Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Combined Load Behaviour of Rock Bolt Installed Across Discontinuity and Its Modelling Using FLAC3D

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining the rock bolt response under the typical in situ loading conditions of tension, shear and bending is an important part of the support design process. Calibrated numerical modelling can be an important tool for simulating the rock bolt response under in situ loads. However, currently available structural support models do not accurately model the rock bolt behaviour under shear loads. These models need to be modified to simulate the actual rock bolt response as determined under laboratory testing. Results from double shear laboratory tests by Kostecki (2019) have been used to calibrate the numerical models in ANSYS (ANSYS® Academic Research Mechanical 2019). The calibrated numerical models were used to study the state of stress along the rock bolt under different concrete strength. These numerical models are compared with the analytical model proposed by Pellet and Egger (1996). The results show that the rock reaction and consequently the shear load on rock bolt in the analytical model is underestimated (by up to 50% in case of high strength concrete). In high strength concrete, the yield and failure behaviour is determined by the shear stress rather than the bending and tensile stress as predicted by the analytical models. The analytical model is modified to better predict the shear forces in high strength concrete. The pile structural element available in FLAC3D (FLAC3D — Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three-Dimensions 2017) finite difference method neglects the transverse shear strain in the element. In this paper, the pile structural element is modified to simulate the correct response of rock bolt under shear. The FLAC3D code is also modified to simulate the bolt yielding and failure under combined axial, bending and shear load. The modified model is validated with laboratory results from Mchugh and Signer (McHugh and Signer 1999) and is shown to be better at simulating the shear response and failure of rock bolt under shear compared to the original pile model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

modified from Pellet and Egger (1996)]

Fig. 2

modified from Kostecki 2019)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANSYS® Academic Research Mechanical (2019). https://www.ansys.com/academic/terms-and-conditions

  • Aziz NI, Jalalifar H (2007) Experimental and numerical study of double shearing of bolt under confinement. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on ground control in mining, Morgantown, WV, USA: 242–249

  • Aziz N, Hossein J, Hadi MN (2005) The effect of resin thickness on bolt-grout-concrete interaction in shear. Coal operators' conference, University of Wollongong & the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: 3–9

  • Bjurstrom S (1974) Shear strength of hard rock joints reinforced by grouted untensioned bolts. Proc 3rd Cong ISRM Denver 2:1194–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco Martín L, Tijani M, Hadj-Hassen F (2011) A new analytical solution to the mechanical behaviour of fully grouted rockbolts subjected to pull-out tests. Constr Build Mater 25:749–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (2014) Experimental study and stress analysis of rock bolt anchorage performance. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Li CC (2015) Performance of fully encapsulated rebar bolts and D-Bolts under combined pull-and-shear loading. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 45:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Cao P, Zhou K, Li L (2018) Analytical study of loading and displacing angles of rock bolt subjected shear condition. In: Proceedings of the 52nd US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association:18364

  • Dight PM (1982) Improvements to the stability of rock walls in open pit mines. Dissertation, Monash University

  • Farmer IW (1975) Stress distribution along a resin grouted rock anchor. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 12:347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(75)90168-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero AM (1995) The shear strength of reinforced rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 6:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLAC3D — Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three-Dimensions (2017), 6.0 edn. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Itasca, Minneapolis

  • Freeman T (1978) The behaviour of fully-bonded rock bolts in the Kielder experimental tunnel. Tunn Tunn 10(5):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith R (2011) Why dead load suspension design for roadway roof support is fundamentally flawed within a pro-active strata management system. In: Proceedings of the 11th underground coal operators' conference, University of Wollongong & the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: 73–82.

  • Gerdeen J, Snyder V, Viegelahn G, Parker J (1979) Design criteria for roof bolting plans using fully resin-grouted nontensioned bolts to reinforce bedded mine roof. Volume III: experimental model studies; Volume IV: theoretical analysis. Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI

  • Grasselli G (2005) 3D behaviour of bolted rock joints: experimental and numerical study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas CJ (1976) Shear resistance of rock bolts. Trans Soc Min Eng AIME (United States) 260:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalalifar H, Aziz N (2010) Analytical behaviour of bolt–joint intersection under lateral loading conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(1):89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalalifar H, Aziz N, Hadi M (2004) Modelling of sheared behaviour bolts across joints. Coal 2004: Coal Operators' conference, University of Wollongong & the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: 225–232.

  • Jalalifar H, Aziz NI, Hadi MN (2005) Rock and bolt properties and load transfer mechanism in ground reinforcement. In: 20th world mining congress 2005: mining and sustainable development: 629–635

  • Jessu KV, Kostecki T, Spearing S (2016) Measuring roof-bolt response to axial and shear stresses: laboratory and first in-situ analyses. CIM J 7:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostecki TR (2019) Design methods for rock bolts using in-situ measurement from underground coal mines. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University Carbondale

  • Li C, Stillborg B (1999) Analytical models for rock bolts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:1013–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li CC (2010) Field observations of rock bolts in high stress rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:491–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Hagan P, Saydam S, Hebblewhite B, Li Y (2016a) Parametric study of rockbolt shear behaviour by double shear test. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4787–4797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Aziz N, Mirzaghorbanali A, Nemcik J (2016b) Behavior of fiber glass bolts, rock bolts and cable bolts in shear. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:2723–2735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Zhao Z, Shang J (2019) An analytical model for shear behaviour of bolted rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 121:104019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark C, Pakalnis RT, Tuchman RJ (2007) Proceedings of the international workshop on rock mass classification in underground mining. Department Of Health And Human Services, CDC, NIOSH, Pittsburgh PA

  • McHugh E, Signer S (1999) Roof bolt response to shear stress: laboratory analysis. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on ground control in mining, Morgantown: 232–238

  • Pinazzi PC, Spearing AJS, Jessu KV, Singh P, Hawker R (2020) Mechanical performance of rock bolts under combined load conditions. Int J Min Sci Technol 30(2):167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellet F (1994) Strength and deformability of jointed rock masses reinforced by rock bolts. Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne

  • Pellet F, Egger P (1996) Analytical model for the mechanical behaviour of bolted rock joints subjected to shearing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 29:73–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell G, Kuley E, Milne DA (2017) Laboratory-based approach to assess rockbolt behaviour in shear. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on underground mining technology, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth: 45–54

  • Spang K, Egger P (1990) Action of fully-grouted bolts in jointed rock and factors of influence. Rock Mech Rock Eng 23:201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulu I, Esterhuizen G, Heasley K (2012) Calibration of FLAC3D to simulate the shear resistance of fully grouted rock bolts. In: Proceedings of the 46th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium American Rock Mechanics Association, Chicago, Illinois: 78:88

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Minerals Research Institute of Western Australia (MRIWA); Mining3 and Peabody Energy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasoon Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, P., Spearing, A.J.S. & Jessu, K. Analysis of the Combined Load Behaviour of Rock Bolt Installed Across Discontinuity and Its Modelling Using FLAC3D. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 5867–5883 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01398-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01398-z

Keywords

Navigation