An institutional response to changing students expectations and their impact on retention rate. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J. (2008). Living the dream. Retrieved on February 4, 2013. Available from, http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=403454.

  • Marshall, D., & Linder, C. (2005). Students’ expectations of teaching in undergraduate physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1255–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (1969). The charter: Conditions of diffuse socialisation in schools. Stanford: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J., McNeil, J., & Halliday, S. (2011). Worth the price? Some findings from young people on attitudes to increases in university tuition fees. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 13(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Independent Adjudicator. (2012). Annual Report. Accessed on July 22, 2013. Retrieved from, http://oiahe.org.uk/media/88650/oia-annual-report-2012.pdf.

  • Ramsden, P. (2013). The future of Higher Education teaching and the student experience. Retrieved February 4, 2013. Available from, http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/consultations/paulramsden_teaching_and_student_experience.

  • Rolfe, H. (2002). Students’ demands and expectations in an age of reduced financial support: The perspectives of lecturers in four English universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P., & Martin, L. (2008). Reading lists: A study of tutor and student perceptions, expectations and realities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, C., Adie, J., Pitt, E. & Owens, T. (2013). Feeding forward from summative assessment: the EFC as a learning tool. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Yooyen, A., Pirani, M., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2011). Expectations versus realities of Higher Education: Gap analysis and university service examination. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(10), 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Han, Z., & Gao, Q. (2008). Empirical study on the student satisfaction index in Higher Education. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Bates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, E.A., Kaye, L.K. “I’d be expecting caviar in lectures”: the impact of the new fee regime on undergraduate students’ expectations of Higher Education. High Educ 67, 655–673 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9671-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9671-3

Keywords

Navigation