Skip to main content
Log in

Study on Dynamic Response of Soil Layer at the Bottom of Subway Shield Tunnel Under Seismic Action

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic response characteristics of the soil layer at the bottom of the subway shield tunnel under seismic loads are related to the seismic performance and seismic safety evaluation of the subway shield tunnel structure. It is of great significance to reveal the dynamic response and seismic failure mechanism of the subway shield tunnel structure and its surrounding soil layer under seismic action. With the shield tunnel of Xiamen Metro Line 6 (from Maluan Center to Jimei Island) as an engineering case, the dynamic response characteristics of the bottom soil layer of shield tunnel with different structural stiffness under different seismic loads are systematically studied using the finite difference method. The results show that (1) under seismic loads, with the increase of the distance from the bottom of shield tunnel, the vertical stress of each monitoring point increases and its vertical displacement decreases, and the change rate of both increases; (2) with the increase of seismic wave peak acceleration, the vertical stress and displacement of the soil layer at the same distance from the bottom of the shield tunnel show an increasing trend. Specifically, the farther the soil layer is from the bottom of the tunnel, the greater the increase rate is; (3) as the concrete strength grade of shield tunnel segment increases, the vertical stress of soil layer at the bottom of shield tunnel increases and the vertical displacement decreases, while the overall change is within a slight range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Chen GX, Zuo X, Zhuang HY et al (2007) Contrast analysis of numerical simulation of subway tunnel earthquake response with test results. J Nat Disasters 16(6):81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan ZH, Dou YM, Wang JN et al (2017) Shaking table test for seismic responses of shield tunnel in soft soil foundation. Sci Technol Eng 17(2):106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng P, He C, Zhang J et al (2020) Experimental study on seismic response of shield tunnel. Hazard Control Tunn Undergr Eng 2(2):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo JQ, Xu LX, Xu C et al (2022) Dynamic response analysis on stress and displacement of the shield tunnel structure and soil layer under train-induced vibration in Xiamen Metro Line 6. Sustainability 14:11962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han BM, Li YW, Lu F et al (2022) Statistical analysis of urban rail transit operations in the world in 2021: a review. Urban Rapid Rail Transit 35(1):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • He PP, Cui ZD (2015) Dynamic response of a thawing soil around the tunnel under the vibration load of subway. Environ Earth Sci 73:2473–2483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Peng L, Yu J et al (2015) Model test on dynamic characteristics of invert and foundation soils of high-speed railway tunnel. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 14:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei M, Omer J (2017) Study on train vibration response and cumulative deformation of double arch tunnel in Kast foundation. Geotech Geol Eng 33:549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SM, Yu HT, Xue GQ et al (2021) Analysis on seismic response of shield tunnels passing through soil-rock strata. Modern Tunn Technol 5:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu NN, Men YM, Peng JB et al (2010) Dynamic response of shield metro tunnel in earthquake load. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 37(4):58–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv G, Liu YC, Xu CM et al (2014) Study on seismic resistance for shield tunnel of peat soft soil area. Modern Urban Transt 26–29

  • Mazaheri A, Cheraghi Seifabad M, Mahdavi S et al (2021) Seismic sensitivity analysis of rigidity and thickness of tunnel lining by using Ground_Structure interaction method case study: Roudbar Lorestan Dam. Geotech Geol Eng 39:1557–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan B, Zhang W, Cao J et al (2020) Dynamic responses of soils around a one-hole double-track tunnel with the metro train meeting. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1782803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Xie J, He S et al (2019) Dynamic responses of bridge-tunnel overlapping structure for high-speed railway under different seismic excitations. Geotech Geol Eng 37:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang MF, Gong QM (2007) Seismic response analysis of the shield tunnel across the river in Shanghai soft ground. Earthq Resist Eng Retrofit 29(1):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao LJ, Ding P, Yang XR et al (2020) Comparative study of the seismic performance of prefabricated and cast-in-place subway station structures by shaking table test. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 105:103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao LJ, Ding P, Lin H et al (2021) Three-dimensional seismic performance analysis of large and complex underground pipe trench structure. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 150:106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao LJ, Shi C, Ding P et al (2022) Shaking table test of the effect of an enclosure structure on the seismic performance of a prefabricated subway station. Tunn Undergr Space Technol Incorporating Trenchless Technol Res 125:104533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Sun B (2014) Study on seismic response of shield tunnel under complex geological conditions. J Shandong Agric Univ (nat Sci) 45(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu XF, Zhou J, Dong P (2004) Seismic analysis of DOT shield tunnel surrounded by soft soil. Earthq Resist Eng 4:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan ZX, Shi S, Jiang P et al (2013) Numerical analysis of tunnel dynamic response under earthquake. Chin J Undergr Space Eng 9(5):1025–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan Y, Bao Z, Yu HT et al (2017a) Multi point shaking table test on shield tunnels in consideration of wave passage effect. China J Highw Transp 30(8):174–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan ZH, Cai YQ, Yuan W et al (2017b) Dynamic response of circular railway tunnel and track system in saturated soil under moving train loading. Rock Soil Mech 38:1003–1014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Development Projects of FSDI (17-24, 17-25); the Shaanxi Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Team Plan (2015KCT-01); the Software Development Project of China Railway First Survey and Design Institute (17-22).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, L., Guo, J., Xu, C. et al. Study on Dynamic Response of Soil Layer at the Bottom of Subway Shield Tunnel Under Seismic Action. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 1635–1646 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02358-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02358-5

Keywords

Navigation