Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Study on Rock Failure Characteristics of Ejective Rock Burst Based on Energy Compensation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock burst is a typical type of dynamic geological disaster in the process of underground engineering excavation under high in-situ stress. Based on the understanding of the principle of elastic strain energy accumulation and release in the process of rock burst, the uniaxial load rock burst test is carried out using the self-designed rock burst process experiment system. In addition, the simulation of rock burst with different strength levels is realised. The distribution characteristics of rock burst debris, intensity of rock burst, acoustic emission characteristics, failure mode and energy characteristics of rock burst fracture surface were analysed using statistics and effective kinetic energy theory. According to the test results, the whole process of rock burst is divided into three stages: static incubation stage, dynamic burst stage and comprehensive rock burst development stage. A more severe degree of rock burst indicates larger mass proportion of rock burst fragments, more broken rock burst fragments, farther ejection and throwing distance of fragments and greater effective kinetic energy of fragments. The weaker degree of rock burst indicates smaller mass proportion of rock burst fragments, larger mass of damaged blocks, closer ejection and throwing distance of blocks and smaller effective kinetic energy of fragments. In the load process, many tensile cracks and a certain amount of shear cracks are generated. When more cracks are generated in the load process, the acoustic emission activity becomes more intense. The detritus produced are mostly lumpy, flaky and lamellar.Please confirm the corresponding author mail ID is correctly identified and amend if necessary.The mail ID is accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  • Chen XH, Deng XL, Li ZH (2008) Mechanics analysis on the conditions of rock burst occurrence in the coal mass of roadway rib. J Coal Sci Eng 14(2):213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen BR, Feng XT, Li QP, Luo RZ, Li SJ (2015) Rock burst intensity classification based on the radiated energy with damage intensity AI Jinping II hydropower station, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederichs MS, Kaiser PK, Eberhardt E (2004) Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunnelling and the influence of near-face stress rotation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:785–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao MS, Dou LM, Zhang N (2008) Simulation of the relationship between roadway dynamic destruction and hypocenter parameters. J China Univ Min Technol 18(1):93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong WL, Peng YY, Wang H, He MC, Sousa RE, Wang J (2015) Fracture angle analysis of rock burst faulting planes based on true-triaxial experiment. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1017–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu ST, Zhang W, Jiang BY, Hu CC (2019) Case of rock burst danger and its prediction and prevention in tunneling and mining period at an irregular coal face. Geotech Geol Eng 37:2545–2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo WJ, Li YY, Yin DW, Zhang SC, Sun XZ (2016) Mechanisms of rock burst in hard and thick upper strata and rock-burst controlling technology. Arab J Geosci 9:561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdia KM, Silani M, Zhuang XY, He PF, Rabczuk T (2017) Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions. Intern J Fract 206(2):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He MC, Sousa LRE, Miranda T, Zhu G (2015) Rockburst laboratory tests database-application of data mining techniques. Eng Geol 185:116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Dou LM, Mu ZL, Cao AY, Gong SY (2016) Numerical simulation study on hard-thick roof inducing rock burst in coal mine. J Cent South Univ 23:2314–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He MC, Li JY, Ren FQ (2020) Rock burst criterion based on clay mineral content. Arab J Geosci 13:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang RQ, Wang XN, Chan LS (2001) Triaxial unloading test of rocks and its implications for rock burst. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60:37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia CY, Wang HL, Sun XZ, Liu KM, Zhang GB, Yu XB, Song XY (2020) Similar material simulation test of overlying strata characteristics of isolated working face mining with thick-hard strata. Geotech Geol Eng 38:1121–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang LS, Kong P, Zhang PP, Shu JM, Wang QB, Chen LJ, Wu QL (2020) Dynamic analysis of the rock burst potential of a Longwall panel intersecting with a fault. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:1737–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XL, Wang EY, Li ZH, Liu ZT, Song SZ, Qiu LM (2016) Rock burst monitoring by integrated microseismic and electromagnetic radiation methods. