Skip to main content
Log in

Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Scholars have acknowledged the need to anchor scientific knowledge about social and psychological processes in the norms, values, and experiences of the partticular population under study. This article describes how focus groups can be incorporated into the planning stages of a research pogram to facilitate these goals. After a brief overview of teh central components of focus group research, and example from a program of research involving dual-earner African American families is used to as an illustration. The article describes how (a) the identification of cultural knowledge and (b)access to the language participants use to think and talk about a topic can help researchers formulate a conceptual framework, identify important constructs, and develop appropriate instruments for assessing constructs. Some strengths and limitations of focus group research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderfer, C., Alderfer, C., Tucker, L., & Tucker, S. (1980). Diagnosing race problems in management.Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 16, 135–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An under-utilized research technique for improving theory and practice in Health Education.Health Education Quarterly, 14, 411–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1982).Concephialization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykin, A. W. (1979). Black psychology and the research process: Keeping the baby but throwing out the bath water. In A. W. Boykin, A. J. Franklin, & J. F. Yates (Eds.),Research directions of Black psychologists (pp. 85–103). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979).The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, (1991). The narrative construction of reality.Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1987).Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., & Watson, G. (1982).Black life in Corporate America. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, H., Weijts, W., Dijkstra, M., & Kok, G. (1992). The utilization of qualitative and quantitative data for health education program planning, implementation, and evaluation: A spiral approach.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, N. H., Lovato, C. Y., Weinstein, R., Green, L. W., & Eriksen, M. P. (1992). The implementation of a restrictive worksite smoking policy in a large decentralized organization.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M. L., Collier, M. J., & Ribeau, S. A. (1993).African American communication: Ethnic identity and cultural interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, G. S. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy.American Psychologist, 46, 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A., & Scott, R. A. (1981). The study of minority groups in complex societies. In R. H. Munroe, R. L. Munroe, & B. B. Whiting (Eds.),Handbook of cross-cultural human development (pp. 113–152). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugentobler, M. K., Israel, B. A., Schurman, S. J. (1992). An action research approach to workplace health: Integrating methods.Health Education Quarterly, 19, 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response styles.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. G., Emmors, CA., Kessler, R. C., Wortman, C. B., O'Brien, K., Hockev, W. T., Schaefer, C. (1984). Coping with the threat of AIDS. An approach to psychosocial assessment.American Psychologist, 39, 1297–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J. (1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35–50). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L. (1969).Class and conformity. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L. & Schooler, C. (1973). Occupational experience and psychological functioning: An assessment of reciprocal effects.American Sociological Review, 38, 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1978). The reciprocal effects of substantive complexity of work on intellectual flexibility: A longitudinal assessment.American Journal of Sociology, 84, 24–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. (1980).Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (1988).Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreckel, M. (1981).Communicative acts and shared knowledge in natural discourse. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengua, L. J., Roosa, M. W., Schupak-Newbery, E., Micheals, M. L., Berg, G. N., & Weschler, L. F. (1992). Using focus groups to guide the development of a parenting program for difficult-to-reach, high risk families.Family Relations, 41, 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, M. (1988). Psychology as storytelling.International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 1, 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsella, A. J., & Kameoka, V. A. (1989). Ethnocultural issues in the assessment of psychopathology. In S. Wetzler (Ed.),Measuring mental illness: Psychometric assessment for clinicians (pp. 231–255). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, H. P. (1982). Patterns of upward mobility in Black families. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.),Black families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler, P. P., & Zull, C. (1984).TEXTPACK Version V. Release 2. Mannheim: ZUMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1988).Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1989). Adjusting to widowhood: Do social networks really make it easier?Gerontologist, 29, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1993).Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, A. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3–19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L., & Spanish, M. T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research.Qualitative Sociology, 7, 253–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, K. O. (1993). Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 105–117). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrkowski, C. S. (1979).Work and the family system: A naturalistic study of working-class and lower-middle-class families. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plas, J. M. (1986).Systems psychology in the schools. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, L. (1985).Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popko, E. S. (1980).Key-word-in-context bibliographic indexing: Release 4.0 users manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Laboratory for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pramualratana, A., Havanon, N., & Knodel, J. (1985). Exploring the normative age at marriage in Thailand. An example from focus group research.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. P., & Staines, G. L. (1979).The 1977 quality of employment survey: Descriptive statistics with comparison data from 1969–70 and 1972–73 surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, J. V., Kjolseth, R., & Seymour, E. (1988).The ethnograph: A user's guide. Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., & LeVine, R. A. (1984).Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart. D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990).Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (1980). Work roles as stressors in corporate families.Family Relations, 29, 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P. (1985).Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, B., Knodel, J., & Sittitrai, W. (1993). Focus groups and surveys as complementary research methods: A case example. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.),Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 118–138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Work, J. (1980). Management blacks and the international labor market: Answers to a questionnaire.Human Resource Management (Fall), 16–22.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The writing of this manuscript was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (#DBS—9154413) and The William T. Grant Foundation (92147692) awarded to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, D., DuMont, K. Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. Am J Commun Psychol 21, 775–806 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00942247

Key words

Navigation