Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design Response Spectra and Site Coefficients for Various Seismic Site Classes of Guwahati, India, Based on Extensive Ground Response Analyses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismicity of northeast India and its surroundings is governed by complex tectonic setting. Guwahati, the largest city of northeast India, had suffered minor to major damages during past earthquakes (EQs). Known seismic source information also suggests that Guwahati is susceptible for future EQs both from nearby as well as distance source. Taking into account the subsoil information of Guwahati, present work attempts to understand the role of Guwahati soil during probable seismic excitation. In the absence of regional ground motion records, covering a possible variation in ground motion characteristics, which can occur during potential future EQ, 30 globally recorded ground motions are used as input motions in this work. Each input motion is applied to each of the 225 boreholes resulting in 225 × 30 = 6750 ground response analyses using equivalent linear approach. Based on the response of subsoil to each input motion, site coefficients as well as average response spectra for various seismic site classes are proposed. It has to be mentioned here that in comparison to previous works which attempted to understand the subsoil of Guwahati based on specific location-based subsoil information and specific scenario EQ, present work provides a broader picture of soil response which can be applied to any level of ground shaking. Further, based on predominant period, suggestion of maximum building storeys are suggested for Guwahati. In addition, based on the work, characteristics of EQ scenario, which can trigger maximum response from local soil of Guwahati, are assessed. Based on the present analyses, design response spectra of Guwahati are also proposed. Keeping in mind Government of India’s policy towards the development of northeast India and further to develop Guwahati as “Smart city”, the present findings will be very useful in city planning, estimation of induced effects as well as for seismic design of probable infrastructure in Guwahati.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(modified after Baro and Kumar 2017)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008) Mapping of average shear wave velocity for Bangalore region: a case study. J Environ Eng Geophys 13(2):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Thingbaijam KKS, Nath SK, Kumar JN, Sitharam TG (2010a) Multi-criteria seismic hazard evaluation for Bangalore city, India. J Asian Earth Sci 38(5):186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG (2010b) Site response of deep soil sites in Indo-gangetic plain for different historic earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, California 3.21b: 12

  • Anbazhagan P, Kumar A, Sitharam TG (2011) Amplification factor from intensity map and site response analysis for the soil sites during 1999 Chamoli earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Indian young geotechnical engineers conference, New Delhi, pp 311–316

  • Baro O, Kumar A (2015) A review on the tectonic setting and seismic activity of the Shillong Plateau in the light of past studies. Disaster Adv 8(7):34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Baro O, Kumar A (2017) Seismic source characterization for the Shillong Plateau in Northeast India. J Seismol 21(5):1229–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baro O, Kumar A, Ismail-Zadeh Alik (2018) Seismic hazard assessment of the Shillong Plateau, India. Geom Nat Hazards Risk 9(1):841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhingarde Nika S, Naik Nisha P (2016) Site-specific seismic ground response for Mormugao Port, Goa, India. Geo-Chicago Conference, August 2016. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480120.024

  • Bilham R, England P (2001) Plateau “pop-up” in the great 1897 Assam earthquake. Nature 410:806–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boominathan A, Dodagoudar R, Suganthi A, Uma Maheswari R (2008) Seismic hazard assessment considering local site effect for microzonation studies of Chennai city. J Earth Syst Sci 117:853–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran SS, Bharadwaja GS, Bharathi P, Dutt H Harish (2012) Seismic ground response analysis for a site in Coimbatore. ISET Golden Jubilee Symposium, October 20–21, 2012, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology Department of Earthquake Engineering Building, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, Paper No. A005

  • Chatterjee K, Choudhury D (2016) Influences of local soil conditions for ground response in Kolkata city during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, India. section a: physical sciences, Springer, India

  • Choudhury D, Phanikanth VS, Mhaske SY, Phule RR, Chatterjee K (2015) Seismic liquefaction hazard and site response for design of piles in Mumbai city. Indian Geotech J 45(1):62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNDM (2002) Scenario of seismic hazard in Assam, report by Centre for Natural Disaster Management, Assam Administrative Staff Office. Retrieved September 16, 2014, from http://aasc.nic.in/course%20material/Disaster/ SCENARIO%20OF%20SEISMIC%20HAZARD%20IN%20ASSAM.pdf

