Abstract
In this paper we investigate the problem of locating medications in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) to minimize human selection errors. We formulate the multiple-drawer medication layout problem and show that the problem can be formulated as a quadratic assignment problem. As a way to evaluate various medication layouts, we develop a similarity rating for medication pairs. To solve industry-sized problem instances, we develop a heuristic approach. We use hospital ADC transaction data to conduct a computational experiment to test the performance of our developed heuristics, to demonstrate how our approach can aid in ADC design trade-offs, and to illustrate the potential improvements that can be made when applying an analytical process to the multiple-drawer medication layout problem. Finally, we present conclusions and future research directions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armour GC, Buffa ES (1963) A heuristic algorithm and simulation approach to relative location of facilities. Manage Sci 9:294–309
Bozer YA, Meller RD (1994) An improvement-type layout algorithm for single and multiple floor facilities. Manage Sci 40:918–932
Butler TW, Karwan KR, Sweigart JR (1992) Multi-level strategic evaluation of hospital plans and decisions. J Oper Res Soc 43:665–675
Cela E (1998) The quadratic assignment problem theory and algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands
MR Cohen (2007) Medication errors, 2nd edn. American Pharmacists Association, Washington, DC
Drira A, Pierreval H, Hajri-Gabouj S (2007) Facility layout problems: a survey. Annu Rev Control 31:255–267
Elshafei AN (1977) Hospital layout as a quadratic assignment problem. Oper Res Q 28:167–179
Francis RL, McGinnis LF Jr, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location an analytical approach, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
Garrelts JC, Koehn Lyle, Snyder V, Snyder R, Rich DS (2001) Automated medication distribution systems and compliance with joint commission standards. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 58:2267–2272
Gu J, Goetschalckx M, McGinnis LF (2007) Research on warehouse operation: a comprehensive review. Eur J Oper Res 177:1–21
Guidance on the interdisciplinary safe use of automated dispensing cabinets. Technical report, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (2008). http://www.ismp.org/Tools/guidelines/ADC_Guidelines_Final.pdf
ISMP’s list of confused drug names. Technical report, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (2010). http://www.ismp.org/Tools/confuseddrugnames.pdf
Jane C-C, Laih Y-W (2005) A clustering algorithm for item assignment in a synchronized zone order picking system. Eur J Oper Res 166:489–496
Kelle P, Schneider H, Wiley-Patton S, Woosley J (2009) Healthcare supply chain management. In: Badiru AB (eds) Inventory management non-classical views. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, pp 99–127
Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Tells JL, Karsh BT (2008) Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inf Assoc 15:408–423
Lim A, Rodrigues B, Zhang X (2004) Metaheuristics with local search techniques for retail shelf-space optimization. Manage Sci 50:117–131
Mantel RJ, Schuur PC, Heragu SS (2007) Order oriented slotting: a new strategy for warehouses. Eur J Ind Relat 1:301–316
Mason SJ, Thomas LM, Meller RD, Pazour JA, Root SE (2010) Survey of hospital pharmacy directors: assessment of the current state of unit-dose acquisition. J Pharm Technol 26:3–8
Meller RD, Bozer YA (1996) A new simulated annealing algorithm for the facility layout problem. Int J Prod Res 34:1675–1692
Meller RD, Chen W, Sherali HD (2007) Applying the sequence-pair representation to optimal facility layout designs. Oper Res Lett 35:651–659
Meller RD, Gau K-Y (1996) The facility layout problem: recent and emerging trends and perspectives. J Manuf Syst 15:351–366
Montreuil B (1990) A modelling framework for integrating layout design and flow network design. In: International material handling research colloquium proceedings, pp 43–58
Pederson CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ (2009) Ashp national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: dispensing and administration 2008. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 66:926–946
Petersen CG, Siu C, Heiser DR (2005) Improving order picking performance utilizing slotting and golden zone storage. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25:997–1012
Singh SP, Sharma RRK (2006) A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30:425–433
Tam KY (1991) A simulated annealing algorithm for allocating space to manufacturing cells. Int J Prod Res 30: 63–87
Tompkins JA, White JA, Bozer YA, Tanchoco JMA (2010) Facilities planning, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
Urban TL (1993) A heuristic for the dynamic facility layout problem. IIE Trans 25:57–63
Wise LC, Bostrom J, Crosier JA, White S, Caldwell R (1996) Cost-benefit analysis of an automated medication system. Nurs Econ 14:224–231
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: A drawer assignment model formulation
Appendix: A drawer assignment model formulation
We provide a non-linear integer programming formulation that uses the notation from Section 3 for the assignment of medications to drawers. To minimize the potential of a nurse having access to a drawer of medications that are similar, medications with high similarity ratings should be located in different drawers.
Drawer assignment model:
The objective, Eq. 13, is to minimize the similarity ratings of medications that are assigned to the same drawer, which has the impact of minimizing the likelihood of a similar medication being assigned to the same drawer. In Eq. 14, an upper bound on the number of medications to assign to each drawer is the total number of compartments in that drawer. Each medication must be assigned to exactly one drawer as enforced in Eq. 15. Finally, the x id variables are restricted to be binary in Eq. 16.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pazour, J.A., Meller, R.D. A multiple-drawer medication layout problem in automated dispensing cabinets. Health Care Manag Sci 15, 339–354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-012-9197-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-012-9197-8