Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inferring model parameters in network-based disease simulation

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many models of infectious disease ignore the underlying contact structure through which the disease spreads. However, in order to evaluate the efficacy of certain disease control interventions, it may be important to include this network structure. We present a network modeling framework of the spread of disease and a methodology for inferring important model parameters, such as those governing network structure and network dynamics, from readily available data sources. This is a general and flexible framework with wide applicability to modeling the spread of disease through sexual or close contact networks. To illustrate, we apply this modeling framework to evaluate HIV control programs in sub-Saharan Africa, including programs aimed at concurrent partnership reduction, reductions in risky sexual behavior, and scale up of HIV treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amaral LAN, Scala A, Barthlmy M, Stanley HE (2000) Classes of small-world networks. PNAS 97(21):11,149–11,152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Badri M, Lawn S, Wood R (2006) Short-term risk of AIDS or death in people infected with HIV-1 before antiretroviral therapy in South Africa: a longitudinal study. Lancet 368(9543):1254–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks J, Carson JS, Nelson BL, Nicol DM (2009) Discrete-event simulation, 5th edn. Prentice Hall

  5. Bendavid E, Young SD, Katzenstein DA, Bayoumi AM, Sanders GD, Owens DK (2008) Cost-effectiveness of HIV monitoring strategies in resource-limited settings: a southern African analysis. Arch Intern Med 168(17):1910–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter MW, Kraft JM, Koppenhaver T, Galavotti C, Roels TH, Kilmarx PH, Fidzani B (2007) A bull cannot be contained in a single kraal: concurrent sexual partnerships in Botswana. AIDS Behav 11(6):822–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drummond M, McGuire A (2001) Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. Oxford University Press

  8. Enns EA, Brandeau ML, Igeme TK, Bendavid E (2011) Assessing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of concurrency reduction for HIV prevention. Working Paper, Stanford University

  9. Fenton K, Johnson A, McManus S, Erens B (2001) Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sex Transm Infect 77(2):84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghani AC, Swinton J, Garnett G (1997) The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis 24(1):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldie S, Yazdanpanah Y, Losina E, Weinstein MC, Anglaret XRW, Hsu H, Kimmel A, Holmes C, Kaplan J, Freedberg K (2006) Cost-effectiveness of HIV treatment in resource-poor settings–the case of Cote d’Ivoire. N Engl J Med 355(11):1141–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grant M, Boyd S (2010) CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 1.21. cvxr.com/cvx

  13. Gray RH, Wawer MJ, Brookmeyer R, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Wabwire-Mangen F, Lutalo T, Li X, vanCott T, Quinn TC (2001) Probability of HIV-1 transmission per coital act in monogamous, heterosexual, HIV-1-discordant couples in Rakai, Uganda. Lancet 357(9263):1149–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Green EC, Halperin DT, Nantulya V, Hogle JA (2006) Uganda’s HIV prevention success: the role of sexual behavior change and the national response. AIDS Behav 10(4):335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Helleringer S, Kohler H (2007) Sexual network structure and the spread of HIV in Africa: evidence from Likoma Island, Malawi. AIDS 21(17):2323–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson M (2008) Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press

  17. Kiss IZ, Green DM, Kao RR(2006) Infectious disease control using contact tracing in random and scale-free networks. J R Soc Interface 3(6):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klovdahl AS (1985) Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med 21(11):1203–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klusmann D (2002) Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Arch Sex Behav 31(3):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kretzschmar M, van Duynhoven YTHP, Severijnen AJ (1996) Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhea and chlamydia using stochastic network simulations. Am J Epidemiol 144(3):306–317

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liljeros F, Edling CR, Amaral LAN, Stanley HE, Åberg Y (2001) The web of human sexual contacts. Nature 411:907–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mah T, Halperin D (2008) Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: evidence to move forward. AIDS Behav 14(1):11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MEASURE DHS. Demographic and health surveys. www.measuredhs.com. Accessed January 2009

  24. MEASURE DHS (2003) Tanzania demographic and health survey. www.measuredhs.com

  25. Morris M, Kretzschmar M (2000) A microsimulation study of the effect of concurrent partnerships on the spread of HIV in Uganda. Math Popul Stud 8(2):109–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National AIDS Coordinating Agency Botswana (2009) National campaign plan—multiple concurrent partnerships. www.comminit.com/en/node/304747/2781

  27. Newman MEJ, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ (2001) Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys Rev E 64(2):026,118

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parker M, Ward H, Day S (1998) Sexual networks and the transmission of HIV in London. J Biosoc Sci 30(1): 63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Serlemitsos E (2009) Mass media campaign on multiple concurrent sexual partnerships (MCP) in Zambia. www.harvardaidsprp.org

  30. Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825):268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. The United Republic of Tanzania Prime Minister’s Office (2009) National policy on HIV/AIDS. www.tanzania.go.tz/pdf/hivaidspolicy.pdf

  32. Troitzsch KG (2004) Validating simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 18th European simulation multiconference. Society for Modeling and Simulation, Germany

  33. Tumbo D, Jana M, Nkambule M (2008) One love: Multiple and concurrent sexual partnerships in southern Africa. www.onelovesouthernafrica.org

  34. UNAIDS (2008) Report on the global AIDS epidemic. www.unaids.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/HIVData/GlobalReport/2008

  35. US Census Bureau, P.D. (2008) International data base. www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/tables.html

  36. Vieira IT, Cheng RCH, Harper PR, Senna V (2010) Small world network models of the dynamics of HIV infection. Ann Oper Res 178(1):173–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wadsworth J, Johnson A, Wellings K, Field J (1996) What’s in a mean?—an examination of the inconsistency between men and women in reporting sexual partnerships. J R Stat Soc A 159(1):111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):440–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wawer MJ, Gray RH, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Li X, Laeyendecker O, Kiwanuka N, Kigozi G, Kiddugavu M, Lutalo T, Nalugoda F, Wabwire-Mangen F, Meehan MP, Quinn TC (2005) Rates of HIV-1 transmission per coital act, by stage of HIV-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis 191(9):1403–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weeks MR, Clair S, Borgatti SP, Radda K, Schensul JJ (2002) Social networks of drug users in high-risk sites: finding the connections. AIDS Behav 6(2):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. WHO (1999) Removing obstacles to healthy development. www.who.int/infectious-disease-report/

  42. WHO (2006) Life tables for WHO member states. www.who.int/whosis/database/life_tables/life_tables.cfm

  43. WHO (2008) Millennium development goals: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases. www.who.int/topics/millennium_development_goals/

  44. Wylie JL, Jolly A (2001) Patterns of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in sexual networks in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Dis 28(1):14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, Grant Number R01-DA15612. Eva Enns is supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship, a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship, and a Rambus Inc. Stanford Graduate Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva A. Enns.

Appendix: Details of Tanzania example

Appendix: Details of Tanzania example

This Appendix describes input parameters and key assumptions for the example analysis of the effects of concurrency reduction and other HIV prevention programs in Tanzania. Values for all input parameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Input parameters for numerical example evaluating the effects of concurrency reduction and other HIV prevention programs in Tanzania

We initialized the model with approximately 8,000 sexually active and potentially sexually active individuals aged 15–49 years old. We matched the age distribution of this population to gender-specific age distributions of Tanzania. Individuals age into the population at age 15 with an annual maturation rate determined from Tanzania demographic data [35]. Individuals experience a baseline gender- and age-specific mortality risk determined from country-specific life tables [42]. We matched the gender-specific concurrent partnership behavior reported in the most recent Demographic Health Survey conducted in Tanzania [24].

The disease model is a simplified version of a previously developed HIV progression model [5] and is described in detail in [8].

We modeled three discrete HIV disease states: acute, chronic, and on treatment. The HIV disease state determined the risk of transmission to sexual partners, with the acute state having the highest transmission risk and the treated state having the lowest. Per-act transmission probabilities were obtained from the literature [39] and then adjusted in model calibration to account for levels of sexual activity and condom use so that model-projected prevalence matched projected HIV prevalence trends in Tanzania.

We also modeled each individual’s CD4 counts. This provides a continuous measure of an individual’s immune function. CD4 counts determined HIV-related mortality risk and risks of opportunistic infections, which also increased mortality. In the chronic HIV state, CD4 counts decline slowly over time. Once CD4 counts fall below 200 cells/μL, an individual becomes HIV treatment eligible. HIV treatment causes a recovery in CD4 counts and thus a reduction in HIV-related mortality, though not all eligible individuals receive treatment in these resource-limited settings. The level of treatment coverage in Tanzania is estimated to be about 30% [34].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enns, E.A., Brandeau, M.L. Inferring model parameters in network-based disease simulation. Health Care Manag Sci 14, 174–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-011-9150-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-011-9150-2

Keywords

Navigation