  • Desai SS, Choudhury D (2015a) Site specific seismic ground response study for Nuclear power plants and ports in Mumbai. Nat Hazards Rev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000177,04015002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai SS, Choudhury D (2015b) Non-linear site-specific seismic ground response analysis for port sites in Mumbai, India, Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication (ISSN: 2188-8027), Japan, In: Section 3. Geodisaster—Seismic site response. In: Proceedings of the 15th Asian regional conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Japan, vol 2, no (19), pp 733–736

  • Dorourdian M, Vucetic M (1995) A direct simple shear device for measuring small-strain behavior. Geotech Test J 18(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DST (2007) Seismic microzonation atlas of Guwahati Region, Ed. S.K. Nath, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi

  • DST (2008) Report on Seismic Microzonation of Guwahati region, http://www.am.tron.in/microzonation/

  • Eurocode 8, prEN 1998-1 (2003) Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Final Draft, December 2003

  • FEMA P-750 (2009) Edition NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for buildings and other structures, Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency

  • GMDA (2006) New Revised Building Byelaws for Guwahati Metropolitan Area 2006, Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority, 80

  • Govindraju L, Bhattacharya S (2008) Site response studies for Seismic hazard analysis for Kolkata city. In: Proceedings of 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics, pp 2899–2907

  • GSI (2000) Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs. Geological Survey of India

  • Harinarayan NH, Kumar A (2017a) Determination of NEHRP site class of seismic recording stations in the Northwest Himalayas and its adjoining area using HVSR method. Pure Appl Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1696-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harinarayan NH, Abhishek Kumar (2017b) Site classification of the strong motion stations of Uttarakhand, India, based on the model horizontal to vertical spectral ratio. In: Proceedings of geotechnical frontiers, GSP 281, Orlando, Florida, (ASCE special Publication)

  • Harinarayan NH, Kumar A (2018) Seismic site classification of recording stations in Tarai Region of Uttarakhand, from Multiple APPROACHES. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0399-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang HHM, Lin H, Huo JR (1997) Site coefficients for design of buildings in Eastern United States. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 6:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 1498 (1970) Indian Standard Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes, vol First revision. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 1892 (1974) Indian standard code of practice for subsurface investigation for foundations. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2131 (1981) Indian Standard, Method for standard penetration test for soils, vol First revision. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2132 (1986) Indian Standard code of Practice for thin walled tube sampling of soils, vol Second revision. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • IS:1893 (2016) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Murthy CVR, Jaswant NA, Rajendran CP, Rajendran K, Sinha R (1999) Chamoli (Himalaya, India) Earthquake of 29 March 1999. EERI special report 33, no. 7

  • Kamal A, Mundepi AK (2007) Site response studies in Dehradun: first step towards microzonation. In: Natural hazards, Spl Vol IGC, Proceedings of indian geological congress, pp 175–181

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalaya plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN, Wyss M (1978) Precursory variation of seismicity rate in the Assam area. Geology 6:685–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2013) Seismic microzonation of Lucknow based on region specific GMPE’s and geotechnical field studies. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

  • Kumar A, Baro O (2016) In-direct estimation of local soil response in the light of past as well as recent earthquakes in the Shillong Plateau. In: Proceeding of the Indian geotechnical conference IIT Madras, Chennai, India

  • Kumar A, Mondal JK (2017) Newly developed MATLAB based code for equivalent linear site response analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 35:2303–2325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Mittal H, Sachdeva R, Kumar A (2012) Indian strong motion instrumentation network. Seismol Res Lett 83(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Baro O, Narayan LM (2014) Estimation of surface PGA and determination of target value for no liquefaction at Guwahati city. In: Proceedings of geo-innovations, Bangalore, India: Indian Institute of Science