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4393–4406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li TB, Ma CC, Zhu ML, Meng LB, Chen GQ (2017a) Geomechanical types and mechanical analyses of rockbursts. Eng Geol 222:72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li TZ, Li YX, Yang XL (2017b) Rock burst prediction based on genetic algorithms and extreme learning machine. J Cent South Univ 24:2105–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZQ, Xue YG, Li SC, Qiu DH, Zhang LW, Zhao Y, Zhou BH (2020) Rock burst risk assessment in deep-buried underground caverns: a novel analysis method. Arab J Geosci 13:388–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZB, Shao JF, Xu WY, Meng YD (2013) Prediction of rock burst classification using the technique of cloud models with attribution weight. Nat Hazards 68:549–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Chen ZQ, Wang LG (2015) Rock burst laws in deep mines based on combined model of membership function and dominance-based rough set. J Cent South Univ 22:3591–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Yu B, Liu JR, Wang TX (2019) Investigation of impact rock burst induced by energy released from hard rock fractures. Arab J Geosci 12:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu AH, Mao XB, Liu HS (2008) Physical simulation of rock burst induced by stress waves. J China Univ Min Technol 18:0401–0405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu CP, Liu GJ, Liu Y, Zhang N, Xue JH, Zhang L (2015) Microseismic multi-parameter characteristics of rockburst hazard induced by hard roof fall and high stress concentration. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 76:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng XX, Liu WT, Zhang H (2018) A study of rock burst hazard prevention method. Geotech Geol Eng 36:2237–2246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao SJ, Cai MF, Guo QF, Huang ZJ (2016) Rock burst prediction based on in-situ stress and energy accumulation theory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi G, Wei ZY, Meng H (2014) Numerical and experimental method to determine the boring diameters of a two-stage TBM cutterhead to prevent rock burst. J Mech Sci Technol 28(11):4613–4620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SR, Li CY, Yan WF, Zou ZS, Chen WX (2017) Multiple indicators prediction method of rock burst based on microseismic monitoring technology. Arab J Geosci 10:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XT, Li SC, Xu ZH, Xue YG, Hu J, Li ZQ, Zhang B (2019) An interval fuzzy comprehensive assessment method for rock burst in underground caverns and its engineering application. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:5161–5176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SC, Wu ZG, Zhang CX (2019) Rock burst prediction probability model based on case analysis. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 93:103069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao YX, Feng XT, Li SJ, Feng GL, Yu Y (2016) Rock mass failure mechanisms during the evolution process of rockbursts in tunnels. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 83:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie LT, Yan P, Lu WB, Chen M, Wang GH (2018) Effects of strain energy adjustment: a case study of rock failure modes during deep tunnel excavation with different methods. KSCE J Civ Eng 22(10):4143–4154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu NW, Li TB, Dai F, Li B, Zhu YG, Yang DS (2015) Microseismic monitoring and stability evaluation for the large-scale underground caverns at the Houziyan hydropower station in Southwest China. Eng Geol 188:48–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang CQ, Feng XT, Zhou H, Qiu SL, Wu WP (2012) Case histories of four extremely intense rockburst in deep tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(3):275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZZ, Gao F, Shang XJ (2014) Rock burst proneness prediction by acoustic emission test during rock deformation. J Cent South Univ 21:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao TB, Guo WY, Tan YL, Yin YC, Cai LS, Pan JF (2018) Case studies of rock bursts under complicated geological conditions during multi-seam mining at a depth of 800 m. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:1539–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Bi J, Zhou XP (2020) Quantitative analysis of rockburst in the surrounding rock masses around deep tunnels. Eng Geol 273:105669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XP, Zhang XQ (2017) The 3D numerical simulation of damage localization of rocks using general particle dynamics. Eng Geol 224:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu WS, Zhang QB, Zhu HH, Li Y, Yin JH, Li SC, Sun LF, Zhang L (2010) Large-scale geomechanical model test study of an underground cavern group under true three-dimensional stress state. Can Geotech J 47(9):935–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M623388). We are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their constructive reviews on the manuscript, and the editors for carefully revising the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Defense Engineering, AMS, PLA, Luoyang, 471023, Henan, China

    Junqi Fan, Peng Guo, Fuli Kong & Xiaoyan Shi

Authors
  1. Junqi Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fuli Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoyan Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, J., Guo, P., Kong, F. et al. Experimental Study on Rock Failure Characteristics of Ejective Rock Burst Based on Energy Compensation. Geotech Geol Eng 40, 5547–5564 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02232-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-022-02232-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation