Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of the Geotechnical Parameters of Soils Behavior for Safe Future Urban Development, Najran Area, Saudi Arabia: Implications for Settlements Mitigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the geotechnical characterization of Sultana soils (Najran region, Saudi Arabia) by in situ and laboratory tests, for a project proposal for the construction of commercial and government buildings. Geotechnical parameters of the subsoil were analyzed with a view to using the soil as an earth construction material and as a foundation for buildings constructed on the grounds tested. The site was investigated by means of boreholes, trial pits, standard penetration tests, plate load tests, Seismological data, particle size analyses, modified Proctor Tests, Oedometer and direct shear tests. The study contains full description to the subsurface soil conditions and provides recommendations for collapse potential, foundation type, foundation depth, allowable net bearing capacity, estimation for the expected settlement. In this paper a review of the principal results of the in situ and laboratory investigations is described. Results of the study revealed that within the maximum depth of 10.0 m of boring, the soil was found to be composed of brown soil mixture of sand and clayey silt with little gravel, classified as (SM) and (SC) according to USCS classification and as (A-2-4) and A-2-6 according to AASHTO classification. The area was found to consist in general of collapsible soils, classified as collapsible alluvial soils. The results show that the collapse potential of the majority of semi-arid soils tested were classified as severe trouble soils and natural moisture content is an important factor influencing the collapse potential of the soil. In addition, the results of this study provide the parameters to evaluate the soil behavior and the geotechnical model for the foundation bearing capacity and soil settlements evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO T180 (2001) Modified method of test for the moisture-density relations of soils. Washington, DC

  • ANSI/IEEE Std 81 (1983) The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. New York

  • ASTM D 1557-12 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D4643-08 (2008) Standard test method for determination of water (moisture) content of soil by microwave oven heating. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles JE (1988) Foundation analysis and design, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Indian standards (1970) Indian standard classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. BIS, New Delhi, 1970, (Reaffirmed 1987), IS 1498

  • Cameron DA (2006) The role of vegetation in stabilizing highly plastic clay subgrades. In: Ghataora GS, Burrow MPN (eds) Proceedings of railway foundations, Rail Found 06, Birmingham, Sept., pp 165–186

  • Chen FH (1988) Foundations on expansive soils. 2nd edn, Elsevier Science Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton CRI, Xu M, Whiter JT, Ham A, Rust M (2010) Stresses in cast-iron pipes due to seasonal Shrink-swell of clay soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Manag 163(WM3):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemence SP, Finbarr AO (1981) Design considerations for collapsible soils. J Geotech Eng Div 107(GT3):305–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Das BM (1998) Principles of geotechnical engineering, 4th edn. PWS Publishing Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rienzo F, Oreste P, Pelizza S (2008) Subsurface geological-geotechnical modelling to sustain underground civil planning. Eng Geol 96(3–4):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhowian A, Ruwiah I, Erol A (1985) The distribution and evaluation of expansive soils in Saudi Arabia. In: Proceedings of the second Saudi engineering conference, vol 4. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, 1969–1990

  • Dhowian AW, Erol AO, Youcef A (1988) Evaluation of expansive soils and foundation methodology in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. King Abdualaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh

    Google Scholar 

  • Donghee K, Kyu-Sun K, Seongkwon K, Youngmin C, Woojin L (2012) Assessment of geotechnical variability of Songdo silty clay. Eng Geol 133–134:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtug Y, Sridharan A (2004) Compaction behaviour and prediction of its characteristics of fine grained soils with particular reference to compaction energy. Soils Found 44(5):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy RL (1973) Collapsible loess in Iowa. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 37:281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz WG, Gibbs HJ (1956) Engineering properties of expansive clays. Transact ASCE 121:641–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston SL, Houston WN, Zapata CE, Lawrence C (2001) Geotechnical engineering practice for collapsible soils. Geotechn Geol Eng 19:333–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman D, Hyndman D (2014) Natural hazards and disasters. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2720. Indian standard methods of test for soils: Part 40—determination of Free Swell Index of Soils 1977. BSI, New Delhi

  • Jennings JE, Knight K (1975) A guide to construction on or with material exhibiting additional settlement due to collapse of grain structure. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, In: 6th regional conference for Africa on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Durban, South Africa, pp 99–105

  • Kolat C, Ulusay R, Lutfi Suzen M (2012) Development of geotechnical microzonation model for Yenisehir (Bursa, Turkey) located at a seismically active region. Eng Geol 127:36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konert G, Afifi AM, Al-Harjri SA, Droste HJ (2001) Paleozoic stratigraphic and hydrocarbon habitat of the Arabian Plate. GeoArabia 6:407–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoud AA, Abd El Aal AK (2017) Three-dimensional geotechnical modeling of the soils in Riyadh city. KSA Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1011-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D (1977) Engineering of expansive soils, inaugural address. In: Proceedings of the 1st National symposium on expansive soils, HBTI, Kanpur, India

  • Mulvey WE (1992) Engineering geologic problems caused by soil and rock in southwestern Utah. In: Harty KM (ed) Engineering and environmental geology of southwestern Utah: Utah geological association publication, vol 21, pp 139–144

  • Murthy VNS (2010) Soil mechanics and foundation engineering. CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons RL, Frost JD (2002) Evaluating site investigation quality using GIS and geostatistics. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(6):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH (1974) Foundation engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge PR (2007) Corrosion inspection and monitoring. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins KM, Jorgensen ST, Ross TE (1998) Optimum moisture content for dynamic compaction of collapsible soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(8):699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins KM, Williams T, Bleazard R, Owens RL (1992) Identification, characterization, and mapping of collapsible soils in southwestern Utah. In: Harty KM (ed) Engineering and environmental geology of southwestern Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication, vol 21, pp 145–158

  • Rouaiguia A, Dahim MA (2016) Hydrocollapse of semi-arid soils. Indian Geotechn J 46(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saudi Building Code SBC-301-2007 (2007) Chapter (9), Seismic Design Criteria

  • Saudi Building Code SBC-301-2007 (2007) Chapter (14), Site classification for seismic design

  • Stavridakis EI (2006) Assessment of anisotropic behaviour of swelling soils on ground and construction work. In: Al-Rawas AA, Goosen MFA (eds) Expansive soils: recent advances in characterization and treatment. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • White JL, Wait, TC, Morgan ML(2008) Geologic hazards mapping project for Montrose County, Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey Department of Natural Resources Denver, Colorado

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed K. Abd El Aal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abd El Aal, A.K., Rouaiguia, A. Determination of the Geotechnical Parameters of Soils Behavior for Safe Future Urban Development, Najran Area, Saudi Arabia: Implications for Settlements Mitigation. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 695–712 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01058-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01058-x

Keywords

Navigation