Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Loess Collapse Potential

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collapsible soils, particularly loessial soils, present significant geotechnical engineering hazards that should be carefully investigated before any construction can commence. However, it is generally difficult to estimate the collapse potential of soils based on the relative contributions of each of the numerous influencing factors. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to find a reliable method for predicting the collapse potential of loessial soils by using machine learning-based tools. In this regard, details of 766 performed oedometer test were gathered from the published literature containing six variables for each data point including dry unit weight of soil, plasticity index, void ratio, degree of saturation, inundation stress at which the oedometer test was conducted, and the collapse potential. Then, prediction for the degree of collapsibility of loess was performed by employing three well-known supervised machine learning tools, namely Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN), Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN), and Naïve Bayesian Classifier (NBC), and outcomes were analyzed based on a comparative view. Simulation results indicate the superiority of MLPNN in estimating the degree of collapsibility of loess against other models in terms of performance error metrics and precision criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No new data were generated during this study.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SM: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, data curation, formal analysis, validation, writing – original draft, writing–review & editing. FR: methodology, data curation, writing–original draft. SF: formal analysis, methodology, software, validation, writing–original draft, writing–review & editing. AS: conceptualization, project administration, methodology, writing–review & editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sahand Motameni or Abbas Soroush.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 6 An overview of the dataset

6

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motameni, S., Rostami, F., Farzai, S. et al. A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Loess Collapse Potential. Geotech Geol Eng 42, 881–894 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02593-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02593-4

Keywords

Navigation