Skip to main content
Log in

A multiple-drawer medication layout problem in automated dispensing cabinets

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the problem of locating medications in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) to minimize human selection errors. We formulate the multiple-drawer medication layout problem and show that the problem can be formulated as a quadratic assignment problem. As a way to evaluate various medication layouts, we develop a similarity rating for medication pairs. To solve industry-sized problem instances, we develop a heuristic approach. We use hospital ADC transaction data to conduct a computational experiment to test the performance of our developed heuristics, to demonstrate how our approach can aid in ADC design trade-offs, and to illustrate the potential improvements that can be made when applying an analytical process to the multiple-drawer medication layout problem. Finally, we present conclusions and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armour GC, Buffa ES (1963) A heuristic algorithm and simulation approach to relative location of facilities. Manage Sci 9:294–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bozer YA, Meller RD (1994) An improvement-type layout algorithm for single and multiple floor facilities. Manage Sci 40:918–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler TW, Karwan KR, Sweigart JR (1992) Multi-level strategic evaluation of hospital plans and decisions. J Oper Res Soc 43:665–675

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cela E (1998) The quadratic assignment problem theory and algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  5. MR Cohen (2007) Medication errors, 2nd edn. American Pharmacists Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drira A, Pierreval H, Hajri-Gabouj S (2007) Facility layout problems: a survey. Annu Rev Control 31:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elshafei AN (1977) Hospital layout as a quadratic assignment problem. Oper Res Q 28:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Francis RL, McGinnis LF Jr, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location an analytical approach, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garrelts JC, Koehn Lyle, Snyder V, Snyder R, Rich DS (2001) Automated medication distribution systems and compliance with joint commission standards. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 58:2267–2272

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gu J, Goetschalckx M, McGinnis LF (2007) Research on warehouse operation: a comprehensive review. Eur J Oper Res 177:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guidance on the interdisciplinary safe use of automated dispensing cabinets. Technical report, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (2008). http://www.ismp.org/Tools/guidelines/ADC_Guidelines_Final.pdf

  12. ISMP’s list of confused drug names. Technical report, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (2010). http://www.ismp.org/Tools/confuseddrugnames.pdf

  13. Jane C-C, Laih Y-W (2005) A clustering algorithm for item assignment in a synchronized zone order picking system. Eur J Oper Res 166:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelle P, Schneider H, Wiley-Patton S, Woosley J (2009) Healthcare supply chain management. In: Badiru AB (eds) Inventory management non-classical views. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, pp 99–127

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Tells JL, Karsh BT (2008) Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inf Assoc 15:408–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim A, Rodrigues B, Zhang X (2004) Metaheuristics with local search techniques for retail shelf-space optimization. Manage Sci 50:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mantel RJ, Schuur PC, Heragu SS (2007) Order oriented slotting: a new strategy for warehouses. Eur J Ind Relat 1:301–316

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mason SJ, Thomas LM, Meller RD, Pazour JA, Root SE (2010) Survey of hospital pharmacy directors: assessment of the current state of unit-dose acquisition. J Pharm Technol 26:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meller RD, Bozer YA (1996) A new simulated annealing algorithm for the facility layout problem. Int J Prod Res 34:1675–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meller RD, Chen W, Sherali HD (2007) Applying the sequence-pair representation to optimal facility layout designs. Oper Res Lett 35:651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meller RD, Gau K-Y (1996) The facility layout problem: recent and emerging trends and perspectives. J Manuf Syst 15:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Montreuil B (1990) A modelling framework for integrating layout design and flow network design. In: International material handling research colloquium proceedings, pp 43–58

  23. Pederson CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ (2009) Ashp national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: dispensing and administration 2008. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 66:926–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Petersen CG, Siu C, Heiser DR (2005) Improving order picking performance utilizing slotting and golden zone storage. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25:997–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh SP, Sharma RRK (2006) A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30:425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tam KY (1991) A simulated annealing algorithm for allocating space to manufacturing cells. Int J Prod Res 30: 63–87

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tompkins JA, White JA, Bozer YA, Tanchoco JMA (2010) Facilities planning, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Urban TL (1993) A heuristic for the dynamic facility layout problem. IIE Trans 25:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wise LC, Bostrom J, Crosier JA, White S, Caldwell R (1996) Cost-benefit analysis of an automated medication system. Nurs Econ 14:224–231

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Pazour.

Appendix: A drawer assignment model formulation

Appendix: A drawer assignment model formulation

We provide a non-linear integer programming formulation that uses the notation from Section 3 for the assignment of medications to drawers. To minimize the potential of a nurse having access to a drawer of medications that are similar, medications with high similarity ratings should be located in different drawers.

Drawer assignment model:

$$ \min \displaystyle\sum\limits_{d}\displaystyle\sum\limits_{i}\displaystyle\sum\limits_{j>i} \quad s_{ij} \; x_{id} \; x_{jd} $$
(13)
$$s.t. \displaystyle\sum\limits_{i} x_{id} \leq |C| \quad\forall d \in D, $$
(14)
$$ \displaystyle\sum\limits_{d} x_{id} = 1 \quad\forall i \in M $$
(15)
$$ x_{id} \in \{ 0,1 \} \quad \forall i \in M, \quad \forall d \in D $$
(16)

The objective, Eq. 13, is to minimize the similarity ratings of medications that are assigned to the same drawer, which has the impact of minimizing the likelihood of a similar medication being assigned to the same drawer. In Eq. 14, an upper bound on the number of medications to assign to each drawer is the total number of compartments in that drawer. Each medication must be assigned to exactly one drawer as enforced in Eq. 15. Finally, the x id variables are restricted to be binary in Eq. 16.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pazour, J.A., Meller, R.D. A multiple-drawer medication layout problem in automated dispensing cabinets. Health Care Manag Sci 15, 339–354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-012-9197-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-012-9197-8

Keywords

Navigation