Abstract
The presented article is relevant, as Kazakhstan is the first of the countries of the Central Asian region that has moved to the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment and seismic zoning at the regulatory level, consistent with the basic principles of Eurocodes. The methodology used is being improved in accordance with global trends and includes both domestic developments in the identification and parameterization of zones of possible earthquake sources, and the advantages of the Western engineering approach. However, the accuracy of estimates is strongly influenced by the weak development of seismological networks in Kazakhstan, poor knowledge of active faults, insufficient involvement of local specialists in significant international research projects. The current state of seismic hazard assessment in Kazakhstan is presented. The aim of the article was to highlight the developments in the country in recent years in this field of research. The stages of the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) development, methodological features in comparison with Central Asian countries, significance for the seismic safety of the country, the achieved level and difficulties are considered. The existing normative maps of seismic zoning based on PSHA and maps developed during current projects are characterized. The development of the modern probabilistic assessment is extremely relevant for the highly seismic areas of Kazakhstan. It is dictated by the need to update seismic design standards and the country’s declared harmonization of the construction regulatory framework with the European building codes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Abakanov TD, Li AN, Sadykova AB, Silacheva NV, Stepanenko NP (2016) Seismic zoning of the territory of Kazakhstan within the framework of Eurocode 8. Institute of Physics Land named after OYu Schmidt, Moscow
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1025–1055
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81(2):195–206
Aleshin AS (2017) Continuum theory of seismic microdistricting. Nauchnyy Mir, Moscow
Andrieiev VG, Anisimova LB, Burlakova AO, Tiapkin OK, Kravtsov YS (2019) Geoinformation support of effective water resources management of coal mining regions of south eastern Ukraine. 18th Inter Conf Geoinform: Theor Appl Aspects, Geoinform 2019: 15648. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201902047
Begaliev U (2022) III International Scientific and Practical Conference on Earthquake Engineering, dedicated to the International Year of Sustainable Mountain Development Bishkek city. https://scadsoft.com/download/2019_Msk/06_(2019)_SP_RK_2-03-30-2017_v_SCAD_(Verevkin_D.V)_Pavlodar.pdf
Bolatbek K, Ivanov SI, Gordienko MG, Menshutina NV (2016) Mathematical modeling of aerogel structures, including with embedded carbon nanotubes. Inter Multidisc Sci Geo Conf 3:69–76
Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1057–1085
Bozorgnia Y, Abrahamson NA, Campbell KW, Rowshandel BY, Shantz T (2012) NGA-West2: A comprehensive research program to update ground motion prediction equations for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions. New York: Proceedings
Chiou BS-J, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1117–1153
Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0580051583
Decree of the Government of the Republic of (2013) Kazakhstan of the “Concept for reforming the regulatory framework of the construction industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan” No. 1509. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31499350
Field EH, Jordan TH, Cornell CA (2003) OpenSHA: a developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Letters 74:406–419
Giardini D (1999) The global seismic hazard assessment program, 1992/1999. Annals of Geophys 42(6):957–974
Ischuk A, Bjerrum LW, Kamchybekov M, Abdrakhmatov K, Lindholm C (2018) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the area of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Eastern Uzbekistan, Central Asia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108(1):130–144
Khussain BK, Vinnikova KK, Kumarov YY, Meirbek ZD, Khussain AB (2020) Import substitution of software for digitalization of industry in the Republic of Kazakhstan. News Nation Acad Sci Rep Kazakh Ser Geol Tech Sci 3(441):204–207
Mosca I, Baptie B, Sargeant S, Walker RT (2019) Integrating outcomes from probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard analysis in the Tien Shan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109:688–715
Musson R (2009) The use of Monte Carlo simulations for seismic hazard assessment in the UK. Annali Geofis 43(1):1–9
Nazarova GY, Ivashkina EN, Oreshina AA, Vymyatnin EK, Seytenova GZ, Burumbaeva GR (2020) Vacuum distillate catalytic cracking technology modelling: feedstock and products composition and properties investigation. Petrol Coal 62(2):380–389
Onur T, Gök R, Mackey K, Abrams K, Berezina A, Mikhailova N, Bekturganova B, Murodkulov Sh, Bondar I, Herrera C (2021) Central Asia seismic hazard assessment (CASHA). “Complete” catalog of earthquakes. Lawrence Livermore Nat Lab 828313:1–8
Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G, Danciu L, Crowley H, Silva V, Henshaw P, Butler L, Nastasi M, Panzeri L, Simionato M, Vigano D (2014) OpenQuake engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Letters 85:692–702
Riznichenko YV (1965) From the activity of earthquake sources to the shaking of the earth’s surface. Sci USSR Phys Earth 11:1–12
Silacheva NV, Kulbayeva UK, Kravchenko NA (2018) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Kazakhstan and Almaty city in peak ground accelerations. Geod Geodyn 9(2):131–141
Silacheva NV, Kulbayeva UK, Kravchenko NA (2020) On the realization of seismic microzonation of Almaty (Kazakhstan) in ground accelerations based on the “continual” approach. Geod Geodyn 11(1):56–63
SN RK 2.03- 07-2001 “Development of the city of Almaty and suburban areas according to seismic zoning”. https://onlinezakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30005597
SN RK 2.03- 28-2004 “Scale for assessing the intensity of earthquakes MSK-64 (K) building regulations of the Republic of Kazakhstan”. https://onlinezakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30400303
SP RK 2.03- 30-2017 “Construction in seismic zones. Code of rules of the Republic of Kazakhstan”. https://scadsoftcom/download/2019_Msk/06_(2019)_SP_RK_2-03-30
SP RK 2.03- 31-2020 “Development of the territory of the city of Almaty, taking into account seismic microzoning”. https://onlinezakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=38119517
Suleyev DK, Uzbekov NB, Sadykova AB, Silacheva NV, Stepanenko NP (2020) Recommendations on the development of probability maps of seismic zoning of the territory of Kazakhstan based on modern methodology. NEWS Acad Sci Rep Kazakh 6(444):236–244
Timush AV, Taradaeva TV, Stepanenko NP, Sadykova AB, Sydykov A (2012) Seismogenic zones of Kazakhstan. High Technology, Almaty
Topalov A, Kondratenko G, Gerasin O, Kozlov O, Zivenko O (2020) Information system for automatic planning of liquid ballast distribution. CEUR Work Proceed 2762:191–200
Ullah S, Bindi D, Pilz M, Danciu L, Weatherill G, Zuccolo E, Ischuk A, Mikhailova NN, Abdrakhmatov K, Parolai S (2015) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Central Asia. Annals of Geophys 58:1–21. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6687
Ulomov VI (1999) The GSHAP region working group. Seismic hazard of Northern Eurasia. Annals Geophys 42(6):1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3785
Ulomov VI, Shumilina LS (1999) Set of maps of the general seismic zoning of the territory of the Russian Federation GSZ-97 explanatory note. Joint Institute of Physics of the Earth OYu Schmidt RAS, Moscow
Zhao JX, Zhou Sh, Zhou J, Zhao Ch, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Gao P, Lan X, Rhoades D, Fukushima Y, Somerville PG, Irikura K (2016) Ground-motion prediction equations for shallow crustal and upper-mantle earthquakes in Japan using site class and simple geometric attenuation functions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(4):1552–1569. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150063
Zhukov Y, Gordeev B, Zivenko A, Nakonechniy A (2015) Polymetric sensing in intelligent systems. In: Advances in Intelligent Robotics and Collaborative Automation, pp 211–234
Protocol Note Central Asian Earthquake Risk Reduction Forum (2015) http://www.unesco.kz/_files/77_Central%20Asia%20Earthquake%20Risk%20Reduction%20Forum%20Proceedings_2015_rus.pdf
SN RK 20 – 02:2018 “Building code of Kyrghyz Republic standard system of building seismic evaluation of existing buildings”. http://gosstroy.gov.kg/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/SNiP-KR-22-01-2018_-2018-08-101.pdf
SN RK EN 1998-1:2004/2012 “Eurocode 8: Design of earthquake-resistant structures – Part 1: General rules, seismic impacts and rules for buildings”. https://onlinezakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31211568
SNiP II-7 -81 “Construction in seismic areas”. http://onlinebudstandart.com/ru/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=4992
SNT 2. 01.08-99 “Building regulations of Turkmenistan Construction in seismic areas”. https://gostperevod.com/snt-2-01-08-99html
Acknowledgements
The work was carried out within the framework of the “Seismic hazard assessment of the territories of regions and cities of Kazakhstan on a modern scientific and methodological basis”, program code F.0980, IRN OR11465449. The source of funding is the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Silacheva, N. On the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment in Kazakhstan. Geotech Geol Eng 41, 1429–1437 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02345-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02345-w