  • Kumar A, Harinarayan NH, Baro O (2015) High amplification factor for low amplitude ground motion: assessment for Delhi. Disaster Adv 8(12):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Baro O, Harinarayan N (2016) Obtaining the surface PGA from site response analyses based on globally recorded ground motions and matching with the codal values. Nat Hazards 81(1):543–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Harinarayan N, Baro O (2017a) Nonlinear soil response to ground motions during different earthquakes in Nepal, to arrive at surface response spectra. Nat Hazards 87(1):13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Harinarayan NH, Baro O (2017b) Effects of earthquake motion and overburden thickness on strain behavior of clay and sandy soils. In Proceedings of 16th world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile

  • Kumar A, Haldar S, Baro O (2018) Approximation of equivalent linear ground response analysis by strain dependent linear ground response analysis for Delhi, India. 5th Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference, Austin, Texas, (ASCE special Publication)

  • Kumar A, Harinarayan NH, Verma V et al (2018b) Seismic site classification and empirical correlation between standard penetration test N value and shear wave velocity for Guwahati based on thorough subsoil investigation data. Pure Appl Geophys 25:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1858-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan AK, Virdi KS (2001) Macroseismic field generated by 29 March, 1999 Chamoli earthquake and its seismotectonics. J Asian Earth Sci 19(4):507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal JK, Kumar A (2016) Impact of higher frequency content of input motion upon equivalent linear site response analysis for the study area of Delhi. Geotech Geolog Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0153-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NDMA (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. Technical report by National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India

  • NDMA (2011) Geotechnical/Geophysical investigation for Seismic microzonation studies of urban centres in India. Technical report by National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India

  • Nihon (2011) Liquefaction induced damages caused by the M 9.0 East Japan mega earthquake on March 11, 2011, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hisataka Tano, Nihon University, Koriyama Japan, with cooperation of save Earth co. and Waseda University

  • Oldham T (1882) A catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest time to the end of A.D. 1869, by the late Thomas Oldham edited by R. D. Oldham, Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 19, 163-215. Mem Geol Surv India 19:1–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham RD (1899) Report on the great earthquake of 12 June 1897. Mem Geol Surv India 29:1–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K (2004) Site effects, recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Geotech Geol Earthq 1:139–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Dash SK (2010) Evaluation of seismic soil liquefaction at Guwahati city. Environ Earth Sci 61:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Sreelatha S, Dash SK (2008) Ground motion estimation at Guwahati city for an Mw 8.1 earthquake in the Shillong plateau. Tectonophysics 448:98–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RaghuKanth STG, Dixit J, Dash SK (2009) Estimation of site amplification factors for Guwahati city. In: Proceedings of Indian geotechnical conference 2009, Guntur, India

  • Reddy DV, Nagabhushanam P, Kumar D et al (2009) The great 1950 Assam Earthquake revisited: field evidences of liquefaction and search for paleoseismic events. Tectonophysics 474:463–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.04.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RIC (1994) Preliminary seismic microzonation assessment for British Columbia. Prepared by Klohn- Crippen Consultants Ltd. For the Earth Sciences Task Force, Resources Inventory Committee, The Province of British Columbia, Canada

  • Schnabel PB (1973) Effect of local geology and distance from source on earthquake ground motion. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report no. EERC 70-10. University of California, Berkeley

  • Shukla J, Choudhury D (2012) Seismic hazard and site-specific ground motion for typical ports of Gujarat. Nat Hazards 60(2):541–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun JI, Golesorkhi R, Seed HB (1988) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Report no. EERC 88-15. University of California, Berkeley

  • Topal T, Doyuran V, Karahanoglu N, Toprak V, Suzen ML, Yesilnacar E (2003) Microzonation for earthquake hazards: Yenisehir settlement, Bursa, Turkey. Eng Geol 70(1):93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank start-up project titled “Seismic site classification of Guwahati city and development of design response spectra considering detailed in situ geotechnical and geophysical studies” from IIT Guwahati for necessary motivation and financial support for this work. Further, authors ate thankful to Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority (GMDA) for sharing necessary borehole reports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India

    Abhishek Kumar

  2. Bankura Unnayani Institute of Engineering, Bankura, West Bengal, India

    Haldar Suman

Authors
  1. Abhishek Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haldar Suman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Kumar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Suman, H. Design Response Spectra and Site Coefficients for Various Seismic Site Classes of Guwahati, India, Based on Extensive Ground Response Analyses. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 6255–6280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01434-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01434-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation