Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Barak River Sand Using Resonant Column Apparatus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The whole of the northeast region of India lies in the seismic zone V. Barak River flows through the Silchar town of Assam. Several construction projects utilize the sand extracted from the Barak river for carrying out their operations; hence, its dynamic analysis becomes important. This study aims to experimentally investigate the dynamic behavior of Barak river sand in dry conditions by varying influencing parameters such as confining pressure and relative density, at a very low strain condition. The most important parameters in the dynamic analysis of soil include shear modulus and damping ratio, which were evaluated using resonant column apparatus in the torsional mode of vibration. The sand samples were prepared by compacting to relative densities of 30, 50, and 65% and tested at confining pressures of 50, 100, and 200 kPa. It was observed that with an increase in strain percentage, the shear modulus of the test sand decreased, but the damping ratio values increased. Shear modulus values obtained were found to be proportional to confining pressure and relative density, but the damping ratio followed an inverse trend. The outcomes of the present study can be implemented in the designing of foundations and structures exposed to dynamic loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das S, Bhowmik D (2020) Dynamic behaviour of sand-crumbed rubber mixture at low strain level. Geotech Geol Eng 38:6611–6622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01458-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dutta TT, Saride S (2016) Influence of shear strain on the Poisson’s ratio of clean sands. Geotech Geol Eng 34:1359–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dutta TT, Saride S (2016) Dynamic properties of moderately expansive soil stabilized with class C fly ash. Geo-Chicago 2016:949–958

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Shear strain for the first cycle of unidirectional cyclic shear loading. The relation consists of the initial loading curve OD, the unloading branch of the loop DEC, and the reloading branch CFD. The loop in Fig. 1(a) is somewhat idealized in th. J Geotech Eng 117:89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang J, Andrus RD, Juang CH (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2005)131:4(453)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan Z, El Naggar MH, Cascante G (2011) Frequency dependent dynamic properties from resonant column and cyclic triaxial tests. J Franklin Inst 348:1363–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Das BM, Luo Z (2016) Principles of soil dynamics. Cengage Learning

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ishimoto M, Iida K (1937) Determination of elastic constants of soils by means of vibration methods. Part 2. Modulus of rigidity and Poisson’s ratio. Bull Earthq Res Institute, Univ Tokyo 15:67–85

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng Z-Y, Sutter KG (2000) Dynamic properties of granulated rubber/sand mixtures. Geotech Test J 23:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Madhusudhan BN (2011) Dynamic properties of dry to fully saturated states using resonant column and bender element tests

  11. Mog K, Anbazhagan P (2022) Evaluation of the damping ratio of soils in a resonant column using different methods. Soils Found 62:101091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang XJ, Aggour MS (1996) Damping determination of sands under different loadings. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh World Conference of Earthquake Engineering. Elsevier Science Ltd. Paper

  13. Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T (2013) Effect of uniformity coefficient on g/gmax and damping ratio of uniform to well-graded quartz sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amir-Faryar Behzad (2012) Dynamic properties of fiber reinforced clay. In: Proceedings of 15th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering

  15. Maher BMH, Member A, Woods RD (1990) Dynamic response of sand reinforced with randomly distributed fibers. J Geotech Eng 116:1116–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A, Pitilakis K (2018) Dynamic behaviour of granular soil materials mixed with granulated rubber: effect of rubber content and granularity on the small-strain shear modulus and damping ratio. Geotech Geol Eng 36:1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0391-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akbulut S, Arasan S, Kalkan E (2007) Modification of clayey soils using scrap tire rubber and synthetic fibers. Appl Clay Sci 38:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2007.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Das S, Bhowmik D (2020) Small-strain dynamic behavior of sand and sand-crumb rubber mixture for different sizes of crumb rubber particle. J Mater Civ Eng 32:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacharya LGS (2012) Site-specific earthquake response study for hazard assessment in Kolkata city, India. Nat Hazards 61:943–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9940-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Materials T (1994) by the bender element and resonant column tests. 519–526

  21. Dammala PK, Krishna AM, Bhattacharya S et al (2017) Dynamic soil properties for seismic ground response studies in Northeastern India. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 100:357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madhusudhan BN, Senetakis K (2016) Evaluating use of resonant column in flexural mode for dynamic characterization of Bangalore sand. Soils Found 56:574–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stokoe KH, Darendeli MB, Andrus RD, Brown LT (1999) Dynamic soil properties: laboratory, field and correlation studies. In: Earthquake geotechnical engineering. pp 811–845

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parikshit Dubey.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors announce that there is no known conflict of interest with this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gautam, Dubey, P., Mazumdar, A. et al. Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Barak River Sand Using Resonant Column Apparatus. Indian Geotech J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00968-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-024-00968-9

Keywords

Navigation